If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AthlonXP-M for 133MHz FSB m/b?
Hi. This is not quite overclocking, but this is the best place to ask
I'm looking to upgrade my Asus A7V133-VM KM133A 133MHz FSB motherboard. The fastest thing I can see to put in this FSB speed is an Athlon XP-Mobile Barton 2600+ 133/266MHz FSB 2.13GHz. Would this be likely to work in my motherboard? Would the low 1.45vcore be a problem? The m/b does nothing but autodetect for the vcore. Would this Powernow thing be a problem (I read somewhere they don't want to run at full speed in desktop m/bs)? I read something about pinmodding them so they'll run at the correct speed, is this possible? Do the XP-Ms still come unlocked? Since they run cool, would my current Thunderbird stock hs/fans be enough? Thankyou! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:14:47 +1300, before wrote:
Hi. This is not quite overclocking, but this is the best place to ask I'm looking to upgrade my Asus A7V133-VM KM133A 133MHz FSB motherboard. The fastest thing I can see to put in this FSB speed is an Athlon XP-Mobile Barton 2600+ 133/266MHz FSB 2.13GHz. 2800+ MP would be the fastest. Barton core with 133MHz FSB. Would this be likely to work in my motherboard? Parobably. Would the low 1.45vcore be a problem? Good question. Don't know. The m/b does nothing but autodetect for the vcore. Pinmod. Set anything you like. Would this Powernow thing be a problem (I read somewhere they don't want to run at full speed in desktop m/bs)? I read something about pinmodding them so they'll run at the correct speed, is this possible? Do the XP-Ms still come unlocked? Since they run cool, would my current Thunderbird stock hs/fans be enough? I have never seen the stock HSF's, but I wouldn't use it on any of the cpu's. TR2-M1 for $8 works great and is quiet. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Wes Newell wrote:
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:14:47 +1300, before wrote: Hi. This is not quite overclocking, but this is the best place to ask I'm looking to upgrade my Asus A7V133-VM KM133A 133MHz FSB motherboard. The fastest thing I can see to put in this FSB speed is an Athlon XP-Mobile Barton 2600+ 133/266MHz FSB 2.13GHz. 2800+ MP would be the fastest. Barton core with 133MHz FSB. From Newegg.com: Model: AMD Athlon MP 2800+ Co Barton Operating Frequency: 2.13GHz FSB: 266MHz Cache: L1/64K+64K; L2/512K Voltage: 1.65V Process: 0.13Micron $169 Model: AMD Mobile Athlon XP Co Barton Operating Frequency: 2.13GHz FSB: 266MHz Cache: L1/64K+64K; L2/ 512KB Voltage: 1.45V Process: 0.13Micron $104.00 Unless there's some L3 cache I don't know about, I think they may be the same processor. But there seems to be an XP-M 3000+ 2.20GHz(133x16.5). I wonder if those could go to 3GHz ;-) Would this be likely to work in my motherboard? Parobably. Would the low 1.45vcore be a problem? Good question. Don't know. The m/b does nothing but autodetect for the vcore. Pinmod. Set anything you like. Great. Would this Powernow thing be a problem (I read somewhere they don't want to run at full speed in desktop m/bs)? I read something about pinmodding them so they'll run at the correct speed, is this possible? Do the XP-Ms still come unlocked? I'm basically wondering whether it's possible to force the XP-M to use its correct multiplier (eg: 16x) rather than automatically revert to 133x6 because of the unsupported ''Powernow" feature. Since they run cool, would my current Thunderbird stock hs/fans be enough? I have never seen the stock HSF's, but I wouldn't use it on any of the cpu's. TR2-M1 for $8 works great and is quiet. Ok, the XP-M dissipates less than my current CPU, so I think it'll be good enough. I was just wondering how well it'd physically fit, as I've read Thunderbird heatsinks aren't right for Bartons for some reason. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
2800+ MP would be the fastest. Barton core with 133MHz FSB. This reminded me.. Got any idea as to why there are no 166 - 200 fsb MP boards (or processors) out there? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Has to do with the low vcore....lower fsb produces less heat...does this
make sense? "rstlne" wrote in message news 2800+ MP would be the fastest. Barton core with 133MHz FSB. This reminded me.. Got any idea as to why there are no 166 - 200 fsb MP boards (or processors) out there? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:19:18 +0000, wrote:
2800+ MP would be the fastest. Barton core with 133MHz FSB. This reminded me.. Got any idea as to why there are no 166 - 200 fsb MP boards (or processors) out there? AMD never made a SMP chipset that supported anything above 133MHz (officially) afaik. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 02:13:13 +1300, before wrote:
Wes Newell wrote: On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:14:47 +1300, before wrote: Hi. This is not quite overclocking, but this is the best place to ask I'm looking to upgrade my Asus A7V133-VM KM133A 133MHz FSB motherboard. The fastest thing I can see to put in this FSB speed is an Athlon XP-Mobile Barton 2600+ 133/266MHz FSB 2.13GHz. 2800+ MP would be the fastest. Barton core with 133MHz FSB. From Newegg.com: Model: AMD Athlon MP 2800+ Co Barton Operating Frequency: 2.13GHz FSB: 266MHz Cache: L1/64K+64K; L2/512K Voltage: 1.65V Process: 0.13Micron $169 Model: AMD Mobile Athlon XP Co Barton Operating Frequency: 2.13GHz FSB: 266MHz Cache: L1/64K+64K; L2/ 512KB Voltage: 1.45V Process: 0.13Micron $104.00 Unless there's some L3 cache I don't know about, I think they may be the same processor. basically, they are. But there seems to be an XP-M 3000+ 2.20GHz(133x16.5). I wonder if those could go to 3GHz ;-) Well, you could get a little more speed out of this one. I'm basically wondering whether it's possible to force the XP-M to use its correct multiplier (eg: 16x) rather than automatically revert to 133x6 because of the unsupported ''Powernow" feature. I have no experience with the mobiles but I've heard that they start out at the highest setting and that this setting can be changed via the L12? bridges on the cpu. Don't tke L12 for granted, it may me another group of bridges. Since they run cool, would my current Thunderbird stock hs/fans be enough? I have never seen the stock HSF's, but I wouldn't use it on any of the cpu's. TR2-M1 for $8 works great and is quiet. Ok, the XP-M dissipates less than my current CPU, so I think it'll be good enough. I was just wondering how well it'd physically fit, as I've read Thunderbird heatsinks aren't right for Bartons for some reason. But the surface area of the new cores is smaller than the tbird cores. I used my pretty good all aluminum cooler for a while, but in the end the cheap new copper base cooler worked a lot better with the tbred core. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert Jackson Marley" wrote in message ... Has to do with the low vcore....lower fsb produces less heat...does this make sense? "rstlne" wrote in message news 2800+ MP would be the fastest. Barton core with 133MHz FSB. This reminded me.. Got any idea as to why there are no 166 - 200 fsb MP boards (or processors) out there? Higher FSB speeds needs better RAM, northbrige chip and cooling and generally needs better motherboard components. These are more expensive and needs more power and outputs more heat. Extra heat in a notebook is not good and power requirements needs to be kept as low as possible for decent battery life. You look at a 1.0Ghz Intel Centrino processor and is uses a 0.9v Vcore! Wow! Overall, Intel are better (at the moment) at making chip for mobile devices, in my opinion. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert Jackson Marley" wrote in message ... Has to do with the low vcore....lower fsb produces less heat...does this make sense? Kinda but 200 * 10.6 166.66 * 12.8 133.33 * 16 They should all produce similar heat shouldnt they? and shouldnt they all run at the same vcore? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Hi. This is not quite overclocking, but this is the best place to ask
I'm looking to upgrade my Asus A7V133-VM KM133A 133MHz FSB motherboard. The fastest thing I can see to put in this FSB speed is an Athlon XP-Mobile Barton 2600+ 133/266MHz FSB 2.13GHz. Would this be likely to work in my motherboard? Would the low 1.45vcore be a problem? The m/b does nothing but autodetect for the vcore. Would this Powernow thing be a problem (I read somewhere they don't want to run at full speed in desktop m/bs)? I read something about pinmodding them so they'll run at the correct speed, is this possible? Do the XP-Ms still come unlocked? Since they run cool, would my current Thunderbird stock hs/fans be enough? Thankyou! Got that proc from newegg and put it in a MSI K7T Turbo 2...KT133A chipset 15X141= 2115mhz- mem at cas2. 15X147= 2205mhz- mem at cas3. Needed a program called CPU MSR to reach the 15X multi, wouldn't go higher than 13X without it. Thermalright slk-900 w/92mm vantec tornado dead slow thru a rheobus 41C/29C temps at 1.45V Ski "The only way to find out how far is too far... is to go there" (remove spleen to e-mail) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMD CPU Temp (AthlonXP vs. Athlon64)? | bleekay | General | 1 | December 12th 04 07:11 PM |
Abit KT7-RAID - Is it AMD AthlonXP compatible? | Useko Netsumi | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | August 29th 04 08:35 AM |
AthlonXP 2000 on MSI KT4AV with (VIA KT400A) chipset Mainboard has Speed | ÎÔ»¢²ØÁúCrouching Tiger Hidden Dragon | Overclocking AMD Processors | 18 | May 6th 04 12:14 AM |
AthlonXP 2000 on MSI KT4AV with (VIA KT400A) chipset Mainboard has Speed Complexity | LongBow | Overclocking AMD Processors | 7 | May 2nd 04 12:23 AM |
AthlonXP 2600+ question | Lee Marsh | Overclocking AMD Processors | 7 | September 9th 03 02:49 AM |