If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What's with my video card!!
I'd appreciate some help on video cards.
I currently have an ATI Technologies 3D Rage II+ PCI video card with 4 Meg memory, and I think I need to upgrade it but I'd like to understand my computer and I'd like to understand why. I've installed Google Earth under WinXP SP3, and I ran DXDiag.exe and under the display page, it says that Direct3D Acceleration is not available. Yet "3D" appears in the name of the card. Isn't that what Google Earth wants? What am I missing? My driver is dated 8/17/2001, and I know there is a newer one but a lot of hunting about 6 months ago led me to download sites that listed the newer one, but then they either couldn't find their own link or they pointed me back to the ATI website, which doesn't have it. That's still happening. Even one that said it had done 25 downloads in the last week. :-) I have driver version: 5.01.2493.0000 and the independent driver pages make reference to version: 5.01.2535.0000. Is ATI just missing this particular driver, because it's "legacy"? Why do you think none of the independent sites don't have it? This is just curiosity. I obviously cant' do anything about it. I needed the new driver because the computer won't go into Standby mode with the current driver, and the message says to upgreade the driver. But now I also seem to need something to use Google Earth in DirectX mode. The message said "graphics card or IGP" I'm guessing, does IGP mean Integrated Graphics Processor, on the motherboard? If so, I don't have that. Thanks for any help you can give. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What's with my video card!!
* mm:
I currently have an ATI Technologies 3D Rage II+ PCI video card with 4 Meg memory, and I think I need to upgrade it but I'd like to understand my computer and I'd like to understand why. I've installed Google Earth under WinXP SP3, and I ran DXDiag.exe and under the display page, it says that Direct3D Acceleration is not available. Yet "3D" appears in the name of the card. Isn't that what Google Earth wants? What am I missing? You are missing that your 12(!) years old graphics card is just rudimentarily supported in Windowsxp. Yes, the 3D Rage II+ supports 3D acceleration but it was made when Windows95 and WindowsNT were current. It does support OpenGL 1.x, and it does support DirectX 3 and 5, both which are really ancient by today's standards. The ATI Rage Pro/Rage II series was already crap when they were new. There really is no reason to waste any time with such a card. Not only requires Google Earth somewhat more modern APIs (IIRC it requires DirectX 9 or OpenGL 2.x), even if it would run on your old Rage II+ it would perform like crap (more like a very slow slide show with low details). Save yourself the hazzle, take say five bucks and buy a better PCI graphics card on ebay (i.e. ATI Radeon 7000 and newer or Nvidia Geforce 2 MX or newer) which are way faster, have better drivers available, and run Google Earth at least somewhat decent. However, I wonder when your card is already 12 years old how about the rest of your computer. If it is similarly antique I would refrain from the thought to be able to run modern applications like Google Earth on it. Benjamin |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What's with my video card!!
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:48:20 +0000, Benjamin Gawert
wrote: * mm: I currently have an ATI Technologies 3D Rage II+ PCI video card with 4 Meg memory, and I think I need to upgrade it but I'd like to understand my computer and I'd like to understand why. I've installed Google Earth under WinXP SP3, and I ran DXDiag.exe and under the display page, it says that Direct3D Acceleration is not available. Yet "3D" appears in the name of the card. Isn't that what Google Earth wants? What am I missing? You are missing that your 12(!) years old graphics card is just rudimentarily supported in Windowsxp. Thanks for answering. I guess you're right about that. I didnt' realize how bad it was. :-) Yes, the 3D Rage II+ supports 3D acceleration but it was made when Windows95 and WindowsNT were current. It does support OpenGL 1.x, and it does support DirectX 3 and 5, both which are really ancient by today's standards. The ATI Rage Pro/Rage II series was already crap when they were new. There really is no reason to waste any time with such a card. I got it free? Maybe that's why my friend gave it to me. Not only requires Google Earth somewhat more modern APIs (IIRC it requires DirectX 9 or OpenGL 2.x), even if it would run on your old Rage II+ it would perform like crap (more like a very slow slide show with low details). Save yourself the hazzle, take say five bucks and buy a better PCI graphics card on ebay (i.e. ATI Radeon 7000 and newer or Nvidia Geforce 2 MX or newer) which are way faster, have better drivers available, and run Google Earth at least somewhat decent. Okay. That sounds like what I should do. So if I'm going to buy another graphics card, I'd like to get one that has output for the TV**. I usually use an antenna and a Philips DVDR with a digital tuner that supplies an analog signal to 3 analog tvs. The DVDR has RCA input jacks, and one S-Video input jack. It has: AV In, Red, Yellow, and White RCA jacks. (Component, right?) and Composite-video In, also 3 RCA jacks, but just for video iiuc and S-Video In and RF/Antenna in, for the record, but that doesn't count. I guess the only sound-In is the yellow and white AV audio RCA jacks. How would I connect the computer to the DVDR to get both picture and sound? Do I have to run all 3 video and left and right audio cables, or is there a simpler way? The DVDR is about 30 feet away. If I run the wire up to the attic and over to the closet and down and back to the DVR, it's maybe 70 feet total. **(so I could watch online-tv like Hulu on my tv instead just the computer monitor while sitting in a desk chair.) Also, is there any issue about a new model graphics card working on XP but not on Win98SE? I still have that on the same harddrive, and when I once had big trouble with XP, 98 has been very useful, if nothing else to get my email and read my newsgroups. Any graphics card recommendations considering all these things? Even 20 or 30 dollars is okay. The ATI Radeon 7000 says it has VGA (d-sub), DVI-I and TV out. And I can't see too well but it may have an S-video jack?? And it says it runs on win98SE? Is it still what I want? However, I wonder when your card is already 12 years old how about the rest of your computer. If it is similarly antique I would refrain from the thought to be able to run modern applications like Google Earth on it. I'll have to upgrade more of it if necessary. It is 800 MHz now, but my friend says he has a faster motherboard/cpu that he's going to give me, when he upgrades his stuff. And that may include a bigger power supply. Benjamin Thanks a lot, Mike |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What's with my video card!!
* mm:
There really is no reason to waste any time with such a card. I got it free? It is only free if your time is worth nothing. Maybe that's why my friend gave it to me. Probably. So if I'm going to buy another graphics card, I'd like to get one that has output for the TV**. Most older graphics card had a TV output (Y/C aka SVHS, can be converted to CVBS by a cheap adapter), so that shouldn't be a problem. Also, is there any issue about a new model graphics card working on XP but not on Win98SE? I still have that on the same harddrive, and when I once had big trouble with XP, 98 has been very useful, if nothing else to get my email and read my newsgroups. Yes, cards like the Radeon 7000 had Win98 drivers available. However, it is really not a good idea to use the internet with Windows98 any more as there haven't been any security updates to Windows or the browsers which run on it for years, and despite common belief there still are many threats around that do affect Windows98. Any graphics card recommendations considering all these things? Even 20 or 30 dollars is okay. The ATI Radeon 7000 says it has VGA (d-sub), DVI-I and TV out. And I can't see too well but it may have an S-video jack?? And it says it runs on win98SE? Is it still what I want? Yes. I'll have to upgrade more of it if necessary. It is 800 MHz now, but my friend says he has a faster motherboard/cpu that he's going to give me, when he upgrades his stuff. And that may include a bigger power supply. To be honest, with 800MHz watching Hulu (which is Flash-based and thus requires quite a bit more CPU performance) won't work, no matter what graphics card you throw in. You should at least get something in the area of a Pentium4 2.6GHz or AthlonXP 2000 or better. I wouldn't waste any time with anything slower as it never will do what you want it to do (Google Earth and Hulu). Honestly, if I were you I'd just fetch something like a Dell Precision (360/370/380) or HP dc-Series (dc7100/7200) computer which can be had for around $60-$90 today and has enough performance for what you want it to do. Ben |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What's with my video card!!
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:58:32 -0500, mm
wrote: ..... It has: AV In, Red, Yellow, and White RCA jacks. (Component, right?) and Composite-video In, also 3 RCA jacks, but just for video iiuc and S-Video In I think I got this wrong. The yellow video jack is composite, iiuc. The three jacks for YPbPg is component, iiuc. I guess the only sound-In is the yellow and white AV audio RCA jacks. Sorry. I meant red and white. How would I connect the computer to the DVDR to get both picture and sound? Do I have to run all 3 video and left and right audio cables, or is there a simpler way? After reading a lot tonight, I gather if I can't use HDMI, there is no simpler way. I need 3 cables. I've read there are better ways than S-video, but since the largest TV I have or expect to get is 19 inches and a couple are 15 inch, do you think S-video is good enough? It seems like, if I get a video card with S-video out, it would be pretty simple compared to all the adapters etc. I'd need to use anything better. http://www.cablesnmor.com/qo-s-video-cables.aspx had 100 foot S-video for 24.50 although they won't tell me what the shipping charge is unless I give them my name etc. And I can get the sound from the sound card, like everyone does. Thaks again. The DVDR is about 30 feet away. If I run the wire up to the attic and over to the closet and down and back to the DVR, it's maybe 70 feet total. Also, is there any issue about a new model graphics card working on XP but not on Win98SE? I still have that on the same harddrive, and when I once had big trouble with XP, 98 has been very useful, if nothing else to get my email and read my newsgroups. Any graphics card recommendations considering all these things? Even 20 or 30 dollars is okay. The ATI Radeon 7000 says it has VGA (d-sub), DVI-I and TV out. And I can't see too well but it may have an S-video jack?? And it says it runs on win98SE? Is it still what I want? ...... Benjamin Thanks a lot, Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What's with my video card!!
"I currently have an ATI Technologies 3D Rage II+ PCI video card
with 4 Meg memory, and I think I need to upgrade it" A gross understatement; that card is more than a decade old, it's truly a fossil. The card is not compliant with any modern standards. It's from the era of 486 and very early Pentium [Pentium ONE] PCs. You desperately need a new video card. What I'm wondering is if what you really need is a new computer. mm wrote: I'd appreciate some help on video cards. I currently have an ATI Technologies 3D Rage II+ PCI video card with 4 Meg memory, and I think I need to upgrade it but I'd like to understand my computer and I'd like to understand why. I've installed Google Earth under WinXP SP3, and I ran DXDiag.exe and under the display page, it says that Direct3D Acceleration is not available. Yet "3D" appears in the name of the card. Isn't that what Google Earth wants? What am I missing? My driver is dated 8/17/2001, and I know there is a newer one but a lot of hunting about 6 months ago led me to download sites that listed the newer one, but then they either couldn't find their own link or they pointed me back to the ATI website, which doesn't have it. That's still happening. Even one that said it had done 25 downloads in the last week. :-) I have driver version: 5.01.2493.0000 and the independent driver pages make reference to version: 5.01.2535.0000. Is ATI just missing this particular driver, because it's "legacy"? Why do you think none of the independent sites don't have it? This is just curiosity. I obviously cant' do anything about it. I needed the new driver because the computer won't go into Standby mode with the current driver, and the message says to upgreade the driver. But now I also seem to need something to use Google Earth in DirectX mode. The message said "graphics card or IGP" I'm guessing, does IGP mean Integrated Graphics Processor, on the motherboard? If so, I don't have that. Thanks for any help you can give. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What's with my video card!!
The real question here that you have not addressed is the COMPUTER.
You may be dealing with a computer that is old that, as a practical matter, you can't get a modern video card. You also need to concern yourself with what video card motherboard options you have. You should use PCI only as a last resort. If you have AGP you should use that, if you have PCI Express (I'm 99% sure you don't) you should use that: PCI (oldest and worst) AGP PCI Express (newest and best) BTW, if you are interested, I have a brand new, still shrink wrapped ATI Radeon 7000 "Dual Display Edition" video card for $15 + shipping. It's not a truly modern card but it's cheap and new and very reasonable for almost all non-gaming applications. It has VGA Output, DVI output (which can be converted to HDMI with an adapter, OR to a SECOND, INDEPENDENT VGA output) and TV output (both composite and S-Video). It's a decent card for an older AGP machine. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What's with my video card!!
* Barry Watzman:
"I currently have an ATI Technologies 3D Rage II+ PCI video card with 4 Meg memory, and I think I need to upgrade it" A gross understatement; that card is more than a decade old, it's truly a fossil. The card is not compliant with any modern standards. It's from the era of 486 and very early Pentium [Pentium ONE] PCs. Not really. While the Rage II series is old, it is really not *that* old. The Rage II is from end of 1996, and at that time 486 haven't been sold new any more for several years (and the very early Pentium PCs you mentioned came out 3 years before the Rage II was announced). PCs of these days were computers with Pentium 166-200MHz (the upper range of the Pentium series) and Pentium Pro. And it does support Direct3D and OpenGL (in older versions, though), which if I remember right are both "modern standards". You desperately need a new video card. What I'm wondering is if what you really need is a new computer. That is probably right, though. Benjamin |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What's with my video card!!
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:25:05 -0500, Barry Watzman
wrote: The real question here that you have not addressed is the COMPUTER. You may be dealing with a computer that is old that, as a practical matter, you can't get a modern video card. You also need to concern yourself with what video card motherboard options you have. You should use PCI only as a last resort. If you have AGP you should use that, if you have PCI Express (I'm 99% sure you don't) you should use that: It has AGP. YOu're right it doesn't have pci-express. PCI (oldest and worst) AGP PCI Express (newest and best) BTW, if you are interested, I have a brand new, still shrink wrapped ATI Radeon 7000 "Dual Display Edition" video card for $15 + shipping. It's It sounds very interesting. How much memory does it have? Does it work with win98SE? not a truly modern card but it's cheap and new and very reasonable for almost all non-gaming applications. It has VGA Output, DVI output (which can be converted to HDMI with an adapter, OR to a SECOND, INDEPENDENT VGA output) and TV output (both composite and S-Video). You're sure it has S-Video? I had already been looking at ebay ads, for ATI Radeon 7000 and didn't see any that had all of those you list: composite (yellow RCA), S-video, DVI, and VGA. Didn't see any that had S-video. (I need VGA for my monitor, and I need S-video, because there is no HDMI or DVI jack on the DVDR, and I read that S-video, though not as good as YPgPr (which is not an option here anyhow) is better than composite. Right? Plus they don't sell cables that are 100 feet long for DVI, which might mean it's a bad idea, and as to connecting two 50-foot cables, why make things compllicate?) Thanks. It's a decent card for an older AGP machine. That's me. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What's with my video card!!
* mm:
After reading a lot tonight, I gather if I can't use HDMI, there is no simpler way. I need 3 cables. I've read there are better ways than S-video, but since the largest TV I have or expect to get is 19 inches and a couple are 15 inch, do you think S-video is good enough? Honestly, in my experience both the composite (CVBS) and SVHS (Y/C) TV outs are usually awful, no matter what graphics card. However, if TV you "expect to get" means that the device is equally ancient as your computer then there probably are not much other options. However, if we are talking about modern flat screen TVs then forget about the crap TV out, HDMI is definitely the way to go. It seems like, if I get a video card with S-video out, it would be pretty simple compared to all the adapters etc. I'd need to use anything better. http://www.cablesnmor.com/qo-s-video-cables.aspx had 100 foot S-video for 24.50 although they won't tell me what the shipping charge is unless I give them my name etc. I can tell you that the signal that comes out after 100ft of cable will look like crap. As with most analogue signals, neither CVBS nor Y/C get any better when pushed over long cables. I wouldn't go over 10ft to avoid degrading the usually already poor image quality that comes out of most TV out ports. Benjamin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Video Card for TV and Video Card for traditional display | [email protected] | Nvidia Videocards | 2 | March 22nd 07 08:12 PM |
Xbox 360: how powerful the video hardware? What video card would it be comparable to? | Doug | Nvidia Videocards | 1 | June 24th 05 02:02 AM |
Is losing video signal resulting from an overheated video card? | [email protected] | Ati Videocards | 5 | March 20th 05 06:39 PM |
Is it worth paying a bit more for a 256 Meg video card than buy a 128Meg video card? | Brian | Ati Videocards | 4 | February 13th 04 09:12 AM |
Building a New System - Use Onboard Video or Existing GeForce3 Video Card? | Rick Cathey | Nvidia Videocards | 4 | July 22nd 03 08:14 PM |