If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between Usenet hardware groups
What's the difference bewteen these PC hardware newsgroups:
alt.comp.hardware alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt and even: uk.comp.homebuilt I get tempted to crosspost questions because I don't know how one these group's readership is different from another. But ... I don't want to upset people whose newsreader doesn't suppress posts they've already read in another group. Thanks. Dix -- This post is crossposted for a completely different reason. So please don't get upset! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between Usenet hardware groups
"Dixie UK" wrote in message
... What's the difference bewteen these PC hardware newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt and even: uk.comp.homebuilt I get tempted to crosspost questions because I don't know how one these group's readership is different from another. You will find the same in your public library, viz. several books on the same topic, say home-built PCs. There may be obvious differences between them, as between newsgroups: but these differences obey no rule, and to see the differences you have to read the stuff. If any general difference can be specified, each of us has to do that for ourselves, in our own minds. -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between Usenet hardware groups
On 11/10/2008 in message
Dixie UK wrote: What's the difference bewteen these PC hardware newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt and even: uk.comp.homebuilt It's a matter of quality really, the last group you mention is clearly the best because it is UK centric :-) That aside if you are in the UK it's probably best for you as there will be references to UK suppliers, prices and specifications. -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK This is as bad as it can get, but don't bet on it |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between Usenet hardware groups
In message , Dixie UK
writes What's the difference bewteen these PC hardware newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt and even: uk.comp.homebuilt I get tempted to crosspost questions because I don't know how one these group's readership is different from another. If you don't know the readership of the newsgroup you shouldn't post to it at all. -- Bernard Peek London, UK. DBA, Manager, Trainer & Author. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between Usenet hardware groups
"Dixie UK" wrote...
What's the difference bewteen these PC hardware newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt and even: uk.comp.homebuilt I get tempted to crosspost questions because I don't know how one these group's readership is different from another. But ... I don't want to upset people whose newsreader doesn't suppress posts they've already read in another group. alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt is the most active. You can crosspost to uk.comp.homebuilt if they are active with a different readership. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between Usenet hardware groups
On 2008-10-11, Dixie UK wrote: What's the difference bewteen these PC hardware newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt and even: uk.comp.homebuilt I get tempted to crosspost questions because I don't know how one these group's readership is different from another. But ... I don't want to upset people whose newsreader doesn't suppress posts they've already read in another group. You should try to find the charter for a group if you are not sure what the purpose of a particular group is. Most groups have one, although in the case of alt.* groups it may be somewhat informal or only a single line description carried by your news server. If you consult the charters you will find that alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt is the only _PC_ group that you have listed. In general is it considered bad form to cross post between local and regional and global newsgroups for two reasons. Firstly local groups have far more implicit context - if you post to uk.comp.homebuilt it is assumed that you are UK based, whereas this needs stating explicitly on other groups, and turns of phrase or referencing e.g. TV programmes may be appropriate on a local group but not elsewhere. Bear in mind this affects not just you, but anyone that responds to your posts. Secondly, if a message includes local groups then respondents not in that locality are probably using a server that does not carry the local groups. This can cause all sorts of problems if it isn't noticed before the post is attempted - depending on the reader the message may be unsubmittable until the missing groups are removed from the Newgroups: header, with no indication as to which of the groups are causing the problem. As to cross posting more generally, most newsreaders keep track of posts by message-id and will only show the messages as unread (or at all) in the first group you encounter and read them. This is the source of all those flames about multi-posting (posting an identical message to different groups) instead of cross posting (posting the same only once, but to multiple groups), since multi-posting breaks this behaviour. -- Andrew Smallshaw |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between Usenet hardware groups
"Dixie UK" wrote in message ... What's the difference bewteen these PC hardware newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt and even: uk.comp.homebuilt I get tempted to crosspost questions because I don't know how one these group's readership is different from another. But ... I don't want to upset people whose newsreader doesn't suppress posts they've already read in another group. Thanks. Dix I usually post my questions to just one group ....If I don't get any good advice...I try a different group. Best to read the questions and replies before posting... it only takes a few minutes to see if the group is appropriate |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between Usenet hardware groups
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:00:03 -0500
"philo" wrote: Best to read the questions and replies before posting... And check on Google Groups to make sure the question hasn't been asked a hundred times already. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between Usenet hardware groups
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:36:52 +0100, Dixie UK
wrote: What's the difference bewteen these PC hardware newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt and even: uk.comp.homebuilt I get tempted to crosspost questions because I don't know how one these group's readership is different from another. But ... I don't want to upset people whose newsreader doesn't suppress posts they've already read in another group. Thanks. Dix Consider the topic you'd post. If it's a generalized question then you shouldn't need to post to other than one group, alt.comp.hardware. If it's a somewhat generalized question and the system is self/home-built, then alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt and alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt. If the question involves tracking down a specific part or shop to handle a problem then a more localized group like uk.comp.homebuilt (or other uk groups if they apply) would tend to know more about not just availability of parts in that region but market costs. If the question is rather specific to a certain brand, even model of hardware, there may be an even more specific group not mentioned above. For example video and sound cards from nVidia, ATI, or Creative have their own groups IIRC. If a question seems obscure enough that it's not likely any readers of only one group would know the answer (given a few days, seldom is an obscure question answered completely within the same day or even longer), it becomes more reasonable to cross-post upwards in the usenet hierarchy or overlapping groups or more general ones. It seems unlikely that any general question best targeted to the above groups would need be posted to all of them listed. That's what tends to irritate some, when there are too many people involved in basic questions it tends to waste too many people's time and even worse it often makes the trolls come out of the woodwork and turn basic conversations into off-topic flaming and several people taking the thread on different tangents that make it excessively long to wade through. Often long thread length results from the topic originator not replying back to the thread so the topic can't be more narrowed with questions meant to isolate or define it further. You might also try using google groups to search for recent topics that are very similar to yours and even if those topics don't cover your interest specifically, if the group is showing interest in discussing and knowledge about similar topics it would seem the best place to start first. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between Usenet hardware groups
The main difference is activity. Some are more active than others, more
postings, more answers, except for the uk.xxx, that is UK centric. The second difference is college kids. Some groups, like this one, are frequented by the college crowd who want to show how smart they are, bark orders, and remind everyone else they are idiots. --g |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT besides all the spam, Google Groups is screwing up the USENET archive | John Doe | Homebuilt PC's | 2 | May 29th 08 06:27 PM |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | General | 0 | January 29th 05 03:14 AM |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | General | 0 | January 28th 05 11:44 PM |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | General | 0 | January 28th 05 04:13 PM |