If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150:
http://www.amazon.com/Intel-2-5-Inch...dp/B00DTPYT78/ Amazing value! Lynn |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150
Lynn McGuire wrote:
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150: http://www.amazon.com/Intel-2-5-Inch...dp/B00DTPYT78/ If you click on the "Drive Only" link to see their OEM offer, you see it at their old price. The reseller kit model is cheaper, for now, and comes with more stuff in the box. To see what are the differences in what comes in the OEM, reseller kit, and retail boxes, watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAfoSVZEn9Q |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150
On 3/27/2014 12:35 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150: http://www.amazon.com/Intel-2-5-Inch...dp/B00DTPYT78/ Amazing value! Lynn And now they are $140. Amazing. Lynn |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150
On 4/19/2014 12:07 PM PT, Lynn McGuire typed:
On 3/27/2014 12:35 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150: http://www.amazon.com/Intel-2-5-Inch...dp/B00DTPYT78/ Amazing value! Lynn And now they are $140. Amazing. Still too small for that price. I will still use HDD for huge storages. :P -- "Jesus lives!" /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150
On 4/19/2014 2:11 PM, Ant wrote:
On 4/19/2014 12:07 PM PT, Lynn McGuire typed: On 3/27/2014 12:35 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150: http://www.amazon.com/Intel-2-5-Inch...dp/B00DTPYT78/ Amazing value! Lynn And now they are $140. Amazing. Still too small for that price. I will still use HDD for huge storages. :P 240 GB is an excellent size for a boot drive. The speed of the O/S is amazing when running off a SSD drive. And then you can put a 4 TB drive in as a data drive. Lynn |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150
On 04/19/2014 03:15 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
On 4/19/2014 2:11 PM, Ant wrote: On 4/19/2014 12:07 PM PT, Lynn McGuire typed: On 3/27/2014 12:35 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150: http://www.amazon.com/Intel-2-5-Inch...dp/B00DTPYT78/ Amazing value! Lynn And now they are $140. Amazing. Still too small for that price. I will still use HDD for huge storages. :P 240 GB is an excellent size for a boot drive. The speed of the O/S is amazing when running off a SSD drive. And then you can put a 4 TB drive in as a data drive. Lynn For my money, 120 GB at slightly more than half the price is a better choice for a boot drive. Another even better alternative is mirrored 120 GB drives for just a tad more than the 240. Actually, I think 60 GB should be plenty for a boot drive, but the 120's don't cost much more because of their popularity. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150
"cjt" wrote in message ... On 04/19/2014 03:15 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: On 4/19/2014 2:11 PM, Ant wrote: On 4/19/2014 12:07 PM PT, Lynn McGuire typed: On 3/27/2014 12:35 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150: http://www.amazon.com/Intel-2-5-Inch...dp/B00DTPYT78/ Amazing value! Lynn And now they are $140. Amazing. Still too small for that price. I will still use HDD for huge storages. :P 240 GB is an excellent size for a boot drive. The speed of the O/S is amazing when running off a SSD drive. And then you can put a 4 TB drive in as a data drive. Lynn For my money, 120 GB at slightly more than half the price is a better choice for a boot drive. Another even better alternative is mirrored 120 GB drives for just a tad more than the 240. Actually, I think 60 GB should be plenty for a boot drive, Not for me. Even 100GB is too small. but the 120's don't cost much more because of their popularity. Still too small IMO. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:50:59 -0500, cjt wrote:
On 04/19/2014 03:15 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: On 4/19/2014 2:11 PM, Ant wrote: On 4/19/2014 12:07 PM PT, Lynn McGuire typed: On 3/27/2014 12:35 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150: http://www.amazon.com/Intel-2-5-Inch...dp/B00DTPYT78/ Amazing value! Lynn And now they are $140. Amazing. Still too small for that price. I will still use HDD for huge storages. :P 240 GB is an excellent size for a boot drive. The speed of the O/S is amazing when running off a SSD drive. And then you can put a 4 TB drive in as a data drive. Lynn For my money, 120 GB at slightly more than half the price is a better choice for a boot drive. Another even better alternative is mirrored 120 GB drives for just a tad more than the 240. Actually, I think 60 GB should be plenty for a boot drive, but the 120's For Windows versions that require the hibernation file to be in the system partition, how do you hibernate a 32GB system? Also, some consumer SSDs like being only 1/2 or 1/3 full, depending on how many bits per cell, so you only want to use 1/2 or 1/3 of the SSD anyhow. don't cost much more because of their popularity. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150
On 04/19/2014 08:56 PM, Mark F wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:50:59 -0500, cjt wrote: On 04/19/2014 03:15 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: On 4/19/2014 2:11 PM, Ant wrote: On 4/19/2014 12:07 PM PT, Lynn McGuire typed: On 3/27/2014 12:35 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote: Intel 240 GB SSD drives are now $150: http://www.amazon.com/Intel-2-5-Inch...dp/B00DTPYT78/ Amazing value! Lynn And now they are $140. Amazing. Still too small for that price. I will still use HDD for huge storages. :P 240 GB is an excellent size for a boot drive. The speed of the O/S is amazing when running off a SSD drive. And then you can put a 4 TB drive in as a data drive. Lynn For my money, 120 GB at slightly more than half the price is a better choice for a boot drive. Another even better alternative is mirrored 120 GB drives for just a tad more than the 240. Actually, I think 60 GB should be plenty for a boot drive, but the 120's For Windows versions that require the hibernation file to be in the system partition, how do you hibernate a 32GB system? I try to avoid Windows, but that said, surely even Windows doesn't need to save every bit of RAM in order to hibernate. Spent buffers, etc., can be discarded. Also, some consumer SSDs like being only 1/2 or 1/3 full, depending on how many bits per cell, so you only want to use 1/2 or 1/3 of the SSD anyhow. I try to avoid SSDs with serious performance issues to the extent possible; life is too short. And as I said, I generally opt for the 120GB drives, anyway, because the incremental cost tends to be low. So I don't recall ever encountering the issue. I consider boot drives to be expendable, with important stuff belonging on file servers, except sometimes while actually being worked on (for reasons of computational efficiency). One tries to keep expendables cheap; hence, I try not to dramatically oversize boot drives. The way I work (typically with video), I might pull down a half dozen GB to a workstation (that takes what? a minute or two?), work on it for a while (perhaps an hour) and then put it back on the server. Smaller tasks can work directly off of files that stay on the server, with only buffer files being on the local machine. The SSDs that matter in my scenario are the log files on the server, and those aren't all that large. They're fairly small, very fast, and mirrored. They, too, are expendable (as long as not all the mirrors die at once!). So I guess the bottom line is that it depends on the kind of work you do. If for some reason you need to carry everything with you, the balance might be different. But even then, I would have a small SSD as "boot drive" and a large(-ish), preferably redundant, hard disk for data. JMHO, YMMV don't cost much more because of their popularity. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intel 865Perl - More than 2 SATA drives | William G. Anderson | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | December 26th 04 06:03 PM |
problem using 2 serial ata drives on intel mobo | Lee Benningfield | Storage (alternative) | 0 | April 30th 04 05:25 PM |
Hard drives and Intel D875PBZ | Aloke Prasad | Intel | 2 | September 1st 03 04:21 AM |
Hard drives and Intel D875PBZ | Aloke Prasad | Storage (alternative) | 0 | September 1st 03 03:36 AM |
DMA for ATAPI drives on an Intel 440BX | Gary L. | General | 1 | July 10th 03 07:59 PM |