If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DirectX 9 video card....9600xt or wait it out?
Hi,
I'm upgrading to a P4 2.6gHz HT, 512mb ram setup soon (upgradable to 3.6gHz & 1024mb). What I'm wondering about is the video card....now, my main intention is to be able to run advanced DirectX 9 games *nicely*, most of which aren't even out yet (e.g. Half Life 2, Doom 3, Stalker, Far Cry...) After doing some research, it seems the Radeon 9600xt is the best mid-range card at the moment, not too expensive but not too cheap either. However, I'm not sure how worthwhile it is in the long-run....do you think it will last another couple of years properly? i.e. will I be able to play DirectX 9 games with high detail at 1024x768 resolution with acceptable frame rates? I don't want to spend ~$900AU on a high-end card, so should I take the 9600xt ($300AU), or wait for the 9800pro to come down in price? (from $550AU) Also, anyone know if ATI or Nvidia plan to release a new line of cards soon? (obviously influencing current prices) TIA, -- Naggas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:13:33 GMT
"Mike 'Naggas' Anagno" wrote: Hi, I'm upgrading to a P4 2.6gHz HT, 512mb ram setup soon (upgradable to 3.6gHz& 1024mb). What I'm wondering about is the video card....now, my main intention is to be able to run advanced DirectX 9 games *nicely*, most of which aren't even out yet (e.g. Half Life 2, Doom 3, Stalker, Far Cry...) After doing some research, it seems the Radeon 9600xt is the best mid-range card at the moment, not too expensive but not too cheap either. However, I'm not sure how worthwhile it is in the long-run....do you think it will last another couple of years properly? i.e. will I be able to play DirectX 9 games with high detail at 1024x768 resolution with acceptable frame rates? I don't want to spend ~$900AU on a high-end card, so should I take the 9600xt($300AU), or wait for the 9800pro to come down in price? (from $550AU) Also, anyone know if ATI or Nvidia plan to release a new line of cards soon?(obviously influencing current prices) Wait until you _need_ to before you upgrade--in other words until there is something you really want to do that your current hardware is preventing you from doing or preventing you from enjoying. TIA, -- Naggas -- -- --John Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike 'Naggas' Anagno" wrote in message
... Hi, I'm upgrading to a P4 2.6gHz HT, 512mb ram setup soon (upgradable to 3.6gHz & 1024mb). What I'm wondering about is the video card....now, my main intention is to be able to run advanced DirectX 9 games *nicely*, most of which aren't even out yet (e.g. Half Life 2, Doom 3, Stalker, Far Cry...) The best advice is to not upgrade video cards based on upcoming releases. Many a gamer have be burned buying a video card believing that a particular game will be out on a specific release date. For example, if you believed original release dates, Half Life 2 would have been on the shelf for three months already, and Doom 3 would have been released a while ago too. After doing some research, it seems the Radeon 9600xt is the best mid-range card at the moment, not too expensive but not too cheap either. However, I'm not sure how worthwhile it is in the long-run....do you think it will last another couple of years properly? i.e. will I be able to play DirectX 9 games with high detail at 1024x768 resolution with acceptable frame rates? I don't want to spend ~$900AU on a high-end card, so should I take the 9600xt ($300AU), or wait for the 9800pro to come down in price? (from $550AU) I believe the 9600XT will be decent enough to do what you want, at least for the time being. Considering that you are getting a 2.6GHz processor, I have no reason to believe that the games you mentioned won't run nicely at 1024x768 on it unless you crank up the AA and AF considerably. What the 9600XT (or any other video card) will be like in two years is purely speculation. It would probably get by for two years running games at 1024x768 with medium to high detail, but that's just a guess and it also depends again on how much AA and AF mean to you. The wild card (if you'll excuse the pun!) in all of this is PCI Express for Graphics, which will be released along with Intel's Grantsdale processor in the fall of 2004. This slot will replace AGP completely and it has been said that the very first top-end video cards coming out for this new slot will have double the performance level of the 9800 Pro video card. While game developers obviously want to accomodate those who don't have current-generation video cards (otherwise they'd lose sales), PCI Express for Graphics will no doubt raise the bar considerably and I should not be surprised to see those with such hardware getting some really nice bells and whistles graphically compared to those of us "stuck" with AGP. Also, anyone know if ATI or Nvidia plan to release a new line of cards soon? (obviously influencing current prices) You'll probably see a new generation of video cards in mid-March to early April. TIA, -- Naggas |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Consider the 9700 Pro over the 9600XT. It's not much more $. Search the
web and look for benchmarks. The 9700 Pro kicks ass over any 9600, and is actually very close to a 9800. "Mike 'Naggas' Anagno" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm upgrading to a P4 2.6gHz HT, 512mb ram setup soon (upgradable to 3.6gHz & 1024mb). What I'm wondering about is the video card....now, my main intention is to be able to run advanced DirectX 9 games *nicely*, most of which aren't even out yet (e.g. Half Life 2, Doom 3, Stalker, Far Cry...) After doing some research, it seems the Radeon 9600xt is the best mid-range card at the moment, not too expensive but not too cheap either. However, I'm not sure how worthwhile it is in the long-run....do you think it will last another couple of years properly? i.e. will I be able to play DirectX 9 games with high detail at 1024x768 resolution with acceptable frame rates? I don't want to spend ~$900AU on a high-end card, so should I take the 9600xt ($300AU), or wait for the 9800pro to come down in price? (from $550AU) Also, anyone know if ATI or Nvidia plan to release a new line of cards soon? (obviously influencing current prices) TIA, -- Naggas |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I'm upgrading to a P4 2.6gHz HT, 512mb ram setup soon (upgradable to
3.6gHz & 1024mb). What I'm wondering about is the video card....now, my main intention is to be able to run advanced DirectX 9 games *nicely*, most of which aren't even out yet (e.g. Half Life 2, Doom 3, Stalker, Far Cry...) Depends on how you define nicely. I've been content with my 3dfx Voodoo 5 for long 3 years. It even ran UT 2003 at low-end but still playable FPS. After doing some research, it seems the Radeon 9600xt is the best mid-range card at the moment, not too expensive but not too cheap either. However, I'm not sure how worthwhile it is in the long-run....do you think it will last another couple of years properly? i.e. will I be able to play DirectX 9 games with high detail at 1024x768 resolution with acceptable frame rates? I don't want to spend ~$900AU on a high-end card, so should I take the 9600xt ($300AU), or wait for the 9800pro to come down in price? (from $550AU) I've just replaced my V5 with a 9600 XT. It does well enough, and with AA and AF enabled it scores even better against comparable Nvidia offers. That said, a 9800 XT outruns it considerably, especially in newer titles. But seeing that this card is 2-3 times more expensive, I don't see any reason besides geekyness to actually get it. 1024x768 will be very well possible for a 9600 XT for quite some time to come. Also, anyone know if ATI or Nvidia plan to release a new line of cards soon? (obviously influencing current prices) Q1 or Q2 2004. Both companies have meanwhile (more or less) mastered the transition to the 0.13 manufacturing process and DX 9, so product cycles should speed up a little again. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
If Nvidia or ATI are planning on any card releases soon,
they will not say anything about it till after the Christmas season. Talking about any upcoming releases during the holiday season will hurt current product sales. I don't think there will be any real price drops on ATI cards in the near future. I just upgraded from a Sapphire ATI 9100 to an ATI AIW 9600 PRO. I'm really happy with it, plays C&C Zero Hour very nicely (1280X1024) "Mike 'Naggas' Anagno" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm upgrading to a P4 2.6gHz HT, 512mb ram setup soon (upgradable to 3.6gHz & 1024mb). What I'm wondering about is the video card....now, my main intention is to be able to run advanced DirectX 9 games *nicely*, most of which aren't even out yet (e.g. Half Life 2, Doom 3, Stalker, Far Cry...) After doing some research, it seems the Radeon 9600xt is the best mid-range card at the moment, not too expensive but not too cheap either. However, I'm not sure how worthwhile it is in the long-run....do you think it will last another couple of years properly? i.e. will I be able to play DirectX 9 games with high detail at 1024x768 resolution with acceptable frame rates? I don't want to spend ~$900AU on a high-end card, so should I take the 9600xt ($300AU), or wait for the 9800pro to come down in price? (from $550AU) Also, anyone know if ATI or Nvidia plan to release a new line of cards soon? (obviously influencing current prices) TIA, -- Naggas |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Check out Tom's Hardware site. They have just published their latest review
of all of the video cards out there and have included a new chart called "fbucks". Basically it looks at performance/cost ratios of the current video cards, and performance/quality/cost ratios of video cards. Purely on performance the Radeon 9600XT rates highest I believe. But when quality is factored in the 9800 non pro does very well. Anyhow, give it a gander. It's very interesting. JK "Mike 'Naggas' Anagno" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm upgrading to a P4 2.6gHz HT, 512mb ram setup soon (upgradable to 3.6gHz & 1024mb). What I'm wondering about is the video card....now, my main intention is to be able to run advanced DirectX 9 games *nicely*, most of which aren't even out yet (e.g. Half Life 2, Doom 3, Stalker, Far Cry...) After doing some research, it seems the Radeon 9600xt is the best mid-range card at the moment, not too expensive but not too cheap either. However, I'm not sure how worthwhile it is in the long-run....do you think it will last another couple of years properly? i.e. will I be able to play DirectX 9 games with high detail at 1024x768 resolution with acceptable frame rates? I don't want to spend ~$900AU on a high-end card, so should I take the 9600xt ($300AU), or wait for the 9800pro to come down in price? (from $550AU) Also, anyone know if ATI or Nvidia plan to release a new line of cards soon? (obviously influencing current prices) TIA, -- Naggas |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Then don't get the 9600XT. I'd recommend the 9800 Pro instead, which
will last you longer and can now be bought for $239 at this link: http://www.microcenter.com/single_pr...uct_id=0157390 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks to all who replied, I guess waiting could be a better bet for now,
especially hearing about this PCI Express slot I had never heard about before. -- Naggas Mark wrote in message ... "Mike 'Naggas' Anagno" wrote in message ... snip The wild card (if you'll excuse the pun!) in all of this is PCI Express for Graphics, which will be released along with Intel's Grantsdale processor in the fall of 2004. This slot will replace AGP completely and it has been said that the very first top-end video cards coming out for this new slot will have double the performance level of the 9800 Pro video card. While game developers obviously want to accomodate those who don't have current-generation video cards (otherwise they'd lose sales), PCI Express for Graphics will no doubt raise the bar considerably and I should not be surprised to see those with such hardware getting some really nice bells and whistles graphically compared to those of us "stuck" with AGP. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 06:23:26 GMT
"Mike 'Naggas' Anagno" wrote: Thanks to all who replied, I guess waiting could be a better bet for now, especially hearing about this PCI Express slot I had never heard about before. There's nothing new about PCI Express--the standard has been out for a year and a half and so far not one single product has been officially announced, let alone shipped. -- Naggas Mark wrote in message ... "Mike 'Naggas' Anagno" wrote in message ... snip The wild card (if you'll excuse the pun!) in all of this is PCI Express for Graphics, which will be released along with Intel's Grantsdale processor in the fall of 2004. This slot will replace AGP completely and it has been said that the very first top-end video cards coming out for this new slot will have double the performance level of the 9800 Pro video card. While game developers obviously want to accomodate those who don't have current-generation video cards(otherwise they'd lose sales), PCI Express for Graphics will no doubt raise the bar considerably and I should not be surprised to see those with such hardware getting some really nice bells and whistles graphically compared to those of us "stuck" with AGP. -- -- --John Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about video card and directx, TIA | roadster3043 | Homebuilt PC's | 5 | November 11th 04 06:38 AM |
Tyan K8S Pro S2882: installing a PCI video card | Andy Kuo | General | 1 | November 5th 04 03:10 AM |
msi ti 4600 & asus p4c800e deluxe no powerup | dluxea | Asus Motherboards | 9 | May 19th 04 10:13 PM |
fx 5200 sweet deal but will it work ? | Skybuck Flying | General | 20 | May 12th 04 05:31 PM |
How much memory does your video card use? | Scott C. Smith | Ati Videocards | 1 | June 26th 03 06:49 AM |