If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Intermittent use - Epson 2100P/2200?
I'm considering buying the Epson 2100P [UK] which I understand is
equivalent to the US 2200 - an A3 inkjet - to use in my photography practice. In addition, the Permajet ink system - for this printer, under reformulation just now - looks appealing. But I've read that the Epson printheads are prone to clogging, and I wondered if anyone knew how it might stand up to intermittent use; that is, if I don't use it for a week or more, would I be faced with having to flush/clean the heads? TIA Gill |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I have had the 2100 for a few months now and have not yet needed to clean
the print heads. "SmileyFace" wrote in message ... I'm considering buying the Epson 2100P [UK] which I understand is equivalent to the US 2200 - an A3 inkjet - to use in my photography practice. In addition, the Permajet ink system - for this printer, under reformulation just now - looks appealing. But I've read that the Epson printheads are prone to clogging, and I wondered if anyone knew how it might stand up to intermittent use; that is, if I don't use it for a week or more, would I be faced with having to flush/clean the heads? TIA Gill |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I have had my Epson printers sit several months and print beautifully when I
went to use them. If you follow the manu. instructions and turn off with the power button, make sure the thickness lever is in the normal position. you shouldn't have any problems. Also if you don't plan on printing during the day don't turn the printer on. Turning the printer on uncaps the heads allowing for air to dry out the heads. Turn it on when you are ready to print and you won't have any problems. I have never had any clogs that one or two cleaning cycles wouldn't fix. "SmileyFace" wrote in message ... "SmileyFace" wrote in message ... I'm considering buying the Epson 2100P [snip] I wondered if anyone knew how it might stand up to intermittent use; that is, if I don't use it for a week or more, would I be faced with having to flush/clean the heads? In , Richard Stephenson typed: I have had the 2100 for a few months now and have not yet needed to clean the print heads. Thanks, Richard. I've often read that Epson printheads are tricky. Do you use it much? TIA Gill |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"SmileyFace" wrote in message
... "SmileyFace" wrote in message ... I'm considering buying the Epson 2100P [snip] I wondered if anyone knew how it might stand up to intermittent use Do you use it much? In , Safetymom123 typed: I have had my Epson printers sit several months and print beautifully when I went to use them. If you follow the manu. instructions and turn off with the power button, make sure the thickness lever is in the normal position. you shouldn't have any problems. Also if you don't plan on printing during the day don't turn the printer on. Turning the printer on uncaps the heads allowing for air to dry out the heads. Turn it on when you are ready to print and you won't have any problems. I have never had any clogs that one or two cleaning cycles wouldn't fix. Thanks for the advice! I think I've made my mind up now. I'll buy one! Cheers, Gill |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
One last recommendation....
I've been using TDK paper in my Epson 2100 with good results. The one I use is "TDK Pro Quality 270g Photo Glossy Paper". They also make a lighter weight version and a heavier "Reference Grade" but the 270g is the one I recommend. Colin "SmileyFace" wrote in message ... Thanks for the advice! I think I've made my mind up now. I'll buy one! Cheers, Gill |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
SmileyFace wrote:
I'm considering buying the Epson 2100P [UK] which I understand is equivalent to the US 2200 - an A3 inkjet - to use in my photography practice. In addition, the Permajet ink system - for this printer, under reformulation just now - looks appealing. But I've read that the Epson printheads are prone to clogging, and I wondered if anyone knew how it might stand up to intermittent use; that is, if I don't use it for a week or more, would I be faced with having to flush/clean the heads? TIA Gill I've had one for a few months and never had to clean the jets even when I haven't used it for a few days. If I know I have a lot of work for it I leave it switched on all the time. I installed the Lyson continuous ink system on it last week and the prints are even better. I'm currently using Ferrania Opti-Jet professional glossy paper with it. Emyr |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In , CWatters
typed: One last recommendation.... I've been using TDK paper in my Epson 2100 with good results. The one I use is "TDK Pro Quality 270g Photo Glossy Paper". They also make a lighter weight version and a heavier "Reference Grade" but the 270g is the one I recommend. Thanks a lot, Colin! That's the missing piece of the puzzle. I'm not fond of lightweight papers myself, so your advice is welcome. Cheers, Gill off in search of paper now ) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
SmileyFace wrote:
I've read about Lyson inks before - they're highly recommended in monochrome circles - but the price is frightening. I'll think about that for a while before jumping in. But not as frightening as the cost of the Epson inks! It seems a lot to fork out when you've just bought the printer but the cost of the Epson inks soon adds up. Apparently the Epson inks work out at about £1000 per litre while the Lyson inks are only about £70. Incidentally I made a note of the quantity of each different ink I used (sad isn't it) but it might be of use to you when ordering - Photo Black (9), Light Black (11), Cyan (4), Light cyan (15), Magenta (7), Light Magenta (22), Yellow (13). Emyr |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
But not as frightening as the cost of the Epson inks!
It seems a lot to fork out when you've just bought the printer but the cost of the Epson inks soon adds up. Apparently the Epson inks work out at about £1000 per litre while the Lyson inks are only about £70. Incidentally I made a note of the quantity of each different ink I used (sad isn't it) but it might be of use to you when ordering - Photo Black (9), Light Black (11), Cyan (4), Light cyan (15), Magenta (7), Light Magenta (22), Yellow (13). Emyr Very good point. At about $10 US each, your ink costs a (drum roll please) $810 US, more than the cost of the printer. The real game being played here is in the light inks, especially the m and c, and to a lesser extent, the black. Those c and m alone cost you about $370 US. Now, in fairness, you would have needed to buy some C and M to replace them, perhaps 25% (or less) as many, or about $90 worth, for a savings of $280. There is "some" justification for a light black ink, especially when making B&W prints. But the light color load c and m are, IMHO, a scam of mass proportions. Not only is the printer profile designed to burn through them, but with today's dot size, they are totally unnecessary to produce photographic quality images. Simply put, the light color load inks could easily be made up for by using a small dot, or series of dots, and allowing the paper to show through. That is how all offset printing is done, and has been forever. With 2 picolitre or smaller dots, no one can see the difference at viewing distance, and in fact, you need a loupe to see it even close up. I use NO 6 or seven color printers, and I have never had anyone imply my images are not photographic quality in nature. In fact, I had a six color rendition done of some work that I had done in 4 color, and the four color actually looked better to me. These ink companies are selling you water, some glycol and maybe some resin for massive amounts of money. The dyes or pigments are the most expensive component in inks. They have to be color accurate and have fade resistance qualities. If the extra colors were really that important to the end result, the printers could be designed with chambers to mix those light color loaded inks, using a cheap "medium" fluid held in storage, and a mixture made for the heavy color load cartridges. After all these inkjets use incredibly precise measuring methods to print with... it would be easy to make a two chambered "cartridge" which would automatically replenish a mixture of the carrier fluid and dye or pigment from the main color load cartridge. But that would cut heavily into ink sales. Also, in terms of dyes, the light dye load inks are more vulnerable to fading because the surface dye on the paper helps to protect the dye underneath from fading. The darker the dye on top, the less it fades. A smaller dot of full dye load is more stable from light than a larger dot of very dilute dye. With the improved size of the heads (number of nozzles) and variable dot technology, and the faster computers and processors within the printers, there is really no need for the c and m low color load inks. We are being scammed. Further, these waste additional ink if you do not refill (and even if you do). As noted in the numbers, the low color load inks run out first. In unified cartridges, this means either tossing the cartridge with leftover ink in the other chambers, or refilling and going through extra purge cycles which wastes inks and build up the protection numbers toward a waste ink pad replacement. With the separate cartridges, things are not much better, since each time you run out of any color ALL the cartridges are purged during the replacement of the one cartridge, dumping six or seven times the amount of ink down the drain as needed. This is NO accident. Epson designed this "feature" into the machine. The same thing happens with a change of Photo to Matte or vice versa in the black ink. In fact, with the professional 7600 and 9600 models, changing the black ink from matte to photo or vice versa flushes nearly 220 ml of ink out of the system (all colors) or OVER $100 US of ink, each time. Also, after doing this a couple of times you need to replace the waste ink receptor, another $40 cost. When I warn people that Epson (and others) design their printers with ink wastage in mind, because they make their money on ink and other consumables, it is not just some fantasy. Remember when the ink cleaning cycles were separate for black and colored inks? They got rid of that also, because now each cleaning or purging cycle uses ink from each cartridge or chamber. Had Epson used a separate black pump and cleaning station in the 7600, for instance, the ink waste on switching between matte and photo inks would have been reduced to 1/6th the amount. Yes, it also cuts cost to the cost of the printer. One less pump mechanism, a unified cleaning station, one less button on the front of the panel. But considering even their cheap letter sized printers had two systems until fairly recently, and considering that the black ink system tends to need special care because any clog shows up clearly, and the black inks are not exchangeable between two types, it would have been economically sound to have a second pump in the design. By far, the cheapest Epson printers to run, have no chip in the cartridge, use only four colors, and have separate black and colored ink cleaning stations. The 900 and 980 in letter size were by far the best going, with their variable dot. They were also ruggedly made, and many are still in use (they also had relatively large cartridges). To even make it cheaper, buy generic inks or ink cartridges, refill, or use a ink system which uses bulk bottles. (Can't do a lot of this with the 2200, and that also, is not by accident). Art Emyr Rhys Williams wrote: SmileyFace wrote: I've read about Lyson inks before - they're highly recommended in monochrome circles - but the price is frightening. I'll think about that for a while before jumping in. But not as frightening as the cost of the Epson inks! It seems a lot to fork out when you've just bought the printer but the cost of the Epson inks soon adds up. Apparently the Epson inks work out at about £1000 per litre while the Lyson inks are only about £70. Incidentally I made a note of the quantity of each different ink I used (sad isn't it) but it might be of use to you when ordering - Photo Black (9), Light Black (11), Cyan (4), Light cyan (15), Magenta (7), Light Magenta (22), Yellow (13). Emyr |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"SmileyFace" wrote in message ... Thanks a lot, Colin! That's the missing piece of the puzzle. I'm not fond of lightweight papers myself, so your advice is welcome. No problem. If you find any other makes that work and are heavier than 270g let me know! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Epson Scan Fails to Load for Perfection 3170 | dc | Scanners | 6 | March 30th 05 03:36 PM |
How do I get an Epson GT-7000 Photo to run Windows XP? | Frode Igland | Scanners | 1 | February 16th 04 01:20 PM |
Help with Epson 3200, Please! | Anonymous | Scanners | 2 | October 15th 03 01:54 AM |
Having driver problems getting my new Epson 3170 Photo image scanner to install | Idris Alooma | Scanners | 5 | September 26th 03 06:55 PM |
Epson Stylus C62 - Poor print quality. Epson Refusing Upgrade. | eric | Printers | 6 | August 1st 03 12:04 AM |