If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Overclocked It
My PC is getting on a bit now so I thought I'd try and speed it up a bit.
Spec is: Celeron 1.3ghz (Socket 370) Geforce 2 GTS 512mb of Cheap No Name 133 Ram Gigabyte 60XM7 Motherboard Running 1.52GHZ Processor @ standard voltage and Geforce GPU at 205 and Memory at 370IIRC. Max CPU temp is 52degrees after an hour of Prime 95. Quite pleased with that. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
dude, its 2004 ;-)
nice overclock though -- ______ From Adam Webb, Nick: Overlag "**-**" wrote in message ... My PC is getting on a bit now so I thought I'd try and speed it up a bit. Spec is: Celeron 1.3ghz (Socket 370) Geforce 2 GTS 512mb of Cheap No Name 133 Ram Gigabyte 60XM7 Motherboard Running 1.52GHZ Processor @ standard voltage and Geforce GPU at 205 and Memory at 370IIRC. Max CPU temp is 52degrees after an hour of Prime 95. Quite pleased with that. Matt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
**-** wrote: My PC is getting on a bit now so I thought I'd try and speed it up a bit. Spec is: Celeron 1.3ghz (Socket 370) Geforce 2 GTS 512mb of Cheap No Name 133 Ram Gigabyte 60XM7 Motherboard Running 1.52GHZ Processor @ standard voltage and Geforce GPU at 205 and Memory at 370IIRC. Max CPU temp is 52degrees after an hour of Prime 95. Quite pleased with that. Matt 1.52 Ghz is good for a Tualatin. Probably as fast as a 2Ghz P4. I'm running 1.33Ghz on a 1.0A Tualatin Celeron |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Who cares if it is 2004 if you done that with a Celery sweet it is. when you
get the money together for a upgrade upgrade to the top then overclock until you can hit that spot. "**-**" wrote in message ... My PC is getting on a bit now so I thought I'd try and speed it up a bit. Spec is: Celeron 1.3ghz (Socket 370) Geforce 2 GTS 512mb of Cheap No Name 133 Ram Gigabyte 60XM7 Motherboard Running 1.52GHZ Processor @ standard voltage and Geforce GPU at 205 and Memory at 370IIRC. Max CPU temp is 52degrees after an hour of Prime 95. Quite pleased with that. Matt |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
)-()-( wrote: **-** wrote: My PC is getting on a bit now so I thought I'd try and speed it up a bit. Spec is: Celeron 1.3ghz (Socket 370) Geforce 2 GTS 512mb of Cheap No Name 133 Ram Gigabyte 60XM7 Motherboard Running 1.52GHZ Processor @ standard voltage and Geforce GPU at 205 and Memory at 370IIRC. Max CPU temp is 52degrees after an hour of Prime 95. Quite pleased with that. Matt 1.52 Ghz is good for a Tualatin. Probably as fast as a 2Ghz P4. I'm running 1.33Ghz on a 1.0A Tualatin Celeron IME it's rare for a Tualatin not to make 1.5Ghz - I've got three 1.0As at 1.5Ghz, and a P3-S 1.4 @ 1.575Mhz. All are undervolted to 1.4v except for one of the 1.0As that needs standard voltage. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
P2B wrote:
)-()-( wrote: **-** wrote: My PC is getting on a bit now so I thought I'd try and speed it up a bit. Spec is: Celeron 1.3ghz (Socket 370) Geforce 2 GTS 512mb of Cheap No Name 133 Ram Gigabyte 60XM7 Motherboard Running 1.52GHZ Processor @ standard voltage and Geforce GPU at 205 and Memory at 370IIRC. Max CPU temp is 52degrees after an hour of Prime 95. Quite pleased with that. Matt 1.52 Ghz is good for a Tualatin. Probably as fast as a 2Ghz P4. I'm running 1.33Ghz on a 1.0A Tualatin Celeron IME it's rare for a Tualatin not to make 1.5Ghz - I've got three 1.0As at 1.5Ghz, and a P3-S 1.4 @ 1.575Mhz. All are undervolted to 1.4v except for one of the 1.0As that needs standard voltage. Your experience is better than mine. With 4 celeron tualatins, 2 - 1.3 gig, a 1.2, and a 1.1, none have made it over 1.495 yet. That was using 2 BH6s (BX), an Asus P2B-VM (BX), and two (different) Chaintechs (815 and VIA). I think it depends on the motherboard. Such as it's voltage regulator stability, among other things. The regulator went out on one BH6 (since repaired) and on the VIA chaintech (but I suspect a [maybe] unrelated capacitor problem with the chaintech). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
David Maynard wrote: P2B wrote: )-()-( wrote: **-** wrote: My PC is getting on a bit now so I thought I'd try and speed it up a bit. Spec is: Celeron 1.3ghz (Socket 370) Geforce 2 GTS 512mb of Cheap No Name 133 Ram Gigabyte 60XM7 Motherboard Running 1.52GHZ Processor @ standard voltage and Geforce GPU at 205 and Memory at 370IIRC. Max CPU temp is 52degrees after an hour of Prime 95. Quite pleased with that. Matt 1.52 Ghz is good for a Tualatin. Probably as fast as a 2Ghz P4. I'm running 1.33Ghz on a 1.0A Tualatin Celeron IME it's rare for a Tualatin not to make 1.5Ghz - I've got three 1.0As at 1.5Ghz, and a P3-S 1.4 @ 1.575Mhz. All are undervolted to 1.4v except for one of the 1.0As that needs standard voltage. Your experience is better than mine. With 4 celeron tualatins, 2 - 1.3 gig, a 1.2, and a 1.1, none have made it over 1.495 yet. That was using 2 BH6s (BX), an Asus P2B-VM (BX), and two (different) Chaintechs (815 and VIA). I have the impression the 1.0As were more consistent than the "faster" versions - I think of them as a reincarnated 300A: 50% overclock virtually guaranteed :-) Want to trade one of yours for a 1.0A? I think it depends on the motherboard. Such as it's voltage regulator stability, among other things. Could be, although my P2B-S boards have noticeable Vcore ripple at 1.4v which disappears around 1.7v, but they run Tualatins nicely. Three boards have sequential serial numbers, but only two are stable at 150Mhz FSB - the other tops out at 140Mhz, some BX chips won't overclock 50% I guess :-) The regulator went out on one BH6 (since repaired) and on the VIA chaintech (but I suspect a [maybe] unrelated capacitor problem with the chaintech). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:11:06 GMT, "Fry" wrote:
Who cares if it is 2004 if you done that with a Celery Yeah TRUE! (I am not planning to change till mine lasts too either ... ... (have it almost 2y now ...) Max CPU temp is 52degrees after an hour of Prime 95. finelly someone posts Ok (true ondie) temp (looks like Gigabyte shows ok!) for Tuallie .... -- Regards, SPAJKY ® & visit my site @ http://www.spajky.vze.com "Tualatin OC-ed / BX-Slot1 / inaudible setup!" E-mail AntiSpam: remove ## |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
P2B wrote:
David Maynard wrote: P2B wrote: )-()-( wrote: **-** wrote: My PC is getting on a bit now so I thought I'd try and speed it up a bit. Spec is: Celeron 1.3ghz (Socket 370) Geforce 2 GTS 512mb of Cheap No Name 133 Ram Gigabyte 60XM7 Motherboard Running 1.52GHZ Processor @ standard voltage and Geforce GPU at 205 and Memory at 370IIRC. Max CPU temp is 52degrees after an hour of Prime 95. Quite pleased with that. Matt 1.52 Ghz is good for a Tualatin. Probably as fast as a 2Ghz P4. I'm running 1.33Ghz on a 1.0A Tualatin Celeron IME it's rare for a Tualatin not to make 1.5Ghz - I've got three 1.0As at 1.5Ghz, and a P3-S 1.4 @ 1.575Mhz. All are undervolted to 1.4v except for one of the 1.0As that needs standard voltage. Your experience is better than mine. With 4 celeron tualatins, 2 - 1.3 gig, a 1.2, and a 1.1, none have made it over 1.495 yet. That was using 2 BH6s (BX), an Asus P2B-VM (BX), and two (different) Chaintechs (815 and VIA). I have the impression the 1.0As were more consistent than the "faster" versions - I think of them as a reincarnated 300A: 50% overclock virtually guaranteed :-) Perhaps, but I can't imagine why. As the mantra always goes "same core, same core." The vast majority of users I see jumping up and down about the virtues of the 1.0A were overclocking it from 100MHz FSB to 133 MHz FSB for 1.33 Gig. I also note that most users aren't going in there and modding the AGTL circuitry However, the reports of 1.5 to 1.6 gig was why I picked a 1.3 to begin with, in light of the FSB restrictions on my original issue BH6. I was shooting for about 1.612 at 124MHz FSB since I 'knew' it worked at that FSB (with my P-III). Well it didn't, with a 1.3, a 1.2, OR a 1.1. So much for 'knowing' Want to trade one of yours for a 1.0A? I doubt it would do me much good because the second problem I have is tualatins over 1.4, or so, gig blowing Vcore regulators. (Mostly my fault on the BH6. I let the ambient get hot when I knew better but was preoccupied with something else.) I originally did the tualatins as cheap upgrades to some very old, and also some cheap (20 buck), motherboards but I just might fork over 'real bucks' for an 'official' tualatin motherboard just to settle the dern issue once and for all. I think it depends on the motherboard. Such as it's voltage regulator stability, among other things. Could be, although my P2B-S boards have noticeable Vcore ripple at 1.4v which disappears around 1.7v, but they run Tualatins nicely. Three boards have sequential serial numbers, but only two are stable at 150Mhz FSB - the other tops out at 140Mhz, some BX chips won't overclock 50% I guess :-) Hehe. Likely, and we've talked about BX 'overclocking' before. As I noted then, mine are all very old BX chipsets. The regulator went out on one BH6 (since repaired) and on the VIA chaintech (but I suspect a [maybe] unrelated capacitor problem with the chaintech). |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
David Maynard wrote: P2B wrote: [snip] I have the impression the 1.0As were more consistent than the "faster" versions - I think of them as a reincarnated 300A: 50% overclock virtually guaranteed :-) Perhaps, but I can't imagine why. As the mantra always goes "same core, same core." The vast majority of users I see jumping up and down about the virtues of the 1.0A were overclocking it from 100MHz FSB to 133 MHz FSB for 1.33 Gig. True, but that's a no-brainer - provided you use PC133 and remember to install the HSF :-) I also note that most users aren't going in there and modding the AGTL circuitry Actually I haven't lowered Vtt on a single processor board (yet) - that trick is only used on the dual P3-S systems where a pair of much more expensive processors are at stake, and I have no evidence it affects overclockability at all. However, the reports of 1.5 to 1.6 gig was why I picked a 1.3 to begin with, in light of the FSB restrictions on my original issue BH6. I was shooting for about 1.612 at 124MHz FSB since I 'knew' it worked at that FSB (with my P-III). Well it didn't, with a 1.3, a 1.2, OR a 1.1. So much for 'knowing' Want to trade one of yours for a 1.0A? I doubt it would do me much good because the second problem I have is tualatins over 1.4, or so, gig blowing Vcore regulators. (Mostly my fault on the BH6. I let the ambient get hot when I knew better but was preoccupied with something else.) Perhaps not, but it would allow you to try a CPU that's known to be stable at 1.5Ghz, and allow me to try a higher CPU clock on a board that's known to be stable at 150Mhz FSB - I'd like to play around the 1.6Ghz mark, but have not had my hands on a CPU with more than a 10.5x multiplier yet... I originally did the tualatins as cheap upgrades to some very old, and also some cheap (20 buck), motherboards but I just might fork over 'real bucks' for an 'official' tualatin motherboard just to settle the dern issue once and for all. How many 'real bucks' would it take ;-) I think it depends on the motherboard. Such as it's voltage regulator stability, among other things. Could be, although my P2B-S boards have noticeable Vcore ripple at 1.4v which disappears around 1.7v, but they run Tualatins nicely. Three boards have sequential serial numbers, but only two are stable at 150Mhz FSB - the other tops out at 140Mhz, some BX chips won't overclock 50% I guess :-) Hehe. Likely, and we've talked about BX 'overclocking' before. As I noted then, mine are all very old BX chipsets. Hmm, now you mention it again, it occurs to me most of the older boards I dropped new clock chips on wouldn't do 150Mhz FSB either. I think I'll lower Vtt on the 'dud' P2B-S, see if it makes any difference. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Disk to disk copying with overclocked memory | JT | General | 30 | March 21st 04 02:22 AM |
Overclocked 2500 Barton to 3200 using my old Crucial 2100 DDR | [email protected] | General | 5 | January 18th 04 09:01 AM |
Overclocked PII on Intel SE440BX motherboard | Jeff Carrick | Overclocking | 3 | January 12th 04 01:57 AM |
My overclocked P4 rig | SilverBack | Overclocking | 3 | November 7th 03 06:13 PM |
Overclocked FSB - is this safe? | noise | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | July 11th 03 04:37 PM |