If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Watercooling FX5900ultra
Hey!
I wonder which waterblock i should use if i want to watercooling a ASUS 9950Ultra(fx5900)? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I might want to check www.coolerguys.com but...
The consensus seem to be the extra cooling on video cards bring only but a marginal increase in the overclockability of a card. JC -- "That's when I heard the sound of the Universe cocking the F**k With Me Gun" ************************************************** ****** "Anders Nilsson" wrote in message ... | Hey! | I wonder which waterblock i should use if i want to watercooling a ASUS | 9950Ultra(fx5900)? | | | -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The consensus seem to be the extra cooling on video cards bring only but a marginal increase in the overclockability of a card. Watercooling of video cards is pretty much a pointless waste of cash. The small performance increase you'll see in a game will only be worth the expense for people who orgasm when thinking of cold-cathode caselights, LED fans and DIMM copper heat-spreaders. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 17:41:52 GMT, "Anders Nilsson"
wrote: Hey! I wonder which waterblock i should use if i want to watercooling a ASUS 9950Ultra(fx5900)? Why bother ? It doesn't run hot, max ~ 65 degrees. The new nVidia heat-sink/fan design is very efficient and very quiet, and I assume that the Asus design is equally efficient. Overclockability is overwhelmingly the luck of the draw with the specific part on your board since the ultra parts are already bin-selected for timing-margin to clock at the 450 rate. You are unlikely to get any significant overclock improvement from watercooling. Anyway, all memory on the board would have to be watercooled as well to really push the board to its limit............. DON'T WORRY, BE HAPPY ! John Lewis |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"John Lewis" skrev i meddelandet ... On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 17:41:52 GMT, "Anders Nilsson" wrote: Hey! I wonder which waterblock i should use if i want to watercooling a ASUS 9950Ultra(fx5900)? Why bother ? It doesn't run hot, max ~ 65 degrees. The new nVidia heat-sink/fan design is very efficient and very quiet, and I assume that the Asus design is equally efficient. Overclockability is overwhelmingly the luck of the draw with the specific part on your board since the ultra parts are already bin-selected for timing-margin to clock at the 450 rate. You are unlikely to get any significant overclock improvement from watercooling. Anyway, all memory on the board would have to be watercooled as well to really push the board to its limit............. DON'T WORRY, BE HAPPY ! John Lewis Is not because i want to overclock it, is the heat. In idle is ~75 degress and in full load is ~85 - 90 degress. Anders |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In message , John Lewis
writes On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 17:41:52 GMT, "Anders Nilsson" wrote: Hey! I wonder which waterblock i should use if i want to watercooling a ASUS 9950Ultra(fx5900)? Why bother ? It doesn't run hot, max ~ 65 degrees. The new nVidia heat-sink/fan design is very efficient and very quiet, and I assume that the Asus design is equally efficient. Overclockability is overwhelmingly the luck of the draw with the specific part on your board since the ultra parts are already bin-selected for timing-margin to clock at the 450 rate. You are unlikely to get any significant overclock improvement from watercooling. Anyway, all memory on the board would have to be watercooled as well to really push the board to its limit............. DON'T WORRY, BE HAPPY ! John Lewis However, if you already watercool the CPU and want to loose a fan it does that very well. The RAM can be cooled by adding decent ramsinks and I've seen some cards cooled this way get reasonable overclocks. As you say though, it is luck of the draw as to how far the particular component will go though. To be perfectly honest I've not seen a 'bad' waterblock for a while now, have a look around and see which takes your fancy and then google it to find out other people's experiences with it. -- Thomas Letherby |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
watercooling??? should i? | Lee | Overclocking AMD Processors | 6 | January 12th 05 05:11 PM |
Watercooling, peltiers etc,.. | Moods | Overclocking | 5 | February 3rd 04 08:41 AM |
Watercooling, peltiers etc,.. | Moods | Overclocking AMD Processors | 5 | February 3rd 04 08:41 AM |
Watercooling, peltiers etc,.. | Moods | Asus Motherboards | 5 | February 3rd 04 08:41 AM |
watercooling | \(\) |V| 3 G A | Overclocking AMD Processors | 0 | October 23rd 03 05:16 PM |