If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I think I've solved my Spin Retry Count problem
Mike Tomlinson wrote:
In article , Yousuf Khan writes Well anyway, what I did recently was that I converted two of those old IDE drives into SATA drives using an IDE-to-SATA converter board that fits right onto the back of the drives themselves. I started noticing that the Spin Retries were gone about two weeks ago, but that was only a week after I installed them I think the change in behaviour won't have anything to do with the cables. A dodgy IDE cable is going to affect a lot more than the Spin Retry count. It's probably more to do with the fact hat you have now converted the drive to SATA. Those plug-in converters are notoriously unreliable (especially if you buy the ebay cheapo ones). I've used several different ones with mixed results. How do you know the SMART data is getting through from the drive correctly, if at all? I have had reliability problems and compatibility problems with these things, but never wrong SMART reports (I have tried 5 different ones). I would say if Yousuf gets SMART values that they should be authentic. Arno |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I think I've solved my Spin Retry Count problem
On Sep 18, 9:21*pm, Arno wrote:
But my theory would be auto-spin and if a command arrives before spin-up is complete, have the spin-problem. It may just be that it now has more time to complete spin-up before it needs to answer requests. Arno Exactly what I was thinking. Yousuf Khan |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I think I've solved my Spin Retry Count problem
YKhan wrote
Arno wrote But my theory would be auto-spin and if a command arrives before spin-up is complete, have the spin-problem. It may just be that it now has more time to complete spin-up before it needs to answer requests. Exactly what I was thinking. Thats still not going to result in an extra spin retry in the SMART stats. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
I think I've solved my Spin Retry Count problem
Yousuf Khan wrote:
the reason this change was done was to eventually upgrade the motherboard and processor down the road -- it's extremely difficult to find new motherboards with more than one IDE channel anymore, so I am preparing for the next generation. I have a SIIG controller card with two IDE connections on it. My brother has one too. Both work well. They are still available but cost over $42. http://3btech.net/siimsipciati.html has a Silicon Image Sil0680 PCI ATA/133 IDE RAID Controller Card with two IDE connections for $13.97 with free shipping. If you do not have a free PCI slot for a SIIG controller, I have seen a PCI-E card with one IDE connection, one SATA and one E-SATA for $13.98 delivered. http://www.microbarn.com/details.asp...rce=pricewatch -- I don't understand why they make gourmet cat foods. I have known many cats in my life and none of them were gourmets. They were all gourmands! |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
I think I've solved my Spin Retry Count problem
Rod Speed wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote Rod Speed wrote Yousuf Khan wrote I've also rebooted the system quite a bit more often than I usually do in that time. HD Sentinel is also now starting to upgrade its Health rating automatically, it had gone down to 40% at its lowest and today it's at 52%. I've never considered those numbers are very useful, what matters is the raw value. Well, they seem to be based on the same criteria that we'd use to judge quality: how many errors are there, and how often do they occur. The raw numbers for that particular drive dont support those 40% and 52% claims, particularly with a parameter like spin retry count thats much more likely to be a problem external to the drive than internal to the drive. Well, HD Sentinel uses some kind of proprietary internal rating equation, which seems to be logarithmic (slows down as it gets closer to zero). I don't concern myself too much with the absolute values they come up with, just with the relative values. In this case the relative values has indicated an improvement in health has been noted. Yousuf Khan |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I think I've solved my Spin Retry Count problem
Yousuf Khan wrote
Rod Speed wrote Yousuf Khan wrote Rod Speed wrote Yousuf Khan wrote I've also rebooted the system quite a bit more often than I usually do in that time. HD Sentinel is also now starting to upgrade its Health rating automatically, it had gone down to 40% at its lowest and today it's at 52%. I've never considered those numbers are very useful, what matters is the raw value. Well, they seem to be based on the same criteria that we'd use to judge quality: how many errors are there, and how often do they occur. The raw numbers for that particular drive dont support those 40% and 52% claims, particularly with a parameter like spin retry count thats much more likely to be a problem external to the drive than internal to the drive. Well, HD Sentinel uses some kind of proprietary internal rating equation, which seems to be logarithmic (slows down as it gets closer to zero). Its clearly terminally stupid to give that particular drive either of those numbers to that particular drive when the bulk of the causes for spin retry counts are external to the drive. I don't concern myself too much with the absolute values they come up with, just with the relative values. It makes a lot more sense to do that with the raw SMART numbers instead. In this case the relative values has indicated an improvement in health has been noted. But there isnt a shred of evidence that the health of the drive has changed one iota. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
I think I've solved my Spin Retry Count problem
Daniel Prince wrote:
I have a SIIG controller card with two IDE connections on it. My brother has one too. Both work well. They are still available but cost over $42. Well, thanks, but obviously I already have my solutions in place. Yousuf Khan |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
I think I've solved my Spin Retry Count problem
Rod Speed wrote:
YKhan wrote Arno wrote But my theory would be auto-spin and if a command arrives before spin-up is complete, have the spin-problem. It may just be that it now has more time to complete spin-up before it needs to answer requests. Exactly what I was thinking. Thats still not going to result in an extra spin retry in the SMART stats. And why not? Yousuf Khan |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I think I've solved my Spin Retry Count problem
Yousuf Khan wrote
Rod Speed wrote YKhan wrote Arno wrote But my theory would be auto-spin and if a command arrives before spin-up is complete, have the spin-problem. It may just be that it now has more time to complete spin-up before it needs to answer requests. Exactly what I was thinking. Thats still not going to result in an extra spin retry in the SMART stats. And why not? Because spin retry counts are THE DRIVE trying to the spin up the drive and finding that the drive doesnt spin up when its supposed to. The bios seeing that the drive isnt ready doesnt result in an increase in the spin retry count in the SMART stats. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
I think I've solved my Spin Retry Count problem
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Daniel Prince wrote: How long were your IDE cables? Were they flat or round? They were around 20 inches long, from the furthest ends. Now, they were rounded cables in both cases. I had thought of using flat cables, but in the crowded conditions in my case it was pretty difficult to use them without moving a lot of stuff around. Plus the rounded cables gave better cooling. Just an update on this old issue. I finally got a chance to try the same drives with the flat IDE cables, and the results were the same as when using the rounded ones. Still no spin retry problem when using the SATA converters and cables, but the problem always crops up when using any sort of IDE cable. Yousuf Khan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should I worry about Spin Retry Count? | Yousuf Khan | Storage (alternative) | 18 | July 7th 09 10:58 PM |
Idle time spin-down-spin-up for disks? How often is too often? | Al Dykes | Storage (alternative) | 3 | March 10th 06 10:05 AM |
Disk won't spin up/Possible voltage problem | Paul | General | 14 | April 28th 04 05:06 AM |
Disk won't spin up/Possible voltage problem | Paul | Homebuilt PC's | 14 | April 28th 04 05:06 AM |
OpenGL failed to initialize -- Problem Solved!!! well kind of solved. | Jose Jiminez | Nvidia Videocards | 5 | January 13th 04 11:51 AM |