If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
No serial ports on latest motherboards?
Looking for a motherboard for my next system (Intel, Z68 chipset), the
ones I've looked at so far have no serial ports. My older machine, built on a P4PE board, has two, with DB9 connectors brought out to the rear of the case. My newer machine, built on a P5B-E board, has one, but with just a header on the board and no external connector. Now it seems that the serial port's been abandoned entirely. I have equipment that's controlled via a serial connection and many USB-serial adaptors don't work correctly. Have all makers abandoned serial ports on all their boards? -- Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No serial ports on latest motherboards?
Bert Hyman wrote:
Looking for a motherboard for my next system (Intel, Z68 chipset), the ones I've looked at so far have no serial ports. My older machine, built on a P4PE board, has two, with DB9 connectors brought out to the rear of the case. My newer machine, built on a P5B-E board, has one, but with just a header on the board and no external connector. Now it seems that the serial port's been abandoned entirely. I have equipment that's controlled via a serial connection and many USB-serial adaptors don't work correctly. Have all makers abandoned serial ports on all their boards? This is really a question, of the evolution of SuperI/O chips. The SuperI/O was essential for certain functions, and other functions were placed in the chip as well. Two serial ports would typically be placed inside the SuperI/O. This means the motherboard manufacturer was buying the chip for an essential function, and the other functions "came for free". One problem with the SuperI/O design, is it is "pin bound". Some of the pins, had as many as five signal definitions. If you wanted to drive the floppy interface with all possible bells and whistles, perhaps that prevented a serial port from being used. Or perhaps some of the functions would conflict with additional fan control ports (drive three fans versus five). The SuperI/O had plenty of functionality inside, but the pins limited what could come out. It's actually a pain in the ass, to select the functions to include. The motherboard designer would then make choices, based on "motherboard market segment", as to what functions should be selected from inside the device. In some cases, it would appear they're just "being mean" and discarding functions for no reason. This is partially to do with companies like Intel, declaring certain interfaces to be legacy (replaceable by USB, at extra cost to the customer). Of course, USB hasn't always provided a perfect solution (such as parallel ports, which are still best provided via a PCI card). Enough interfaces on the SuperI/O have been declared legacy/unnecessary that it has allowed the definition of the SuperI/O to be changed. No longer, does the designer have to choose a relatively high pin count SuperI/O, if virtually all the functions have been removed. So the temptation to gut the design is there for the taking. These are typical functions inside a SuperI/O of five years ago. LPC interface (how the SuperI/O is connected to the Southbridge) Game Port --- long gone Midi --- long gone (UART-like ???) GPIO (used for motherboard custom control functions) Hardware monitor (Measure voltages, measure temps, control fans) PS/2 Keyboard/Mouse --- half-hearted support, declared legacy Floppy --- some boards still have these, not many UART A,B --- mostly gone IRDA (another UART, not the 4Mbit version of IRDA, sucks) Parallel Port --- a few boards still have a motherboard header for it ACPI functions (wake on PS/2 kbd, mouse, UART wake on ring, hardly needed if the other interfaces are gone) Out of that mess, the hardware monitor still sees some usage. If you want to measure motherboard voltages, there isn't an equivalent function hiding inside some other chip. Things like GPIO are also available to a limited extent on chips like the Southbridge. You may not know it, but PCI slots are falling into a similar status. I think Intel has made a Southbridge, without a PCI interface. While this can be fixed, by using something like a PLX PCI Express x1 to PCI bridge chip, motherboard manufacturers won't patch up the mess forever. Even though PCI remains a cheap way to get add-in functions. You could try a PCI serial card. In terms of direct hardware access, I presume they show up in PCI address space. So not all software may properly see them. If you were running the computer with DOS, perhaps such a card wouldn't be visible. You'd need to check whatever tech info is available on the manufacturer's site, to discover limitations like that. This is an example of a company making add-in cards, where sometimes they address usage with older OSes. http://www.lavalink.com/dev/index.php?id=55 Good luck, Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
No serial ports on latest motherboards?
Have all makers abandoned serial ports on all their boards?
Do you really need a Z68 chipset board? Even my Intel DQ68EP Mini-ITX Board still has a serial onboard connector. Regards Fritz |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
No serial ports on latest motherboards?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
No serial ports on latest motherboards?
Do you really need a Z68 chipset board?
Need? What's that mean? Well, the Z68 chipset is the overclocker's highend version. There are several different version of the socket 1155 chipset. Please check the INTEL site what you really need, see the D_6 series versions he http://www.intel.com/products/deskto...=desk_nav+chip There are indeed socket 1155 boards with serial connector available. Regards Fritz |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
No serial ports on latest motherboards?
In "Friedrich Wuelfing"
wrote: Do you really need a Z68 chipset board? Need? What's that mean? Well, the Z68 chipset is the overclocker's highend version. There are several different version of the socket 1155 chipset. You miss my point. I don't NEED the Z68 chipset, I simply WANT to build my system around it, at least at the moment. Some of the features just sound like they'd be nice to have. Maybe I'll reach a more sensible conclusion later. -- Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seeking motherboards with 2 serial ports | FS[_2_] | General | 6 | August 19th 08 06:42 PM |
PCI card with two serial ports | Gordon | Homebuilt PC's | 3 | January 28th 08 12:17 AM |
Serial ports | Gordon | Homebuilt PC's | 12 | January 11th 08 04:36 PM |
Mapping Ports, serial / USB | ChrisJ9876 | General | 3 | August 2nd 03 04:02 PM |
Adding ten or so serial ports? | Paul Hutchings | General | 4 | July 23rd 03 08:54 AM |