A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Intel CEO tells us to buy a Mac



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 26th 05, 09:59 PM
YKhan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Intel CEO tells us to buy a Mac

Intel President Paul Otellini says he spends an hour every weekend
cleaning up the spyware from his daughter's computer. Suggests we get a
Mac if we want to be secure.

http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/...ing_to_pa.html

Yousuf Khan

  #2  
Old May 27th 05, 04:46 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Buy something else?

Like AMD?

T.

  #3  
Old May 27th 05, 06:37 AM
Joe Pfeiffer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"YKhan" writes:

Intel President Paul Otellini says he spends an hour every weekend
cleaning up the spyware from his daughter's computer. Suggests we get a
Mac if we want to be secure.

http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/...ing_to_pa.html

Well, he was asked if a user should by a Mac, and said they should buy
"something else" (my interpretation of the wording of the story is
that he meant something other than Wintel, not something other than
Mac).

Gee, I don't have any trouble with spyware on my daughter's
computer. She runs Linux.
--
Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D. Phone -- (505) 646-1605
Department of Computer Science FAX -- (505) 646-1002
New Mexico State University http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~pfeiffer
  #4  
Old May 27th 05, 12:23 PM
YKhan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The word Linux might be a political hot potato which would get him in
trouble with Microsoft. Microsoft doesn't mind the Mac, because it
knows it's not a direct threat, and besides it even sells software for
the Macs.

Yousuf Khan

  #5  
Old May 27th 05, 03:02 PM
Anthony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hmmmm use a MAC were most of my stuff dont work on or use linux were spyware
is almost 0 but alas windows is here to stay now if only microsoft will
figure out the best way to block adware is to ONLY allow what the USER wants
then it will be fine...




"YKhan" wrote in message
oups.com...
The word Linux might be a political hot potato which would get him in
trouble with Microsoft. Microsoft doesn't mind the Mac, because it
knows it's not a direct threat, and besides it even sells software for
the Macs.

Yousuf Khan



  #6  
Old May 27th 05, 11:03 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 26 May 2005 13:59:19 -0700, "YKhan" wrote:

Intel President Paul Otellini says he spends an hour every weekend
cleaning up the spyware from his daughter's computer. Suggests we get a
Mac if we want to be secure.

http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/...ing_to_pa.html

Yousuf Khan


Could this be connected with the rumor of "Intel Inside" Macs coming?

  #7  
Old May 28th 05, 06:01 AM
Tony Hill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:02:26 -0500, "Anthony"
wrote:
"YKhan" wrote in message
roups.com...
The word Linux might be a political hot potato which would get him in
trouble with Microsoft. Microsoft doesn't mind the Mac, because it
knows it's not a direct threat, and besides it even sells software for
the Macs.

Hmmmm use a MAC were most of my stuff dont work on or use linux were spyware
is almost 0 but alas windows is here to stay now if only microsoft will
figure out the best way to block adware is to ONLY allow what the USER wants
then it will be fine...


To be fair, Microsoft already KNOWS how to implement that and it is a
perfectly valid option IFF you set you're WinXP system up correctly.
The trouble is that over 99% of home users will setup their system so
that they always have admin privileges. Now Microsoft is partly to
blame for this in that they default to always giving users full admin
rights, but they are also correct that they would have WAY more
problems if they did not do this.

Hell, even if they did correct this it's not like they would solve the
problem. People just don't care enough to read what they're agreeing
to on computers anymore, they just click "next" and enter their
password when asked for it. If someone made spyware for Macs and OS X
(where the default is to setup a root user for admin tasks and a
non-privileged user for non-admin tasks) and it popped up a Window
asking for a user to enter their password to install the app, I can
guarantee that well over 50% of users will happily type in their admin
password and to install the spyware without giving it a second
thought.

-------------
Tony Hill
hilla underscore 20 at yahoo dot ca
  #8  
Old May 28th 05, 06:01 AM
Tony Hill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 May 2005 22:03:19 GMT, "
wrote:

On 26 May 2005 13:59:19 -0700, "YKhan" wrote:

Intel President Paul Otellini says he spends an hour every weekend
cleaning up the spyware from his daughter's computer. Suggests we get a
Mac if we want to be secure.

http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/...ing_to_pa.html

Yousuf Khan


Could this be connected with the rumor of "Intel Inside" Macs coming?


Extremely doubtful. It's MUCH more likely that people are being dumb
and reading *WAY* too much into an off-hand comment that didn't even
endorsed Macs in the first place. He could just as well have been
thinking more of Linux on Intel than Macs.

-------------
Tony Hill
hilla underscore 20 at yahoo dot ca
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Long lost Intel fan is returnig to Intel :) Bloodstar Intel 1 February 18th 05 01:36 PM
Intel Timeline, Year 2004 Mikhail Sidorin Intel 0 December 30th 04 02:53 AM
P4 Prescott 3.2GHz Leigh-Anne Mills Asus Motherboards 3 May 20th 04 03:26 AM
InfoWorld: Global Standards Are Key, Intel CEO Tells Chinese Execs Dionaea muscipula Intel 2 April 9th 04 07:30 AM
Intel Updates Plans Again: Adds Pentium 4 EE at 3.40GHz and Pentium 4 at 3.40GHz lyon_wonder General 2 November 10th 03 11:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.