If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
A quick look at Bulldozer thread scheduling
On 03/12/2011 8:18 AM, Orson Cart wrote:
Yousuf wrote: No, but I'm also not in the market for any sort of aftermarket cooling system either. I figure by the time I'm ready to go there, I'll be able to really research it. Both AMD and Intel are now offering water-cooling on their next-gen processors. Also I got a pretty decent full-tower case, just upgraded last year, which already has holes drilled in for water-cooling pipes. What took them so long? I recall years ago a Pentium D 3.4 GHz, that was amazingly rated at 95 W TDP. Yet the Intel cooler was maximum RPM within 90 seconds of booting. Surely they needed better cooling way back then. I think they were able to hang onto the traditional cooling systems longer with the advance of internal CPU thermal control circuitry. The processors wouldn't get to high temperatures until they were really pushed for power. Yousuf Khan |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
reason for AMD's Bulldozer fiasco? | Orson Cart | Intel | 5 | November 3rd 11 01:57 AM |
AMD Bulldozer - arrives what decade? | Kulin Remailer | Intel | 2 | May 28th 11 04:21 AM |
Acronis true Image 9.0 scheduling problems | [email protected] | Storage (alternative) | 3 | February 1st 07 04:49 AM |
Question on MMC 9.13 and Scheduling Programs for Recording | gary | Ati Videocards | 5 | March 6th 06 09:51 PM |