If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
2400+ @ 2.0Ghz
Hiya Soupladel... if you can do it, the 2400+ will run ok at an FSB of 200
with a 10x multiplier. But I currently cannot even get another 50Mhz out of the CPU no matter how I screw with the FSBxMultiplier combos and I did try taking VCore up a bit (no higher than 1.725 - I'd rather have it 'stock' and working than dead!). Good power supply is critical, the actual wattage is less important than that current it can supply on the various lines. Especially +3.3 and +5 as these supply the devices on the motherboard, notably power hungry AGP bus devices and CPUs :¬) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
2400+ @ 2.0Ghz
Please reply to group, not new post. were losing organization in the
group.lol -- Jason "IF AT FIRST YOU DON'T SUCCEED, DON'T DIE TRYING" "Gaidheal" wrote in message ... Hiya Soupladel... if you can do it, the 2400+ will run ok at an FSB of 200 with a 10x multiplier. But I currently cannot even get another 50Mhz out of the CPU no matter how I screw with the FSBxMultiplier combos and I did try taking VCore up a bit (no higher than 1.725 - I'd rather have it 'stock' and working than dead!). Good power supply is critical, the actual wattage is less important than that current it can supply on the various lines. Especially +3.3 and +5 as these supply the devices on the motherboard, notably power hungry AGP bus devices and CPUs :¬) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
2400+ @ 2.0Ghz
"Gaidheal" wrote in message ... Hiya Soupladel... if you can do it, the 2400+ will run ok at an FSB of 200 with a 10x multiplier. But I currently cannot even get another 50Mhz out of the CPU no matter how I screw with the FSBxMultiplier combos and I did try taking VCore up a bit (no higher than 1.725 - I'd rather have it 'stock' and working than dead!). Good power supply is critical, the actual wattage is less important than that current it can supply on the various lines. Especially +3.3 and +5 as these supply the devices on the motherboard, notably power hungry AGP bus devices and CPUs :¬) I have the XP 2400+ running fine at 2GHz (100x20) although when i put the FSB up by 10MHz it came through post fine at 2.2GHz but wouldn't load windows! Soupladel |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
2400+ @ 2.0Ghz
Yeah, pretty much the same story here.. I think we both hit the same problem
at the same speed on our processors: limit of the core. But... if someone knows better, I'd LOVE to hear about it :¬) I also tried it at 2.2 or close to by various combinations and even lower than that but higher than 2.0 with the same result as you.. when I tried even 1Mhz higher than an FSB of 200Mhz, regardless of multiplier though, it failed to POST at all. I gather I can probably go higher on the Vcore than I did, if I like.. but I was not willing to risk it unless there was evidence to suggest that the 2400 is likely to go any faster. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
2400+ @ 2.0Ghz
"Gaidheal" wrote in message ... Yeah, pretty much the same story here.. I think we both hit the same problem at the same speed on our processors: limit of the core. But... if someone knows better, I'd LOVE to hear about it :¬) I also tried it at 2.2 or close to by various combinations and even lower than that but higher than 2.0 with the same result as you.. when I tried even 1Mhz higher than an FSB of 200Mhz, regardless of multiplier though, it failed to POST at all. I gather I can probably go higher on the Vcore than I did, if I like.. but I was not willing to risk it unless there was evidence to suggest that the 2400 is likely to go any faster. I have to say that putting up the vcore would probably work on mine i just haven't tried it, it is currently runnig with a very low 1.5 and no stability problems! Soupladel |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
2400+ @ 2.0Ghz
"Soupladel" wrote in message ... "Soupladel" wrote in message news "Gaidheal" wrote in message ... Yeah, pretty much the same story here.. I think we both hit the same problem at the same speed on our processors: limit of the core. But... if someone knows better, I'd LOVE to hear about it :¬) I also tried it at 2.2 or close to by various combinations and even lower than that but higher than 2.0 with the same result as you.. when I tried even 1Mhz higher than an FSB of 200Mhz, regardless of multiplier though, it failed to POST at all. I gather I can probably go higher on the Vcore than I did, if I like.. but I was not willing to risk it unless there was evidence to suggest that the 2400 is likely to go any faster. I have to say that putting up the vcore would probably work on mine i just haven't tried it, it is currently runnig with a very low 1.5 and no stability problems! Soupladel I have just put the FSB up to 110 and the vcore up to 1.65 and it has booted windows no problem, it is running currently at 57c without load though! but i know i need a better cooling solution for it as it is still runnig with the same heatsink that I originally bought for my T/Bird 750MHz (although at the time it was rated for upto 1.4GHz not that means anything) Soupladel I have tried various other voltages just now and the first that would allow windows to boot was 1.6, it is still running at 57c with no load though! Soupladel |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
2400+ @ 2.0Ghz
Why are you guys running a 2400+ at 100 FSB speed (100X20)? It defaults at
133 (133X15). I have mine running at 150 (150X15 = 2250). Daniel "Soupladel" wrote in message ... "Soupladel" wrote in message ... "Soupladel" wrote in message news "Gaidheal" wrote in message ... Yeah, pretty much the same story here.. I think we both hit the same problem at the same speed on our processors: limit of the core. But... if someone knows better, I'd LOVE to hear about it :¬) I also tried it at 2.2 or close to by various combinations and even lower than that but higher than 2.0 with the same result as you.. when I tried even 1Mhz higher than an FSB of 200Mhz, regardless of multiplier though, it failed to POST at all. I gather I can probably go higher on the Vcore than I did, if I like.. but I was not willing to risk it unless there was evidence to suggest that the 2400 is likely to go any faster. I have to say that putting up the vcore would probably work on mine i just haven't tried it, it is currently runnig with a very low 1.5 and no stability problems! Soupladel I have just put the FSB up to 110 and the vcore up to 1.65 and it has booted windows no problem, it is running currently at 57c without load though! but i know i need a better cooling solution for it as it is still runnig with the same heatsink that I originally bought for my T/Bird 750MHz (although at the time it was rated for upto 1.4GHz not that means anything) Soupladel I have tried various other voltages just now and the first that would allow windows to boot was 1.6, it is still running at 57c with no load though! Soupladel |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
2400+ @ 2.0Ghz
You are right, It didn't even click when I saw that.. sorry.
Daniel "Gaidheal" wrote in message ... "Why are you guys running a 2400+ at 100 FSB speed (100X20)? It defaults at 133 (133X15). I have mine running at 150 (150X15 = 2250)." I am not LOL If you bother to read the original post I made, you will see my FSB is 200Mhz, to go nicely with my DDR400 RAM. :¬) However, since then I have got it at 11x200 with no changes to Vcore, seems it just did not like 10.5x odd.. but not complaining. Will try for more once I am satisfied it is still perfectly stable. May even DROP Vcore from the default to see if it is happy with that. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
2400+ @ 2.0Ghz
No worries, Midnight :¬) Easy enough mistake. And I am pretty pleased with
the performance and stability so sometime after the weekend (I work weekends) I might mess about some more. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dell PowerEdge 2400 drivers | LightLady110 | General | 4 | March 21st 05 05:33 PM |
Dell 2400 Quetions | Hugh Comstock | Dell Computers | 28 | September 21st 04 05:11 PM |
Dell 4600 vs 2400 Revisited | JJ | Dell Computers | 2 | May 27th 04 03:57 AM |
How to Install a PCI Video Card in a Dell Dimension 2400 | Tim | Dell Computers | 2 | February 9th 04 03:10 AM |
Problem with XP 1700 @ XP 2400 - Documented | Nick Le Lievre | Overclocking AMD Processors | 8 | November 30th 03 01:53 AM |