If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
John Doe,
Here are the facts. ZipZoomFly has gotten four returns in six weeks from four different customers. They all bought the same drive model, and returned them because the drives were dented and defective. ZipZoomFly told each of them that they damagted the drives and that they were responsible. The head of returns was the one who communicated this. Given the strange nature of the dents and the frequency of the returns, and the fact that all these customers protested violently at the suggestion that they caused these problems, this is a case of either horrible oversight at the ZipZoomFly returns department or one of dishonesty. On top of all this is the ethical question- what if it was one case only- mine? Zipzoomfly has the choice whether to listion to me tell them reapeatedly and consistently that I did not damage this item, that it arrived damaged, or they can ignore what I say and blame me. There are other steps in the delivery process where damage can occur, but ZZF is choosing to ignore that (r or not investigate it) and blame the customer. So from my angle, there's nothing that will return ZZF to the status if innocence here. No matter how many things they get right, the willingness to occasionally screw a customer is all that should matter. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Albert Silverman wrote:
John Doe, Here are the facts. ZipZoomFly has gotten four returns in six weeks from four different customers. They all bought the same drive model, and returned them because the drives were dented and defective. ZipZoomFly told each of them that they damagted the drives and that they were responsible. The head of returns was the one who communicated this. Given the strange nature of the dents and the frequency of the returns, and the fact that all these customers protested violently at the suggestion that they caused these problems, this is a case of either horrible oversight at the ZipZoomFly returns department or one of dishonesty. On top of all this is the ethical question- what if it was one case only- mine? Zipzoomfly has the choice whether to listion to me tell them reapeatedly and consistently that I did not damage this item, that it arrived damaged, or they can ignore what I say and blame me. There are other steps in the delivery process where damage can occur, but ZZF is choosing to ignore that (r or not investigate it) and blame the customer. So from my angle, there's nothing that will return ZZF to the status if innocence here. No matter how many things they get right, the willingness to occasionally screw a customer is all that should matter. Well let's see, if they see hundreds of returned drives and the only four they get that are dented all come from you, what should they believe? -- --John Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
"Albert Silverman" wrote:
John Doe, Here are the facts. ZipZoomFly has gotten four returns in six weeks from four different customers. They all bought the same drive model, and returned them because the drives were dented and defective. ZipZoomFly told each of them that they damagted the drives and that they were responsible. The head of returns was the one who communicated this. Given the strange nature of the dents and the frequency of the returns, and the fact that all these customers protested violently at the suggestion that they caused these problems, this is a case of either horrible oversight at the ZipZoomFly returns department or one of dishonesty. On top of all this is the ethical question- what if it was one case only- mine? Zipzoomfly has the choice whether to listion to me tell them reapeatedly and consistently that I did not damage this item, that it arrived damaged, or they can ignore what I say and blame me. There are other steps in the delivery process where damage can occur, but ZZF is choosing to ignore that (r or not investigate it) and blame the customer. So from my angle, there's nothing that will return ZZF to the status if innocence here. No matter how many things they get right, the willingness to occasionally screw a customer is all that should matter. I think you are pretending that all customers are goodie two shoes. You are asking everyone to believe your story. In fact, some customers will lie. I tend to believe you except when you pretend to know what other customers actually experience. You don't know. I certainly understand how you must feel. However, the circumstance you describe is a problem with online purchases. Since there is no way the merchant can know, the merchant is not 100% at fault. You get what you pay for. If you want the best guarantee and the least risk, by from a local store. Your complaint is well documented. Let us know how it turns out, the final result. Good luck. Path: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com!newscon03.news.prodigy. com!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newsco n02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!po stnews.google.com!f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Albert Silverman" From: "Albert Silverman" tintintx @hotmail.com Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Subject: ZipZoomFly and DOA Hitachi SATA drives Date: 30 Jan 2005 19:16:14 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 26 Message-ID: .com Message-ID: 1107141374.139222.302130 @f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com References: .com .com .com NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.77.19.66 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1107141379 22632 127.0.0.1 (31 Jan 2005 03:16:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 03:16:19 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: Injection-Info: f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.77.19.66; posting-account=cu7sBQwAAACH3cR5AqI_ciBfRByuBG5P Xref: newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:428370 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage:345239 |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
PriceGrabber's store rating for ZipZoomFly is five stars (highest)
based on store reviews by 8,347 customers. That kind of customer satisfaction is not earned by a company that "screws" customers. jimbo |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
On the contrary- you are in the best position to selectively screw
people if you have an excellent reputation. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Albert Silverman wrote:
On the contrary- you are in the best position to selectively screw people if you have an excellent reputation. Except your 'excellent reputation' would quickly degrade to none at all, so it's a self defeating proposition. Not to mention that if you're the type who thinks that way it's unlikely you'd ever get to the point of an 'excellent reputation' to begin with. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
So, you think that ZipZoomFly, a company with the highest customer
rating at PriceGrabber, 8,347 statisfied customers, has singled out YOU to screw? Help, help the paranoids are after me! jimbo |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
There's certainly something extremely fraudulent taking place at
ZipZoomFly. We ordered 4 Hitachi hard drives from them and they were received timely. They were shrink-wrapped. When we opened them, they were in perfect physical condition but 2 of the 4 hard drives were not recognized by the OS and were making clicking noises when installed 9by professional installers who built over 500 PCs in our company). We called ZipZoomFly and got an RMA for refund (because we couldn't wait 2 weeks for replacements that might or might not be functional judging by the 50% failure ratio of this shipment). The drives were packed with extreme care in ZipZoomFly's own double-foam casing and were then double-packed and shipped back to them via FedEx ground. Tracking records show they received them on February 11, 2005. On February 15, we receive an email from an "Andy Huynh" who apparently is the ONLY person in their returns dept. with pictures of two Hitachi drives with severe physical damage (one of them has a whole chunk of metal missing and the other looks like it was punctured with 6 inch nails!!! Of course their "pictures" conveniently do not show the serial numbers of the damaged hard drives! After over 30 calls and wait of over 2 hours collectively holding on line on the only non-toll free phone number ZipZoomFly provides (paying long distance tolls during the wait), I spoke to a lady named "Holly" who was quite rude and stated that "they'd send the drives back to Hitachi and only if Hitachi agreed to replace them they would refund our money". I stated that this was ridiculous and that I packed the drives personally (and they were in perfect physical shape) and also ***HAVE PICTURES** (standard procedure at our company when returning items) of the hard drives being packed at which point "she wanted to see the pictures". When I informed her that the pictures would be sent directly to our credit card company and ONLY our credit card company, she told me that "she wasn't going to spend all day on the phone with me" and abruptly "forwarded me to a supervisor". Needless to say I got an answering machine. I left a message but the call was never returned. I also asked her if there was visible damage to the box so I could claim the FedEx insurance. "Holy" stated that had there been visible damage, they wouldn't have opened the box and they would notify us and FedEx. The clincher is that we've bought well over $100,000 worth of equipment from Google Gear/ZipZoomFly in the past year and even placed a new order (our last one of course) yesterday. Not only ZipZoomFly didn't care we were a very large customer, they basically took our money and sent us to hell!!! Fortunately our loss is only $168 - being a company it's a right-off so we won't go poor over this but I'd hate to be an unsuspecting consumer getting scammed this way. It's a shame to see this happening because they used to be a good company. So, BUYER BEWARE dealing with these people-I have a suspicion there's an inside scam running and someone is pocketing some money at ZipZoomFly. There's something very suspicious going on Albert Silverman wrote: A month ago, I ordered two 250GB SATA drives from ZipZoomFly.com. They both arrived DOA with scratches around the case screws. One was dented on the lid. I reported all this in my RMA request. After some delay, I was granted a RMA number, and sent them back. That was over two weeks ago. They've had them for a week, and the only communication I've received from them stated that the dented one was damaged by me, and would not necessarily be covered by warranty. If Hitachi replaced it, I'd be in the clear, but ZipZoomFly would not issue a replacement if Hitachi considered the warranty voided. Their communication was quite poor (and their customer service gives the impression of being a shoestring operation.) They have not confirmed that either is defective. ZipZoomFly's packaging in shipping was more than adequate (and their shipping fast). The drives were sealed when I got them. So one would have to guess that they were damaged before shipment. But ZipZoomFly's "customer service" approach has put me in a situation where I have no evidence. As far as they are concerned I damaged the drive. It frankly seems reasonable that they would wonder if I damaged the one drive. They ship out new drives and if it comes back looking like someone dropped it, well, the customer could have done it, right? Except in this case there are three other customers who posted to www.resellerratings.com who had the exact same problem, who placed their initial order around the time I did mine. We're taliing the exact same drives- the Hitachi one I mentioned above- and in each case the drives were dented and DOA. One person said the drive looked like it had been shot with a BB gun. another sent two back, ordered replacements, and the replacements were similarly damaged. In every case, ZipZoomFly is asserting that the buyers of these drives damaged them. I can only guess that if there are four cases like this at one review site from such a short period as this, there must be others, and ZipZoomFly must know that they shipped a large batch of bad drives to customers. At this point, I am looking for any similar, essentially identical testimonies from other ZipZoomFly customers. While I feel there's something seriously fradulent about all this, I really would be happy to just get a full refund, and I'd like as much help as I can in backing up my position with my credit card company. Oh, and perhaps I should also add that I've done business with them before. If they get it right the first time, they are an excellent value. But clearly, I've ordered from low-cost online retailers one time too many. Please contact me at |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't I believe you????? Pure bull----!!!!! Another attempt to
disparage a fine company. I have no connection to ZipZoomFly except as a very satisfied customer. I have seen similar attempts to disparage other companies. I suspect some competitor thinks this is a way to gain an edge on a company that they are not able to compete with otherwise. A very despicable practice. jimbo |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"John H." wrote:
Hi. I'm glad you posted this.I sure wont be buying anything from them.I will keep on buying my stuff from newegg.I was going to buy some lite-on cd/dvd burners from them. You posted just to tell us that you're glad he posted and that you will be buying from a different company? Path: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com!newscon03.news.prodigy. com!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newsco n06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca. giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.gi ganews.com!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "John H." jhensleys @att.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt Subject: ZipZoomFly and DOA Hitachi SATA drives References: .com .com In-Reply-To: .com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 167 Message-ID: JhQQd.46237$Th1.13636 @bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:02:01 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.72.208.141 X-Complaints-To: X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1108594921 12.72.208.141 (Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:02:01 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:02:01 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:429580 .... * Magic Is Believing In Yourself* *if you can do that* * You Can Make Anything Happen * |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|