If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SATA II with external enclosure?
I'm looking for an external HDD that I can use for backing up my desktop.
I'm thinking about going with an external SATA II drive/enclosure. That way I can upgrade to a bigger disk as needed, and I'd get 3Gps throughput. I'm relatively new to SATA and hope I can field some questions here... * Because the external HDD is for backup, I'm worried that if my OS (WinXP) becomes corrupted, somehow a bit will get flipped on the external drive, or the MBR of the drive could get messed up - preventing access to my data even after I reinstall my OS - and bye-bye backup. Is this a valid concern? An external USB drive, on the other hand, (although slower) is more independent from the OS and would be less likely to get messed up after an OS corruption - is this correct? * Would an external SATA drive be hot-swappable between computers? I would be using an external SATA port adapter http://www.cooldrives.com/dual-port-...-sata-ii-.html that essentially extends the SATA II port on the motherboard to the back of the case - is it safe to plug/unplug this like a USB port? * Would I get 3Gps throughput? I've heard that this is only possible with a PCI-X SATA card. Is this true? Shouldn't the SATA II controller on the motherboard provide this throughput? Thanks in advance! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"deko" wrote in message . com... I'm looking for an external HDD that I can use for backing up my desktop. I'm thinking about going with an external SATA II drive/enclosure. That way I can upgrade to a bigger disk as needed, and I'd get 3Gps throughput. Nope, that's the peak burst rate of the interface and not the speed of the drive. Around 50MB/sec. is tops for today's drives. I'm relatively new to SATA and hope I can field some questions here... * Because the external HDD is for backup, I'm worried that if my OS (WinXP) becomes corrupted, somehow a bit will get flipped on the external drive, or the MBR of the drive could get messed up - preventing access to my data even after I reinstall my OS - and bye-bye backup. Is this a valid concern? Yes but obscure. The drive could also be hit by a meteroid. An external USB drive, on the other hand, (although slower) is more independent from the OS and would be less likely to get messed up after an OS corruption - is this correct? NO, the same applies either way. * Would an external SATA drive be hot-swappable between computers? I would be using an external SATA port adapter http://www.cooldrives.com/dual-port-...-sata-ii-.html that essentially extends the SATA II port on the motherboard to the back of the case - is it safe to plug/unplug this like a USB port? HW wise it's safe. The OS and driver software is a different issue and the answer there varies. * Would I get 3Gps throughput? I've heard that this is only possible with a PCI-X SATA card. Is this true? Nope, not with any card for sustained transfers. Shouldn't the SATA II controller on the motherboard provide this throughput? Generally they do for very short bursts. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I'm looking for an external HDD that I can use for backing up my
desktop. I'm thinking about going with an external SATA II drive/enclosure. That way I can upgrade to a bigger disk as needed, and I'd get 3Gps throughput. Nope, that's the peak burst rate of the interface and not the speed of the drive. Around 50MB/sec. is tops for today's drives. let's see... if 50MB/sec = 400mbps, then an 8-drive RAID 0 array [8*400 = 3200mbps (or 3.2gbps)] would be needed to max out the capacity of the SATA II interface - is this correct? I'm relatively new to SATA and hope I can field some questions here... * Because the external HDD is for backup, I'm worried that if my OS (WinXP) becomes corrupted, somehow a bit will get flipped on the external drive, or the MBR of the drive could get messed up - preventing access to my data even after I reinstall my OS - and bye-bye backup. Is this a valid concern? Yes but obscure. The drive could also be hit by a meteroid. Aghh!! Another thing to plan for... An external USB drive, on the other hand, (although slower) is more independent from the OS and would be less likely to get messed up after an OS corruption - is this correct? NO, the same applies either way. Perhaps the only way to ameliorate meteoroid risk (and still have decent throughput) would be to have 2 PCs connected via GigE interfaces with a crossover cable. Then I'd only have to worry about a scenario where TWO meteoroids fell - one hitting each PC. Nevertheless, if we entertain a 50MB/sec ceiling for HDD throughput, the gating factor in data transfer (with a single drive) would be the drive. Furthermore, a USB 2.0 interface (480mbps) could then be expected perform as well as a GigE interface (1000mbps) since the HDD can only handle 400mbps. But I've tested that particular scenario by copying the same 1Gb of data from my PC to an external USB drive, and between 2 PCs over a GigE link. The results were that USB 2.0 took roughly twice as long. I'm not sure how to explain this if the interface was NOT the bottleneck... unless the external USB drive was significantly slower than the internal HDDs in the PCs. * Would an external SATA drive be hot-swappable between computers? I would be using an external SATA port adapter http://www.cooldrives.com/dual-port-...-sata-ii-.html that essentially extends the SATA II port on the motherboard to the back of the case - is it safe to plug/unplug this like a USB port? HW wise it's safe. The OS and driver software is a different issue and the answer there varies. That makes sense. But the OS and driver can go up in flames as long as my data remains inviolate. I can always buy a new PC or install a new driver or OS - but I can't replace my data. * Would I get 3Gps throughput? I've heard that this is only possible with a PCI-X SATA card. Is this true? Nope, not with any card for sustained transfers. 10-4. Shouldn't the SATA II controller on the motherboard provide this throughput? Generally they do for very short bursts. Thanks for the reply. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"deko" wrote in message m... I'm looking for an external HDD that I can use for backing up my desktop. I'm thinking about going with an external SATA II drive/enclosure. That way I can upgrade to a bigger disk as needed, and I'd get 3Gps throughput. Nope, that's the peak burst rate of the interface and not the speed of the drive. Around 50MB/sec. is tops for today's drives. let's see... if 50MB/sec = 400mbps, then an 8-drive RAID 0 array [8*400 = 3200mbps (or 3.2gbps)] would be needed to max out the capacity of the SATA II interface - is this correct? Nope, SATA is not like SCSI. Each SATA II drive is on a separate channel. I'm relatively new to SATA and hope I can field some questions here... * Because the external HDD is for backup, I'm worried that if my OS (WinXP) becomes corrupted, somehow a bit will get flipped on the external drive, or the MBR of the drive could get messed up - preventing access to my data even after I reinstall my OS - and bye-bye backup. Is this a valid concern? Yes but obscure. The drive could also be hit by a meteroid. Aghh!! Another thing to plan for... An external USB drive, on the other hand, (although slower) is more independent from the OS and would be less likely to get messed up after an OS corruption - is this correct? NO, the same applies either way. Perhaps the only way to ameliorate meteoroid risk (and still have decent throughput) would be to have 2 PCs connected via GigE interfaces with a crossover cable. On different continents in granite mines. Then I'd only have to worry about a scenario where TWO meteoroids fell - one hitting each PC. Nevertheless, if we entertain a 50MB/sec ceiling for HDD throughput, the gating factor in data transfer (with a single drive) would be the drive. Furthermore, a USB 2.0 interface (480mbps) could then be expected perform as well as a GigE interface (1000mbps) since the HDD can only handle 400mbps. Both are peak theotetical rates and actual sustained throughput may not get there. But I've tested that particular scenario by copying the same 1Gb of data from my PC to an external USB drive, and between 2 PCs over a GigE link. The results were that USB 2.0 took roughly twice as long. HUH, what took twice as long as what exactly? I'm not sure how to explain this if the interface was NOT the bottleneck... unless the external USB drive was significantly slower than the internal HDDs in the PCs. That may be the case. Use external SATA II. * Would an external SATA drive be hot-swappable between computers? I would be using an external SATA port adapter http://www.cooldrives.com/dual-port-...-sata-ii-.html that essentially extends the SATA II port on the motherboard to the back of the case - is it safe to plug/unplug this like a USB port? HW wise it's safe. The OS and driver software is a different issue and the answer there varies. That makes sense. But the OS and driver can go up in flames as long as my data remains inviolate. I can always buy a new PC or install a new driver or OS - but I can't replace my data. * Would I get 3Gps throughput? I've heard that this is only possible with a PCI-X SATA card. Is this true? Nope, not with any card for sustained transfers. 10-4. Shouldn't the SATA II controller on the motherboard provide this throughput? Generally they do for very short bursts. Thanks for the reply. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I'm looking for an external HDD that I can use for backing up my
desktop. I'm thinking about going with an external SATA II drive/enclosure. That way I can upgrade to a bigger disk as needed, and I'd get 3Gps throughput. Nope, that's the peak burst rate of the interface and not the speed of the drive. Around 50MB/sec. is tops for today's drives. let's see... if 50MB/sec = 400mbps, then an 8-drive RAID 0 array [8*400 = 3200mbps (or 3.2gbps)] would be needed to max out the capacity of the SATA II interface - is this correct? Nope, SATA is not like SCSI. Each SATA II drive is on a separate channel. Does this mean the SATA interface is WAY faster than currently available SATA drives? I've heard reports that a SATA II drive on a SATA II interface will provide a 7 to 15% increase in throughput over a SATA I drive on a SATA I interface (all other things being equal). This is far short of the theoretical speed increase of SATA I over SATA II. I'm relatively new to SATA and hope I can field some questions here... * Because the external HDD is for backup, I'm worried that if my OS (WinXP) becomes corrupted, somehow a bit will get flipped on the external drive, or the MBR of the drive could get messed up - preventing access to my data even after I reinstall my OS - and bye-bye backup. Is this a valid concern? Yes but obscure. The drive could also be hit by a meteroid. Aghh!! Another thing to plan for... An external USB drive, on the other hand, (although slower) is more independent from the OS and would be less likely to get messed up after an OS corruption - is this correct? NO, the same applies either way. Perhaps the only way to ameliorate meteoroid risk (and still have decent throughput) would be to have 2 PCs connected via GigE interfaces with a crossover cable. On different continents in granite mines. Then I'd only have to worry about a scenario where TWO meteoroids fell - one hitting each PC. Nevertheless, if we entertain a 50MB/sec ceiling for HDD throughput, the gating factor in data transfer (with a single drive) would be the drive. Furthermore, a USB 2.0 interface (480mbps) could then be expected perform as well as a GigE interface (1000mbps) since the HDD can only handle 400mbps. Both are peak theotetical rates and actual sustained throughput may not get there. But I've tested that particular scenario by copying the same 1Gb of data from my PC to an external USB drive, and between 2 PCs over a GigE link. The results were that USB 2.0 took roughly twice as long. HUH, what took twice as long as what exactly? Copying 1Gb of data from my PC to an external USB drive took twice as long as copying the same 1Gb of data from my PC to another PC over a GigE link. I'm not sure how to explain this if the interface was NOT the bottleneck... unless the external USB drive was significantly slower than the internal HDDs in the PCs. That may be the case. Use external SATA II. External SATA sounds like the best backup solution - at least for backing up data. You could have a script run each night and backup all your data, and even maintain rolling "snapshots" of directories replicated each week (if you had enough disk space). For backing up your OS/Apps, the way to go would be use a separate System disk and clone it periodically with something like this: http://www.logicube.com/products/hd_...ation/echo.asp * Would an external SATA drive be hot-swappable between computers? I would be using an external SATA port adapter http://www.cooldrives.com/dual-port-...-sata-ii-.html that essentially extends the SATA II port on the motherboard to the back of the case - is it safe to plug/unplug this like a USB port? HW wise it's safe. The OS and driver software is a different issue and the answer there varies. That makes sense. But the OS and driver can go up in flames as long as my data remains inviolate. I can always buy a new PC or install a new driver or OS - but I can't replace my data. * Would I get 3Gps throughput? I've heard that this is only possible with a PCI-X SATA card. Is this true? Nope, not with any card for sustained transfers. 10-4. Shouldn't the SATA II controller on the motherboard provide this throughput? Generally they do for very short bursts. Thanks for the reply. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"deko" wrote in message ... Does this mean the SATA interface is WAY faster than currently available SATA drives? Yep. I've heard reports that a SATA II drive on a SATA II interface will provide a 7 to 15% increase in throughput over a SATA I drive on a SATA Well any SATA[II] drive that is 7-15% faster than another SATA[II] drive will remain that 7-15% faster regardless on which drive is on which interface SATA vs SATAII. I interface (all other things being equal). This is far short of the theoretical speed increase of SATA I over SATA II. Right, the interface has nothing to do with it except that the interface should be faster. Drive speed is primarily determined by the number of user sectors per track & RPM AND the average access time. Copying 1Gb of data from my PC to an external USB drive took twice as long as copying the same 1Gb of data from my PC to another PC over a GigE link. That bears some further research. External SATA sounds like the best backup solution - at least for backing up data. You could have a script run each night and backup all your data, and even maintain rolling "snapshots" of directories replicated each week (if you had enough disk space). For backing up your OS/Apps, the way to go would be use a separate System disk and clone it periodically with something like this: http://www.logicube.com/products/hd_...ation/echo.asp Well the best way is to make a compressed image of the whole drive using something like Acronis's TrueImage. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
External HD enclosure advice | NotMe | Storage (alternative) | 1 | November 27th 04 11:58 PM |
Asus P4C800 Deluxe ATA SATA and RAID Promise FastTrack 378 Drivers and more. | Julian | Asus Motherboards | 2 | August 11th 04 12:43 PM |
External 2.5" HDD Enclosure Questions | Knack | Storage (alternative) | 13 | October 14th 03 05:02 AM |
Firewire External Enclosure | garry crothers | Homebuilt PC's | 1 | September 26th 03 12:12 AM |
BAD peformance of all single SATA drives on Asus P4P800/P4C800 mobos?!.. | koop | Asus Motherboards | 1 | June 22nd 03 09:59 PM |