If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Long term data storage options?
Hello,
Is there a storage medium available to store data beyond 50 years? I understand that Magnetic Optical Drives can preserve data on a single disk for a period (in theory) exceeding over 40 years. With the longevity of some storage mediums approaching 350,000 hours, I believe extending beyond 500,000 hours would be ideal for long-term archival projects spanning several decades. My question focuses on the theoretical longevity of past and present computer storage mediums (including): * - Cassettes * - 5.25" diskettes (e.g. from the days of the Commodore 64, Apple, etc.) * - 3.5" diskettes * - Zip disks * - CD-R/CD-RW * - DVD-R/DVD-RW * - Magnetic Optical disks * - Tape drive stored mediums As a point of reference, I do have old diskettes from the Commodore 64 written to in 1984 which still function flawlessly. But I have also experienced data loss on the more modern 3.5" disks after only a few years -- is this just bad luck, using different drives, or care issues of the disk itself (I take excellent care of all my 3.5" disks)? Sincerely, Paul Panks -- SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Paul Allen Panks writes:
Is there a storage medium available to store data beyond 50 years? I understand that Magnetic Optical Drives can preserve data on a single disk for a period (in theory) exceeding over 40 years. http://www.rosettaproject.org/live/disk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Paul Allen Panks wrote: Hello, Is there a storage medium available to store data beyond 50 years? I understand that Magnetic Optical Drives can preserve data on a single disk for a period (in theory) exceeding over 40 years. With the longevity of some storage mediums approaching 350,000 hours, I believe extending beyond 500,000 hours would be ideal for long-term archival projects spanning several decades. My question focuses on the theoretical longevity of past and present computer storage mediums (including): * - Cassettes * - 5.25" diskettes (e.g. from the days of the Commodore 64, Apple, etc.) * - 3.5" diskettes * - Zip disks * - CD-R/CD-RW * - DVD-R/DVD-RW * - Magnetic Optical disks * - Tape drive stored mediums As a point of reference, I do have old diskettes from the Commodore 64 written to in 1984 which still function flawlessly. But I have also experienced data loss on the more modern 3.5" disks after only a few years -- is this just bad luck, using different drives, or care issues of the disk itself (I take excellent care of all my 3.5" disks)? Sincerely, Paul Panks -- SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org The last time I was involved, MO disks were the standard for long-term data storage in the finance world. Here's a recent National Institute of Standards & Technology document that I haven't had time to read yet, but a quick scan indicates that under best cases some CD media can last 100 years or more. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div895/caref...evity.html#4_1 I'm willing to bet that 100 years from now I will be able to read CDs, or pay someone a reasonable amount to convert them to current media. For backup of business data and applications the problem gets much more complex than just being able to read the bytes. -- Al Dykes ----------- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Al Dykes" wrote in message
... The last time I was involved, MO disks were the standard for long-term data storage in the finance world. Here's a recent National Institute of Standards & Technology document that I haven't had time to read yet, but a quick scan indicates that under best cases some CD media can last 100 years or more. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div895/caref...evity.html#4_1 I'm willing to bet that 100 years from now I will be able to read CDs, or pay someone a reasonable amount to convert them to current media. For backup of business data and applications the problem gets much more complex than just being able to read the bytes. -- Al Dykes ----------- I'm willing to bet that 10 years from now you'll have problems reading more than half of your home-burn CDs. The media that you and I buy today is not stable enough to last a long time and degrades at an alarming rate. The 100 year mark is valid only for pressed CDs, a technique that becomes really expensive when you have to create a master for each CD-ROM you want to generate. Any archiving project at this time, regardless if it's disk, tape or optical based, should include a well defined migration path to 'the next thing' every 5-10 years. That's the time span in which either the media, the hardware, the format or the capacity becomes obsolete. Rob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sata and Data Corruption | Robert Neville | General | 7 | April 25th 04 11:02 AM |
Happy Birthday America | SST | Overclocking | 333 | November 27th 03 07:54 PM |
Get the Serial Number with Visual Basic | Michael Wittmann | General | 15 | November 15th 03 06:03 PM |
help with motherboard choice | S.Boardman | General | 30 | October 20th 03 10:23 PM |
Running 230V fans at 115V, any long term problems? | Ken Maltby | Overclocking | 9 | October 8th 03 03:10 AM |