If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
P4 Extreme Edition discontinued
This article states that the original P4EE is being discontinued. It doesn't
mention whether all further EE's will be discontinued or not, but it seems to be the implication. I wonder if that means AMD will also discontinue its FX line of Athlon 64's now? http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...807015441.html Yousuf Khan -- Humans: contact me at ykhan at rogers dot com Spambots: just reply to this email address ;-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
It looks like just the P4 3.2 EE is being cancelled. I wonder if we will soon
see a P4 3.6 EE? The 3.2 EE was priced too close to the 3.4 EE, so I doubt it sold well. I don't know how well the P4 3.4 EE is selling, however Intel needs something to try to compete against the Athlon 64 FX-53. The EE chips are probably also quite expensive to produce. Let's see what Intel comes up with for the holidays. I guess AMD is supposed to come out with the FX-55 in October? Yousuf Khan wrote: This article states that the original P4EE is being discontinued. It doesn't mention whether all further EE's will be discontinued or not, but it seems to be the implication. I wonder if that means AMD will also discontinue its FX line of Athlon 64's now? http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...807015441.html Yousuf Khan -- Humans: contact me at ykhan at rogers dot com Spambots: just reply to this email address ;-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Yousuf Khan wrote:
I wonder if that means AMD will also discontinue its FX line of Athlon 64's now? Huh ? Why would you think the two things are related at all ? P4-EE was Intel's answer to the Athlon FX. Just because Intel has decided they now have a better "answer" than the EE, it does not follow that AMD should roll over and play dead. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 23:53:25 GMT, "Yousuf Khan"
wrote: This article states that the original P4EE is being discontinued. It doesn't mention whether all further EE's will be discontinued or not, but it seems to be the implication. I wonder if that means AMD will also discontinue its FX line of Athlon 64's now? http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...807015441.html My reading of things is that it's JUST the 3.2GHz model that's being discontinued, which would make sense. People paying a HUGE premium for these top-end chips aren't going to be too worried about an extra $80 to get the top-end, so it makes no sense to have a bunch of different speed grades. FWIW current price of the P4EE 3.2GHz is $915 while the P4EE 3.4GHz is $995, ie less than a 10% difference in price. Same reason why AMD has discontinued their Athlon64 FX-51 after the FX-53 arrived.. though I suppose you can still kinda-sorta buy an FX-51 under the Opteron 150 product name. ------------- Tony Hill hilla underscore 20 at yahoo dot ca |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I saw prices around $825 for the P4 3.2 EE. Still too close to the
$1,000 P4 3.4 EE. Imo the Athlon FX-51 is being discontinued since the Athlon 64 3800+ is probably less expensive to make than the FX-51, and seems to perform at least as well in almost all benchmarks. Tony Hill wrote: On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 23:53:25 GMT, "Yousuf Khan" wrote: This article states that the original P4EE is being discontinued. It doesn't mention whether all further EE's will be discontinued or not, but it seems to be the implication. I wonder if that means AMD will also discontinue its FX line of Athlon 64's now? http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...807015441.html My reading of things is that it's JUST the 3.2GHz model that's being discontinued, which would make sense. People paying a HUGE premium for these top-end chips aren't going to be too worried about an extra $80 to get the top-end, so it makes no sense to have a bunch of different speed grades. FWIW current price of the P4EE 3.2GHz is $915 while the P4EE 3.4GHz is $995, ie less than a 10% difference in price. Same reason why AMD has discontinued their Athlon64 FX-51 after the FX-53 arrived.. though I suppose you can still kinda-sorta buy an FX-51 under the Opteron 150 product name. ------------- Tony Hill hilla underscore 20 at yahoo dot ca |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In reconsidering the Athlon 64 3800+ vs FX-51 benchmarks, I now
realize that the Athlon 64 3800+ seems like a much better performer overall than the FX-51. So the FX-51 doesn't really make sense for AMD to continue to produce, since imo the Athlon 64 3800+ is also probably much cheaper to make. JK wrote: I saw prices around $825 for the P4 3.2 EE. Still too close to the $1,000 P4 3.4 EE. Imo the Athlon FX-51 is being discontinued since the Athlon 64 3800+ is probably less expensive to make than the FX-51, and seems to perform at least as well in almost all benchmarks. Tony Hill wrote: On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 23:53:25 GMT, "Yousuf Khan" wrote: This article states that the original P4EE is being discontinued. It doesn't mention whether all further EE's will be discontinued or not, but it seems to be the implication. I wonder if that means AMD will also discontinue its FX line of Athlon 64's now? http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...807015441.html My reading of things is that it's JUST the 3.2GHz model that's being discontinued, which would make sense. People paying a HUGE premium for these top-end chips aren't going to be too worried about an extra $80 to get the top-end, so it makes no sense to have a bunch of different speed grades. FWIW current price of the P4EE 3.2GHz is $915 while the P4EE 3.4GHz is $995, ie less than a 10% difference in price. Same reason why AMD has discontinued their Athlon64 FX-51 after the FX-53 arrived.. though I suppose you can still kinda-sorta buy an FX-51 under the Opteron 150 product name. ------------- Tony Hill hilla underscore 20 at yahoo dot ca |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bitstring 411664DC.1580E4F1@nsaeccueuesizefitterwruovweswer nuao.com,
from the wonderful person Johannes H Andersen said JK wrote: I saw prices around $825 for the P4 3.2 EE. Still too close to the $1,000 P4 3.4 EE. Imo the Athlon FX-51 is being discontinued since the Athlon 64 3800+ is probably less expensive to make than the FX-51, and seems to perform at least as well in almost all benchmarks. I guess that the EE stands for 'Expensive Edition'. 'Extreme' actually, but I guess that the 'extreme' could indeed apply mostly to the expense .. it sure as hell doesn't apply to the relative cost benefit. 8. -- GSV Three Minds in a Can Outgoing Msgs are Turing Tested,and indistinguishable from human typing. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
JK wrote: I saw prices around $825 for the P4 3.2 EE. Still too close to the $1,000 P4 3.4 EE. Imo the Athlon FX-51 is being discontinued since the Athlon 64 3800+ is probably less expensive to make than the FX-51, and seems to perform at least as well in almost all benchmarks. I guess that the EE stands for 'Expensive Edition'. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The P4 EE chips are also probably very expensive to make, so I
doubt that Intel would want to keep making the P4 3.2 EE, especially if they felt they might soon need to drop the price to well under $600. Perhaps it might also mean that there might be a P4 3.6 EE? I wonder if there will be a P4 3.8 ghz before the end of the year, or if Intel plans some 3.6 ghz chips with other enhancements besides clock speed (and besides a huge cache) to boost performance before the end of the year. The Athlon 64 3800+ is a tough chip to compete against. The Athlon 64 4000+ on 90nm will be even more exciting. I wonder how it will benchmark against the FX-53? It looks like it will be released around the time of the FX-55, so AMD might decide to discontinue the FX-53 after the Athlon 64 4000+ and the FX-55 are out ? It looks like the FX-55 and Athlon 64 FX-55 are scheduled for October release. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=2065&p=1 http://www.c627627.com/AMD/Athlon64/ Johannes H Andersen wrote: JK wrote: I saw prices around $825 for the P4 3.2 EE. Still too close to the $1,000 P4 3.4 EE. Imo the Athlon FX-51 is being discontinued since the Athlon 64 3800+ is probably less expensive to make than the FX-51, and seems to perform at least as well in almost all benchmarks. I guess that the EE stands for 'Expensive Edition'. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 18:43:27 +0100, GSV Three Minds in a Can wrote:
Bitstring 411664DC.1580E4F1@nsaeccueuesizefitterwruovweswer nuao.com, from the wonderful person Johannes H Andersen said JK wrote: I saw prices around $825 for the P4 3.2 EE. Still too close to the $1,000 P4 3.4 EE. Imo the Athlon FX-51 is being discontinued since the Athlon 64 3800+ is probably less expensive to make than the FX-51, and seems to perform at least as well in almost all benchmarks. I guess that the EE stands for 'Expensive Edition'. 'Extreme' actually, but I guess that the 'extreme' could indeed apply mostly to the expense .. it sure as hell doesn't apply to the relative cost benefit. It could also be Extreme Envy. They had do do *something* to fill the performace charts. Did anyone actually buy one? -- Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P4 3 switch to p4 3.4 Extreme Edition ? possible with my original Asus p4p800 Deluxe [not the E version] with bios 1019.005 ? | Henry1 | Asus Motherboards | 2 | October 27th 04 02:22 AM |
64 bit - Windows Liberty 64bit, Windows Limited Edition 64 Bit, Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Developer Edition 64 Bit, IBM DB2 64 bit - new ! | vvcd | AMD x86-64 Processors | 0 | September 17th 04 09:07 PM |
Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor with HT Technology Extreme Edition. When will we see them?????????????????? | [email protected] | Asus Motherboards | 2 | January 27th 04 09:51 PM |
64 bit - Windows Liberty 64bit, Windows Limited Edition 64 Bit,Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Developer Edition 64 Bit, IBM DB2 64 bit - new! | TEL | Overclocking AMD Processors | 0 | January 1st 04 06:59 PM |
The new Pentium 4 Extreme Edition | lyon_wonder | General | 5 | September 18th 03 01:59 PM |