A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage & Hardrives
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Connecting Silkworm 3850 to 4100 (Cascade)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 17th 06, 12:21 AM posted to comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Connecting Silkworm 3850 to 4100 (Cascade)

I will be attempting (for the first time) to connect a new 4100 to an
existing 3850 to extend the fabric. My understanding is that the
switches will recognize each other and configure the ports they are
connected on as E type automatically, forming an ISL. Are there any
gotchas I should be aware of? I have tried to find a step-by-step
guide but have been unsucessful.

Thanks in advance for any assistance.

Steve

  #2  
Old January 17th 06, 01:21 AM posted to comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Connecting Silkworm 3850 to 4100 (Cascade)

On 16 Jan 2006 16:21:09 -0800, "SteveRoss" wrote:

I will be attempting (for the first time) to connect a new 4100 to an
existing 3850 to extend the fabric. My understanding is that the
switches will recognize each other and configure the ports they are
connected on as E type automatically, forming an ISL. Are there any
gotchas I should be aware of? I have tried to find a step-by-step
guide but have been unsucessful.

Thanks in advance for any assistance.

Steve



I have very little experience with Brocade but the most obvious thing
to me would be to bring the switch up standalone (not fabric attached)
and verify it's running the same version of OS and firmware.

~F
  #5  
Old January 18th 06, 10:33 AM posted to comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Connecting Silkworm 3850 to 4100 (Cascade)

DD wrote:


"SteveRoss" a icrit dans le message de news:
...
I will be attempting (for the first time) to connect a new 4100 to
an existing 3850 to extend the fabric. My understanding is that the
switches will recognize each other and configure the ports they are
connected on as E type automatically, forming an ISL. Are there any
gotchas I should be aware of? I have tried to find a step-by-step
guide but have been unsucessful.

Thanks in advance for any assistance.

Steve


i already have problems interconnecting two brocade switches.
the soluce was in the "core PID switch format" parameter, was set to
0 on older switch and 1 on the newer one.
setting 1 on both side solved the problem.
to change this parameter = switchdisable / configure / fabric
parameters

take care about domain ID too, must be different.

good luck.

DD


When you interconnect Brocade switches the most important things to
consider a

1) Fabric O/S versions: check the support "matrix" which fabric os
version can talk to which one reliably

2) Core/PID: If any of your switches is running the core pid value set
to zero, you are advised to harmonise all of them to one. BE AWARE of
the fact that depending on the operating system that you are using it
can be that by changing the port id setting the LUNs will re-appear
with different names (most notably HPUX and AIX do port based mapping
and thus changing the corepid will affect the hard device list and make
them appear as different devices)

3) Ensure that the new switch to be used does not have any zone
settings inside it. The zone settings will be propagated across the
switches.

4) In any case of problems, the switches will appear as fragmented
fabrics, luckily not interfering with the existing switch.

Good Luck,
DL

--

  #6  
Old January 18th 06, 04:20 PM posted to comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Connecting Silkworm 3850 to 4100 (Cascade)

Thanks for the reply.

  #7  
Old January 18th 06, 04:20 PM posted to comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Connecting Silkworm 3850 to 4100 (Cascade)

Thanks for this information.

  #8  
Old January 18th 06, 05:01 PM posted to comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Connecting Silkworm 3850 to 4100 (Cascade)

Very good information. Thanks for taking the time to reply. Others
have mentioned domain ID considerations as well. What are your
thoughts about that?

Thanks,
Steve

  #9  
Old January 20th 06, 05:12 AM posted to comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Connecting Silkworm 3850 to 4100 (Cascade)

Thanks again.

  #10  
Old January 21st 06, 08:21 AM posted to comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Connecting Silkworm 3850 to 4100 (Cascade)

as long as the new switch you are plugging in has no conflicting zones
with the old - you will be good.

On 16 Jan 2006 16:21:09 -0800, "SteveRoss" wrote:

I will be attempting (for the first time) to connect a new 4100 to an
existing 3850 to extend the fabric. My understanding is that the
switches will recognize each other and configure the ports they are
connected on as E type automatically, forming an ISL. Are there any
gotchas I should be aware of? I have tried to find a step-by-step
guide but have been unsucessful.

Thanks in advance for any assistance.

Steve

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
XPS R400 and 4100 motherboard...possible? Christopher Muto Dell Computers 0 October 26th 03 12:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.