If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AM2 vs. Socket 939
Have been taking a look at the AM2 processors. What's the big deal? Is there a major performance jump for AM2 chips? Clock speeds are roughly the same. Architecture isn't that much different. DDR2 is no advantage, is it? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
AM2 vs. Socket 939
From what I can tell it was AMD's way of say we have new chips too - pay no
attention to the man behind the curtain. AMD makes great chips but they haven't developed anything lately so they had to have you pay attention to the hand shaking the shiny keys so you wouldn't notice what the other camp was doing. I can't say that either company has a significantly better chip. AMD currently has the better chip in my opinion. Intel may have the better chip with the Core 2 - only time will tell. I think AMD is going to have to do some major work to impress me at this point though. They've been "tweaking" their chips for the past 1 1/2 years, in my opinion not evolving them. I don't consider the AM2 evolution but more of a tweak. Hopefully the new core2 will prompt AMD to drop prices again and make some significant improvements to their chips. Maybe both companies have hit a ceiling but I doubt it. Just my thoughts. "Merrill P. L. Worthington" wrote in message ... Have been taking a look at the AM2 processors. What's the big deal? Is there a major performance jump for AM2 chips? Clock speeds are roughly the same. Architecture isn't that much different. DDR2 is no advantage, is it? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
AM2 vs. Socket 939
On Fri, 26 May 2006 23:27:14 -0500, Merrill P. L. Worthington wrote:
Have been taking a look at the AM2 processors. What's the big deal? Is there a major performance jump for AM2 chips? Clock speeds are roughly the same. Architecture isn't that much different. DDR2 is no advantage, is it? There is essentially no performance difference between the 939s and the AM2s. The difference is in the type of DRAM supported. The AM2s use DDR2. The advantage of DDR2 is that it's possible to buy a 2G DDR2 DIMM, the biggest DDR DIMM is 1G. So if you want more than 4G on a system you'll need an AM2 system. If you don't think you'll ever need more than 4G then you could go either way. Intel has the first Core2 chips coming out in a few weeks. The first ones out will be server chips in June, Woodcrest, followed my desktop chips, Conroe, in July. Early reports are looking good for Intel, we'll know better in a couple of weeks. Anyone thinking about a new systems should wait a few weeks before buying. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
AM2 vs. Socket 939
"Boe" wrote in message
. .. From what I can tell it was AMD's way of say we have new chips too - pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. AMD makes great chips but they haven't developed anything lately so they had to have you pay attention to the hand shaking the shiny keys so you wouldn't notice what the other camp was doing. I can't say that either company has a significantly better chip. AMD currently has the better chip in my opinion. Intel may have the better chip with the Core 2 - only time will tell. I think AMD is going to have to do some major work to impress me at this point though. They've been "tweaking" their chips for the past 1 1/2 years, in my opinion not evolving them. I don't consider the AM2 evolution but more of a tweak. Hopefully the new core2 will prompt AMD to drop prices again and make some significant improvements to their chips. Maybe both companies have hit a ceiling but I doubt it. Just my thoughts. No, this is AMD's way of moving to DDR2 so they are ready to take advantage of it for upcomming chips. Basically they want to give Enthusiests and such people time to switch over to DDR2 before they really *need* to. That way when more memory hungry chips come along every one will already have DDR2 on hand. Carlo |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
AM2 vs. Socket 939
As I said this is just my opinion but it seems quite "coincidental" they
pushed up the date so they could get it out before Intel released their new chips. Going to DDR2 doesn't help unless you are using more than 4 GIGs - not a very large percentage do this or will in the next two years. Since AMD hasn't improved the speed of their processors in quite a while and I don't consider the 62 or x2 5000 a quantum leap so their won't be any noticeable performance improvement by going to DDR2. DDR memory is MUCH cheaper so a 939 saves a ton of money between the motherboard and memory. JUST my opinions of course. Since I don't work for AMD and even if I did unless I was the VP of sales or marketting I doubt most people there even have the skinny on the real reason for this change. I'm not saying that standard chip design or DDR2 are bad things, I just think it is a shame that AM2 doesn't really benefit us on its initial release. But hey, I'm not thrilled that Intel's 3 GHz extreme core2 chip is around $1000 when it comes out. Things will of course change and then we might see the prices drop and perfmance improve. I just doubt that we'll see a faster processor than an x2 5400 using the current core - when they change the core who knows if they will change the 940 socket as well. "Carlo Razzeto" wrote in message .. . "Boe" wrote in message . .. From what I can tell it was AMD's way of say we have new chips too - pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. AMD makes great chips but they haven't developed anything lately so they had to have you pay attention to the hand shaking the shiny keys so you wouldn't notice what the other camp was doing. I can't say that either company has a significantly better chip. AMD currently has the better chip in my opinion. Intel may have the better chip with the Core 2 - only time will tell. I think AMD is going to have to do some major work to impress me at this point though. They've been "tweaking" their chips for the past 1 1/2 years, in my opinion not evolving them. I don't consider the AM2 evolution but more of a tweak. Hopefully the new core2 will prompt AMD to drop prices again and make some significant improvements to their chips. Maybe both companies have hit a ceiling but I doubt it. Just my thoughts. No, this is AMD's way of moving to DDR2 so they are ready to take advantage of it for upcomming chips. Basically they want to give Enthusiests and such people time to switch over to DDR2 before they really *need* to. That way when more memory hungry chips come along every one will already have DDR2 on hand. Carlo |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
AM2 vs. Socket 939
"Carlo Razzeto" wrote in message .. . "Boe" wrote in message . .. From what I can tell it was AMD's way of say we have new chips too - pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. AMD makes great chips but they haven't developed anything lately so they had to have you pay attention to the hand shaking the shiny keys so you wouldn't notice what the other camp was doing. I can't say that either company has a significantly better chip. AMD currently has the better chip in my opinion. Intel may have the better chip with the Core 2 - only time will tell. I think AMD is going to have to do some major work to impress me at this point though. They've been "tweaking" their chips for the past 1 1/2 years, in my opinion not evolving them. I don't consider the AM2 evolution but more of a tweak. Hopefully the new core2 will prompt AMD to drop prices again and make some significant improvements to their chips. Maybe both companies have hit a ceiling but I doubt it. Just my thoughts. No, this is AMD's way of moving to DDR2 so they are ready to take advantage of it for upcomming chips. Basically they want to give Enthusiests and such people time to switch over to DDR2 before they really *need* to. That way when more memory hungry chips come along every one will already have DDR2 on hand. Carlo That's pretty much the case,DDR will eventually be phased out.From the reviews I've read,there's a very slight performance increase,but only in the the higher end models.If Intels new chips do prove better,AMD will undoubtedly come up with an answer,that's the nature of the competition between the two companies.I think in the end price and quality will determine the winner,whoever can come up with a dependable,competitive chip for less.AMD had the edge in that,but they're starting to catch up to Intel in price. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
AM2 vs. Socket 939
AMD now has a FX-62 coming out that blows the doors off anything Intel can
come up with. AM2 will also see AMD's X4 core designs sitting on 65nm wafers which they plan to release next year 1st quater. -- Sapphire X1600 Pro 512mb AGP MSI Theater 550Pro TV Tuner Thermaltake LanFire Midtower(4X80mm fans),Antec 550 Watt PSU Gigabyte GA-K8NSC-939 nForce3, A64 3500+, Stock Cooler IdleTemp 28 C 2 Gb Dual Channel PC3200 OCZ Platinum 2-3-2-5 CL2.5 Viewsonic A91f 19in Moniter 2XSATA WD 320gb Raid Edition, PATA WD 120Gb HD Pioneer 110D+Liteon 1693S Dual Layer burner Logitech MX 310 Optical Mouse Microsoft Sidewinder Precision 2 Joystick Microsoft ergonomic keyboard Cheap computer speakers with Sennheiser HD 477 Headphones 3DMark05Free-Overall-3134 1024X768, 4XAA/8XAF 6.4Drivers Cpu -4405 3Dmark2001 - 8702 4XAA/8XAF 1280X1024 Games I'm Playing- Battlezone II, IL-2 Sturmovick Series Empire Earth 2, Need For Speed: Underground 2, Civ IV "Merrill P. L. Worthington" wrote in message ... Have been taking a look at the AM2 processors. What's the big deal? Is there a major performance jump for AM2 chips? Clock speeds are roughly the same. Architecture isn't that much different. DDR2 is no advantage, is it? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
AM2 vs. Socket 939
"VanShania" wrote...
AMD now has a FX-62 coming out that blows the doors off anything Intel can come up with. AM2 will also see AMD's X4 core designs sitting on 65nm wafers which they plan to release next year 1st quater. The review/comparison I read in ExtremeTech (http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...1966027,00.asp) DOES give the nod to the FX-62 over the latest Intel offerings, but it does NOT "blow the doors off" the EE975 in all environments/applications. The Intel/AMD see-saw will continue, and IMO AMD will continue to eat into Intel's market share as they offer equally- or more-powerful CPUs and systems at lower cost and lower power consumption (read: heat output). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
AM2 vs. Socket 939
I stand corrected, kicks intel ass is what I meant to say, check out those
temps and power supply requirements -- Sapphire X1600 Pro 512mb AGP MSI Theater 550Pro TV Tuner Thermaltake LanFire Midtower(4X80mm fans),Antec 550 Watt PSU Gigabyte GA-K8NSC-939 nForce3, A64 3500+, Stock Cooler IdleTemp 28 C 2 Gb Dual Channel PC3200 OCZ Platinum 2-3-2-5 CL2.5 Viewsonic A91f 19in Moniter 2XSATA WD 320gb Raid Edition, PATA WD 120Gb HD Pioneer 110D Dual Layer burner Logitech MX 310 Optical Mouse Microsoft Sidewinder Precision 2 Joystick Microsoft ergonomic keyboard Cheap computer speakers with Sennheiser HD 477 Headphones 3DMark05Free-Overall-3134 1024X768, 4XAA/8XAF 6.4Drivers Cpu - 4405 3Dmark2001 - 8702 4XAA/8XAF 1280X1024 Games I'm Playing- IL-2 Sturmovick Series Empire Earth 2, Need For Speed: Underground 2, Civ IV, Warhammer 40,000 Gold "John Weiss" jrweiss98155nospamatnospamcomcastdotnospamnet wrote in message ... "VanShania" wrote... AMD now has a FX-62 coming out that blows the doors off anything Intel can come up with. AM2 will also see AMD's X4 core designs sitting on 65nm wafers which they plan to release next year 1st quater. The review/comparison I read in ExtremeTech (http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...1966027,00.asp) DOES give the nod to the FX-62 over the latest Intel offerings, but it does NOT "blow the doors off" the EE975 in all environments/applications. The Intel/AMD see-saw will continue, and IMO AMD will continue to eat into Intel's market share as they offer equally- or more-powerful CPUs and systems at lower cost and lower power consumption (read: heat output). |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
AM2 vs. Socket 939
On Sat, 27 May 2006 23:46:23 -0500, "VanShania"
wrote: AMD now has a FX-62 coming out that blows the doors off anything Intel can come up with. AM2 will also see AMD's X4 core designs sitting on 65nm wafers which they plan to release next year 1st quater. Yep, they haven't improved speed much since the lowly socket 754 2.4Ghz cpu. What they've been doing is adding cores. That was the plan from the beginning with the opteron bus design. Dual channel memory doesn't do much for 939 vs 754 but it comes in handy for dual core. DDR2's bandwidth will be used by quad core cpus after the next die shrink. You need DDR2 if you want 8 Gigs of memory so the government will be able to fully exploit your multiple cores while you're not looking. Pacifica is such a pretty name. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Socket 754 will outlive S939 | lyon_wonder | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | April 16th 06 05:34 AM |
Socket 754 will outlive S939 | lyon_wonder | Overclocking | 0 | April 15th 06 07:14 PM |
Socket 754 will outlive S939 | lyon_wonder | General | 0 | April 14th 06 09:42 PM |
SLI motherboard for Socket 754 | Gnu_Raiz | General | 5 | July 2nd 05 08:14 PM |
Which processor to choose.. | Alec | General | 5 | November 27th 04 07:34 PM |