If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HP notebook running slow
I have a HP NX6120 laptop.
When I opened the Help and Support Centre and looked at my System information, it reported that the processor was Centrino 1.73Ghz, and current speed 800Mhz. Is the "current speed 800Mhz" the reason why the notebook appears to be running slow now? I increased the RAM from 512M to 1.24G ( with matching ram chips)? Is there a BIOS setting that should be touched? I understand that it is quite risky doing that. Mohan -- Message posted via HWKB.com http://www.hwkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/...dware/200804/1 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
HP notebook running slow
bnmohan via HWKB.com wrote:
I have a HP NX6120 laptop. When I opened the Help and Support Centre and looked at my System information, it reported that the processor was Centrino 1.73Ghz, and current speed 800Mhz. Is the "current speed 800Mhz" the reason why the notebook appears to be running slow now? I increased the RAM from 512M to 1.24G ( with matching ram chips)? Is there a BIOS setting that should be touched? I understand that it is quite risky doing that. Mohan There is a review here. http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2483 Most notebook/laptop computers, will have power saving options. One of those options, is to drop the processor speed, when the computer is relatively idle. That is called SpeedStep or EIST by Intel (Powernow or Cool N' Quiet by AMD). That would account for the reported speed - that is one of the two speeds possible. Chipsets come with one or two memory channels. In the two memory channel case, an option called "dual channel" is possible. It allows enhanced memory bandwidth, by fetching from both channels at the same time. If the "dual channel" criterion are not met, the BIOS will set up the chipset for single channel operation. Either one channel or the other channel will be accessed, according to memory address presented. There will be a reduction in memory speed, when this mode is used. For dual channel operation, there are a couple possible criterion used. One is "exact matching". That was a requirement of earlier chipsets. The rows, columns, banks, and ranks of memory (logical dimensions) of each DIMM, had to match its partner. Later chipsets reduced the requirements, to having the same amount of memory present on each channel. On a desktop computer, with that relaxed requirement, you could put 2x512MB on one channel, and a single 1GB stick on the other channel (using three of four slots on a desktop). In the case of your computer, there are two slots. There is little difference between "exact match" and "same total memory" in your case. It is easiest to use the same memory for both the internal slot and the external slot. It sounds like the machine had 2x256MB matched to start with, you removed one and added a 1GB stick. This gives the 1.24GB figure, with the mismatched memory config of 256MB + 1GB. The machine will use single channel mode as a result of the upgrade. (Note - this assumes the manufacturer did not cheat, and simply stick both memories on the same channel, enforcing single channel operation at all times. If that were the case, it would not matter how the slots were populated. But I think this is a dual channel setup.) For a testing program, there is this. This is an ancient program, used by benchmarkers, and has been hand modified (assembler level instructions), in order to prevent cheating. Apparently, the original source is not available. http://www.xtremesystems.com/pi/super_pi_mod-1.5.zip http://www.xtremesystems.com/pi/ To benchmark, the dialog will present a "number of digits" to generate. For example, on my 3.1GHz P4, it takes 50 seconds to generate one million digits of the constant PI. (I used to get 45 seconds, but after my AV program was added, the time increased to 50 seconds.) The above review article (notebookreview.com), notes this benchmark for the program. HP nx6120 (1.73GHz Alviso Pentium M) 1m 50s (Calculate Pi to 2 Million Digits) You could start, by putting the original 2x256MB memory configuration back in the computer. Start SuperPI running, and verify the 1 minute 50 second result. That is verifying the thing works as well as the review article above. On a second run of SuperPI, in the middle of the calculation run, try to run the System Info tool. Now you should be seeing 1.73GHz or whatever displayed as the speed. Since the system should be running at 100% CPU during the SuperPI calculation interval, the Intel SpeedStep should have turned up the clock speed. Now, shut down the computer, and go to your mismatched memory configuration of 256MB plus 1GB sticks. Boot the computer and rerun SuperPI for 2 million digits. You should see a slight reduction in performance. Matching your memory, is the next logical step. As in, purchasing the same memory for both internal and external slots. The maintenance manual for the machine is here. It shows the location of the internal and external slots. Page 140 and 118 respectively. http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/su...reg_R1002_USEN Have fun, Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
HP notebook running slow
I looked at the BIOS, and found a setting for 'Fan always on on AC' set to
disabled. I enabled, and now I find the Current processor speed at 1.73!! SpeedStep is enabled. Thanks all Mohan Paul wrote: I have a HP NX6120 laptop. When I opened the Help and Support Centre and looked at my System information, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] Mohan There is a review here. http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2483 Most notebook/laptop computers, will have power saving options. One of those options, is to drop the processor speed, when the computer is relatively idle. That is called SpeedStep or EIST by Intel (Powernow or Cool N' Quiet by AMD). That would account for the reported speed - that is one of the two speeds possible. Chipsets come with one or two memory channels. In the two memory channel case, an option called "dual channel" is possible. It allows enhanced memory bandwidth, by fetching from both channels at the same time. If the "dual channel" criterion are not met, the BIOS will set up the chipset for single channel operation. Either one channel or the other channel will be accessed, according to memory address presented. There will be a reduction in memory speed, when this mode is used. For dual channel operation, there are a couple possible criterion used. One is "exact matching". That was a requirement of earlier chipsets. The rows, columns, banks, and ranks of memory (logical dimensions) of each DIMM, had to match its partner. Later chipsets reduced the requirements, to having the same amount of memory present on each channel. On a desktop computer, with that relaxed requirement, you could put 2x512MB on one channel, and a single 1GB stick on the other channel (using three of four slots on a desktop). In the case of your computer, there are two slots. There is little difference between "exact match" and "same total memory" in your case. It is easiest to use the same memory for both the internal slot and the external slot. It sounds like the machine had 2x256MB matched to start with, you removed one and added a 1GB stick. This gives the 1.24GB figure, with the mismatched memory config of 256MB + 1GB. The machine will use single channel mode as a result of the upgrade. (Note - this assumes the manufacturer did not cheat, and simply stick both memories on the same channel, enforcing single channel operation at all times. If that were the case, it would not matter how the slots were populated. But I think this is a dual channel setup.) For a testing program, there is this. This is an ancient program, used by benchmarkers, and has been hand modified (assembler level instructions), in order to prevent cheating. Apparently, the original source is not available. http://www.xtremesystems.com/pi/super_pi_mod-1.5.zip http://www.xtremesystems.com/pi/ To benchmark, the dialog will present a "number of digits" to generate. For example, on my 3.1GHz P4, it takes 50 seconds to generate one million digits of the constant PI. (I used to get 45 seconds, but after my AV program was added, the time increased to 50 seconds.) The above review article (notebookreview.com), notes this benchmark for the program. HP nx6120 (1.73GHz Alviso Pentium M) 1m 50s (Calculate Pi to 2 Million Digits) You could start, by putting the original 2x256MB memory configuration back in the computer. Start SuperPI running, and verify the 1 minute 50 second result. That is verifying the thing works as well as the review article above. On a second run of SuperPI, in the middle of the calculation run, try to run the System Info tool. Now you should be seeing 1.73GHz or whatever displayed as the speed. Since the system should be running at 100% CPU during the SuperPI calculation interval, the Intel SpeedStep should have turned up the clock speed. Now, shut down the computer, and go to your mismatched memory configuration of 256MB plus 1GB sticks. Boot the computer and rerun SuperPI for 2 million digits. You should see a slight reduction in performance. Matching your memory, is the next logical step. As in, purchasing the same memory for both internal and external slots. The maintenance manual for the machine is here. It shows the location of the internal and external slots. Page 140 and 118 respectively. http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/su...reg_R1002_USEN Have fun, Paul -- Message posted via HWKB.com http://www.hwkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/...dware/200804/1 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
HP notebook running slow
bnmohan via HWKB.com wrote:
I looked at the BIOS, and found a setting for 'Fan always on on AC' set to disabled. I enabled, and now I find the Current processor speed at 1.73!! SpeedStep is enabled. Thanks all Mohan So maybe it was overheating, and decided to use the lower clock value so it could cool off. Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
HP notebook running slow
Yes.
Now I have to see if the machine is faster. Unfortunately, I have not benchmarked the slower performance. Thanks everyone agan. Mohan Paul wrote: I looked at the BIOS, and found a setting for 'Fan always on on AC' set to disabled. I enabled, and now I find the Current processor speed at 1.73!! [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] Mohan So maybe it was overheating, and decided to use the lower clock value so it could cool off. Paul -- Message posted via HWKB.com http://www.hwkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/...dware/200804/1 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
HP notebook running slow
"bnmohan via HWKB.com" wrote:
I looked at the BIOS, and found a setting for 'Fan always on on AC' set to disabled. I enabled, and now I find the Current processor speed at 1.73!! SpeedStep is enabled. Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all irrelevant material. See the following links: -- http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ (taming google) http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/ (newusers) ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
HP notebook running slow
On My Dell Dimension E-520 Core-2-duo E4300 with 3 GB ram, AVG full running,
it generated 1M pi digits in 31.953 secs. Now I have to have a go at the notebook Thanks Mohan Paul wrote: I have a HP NX6120 laptop. When I opened the Help and Support Centre and looked at my System information, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] Mohan There is a review here. http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2483 Most notebook/laptop computers, will have power saving options. One of those options, is to drop the processor speed, when the computer is relatively idle. That is called SpeedStep or EIST by Intel (Powernow or Cool N' Quiet by AMD). That would account for the reported speed - that is one of the two speeds possible. Chipsets come with one or two memory channels. In the two memory channel case, an option called "dual channel" is possible. It allows enhanced memory bandwidth, by fetching from both channels at the same time. If the "dual channel" criterion are not met, the BIOS will set up the chipset for single channel operation. Either one channel or the other channel will be accessed, according to memory address presented. There will be a reduction in memory speed, when this mode is used. For dual channel operation, there are a couple possible criterion used. One is "exact matching". That was a requirement of earlier chipsets. The rows, columns, banks, and ranks of memory (logical dimensions) of each DIMM, had to match its partner. Later chipsets reduced the requirements, to having the same amount of memory present on each channel. On a desktop computer, with that relaxed requirement, you could put 2x512MB on one channel, and a single 1GB stick on the other channel (using three of four slots on a desktop). In the case of your computer, there are two slots. There is little difference between "exact match" and "same total memory" in your case. It is easiest to use the same memory for both the internal slot and the external slot. It sounds like the machine had 2x256MB matched to start with, you removed one and added a 1GB stick. This gives the 1.24GB figure, with the mismatched memory config of 256MB + 1GB. The machine will use single channel mode as a result of the upgrade. (Note - this assumes the manufacturer did not cheat, and simply stick both memories on the same channel, enforcing single channel operation at all times. If that were the case, it would not matter how the slots were populated. But I think this is a dual channel setup.) For a testing program, there is this. This is an ancient program, used by benchmarkers, and has been hand modified (assembler level instructions), in order to prevent cheating. Apparently, the original source is not available. http://www.xtremesystems.com/pi/super_pi_mod-1.5.zip http://www.xtremesystems.com/pi/ To benchmark, the dialog will present a "number of digits" to generate. For example, on my 3.1GHz P4, it takes 50 seconds to generate one million digits of the constant PI. (I used to get 45 seconds, but after my AV program was added, the time increased to 50 seconds.) The above review article (notebookreview.com), notes this benchmark for the program. HP nx6120 (1.73GHz Alviso Pentium M) 1m 50s (Calculate Pi to 2 Million Digits) You could start, by putting the original 2x256MB memory configuration back in the computer. Start SuperPI running, and verify the 1 minute 50 second result. That is verifying the thing works as well as the review article above. On a second run of SuperPI, in the middle of the calculation run, try to run the System Info tool. Now you should be seeing 1.73GHz or whatever displayed as the speed. Since the system should be running at 100% CPU during the SuperPI calculation interval, the Intel SpeedStep should have turned up the clock speed. Now, shut down the computer, and go to your mismatched memory configuration of 256MB plus 1GB sticks. Boot the computer and rerun SuperPI for 2 million digits. You should see a slight reduction in performance. Matching your memory, is the next logical step. As in, purchasing the same memory for both internal and external slots. The maintenance manual for the machine is here. It shows the location of the internal and external slots. Page 140 and 118 respectively. http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/su...reg_R1002_USEN Have fun, Paul -- Message posted via HWKB.com http://www.hwkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/...dware/200804/1 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
HP notebook running slow
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:39:00 GMT, "bnmohan via HWKB.com"
u35859@uwe wrote: Yes. Now I have to see if the machine is faster. Unfortunately, I have not benchmarked the slower performance. No need to benchmark, it's unquestionably faster if it were staying at the lower speed previously. Only remaining factor is whether the low processor speed was what bottlenecked the use in which you perceived the slowness, other things like a slow notebook hard drive, malwave, filesystem fragmentation, can also seem more impactful on a laptop which inherantly has a disk subsystem handicap compared to a desktop. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
HP notebook running slow
kony wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:39:00 GMT, "bnmohan via HWKB.com" u35859@uwe wrote: Yes. Now I have to see if the machine is faster. Unfortunately, I have not benchmarked the slower performance. No need to benchmark, it's unquestionably faster if it were staying at the lower speed previously. Only remaining factor is whether the low processor speed was what bottlenecked the use in which you perceived the slowness, other things like a slow notebook hard drive, malwave, filesystem fragmentation, can also seem more impactful on a laptop which inherantly has a disk subsystem handicap compared to a desktop. He can compare the 2x256MB configuration, to the 256MB + 1GB configuration. The first may be a dual channel configuration, the second a virtual single channel config. If there is no significant difference, then nothing more need be done. If the 1.25GB configuration is slower, then purchasing a matched 2x1GB configuration is a possible solution. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A8N-E running slow | John | Asus Motherboards | 7 | September 8th 05 11:29 AM |
A8N-E running slow | John | Asus Motherboards | 0 | September 6th 05 09:17 PM |
ISDN USB modem on notebook only works when running on battery | Peter Theill | General Hardware | 0 | September 16th 04 08:27 AM |
Slow Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz notebook ! | Pand | General Hardware | 5 | May 24th 04 03:28 AM |
CPU running 1 Ghz too slow!! HELP PLEASE! | JBFire | General Hardware | 2 | February 3rd 04 12:35 AM |