If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Using Veritas Foundation Suite to stripe a H/W striped Raid set
We have a SUN cluster which is SAN connected to two Sun 3510FC storage
arrays. The disks are physically striped and mirrored at the hardware level in the arrays, however when the Volumes were created using Veritas Foundation Suite they were concatenated as opposed to striped. In reading some other vendors documentation for connecting to their storage and using their LVM software, they recommend striping the Logical Volumes at the software level even when the disks LUN's are already striped. We've done this and have noticed significant performance gains. Does this make sense and can someone provide me with either Veritas or SUN documentation which supports this. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Using Veritas Foundation Suite to stripe a H/W striped Raid set
apples wrote:
We have a SUN cluster which is SAN connected to two Sun 3510FC storage arrays. The disks are physically striped and mirrored at the hardware level in the arrays, however when the Volumes were created using Veritas Foundation Suite they were concatenated as opposed to striped. In reading some other vendors documentation for connecting to their storage and using their LVM software, they recommend striping the Logical Volumes at the software level even when the disks LUN's are already striped. We've done this and have noticed significant performance gains. Does this make sense Yes: instead of distributing your accesses across only half your disks, you're distributing them over all of them. If they're large, streaming accesses (involving presumably logically contiguous files), you're getting the combined bandwidth of both arrays rather than that of just one; if they're small, random accesses, then if there's any significant locality (e.g., not much of your second array was actually populated with data in the concatenated configuration), you're getting the combined IOPS of both arrays rather than that of just one. and can someone provide me with either Veritas or SUN documentation which supports this. Not me - that's why I left this for a while for someone else to answer. - bill |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Changing Harddrives whilst PC includes a RAID Array | D | Storage (alternative) | 10 | November 24th 05 11:05 PM |
A7N8X series "incomplete RAID set" bug - my experiences and solution | Andy C | Asus Motherboards | 0 | July 19th 05 03:06 AM |
Asus A8N-SLI Delux + Silcon Sil3114 Raid Controller | Leif Nordmand Andersen | Asus Motherboards | 21 | July 11th 05 05:41 PM |
Gigabyte GA-8KNXP and Promise SX4000 RAID Controller | Old Dude | Gigabyte Motherboards | 4 | November 12th 03 07:26 PM |
RAID-1 reliability | marcodeo | Storage (alternative) | 26 | August 30th 03 09:53 PM |