A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Motherboards » Asus Motherboards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What Intel drivers are needed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 14th 14, 11:44 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus
Jim[_38_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 58
Default What Intel drivers are needed

I have just bought some new SSD's for my P5E3 Premium wifi and i'm told
i need RST drivers (Rapid Storage Technology) on top of the intel
chipset drivers.

I have gone to Intels site and used there tool which looks inside your
system and tells you what to download, it tells me to download "Intel
Chipset Software Installation Utility 9.4.0.1017" but when i search for
a RST driver i have been able to download something called "Intel®
Matrix Storage Manager v8.9.0.1023".

I'm confused should i install just one or both and if both in what order
because i'm sure using both could cause issues.

Jim
  #2  
Old February 14th 14, 01:28 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,364
Default What Intel drivers are needed

Jim wrote:
I have just bought some new SSD's for my P5E3 Premium wifi and i'm told
i need RST drivers (Rapid Storage Technology) on top of the intel
chipset drivers.

I have gone to Intels site and used there tool which looks inside your
system and tells you what to download, it tells me to download "Intel
Chipset Software Installation Utility 9.4.0.1017" but when i search for
a RST driver i have been able to download something called "Intel®
Matrix Storage Manager v8.9.0.1023".

I'm confused should i install just one or both and if both in what order
because i'm sure using both could cause issues.

Jim


RST is a later version of Matrix Storage (name change).
Both of them are used for setting up RAID arrays.
RAID can be arranged in mirror mode (reliability) or stripe (speed).
Most of the RAID configurations emphasize reliability (such as parity
protection). Fewer of the RAID configurations exist solely for
speed. Using only striping for example (RAID0), increases the risk
that a single drive failing, wipes out the array. If you run a RAID0
stripe, it would be advised to do daily backups (on a failure,
you lose a day's work).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_R...age_Technology

OSes from Vista onwards, have IASTORV, which is built-in RAID support.
If an array already has RAID metadata on the disks, that driver should
be able to see it. (Metadata gets added, if you use the BIOS RAID setup
screen, or by using the management application in the OS.) You probably
won't get a "management application" by using IASTORV. If you install
the Intel package, that would be marked in the OS as IASTOR without
the V on the end. And that in effect, overrides the IASTORV.

Some ideas for Desktop RAID

1) Use a UPS (uninterruptable power supply). Run the warning
cable from the UPS to the PC. The warning cable on my UPS,
when the UPS flips to battery, send a message at the 2 minute
mark to the PC, telling it to "shutdown now". The PC can then
unmount the file system cleanly and shut down the PC, and there
will be no damage to a single disk or to a RAID array.

There have been cases, when a RAID mirror is run, and the computer
doesn't have UPS, the two disks become mismatched. And data can
appear to go missing later, when one of the disks fails, and the
other (out of date) disk is called on. Using a UPS, removes those
potential corner cases.

2) Do frequent backups. Even if you're running a RAID5 (three or more
disks with parity protection), you *still* need backups. There have
been cases where the controller writes bad stuff to all the drives
(it happened to us at work), and corrupts a RAID array. All it takes
is a software bug, a rootkit, and just about anything can happen. Even
a power supply overvoltage, can kill the entire array at the same time,
leaving no redundancy and total data loss. So for "reliable arrays",
you're making a backup just because the entire array could wink out.
For "speedy configurations" such as RAID0, you increase the frequency
of backups, because the MTBF is now worse when run in striped mode.
Either SSD can fail in a stripe, endangering the data. Which means
the failure frequency has just gone up.

When you change settings in the BIOS, on the modern OSes you can
"re-arm" driver detection. These are all the settings you can use,
to identify candidates for detection. There would only be an iaStor
in the system, if you install either Intel RST or Matrix RAID driver.
The iaStorV is likely a Matrix RAID from a while back, that Microsoft
distributes with the OS. The V stands for Vista, even though the same
idea exists in later OSes. The letter V is still there.

http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/fo...p/t-57789.html

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\pciide\Start == 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\msahci\Start == 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\iaStorV\Start == 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\iaStor\Start == 0

As the Wikipedia article at the beginning mentions, TRIM is supported
in a number of modes now. You still have to do your reading and research
though, just to be sure. There is more info on TRIM, here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM_(SSD_command)

HTH,
Paul
  #3  
Old February 14th 14, 05:20 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus
Jim[_38_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 58
Default What Intel drivers are needed

On 14/02/2014 13:28, Paul wrote:
Jim wrote:
I have just bought some new SSD's for my P5E3 Premium wifi and i'm
told i need RST drivers (Rapid Storage Technology) on top of the
intel chipset drivers.

I have gone to Intels site and used there tool which looks inside
your system and tells you what to download, it tells me to download
"Intel Chipset Software Installation Utility 9.4.0.1017" but when i
search for a RST driver i have been able to download something called
"Intel® Matrix Storage Manager v8.9.0.1023".

I'm confused should i install just one or both and if both in what
order because i'm sure using both could cause issues.

Jim


RST is a later version of Matrix Storage (name change).
Both of them are used for setting up RAID arrays.
RAID can be arranged in mirror mode (reliability) or stripe (speed).
Most of the RAID configurations emphasize reliability (such as parity
protection). Fewer of the RAID configurations exist solely for
speed. Using only striping for example (RAID0), increases the risk
that a single drive failing, wipes out the array. If you run a RAID0
stripe, it would be advised to do daily backups (on a failure,
you lose a day's work).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_R...age_Technology

OSes from Vista onwards, have IASTORV, which is built-in RAID support.
If an array already has RAID metadata on the disks, that driver should
be able to see it. (Metadata gets added, if you use the BIOS RAID setup
screen, or by using the management application in the OS.) You probably
won't get a "management application" by using IASTORV. If you install
the Intel package, that would be marked in the OS as IASTOR without
the V on the end. And that in effect, overrides the IASTORV.

Some ideas for Desktop RAID

1) Use a UPS (uninterruptable power supply). Run the warning
cable from the UPS to the PC. The warning cable on my UPS,
when the UPS flips to battery, send a message at the 2 minute
mark to the PC, telling it to "shutdown now". The PC can then
unmount the file system cleanly and shut down the PC, and there
will be no damage to a single disk or to a RAID array.

There have been cases, when a RAID mirror is run, and the computer
doesn't have UPS, the two disks become mismatched. And data can
appear to go missing later, when one of the disks fails, and the
other (out of date) disk is called on. Using a UPS, removes those
potential corner cases.

2) Do frequent backups. Even if you're running a RAID5 (three or more
disks with parity protection), you *still* need backups. There have
been cases where the controller writes bad stuff to all the drives
(it happened to us at work), and corrupts a RAID array. All it takes
is a software bug, a rootkit, and just about anything can happen. Even
a power supply overvoltage, can kill the entire array at the same
time,
leaving no redundancy and total data loss. So for "reliable arrays",
you're making a backup just because the entire array could wink out.
For "speedy configurations" such as RAID0, you increase the frequency
of backups, because the MTBF is now worse when run in striped mode.
Either SSD can fail in a stripe, endangering the data. Which means
the failure frequency has just gone up.

When you change settings in the BIOS, on the modern OSes you can
"re-arm" driver detection. These are all the settings you can use,
to identify candidates for detection. There would only be an iaStor
in the system, if you install either Intel RST or Matrix RAID driver.
The iaStorV is likely a Matrix RAID from a while back, that Microsoft
distributes with the OS. The V stands for Vista, even though the same
idea exists in later OSes. The letter V is still there.

http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/fo...p/t-57789.html

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\pciide\Start
== 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\msahci\Start
== 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\iaStorV\Start
== 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\iaStor\Start
== 0

As the Wikipedia article at the beginning mentions, TRIM is supported
in a number of modes now. You still have to do your reading and research
though, just to be sure. There is more info on TRIM, here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM_(SSD_command)

HTH,
Paul

Paul many thanks for the detailed answer the trouble for me is i'm not
running any form of RAID, I have all my SATA sockets filled on the
mainboard but it's just for normal storage as i say no raid what so
ever, i know i need to instal one of these drivers as looking at my
systry i have the windows "Safely Remove Hardware and Eject Media" icon
and right clciking on it gives me the following didplay:
http://imageshack.com/a/img59/1493/0vbs.jpg

I have taken images at this stage so can play and just go back on the
current image with no damage.

Jim
  #4  
Old February 14th 14, 06:23 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,364
Default What Intel drivers are needed

Jim wrote:
On 14/02/2014 13:28, Paul wrote:
Jim wrote:
I have just bought some new SSD's for my P5E3 Premium wifi and i'm
told i need RST drivers (Rapid Storage Technology) on top of the
intel chipset drivers.

I have gone to Intels site and used there tool which looks inside
your system and tells you what to download, it tells me to download
"Intel Chipset Software Installation Utility 9.4.0.1017" but when i
search for a RST driver i have been able to download something called
"Intel® Matrix Storage Manager v8.9.0.1023".

I'm confused should i install just one or both and if both in what
order because i'm sure using both could cause issues.

Jim


RST is a later version of Matrix Storage (name change).
Both of them are used for setting up RAID arrays.
RAID can be arranged in mirror mode (reliability) or stripe (speed).
Most of the RAID configurations emphasize reliability (such as parity
protection). Fewer of the RAID configurations exist solely for
speed. Using only striping for example (RAID0), increases the risk
that a single drive failing, wipes out the array. If you run a RAID0
stripe, it would be advised to do daily backups (on a failure,
you lose a day's work).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_R...age_Technology

OSes from Vista onwards, have IASTORV, which is built-in RAID support.
If an array already has RAID metadata on the disks, that driver should
be able to see it. (Metadata gets added, if you use the BIOS RAID setup
screen, or by using the management application in the OS.) You probably
won't get a "management application" by using IASTORV. If you install
the Intel package, that would be marked in the OS as IASTOR without
the V on the end. And that in effect, overrides the IASTORV.

Some ideas for Desktop RAID

1) Use a UPS (uninterruptable power supply). Run the warning
cable from the UPS to the PC. The warning cable on my UPS,
when the UPS flips to battery, send a message at the 2 minute
mark to the PC, telling it to "shutdown now". The PC can then
unmount the file system cleanly and shut down the PC, and there
will be no damage to a single disk or to a RAID array.

There have been cases, when a RAID mirror is run, and the computer
doesn't have UPS, the two disks become mismatched. And data can
appear to go missing later, when one of the disks fails, and the
other (out of date) disk is called on. Using a UPS, removes those
potential corner cases.

2) Do frequent backups. Even if you're running a RAID5 (three or more
disks with parity protection), you *still* need backups. There have
been cases where the controller writes bad stuff to all the drives
(it happened to us at work), and corrupts a RAID array. All it takes
is a software bug, a rootkit, and just about anything can happen. Even
a power supply overvoltage, can kill the entire array at the same
time,
leaving no redundancy and total data loss. So for "reliable arrays",
you're making a backup just because the entire array could wink out.
For "speedy configurations" such as RAID0, you increase the frequency
of backups, because the MTBF is now worse when run in striped mode.
Either SSD can fail in a stripe, endangering the data. Which means
the failure frequency has just gone up.

When you change settings in the BIOS, on the modern OSes you can
"re-arm" driver detection. These are all the settings you can use,
to identify candidates for detection. There would only be an iaStor
in the system, if you install either Intel RST or Matrix RAID driver.
The iaStorV is likely a Matrix RAID from a while back, that Microsoft
distributes with the OS. The V stands for Vista, even though the same
idea exists in later OSes. The letter V is still there.

http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/fo...p/t-57789.html

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\pciide\Start
== 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\msahci\Start
== 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\iaStorV\Start
== 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\iaStor\Start
== 0

As the Wikipedia article at the beginning mentions, TRIM is supported
in a number of modes now. You still have to do your reading and research
though, just to be sure. There is more info on TRIM, here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM_(SSD_command)

HTH,
Paul

Paul many thanks for the detailed answer the trouble for me is i'm not
running any form of RAID, I have all my SATA sockets filled on the
mainboard but it's just for normal storage as i say no raid what so
ever, i know i need to instal one of these drivers as looking at my
systry i have the windows "Safely Remove Hardware and Eject Media" icon
and right clciking on it gives me the following didplay:
http://imageshack.com/a/img59/1493/0vbs.jpg

I have taken images at this stage so can play and just go back on the
current image with no damage.

Jim


OK, if you're not running RAID, your choices a

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\pciide\Start == 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\msahci\Start == 0

For those, you don't have to install anything. The drivers are
in the OS already. PCI IDE means PCI address space, a.k.a. "Enhanced IDE".
The other kind, Compatible, is in the I/O space. Compatible exists,
to help older OSes like Win98.

If you were to install the Intel driver, it could end up being AHCI
via IASTOR as an example. But you don't need the Intel driver. It's
because AHCI and PCI IDE are built into the OS and are standards,
that nothing is needed.

The above registry entries, are for "re-arming" driver detection.

1) Using Regedit, set those particular keys to zero. They
will only stay at zero, during the reboot. Once the system is
running, the OS will change the values back.

2) Now, shut down the system. Enter the BIOS, select a disk controller
mode. Select AHCI or Enhanced IDE.

3) On reboot, the modern OSes will reconsider what driver to use.
Your BIOS setting, will match one of the available drivers. By using
the registry entries, you define the "candidate list". If I were
to set both of those keys, I would be ready for IDE or AHCI modes.

So now, the next question would be, what mode would you like:

1) AHCI (the one you're already running) supports command queuing.
That means the command depth can be greater than 1 outstanding
command. The queuing is tagged, so when the disk say "command #3 complete",
the driver checks to see which (potentially out-of-order) access
that was. It allows the drive to reorder outstanding commands
if it wants. This mainly helps hard drives, by providing
the "shortest path" for head movements. Your SSD doesn't have head
movement, so I don't know how exactly it would be expected to
optimize the order of completion. But it will help your hard
drive a tiny bit.

2) AHCI supports Hot Plug. That's why you're getting those Eject options.
You cannot eject C:, even though it says that. It'll tell you the
partition is busy if you try.

3) The IDE option, sometimes has slightly better operation when the
outstanding command queue has zero or one items. This has to do with
the overhead of AHCI, which is slightly larger.

4) Both AHCI and IDE support TRIM. At least, if your OS is patched up
to date.

I don't see anything wrong with the AHCI (MSAHCI) choice you're
using at the moment. If you want to switch to IDE you can. And
to do it, consider the registry entries above. You only have
to "arm" the one you want, but arming both of them, you can
decide at BIOS setup time, which one you actually want to use.
If they're both armed, the one you select in the BIOS, is the
one that wins at OS startup.

Like, say you get into the BIOS, and you can't figure out
what option to set. You can just bail, restart the computer,
and the existing driver choice will be up and running again.
Only re-arm one registry entry, if you like a challenge later :-)
(A Catch22 challenge.)

Paul
  #5  
Old April 9th 14, 11:34 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus
Rob[_20_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default What Intel drivers are needed

On 14/02/2014 18:23, Paul wrote:
Jim wrote:
On 14/02/2014 13:28, Paul wrote:
Jim wrote:
I have just bought some new SSD's for my P5E3 Premium wifi and i'm
told i need RST drivers (Rapid Storage Technology) on top of the
intel chipset drivers.

I have gone to Intels site and used there tool which looks inside
your system and tells you what to download, it tells me to download
"Intel Chipset Software Installation Utility 9.4.0.1017" but when i
search for a RST driver i have been able to download something
called "Intel® Matrix Storage Manager v8.9.0.1023".

I'm confused should i install just one or both and if both in what
order because i'm sure using both could cause issues.

Jim

RST is a later version of Matrix Storage (name change).
Both of them are used for setting up RAID arrays.
RAID can be arranged in mirror mode (reliability) or stripe (speed).
Most of the RAID configurations emphasize reliability (such as parity
protection). Fewer of the RAID configurations exist solely for
speed. Using only striping for example (RAID0), increases the risk
that a single drive failing, wipes out the array. If you run a RAID0
stripe, it would be advised to do daily backups (on a failure,
you lose a day's work).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_R...age_Technology

OSes from Vista onwards, have IASTORV, which is built-in RAID support.
If an array already has RAID metadata on the disks, that driver should
be able to see it. (Metadata gets added, if you use the BIOS RAID setup
screen, or by using the management application in the OS.) You probably
won't get a "management application" by using IASTORV. If you install
the Intel package, that would be marked in the OS as IASTOR without
the V on the end. And that in effect, overrides the IASTORV.

Some ideas for Desktop RAID

1) Use a UPS (uninterruptable power supply). Run the warning
cable from the UPS to the PC. The warning cable on my UPS,
when the UPS flips to battery, send a message at the 2 minute
mark to the PC, telling it to "shutdown now". The PC can then
unmount the file system cleanly and shut down the PC, and there
will be no damage to a single disk or to a RAID array.

There have been cases, when a RAID mirror is run, and the computer
doesn't have UPS, the two disks become mismatched. And data can
appear to go missing later, when one of the disks fails, and the
other (out of date) disk is called on. Using a UPS, removes those
potential corner cases.

2) Do frequent backups. Even if you're running a RAID5 (three or more
disks with parity protection), you *still* need backups. There have
been cases where the controller writes bad stuff to all the drives
(it happened to us at work), and corrupts a RAID array. All it takes
is a software bug, a rootkit, and just about anything can happen.
Even
a power supply overvoltage, can kill the entire array at the same
time,
leaving no redundancy and total data loss. So for "reliable arrays",
you're making a backup just because the entire array could wink out.
For "speedy configurations" such as RAID0, you increase the frequency
of backups, because the MTBF is now worse when run in striped mode.
Either SSD can fail in a stripe, endangering the data. Which means
the failure frequency has just gone up.

When you change settings in the BIOS, on the modern OSes you can
"re-arm" driver detection. These are all the settings you can use,
to identify candidates for detection. There would only be an iaStor
in the system, if you install either Intel RST or Matrix RAID driver.
The iaStorV is likely a Matrix RAID from a while back, that Microsoft
distributes with the OS. The V stands for Vista, even though the same
idea exists in later OSes. The letter V is still there.

http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/fo...p/t-57789.html

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\pciide\Start
== 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\msahci\Start
== 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\iaStorV\Start
== 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\iaStor\Start
== 0

As the Wikipedia article at the beginning mentions, TRIM is supported
in a number of modes now. You still have to do your reading and research
though, just to be sure. There is more info on TRIM, here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIM_(SSD_command)

HTH,
Paul

Paul many thanks for the detailed answer the trouble for me is i'm not
running any form of RAID, I have all my SATA sockets filled on the
mainboard but it's just for normal storage as i say no raid what so
ever, i know i need to instal one of these drivers as looking at my
systry i have the windows "Safely Remove Hardware and Eject Media"
icon and right clciking on it gives me the following didplay:
http://imageshack.com/a/img59/1493/0vbs.jpg

I have taken images at this stage so can play and just go back on the
current image with no damage.

Jim


OK, if you're not running RAID, your choices a

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\pciide\Start == 0
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\servic es\msahci\Start == 0

For those, you don't have to install anything. The drivers are
in the OS already. PCI IDE means PCI address space, a.k.a. "Enhanced IDE".
The other kind, Compatible, is in the I/O space. Compatible exists,
to help older OSes like Win98.

If you were to install the Intel driver, it could end up being AHCI
via IASTOR as an example. But you don't need the Intel driver. It's
because AHCI and PCI IDE are built into the OS and are standards,
that nothing is needed.

The above registry entries, are for "re-arming" driver detection.

1) Using Regedit, set those particular keys to zero. They
will only stay at zero, during the reboot. Once the system is
running, the OS will change the values back.

2) Now, shut down the system. Enter the BIOS, select a disk controller
mode. Select AHCI or Enhanced IDE.

3) On reboot, the modern OSes will reconsider what driver to use.
Your BIOS setting, will match one of the available drivers. By using
the registry entries, you define the "candidate list". If I were
to set both of those keys, I would be ready for IDE or AHCI modes.

So now, the next question would be, what mode would you like:

1) AHCI (the one you're already running) supports command queuing.
That means the command depth can be greater than 1 outstanding
command. The queuing is tagged, so when the disk say "command #3
complete",
the driver checks to see which (potentially out-of-order) access
that was. It allows the drive to reorder outstanding commands
if it wants. This mainly helps hard drives, by providing
the "shortest path" for head movements. Your SSD doesn't have head
movement, so I don't know how exactly it would be expected to
optimize the order of completion. But it will help your hard
drive a tiny bit.

2) AHCI supports Hot Plug. That's why you're getting those Eject options.
You cannot eject C:, even though it says that. It'll tell you the
partition is busy if you try.

3) The IDE option, sometimes has slightly better operation when the
outstanding command queue has zero or one items. This has to do with
the overhead of AHCI, which is slightly larger.

4) Both AHCI and IDE support TRIM. At least, if your OS is patched up
to date.

I don't see anything wrong with the AHCI (MSAHCI) choice you're
using at the moment. If you want to switch to IDE you can. And
to do it, consider the registry entries above. You only have
to "arm" the one you want, but arming both of them, you can
decide at BIOS setup time, which one you actually want to use.
If they're both armed, the one you select in the BIOS, is the
one that wins at OS startup.

Like, say you get into the BIOS, and you can't figure out
what option to set. You can just bail, restart the computer,
and the existing driver choice will be up and running again.
Only re-arm one registry entry, if you like a challenge later :-)
(A Catch22 challenge.)

Paul


The only real changes that you see when using AHCI instead of IDE
mode and when installing the RST drivers on a non-raid system is
that there is no longer a 'safely eject' item in the system tray
for the OS drive (an entry which is, let's just say, a bit stupid
and confusing) and the ability to use tools which rely on
interrogating the SMART information on drives (which can be very
useful of course.)

What I do with systems set to IDE mode is use the re-arm procedure
Paul describes, set the BIOS to use AHCI, reboot (usually 2 reboots
are needed as the OS sees 'new' drives) and then install the RST
drivers.
--
Rob

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
are drivers needed? rb[_2_] General 6 May 3rd 07 02:48 PM
RT2000 Drivers needed Shaker Matrox Videocards 2 May 9th 04 08:24 PM
Intel drivers needed for AMD64 Windows Yousuf Khan General 0 February 9th 04 11:26 AM
Advice needed: AMD or Intel Papa Lazarou Homebuilt PC's 20 January 23rd 04 03:49 PM
Help with MB drivers needed! Cari Homebuilt PC's 0 October 22nd 03 09:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.