If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hardware RAID vs Software RAID
My situation... I was running a four 500g drive RAID5 array on an Adaptec SATA RAID controller (Two, actually, second is fine). One drive failed and then the replacement failed during the rebuild. The array has been verified that it's trashed. Very little hope of recovering my data without spending more money than it's worth. The Adaptec controller (21610SA) is older tech... PCI-X, 16 SATA ports, 2TB array limitations, etc. This controller seems to work OK, except that it did not like Hitachi drives and trashed the array when the infamous Seagate firmware issues started happening. I have now obtained an LSI 8408E controller... 4x PCI-e, 8 SATA ports, battery backup. This controller should perform better than the Adaptec. It probably won't handle the Seagate issue much better though. At this point I'm trying to decide on whether to use the hardware RAID5 on the LSI controller, or just use it as a SATA controller and do the RAID5 with Windows disk management. Pros and cons for each method. + LSI should have good performance + LSI can manage and resize arrays - LSI is limited to 8 drives (Can you chain LSI controllers to make a larger single RAID?) - LSI requires another LSI controller should my current controller fail - Windows can't resize it's RAID arrays (BIG minus) + Windows can RAID from different sized drives and still make use of the left over space as seperate partitions. + Windows RAID can span multiple controllers, allowing for as many drives as I can mount in the chassis - Windows performance will be slower + Windows array should be easier to relocate should the PC fail The OS on this PC is Windows 2003. The drives that will be going into this PC a (2) 1TB WD SATA drives - (1) 500gig Hitachi SATA - (9) 500gig Seagate SATA, mix of 7200.8, .9, .10, .11 - (1) 500gig WD SATA - (1) 320gig Seagate - My chassis has room for 14 HDDs and an optical drive. PSU is large enough to support that many drives. At this point my plan is as follows (and I'm looking for any feedback regarding this): (8) 500gig Seagate in hardware RAID5 on the LSI controller (1) 320gig Seagate as the OS drive on mainboard (1) 1TB WD as a backup drive for anything important on the RAID5 array on mainboard (1) 1TB WD drive for non-important data that does not exist on the RAID5 array on mainboard (3) other 500gig drives (Seagate, Hitachi, WD) for ??? I could use Windows RAID5 on the three 500gig and use that for the important RAID5 stuff. The two 1TB could be used for non-critical data (Music, etc.) I could also just keep on 500gig drive unhooked as a spare for the LSI array. Does anyone see any other options I should be considering? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hardware vs. software Raid | Jeff | Homebuilt PC's | 2 | December 13th 06 01:07 PM |
Software Or hardware RAID? | Teilhard Knight | General | 3 | April 30th 06 05:22 PM |
Hardware raid or XP software ? | Mark | Overclocking AMD Processors | 20 | February 27th 04 03:54 AM |
Hardware raid or XP software ? | Mark | Asus Motherboards | 20 | February 27th 04 03:29 AM |