If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Creative NX Pro-query/poor picture?
Hello,i recently bought a creative webcam NX Pro and had hoped for
better but i find the image quality poor. Perhaps i should have done more research but i find that it cannot deal with high light levels very well and the picture is greatly overexposed. The software has an auto exposure setting but even if i over-ride this and put it on manual at the lowest setting,its still overexposed. This only happens when pointing the cam outside eg looking through a window. Even on relatively dull days,it cannot cope with high external light levels. Is this a common thing with webcams or have i perhaps got a faulty product? reply via group please joe |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
tarquinlinbin wrote:
Hello,i recently bought a creative webcam NX Pro and had hoped for better but i find the image quality poor. Perhaps i should have done more research but i find that it cannot deal with high light levels very well and the picture is greatly overexposed. The software has an auto exposure setting but even if i over-ride this and put it on manual at the lowest setting,its still overexposed. This only happens when pointing the cam outside eg looking through a window. Even on relatively dull days,it cannot cope with high external light levels. Is this a common thing with webcams or have i perhaps got a faulty product? reply via group please joe Many cameras do this. It's a problem in that you can't get relatively inexpensive sensors that can cope with the wide range of conditions - and as most people use webcams inside where they need good response in lower light levels, many max out if pointed outside. Try - reducing the amount of sky/reflective/pale surfaces in the frame, shielding the lens from direct sun falling on it, and putting a pair of sunglasses over it to reduce the light levels hitting the sensor. A lot of the time careful positioning can reduce the amount of white-out, or the time spent in whiteout. Velvet |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:47:09 GMT, Velvet
wrote: Many cameras do this. It's a problem in that you can't get relatively inexpensive sensors that can cope with the wide range of conditions - and as most people use webcams inside where they need good response in lower light levels, many max out if pointed outside. Try - reducing the amount of sky/reflective/pale surfaces in the frame, shielding the lens from direct sun falling on it, and putting a pair of sunglasses over it to reduce the light levels hitting the sensor. A lot of the time careful positioning can reduce the amount of white-out, or the time spent in whiteout. Velvet Yes this is what i had thought. I went over to the creative web site though and in the support section, they have seen fit to produce a new updated driver specifically aimed at addressing the problem of overexposure when used to film outside. I duly downloaded the new driver and now find that its even worse!!,,argghh. I can only assume then that this problem has been flagged to creative a number of times by their customers. I have emailed them for further but am not expecting much!. When i look at webcams around the world, many of them are filming outside scenes , sunsets ,well known locations etc and yet the pictures are very reasonable. I wonder what sort of webcams these people use?. If anyone out there has simiolar problems with the nx pro or has one that works great outisde, i;d love to hear from them. Also if anyone can recommend a cam they use which works very well in and out ,that would be usefull also. I think this one will be getting returned!.. replies via group or email but dont forget to change the 1999 to 2003 !. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
tarquinlinbin wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:47:09 GMT, Velvet wrote: Many cameras do this. It's a problem in that you can't get relatively inexpensive sensors that can cope with the wide range of conditions - and as most people use webcams inside where they need good response in lower light levels, many max out if pointed outside. Try - reducing the amount of sky/reflective/pale surfaces in the frame, shielding the lens from direct sun falling on it, and putting a pair of sunglasses over it to reduce the light levels hitting the sensor. A lot of the time careful positioning can reduce the amount of white-out, or the time spent in whiteout. Velvet Yes this is what i had thought. I went over to the creative web site though and in the support section, they have seen fit to produce a new updated driver specifically aimed at addressing the problem of overexposure when used to film outside. I duly downloaded the new driver and now find that its even worse!!,,argghh. I can only assume then that this problem has been flagged to creative a number of times by their customers. I have emailed them for further but am not expecting much!. When i look at webcams around the world, many of them are filming outside scenes , sunsets ,well known locations etc and yet the pictures are very reasonable. I wonder what sort of webcams these people use?. If anyone out there has simiolar problems with the nx pro or has one that works great outisde, i;d love to hear from them. Also if anyone can recommend a cam they use which works very well in and out ,that would be usefull also. I think this one will be getting returned!.. replies via group or email but dont forget to change the 1999 to 2003 !. I use creative webcams - the pc-cam300 iirc. You can see them (feeds 1 and 3) on my website at http://www.velvetpurrs.com/webcam.html if you fancy. Feed 1 points ESEish, feed 3 points SW. Both are hit by direct sunlight at some point in the day, feed 1 tends to be earlyish morning, feed 3 is some time in the afternoon. Feed 4 is offline currently, and was served by a very old webcam with a CMOS sensor. The creative cam 300 uses a CCD sensor, which I've found to be far better than CMOS. (feed 2 is an IR CCTV, not a webcam). I'm in the UK, but all the feeds have timestamps on if you want to work out when to check back and compare. At the moment I'm not taking any steps to shade the cams, just being careful where they are pointed. Some white-out does occurr, but it's livable with for my purposes. Velvet |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:06:38 GMT, Velvet
wrote: I use creative webcams - the pc-cam300 iirc. You can see them (feeds 1 and 3) on my website at http://www.velvetpurrs.com/webcam.html if you fancy. Feed 1 points ESEish, feed 3 points SW. Both are hit by direct sunlight at some point in the day, feed 1 tends to be earlyish morning, feed 3 is some time in the afternoon. Feed 4 is offline currently, and was served by a very old webcam with a CMOS sensor. The creative cam 300 uses a CCD sensor, which I've found to be far better than CMOS. (feed 2 is an IR CCTV, not a webcam). I'm in the UK, but all the feeds have timestamps on if you want to work out when to check back and compare. At the moment I'm not taking any steps to shade the cams, just being careful where they are pointed. Some white-out does occurr, but it's livable with for my purposes. Velvet Hi again velevet,thanks for the reply and i did check your cams,all working well. I tried your trick using a sunglass lens and guess what? it works very well!. If i can just fashion a piece of sunglass into the right diamter to sit just in front of the lens, I'll have it sorted. Which software do you use by the way? ta joe but remember to change the 1999 to 2003! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
tarquinlinbin wrote:
Hi again velevet,thanks for the reply and i did check your cams,all working well. I tried your trick using a sunglass lens and guess what? it works very well!. If i can just fashion a piece of sunglass into the right diamter to sit just in front of the lens, I'll have it sorted. Which software do you use by the way? ta joe Glad it was of use! I use paid version of webcamXP pro (www.webcamxp.com iirc) - it supports up to 5 sources, does streaming video as well as timed ftp uploads, can either be embedded in an existing website (as mine is) or has its own 'gallery' pages and html server built in. It's the most stable software I've found to date (webcam32 was the previous contender for the award but would crash every few days/hours), and I'm very pleased with it - though it is quite expensive, I believe in funding an application which is useful and works well, especially if I use it every day :-) Velvet |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
use blue tack to stick that sunglass lens to yr webcam
i have various cameras set up here for my own use and sunglass lenses have been the most usefull addition they should come with one allready cut to shape !! regards slayer -- if the following image offends then dont look at it... /' /) ,/_ / / / /'_'/' '/'_'7, /'/ / / /" \ ('( ' ' _~/ \ '\ '\' \ \ \ _7 \ ( \ \. slayer in da house annoying the people ERROR 404 SIG NOT FOUND . END OF INSTRUCTION , PROGRAM FAILED TO INITIALIZE. KILL ALL ENEMIES OF THE UK AND COALITION FORCES NOW !!! SOME PEOPLE ENJOY SIPPING FROM THE FOUNTAIN OF KNOWLEDGE........... PERSONALLY ,,,, i like to take huge gulps.......... remove my shorts to email me direct.... http://www.rselby.com/tips.htm windowx xp tips regards slayer |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:14:43 +0000 (UTC), "SlAyEr"
wrote: use blue tack to stick that sunglass lens to yr webcam i have various cameras set up here for my own use and sunglass lenses have been the most usefull addition they should come with one allready cut to shape !! regards slayer Yes,thats just what i was thinking,why cant the makers just include a clip on lens or even a photochromic (?) lens to automatically lighten/darken?. I;d have happily paid a couple of quid more.. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
tarquinlinbin wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:14:43 +0000 (UTC), "SlAyEr" wrote: use blue tack to stick that sunglass lens to yr webcam i have various cameras set up here for my own use and sunglass lenses have been the most usefull addition they should come with one allready cut to shape !! regards slayer Yes,thats just what i was thinking,why cant the makers just include a clip on lens or even a photochromic (?) lens to automatically lighten/darken?. I;d have happily paid a couple of quid more.. There IS A DAYLIGHT COMPENSATOR built into this cam people!!!!! Only thing is, you MUST get the updated driver to find it! I recieved mine for my XP machine. Get yours at the Creative Labs support page, select NX Pro from Webcams, and OS. http://us.creative.com/support/downloads/ You will find the control in the advanced section of the source control. Where you currently see the 50Hz & 60Hz refresh rates, you will now find an "Outdoor" radio button. Again, this is for the updated XP driver. Other OS's may have same feature in updated driver, but can't garunteee it. Hope this helps! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Don Gumbert wrote:
tarquinlinbin wrote in message . .. On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:14:43 +0000 (UTC), "SlAyEr" wrote: use blue tack to stick that sunglass lens to yr webcam i have various cameras set up here for my own use and sunglass lenses have been the most usefull addition they should come with one allready cut to shape !! regards slayer Yes,thats just what i was thinking,why cant the makers just include a clip on lens or even a photochromic (?) lens to automatically lighten/darken?. I;d have happily paid a couple of quid more.. There IS A DAYLIGHT COMPENSATOR built into this cam people!!!!! Only thing is, you MUST get the updated driver to find it! I recieved mine for my XP machine. Get yours at the Creative Labs support page, select NX Pro from Webcams, and OS. http://us.creative.com/support/downloads/ You will find the control in the advanced section of the source control. Where you currently see the 50Hz & 60Hz refresh rates, you will now find an "Outdoor" radio button. Again, this is for the updated XP driver. Other OS's may have same feature in updated driver, but can't garunteee it. Hope this helps! Well I DON'T HAVE THAT CAM, mister!!! Thus I was offering suggestions that'll work on any cam, and that have been used on the ones I DO own. Sheesh. If you think we're all such thickos you have to post like that, how about answering the original post sooner, hmm? Velvet |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Game freezes system - possible ATI issue? | Blaedmon | Ati Videocards | 1 | February 12th 05 05:20 PM |
Still no gameplay. Could this be the problem? | Ferrante | Nvidia Videocards | 14 | December 16th 04 12:38 AM |
pc problems after g card upgrade + sp2 | ben reed | Homebuilt PC's | 9 | November 30th 04 01:04 AM |
My system seems to "recover" with great frequency | Louise | Homebuilt PC's | 3 | May 17th 04 06:02 AM |
Problem with Creative Graphics Card | Martin Hathaway | Nvidia Videocards | 2 | December 15th 03 04:32 AM |