If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part: I had previously noted the puniness of power supplies on OEM boxes, but not by overloading them to the point where the machine wouldn't run. I don't think that upping the RAM by 50% and adding a HDD causing a power supply overload is a reasonable expectation. Agreed. HDDs (especially 10k) can cause a heavy motor-start load on the 12V but should otherwise be fine. One problem with big OEMs is they are also aiming at EPA EnergyStar targets which cause them to tight-size PSUs for max efficiency. The German TuV may also have powerfactor targets. Energy efficiency is the new wild card. It's the only consideration I can imagine that would justify cutting it so close. Something else about this machine that is shaved very close is the thermal design. It will not run for long with the side cover removed. That wouldn't surprise me if the side cover included a duct, but there are only holes strategically placed in the side panel. The CPU has an enormous heat sink, but no fan of its own! There is your clue, no CPU fan -- the cover is a duct. With the cover off, air can bypass the CPU heatsink and slip straight to [from] the PSU fan. I've built machines without CPU fans, and you have to be very careful about airflow. It's misleading for me to say that the CPU has no fan. The case fan draws air in such a way that the predominant flow is through the many horizontally stacked, spaced plates of the heat sink. It wouldn't seem that it would matter so much where the air comes from, but apparently it does. The heat sink stack is so tall it extends nearly to the edge of the case, so that air entering through the side holes (highly turbulent because it is a collection of small jets) encounters the top of the heat sink almost immediately. I suspect that those holes behave more like vorticity generators than like a duct. Take the cover off, and the relatively laminar flow through the heat sink doesn't create enough heat transfer. Robert. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Robert Myers wrote:
Robert Redelmeier wrote: In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part: I had previously noted the puniness of power supplies on OEM boxes, but not by overloading them to the point where the machine wouldn't run. I don't think that upping the RAM by 50% and adding a HDD causing a power supply overload is a reasonable expectation. Agreed. HDDs (especially 10k) can cause a heavy motor-start load on the 12V but should otherwise be fine. One problem with big OEMs is they are also aiming at EPA EnergyStar targets which cause them to tight-size PSUs for max efficiency. The German TuV may also have powerfactor targets. Energy efficiency is the new wild card. It's the only consideration I can imagine that would justify cutting it so close. Something else about this machine that is shaved very close is the thermal design. It will not run for long with the side cover removed. That wouldn't surprise me if the side cover included a duct, but there are only holes strategically placed in the side panel. The CPU has an enormous heat sink, but no fan of its own! There is your clue, no CPU fan -- the cover is a duct. With the cover off, air can bypass the CPU heatsink and slip straight to [from] the PSU fan. I've built machines without CPU fans, and you have to be very careful about airflow. It's misleading for me to say that the CPU has no fan. The case fan draws air in such a way that the predominant flow is through the many horizontally stacked, spaced plates of the heat sink. It wouldn't seem that it would matter so much where the air comes from, but apparently it does. The heat sink stack is so tall it extends nearly to the edge of the case, so that air entering through the side holes (highly turbulent because it is a collection of small jets) encounters the top of the heat sink almost immediately. I suspect that those holes behave more like vorticity generators than like a duct. Take the cover off, and the relatively laminar flow through the heat sink doesn't create enough heat transfer. Possible, but I think having the coolest outside air coming to the CPU first is probably the key. My problem has been running high ambient temperatures. With a 90F building temp keeping CPU and disk cool is an issue. I looked for a Peltier cooler, but didn't come up with one I really liked. And they draw a ton of power. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Robert Myers wrote: It's misleading for me to say that the CPU has no fan. The case fan draws air in such a way that the predominant flow is through the many horizontally stacked, spaced plates of the heat sink. It wouldn't seem that it would matter so much where the air comes from, but apparently it does. The heat sink stack is so tall it extends nearly to the edge of the case, so that air entering through the side holes (highly turbulent because it is a collection of small jets) encounters the top of the heat sink almost immediately. I suspect that those holes behave more like vorticity generators than like a duct. Take the cover off, and the relatively laminar flow through the heat sink doesn't create enough heat transfer. Possible, but I think having the coolest outside air coming to the CPU first is probably the key. The short circuit to the air flow with the cover off is just a few inches between the heat sink stack and the exhausting case fan, which exhausts much greater heat than the power supply. A piece of cardboard or plastic that blocked that short circuit would be an interesting test. There are actually holes upstream of the CPU to cool the disk drive, and that air has to get through/around the CPU heat sink to exit the case. My problem has been running high ambient temperatures. With a 90F building temp keeping CPU and disk cool is an issue. I looked for a Peltier cooler, but didn't come up with one I really liked. And they draw a ton of power. These boxes have run without air conditioning in summer weather. I don't think 90F ambient should be a problem. Robert. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Robert Myers wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote: Robert Myers wrote: It's misleading for me to say that the CPU has no fan. The case fan draws air in such a way that the predominant flow is through the many horizontally stacked, spaced plates of the heat sink. It wouldn't seem that it would matter so much where the air comes from, but apparently it does. The heat sink stack is so tall it extends nearly to the edge of the case, so that air entering through the side holes (highly turbulent because it is a collection of small jets) encounters the top of the heat sink almost immediately. I suspect that those holes behave more like vorticity generators than like a duct. Take the cover off, and the relatively laminar flow through the heat sink doesn't create enough heat transfer. Possible, but I think having the coolest outside air coming to the CPU first is probably the key. The short circuit to the air flow with the cover off is just a few inches between the heat sink stack and the exhausting case fan, which exhausts much greater heat than the power supply. A piece of cardboard or plastic that blocked that short circuit would be an interesting test. There are actually holes upstream of the CPU to cool the disk drive, and that air has to get through/around the CPU heat sink to exit the case. My problem has been running high ambient temperatures. With a 90F building temp keeping CPU and disk cool is an issue. I looked for a Peltier cooler, but didn't come up with one I really liked. And they draw a ton of power. These boxes have run without air conditioning in summer weather. I don't think 90F ambient should be a problem. Now that I look, this system seems to have hit 52C air temp last August. That's air, not components. That sound right for four servers in a room, 102F temp outside, pulling in "cooling" air with a window fan over a hot black roof in full sunlight. As the song says, "Somethin' Got to be Arranged." Google says systems can run hotter, several have been up for 400+ days, so maybe they're right. Hope so. :-( |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part:
Energy efficiency is the new wild card. It's the only consideration I can imagine that would justify cutting it so close. Older problems, but perhaps related/continuing: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/te...gy/29dell.html -- Robert R |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part: Energy efficiency is the new wild card. It's the only consideration I can imagine that would justify cutting it so close. Older problems, but perhaps related/continuing: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/te...gy/29dell.html A long time before Dell's customer service problems and practices began to get public attention, I had a long go-round with them that told me everything I needed to know about the corporate culture there. I even wrote about it in one of these forums, and Felger Carbon defended Dell as not being the bottom-feeder I characterized it as being. I suspect the (still unidentified) company that built the box causing the current problem was the company that he would have claimed was the bottom feeder. When I finally wrestled Dell to the mat, it turned out that there were six hundred people ahead of me for the replacement part needed (so I had to wait another six months for it), and the customer service rep had to consult a manager before finally agreeing with me that there was something wrong with the hardware, which manifested itself as a clear data-corruption problem. The story reported in the New York Times sounds very similar. While it was still in the PC business, no IBM alum would ever comment on the competitive landscape it faced in that market. As I infer the corporate culture at IBM as it once was, they probably believed that their corporate customers would wise up and stop buying the kind of junk that was being sold at rock-bottom prices. History, of course, proved otherwise. As Yousuf pointed out earlier, it's quite a challenge to build a box at a price that's competitive with what you can get from an OEM, and, even then, although you know exactly who provided each part (at least in theory), you can still wind up with a motherboard that becomes notorious for having been built with bad capacitors. If I had to finger a culprit here, I'd point at the business schools, which seem to be so detached from reality that they actually think that anything that looks good on a spreadsheet is a good business practice. That anyone ever would have admired Dell just boggles my mind, just as it boggles my mind that people *still* don't get why we are so much poorer now than we were a few years ago. That is to say that, although the PC business is cut-throat in a way that ultimately puts customers at risk, it is not a problem that is peculiar to PC OEM's. Robert. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
On 6/29/2010 11:38 PM, Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert wrote in part: Energy efficiency is the new wild card. It's the only consideration I can imagine that would justify cutting it so close. Older problems, but perhaps related/continuing: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/te...gy/29dell.html Quite the come down for a company which was a model taught at the Harvard business school. But in reality, even back when it was a business darling, people knew they were sitting on a slippery slope. It's real business model lay in the taking of subsidies from bigger companies that acted as its sugar daddy. Yousuf Khan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Robert Myers wrote:
If I had to finger a culprit here, I'd point at the business schools, which seem to be so detached from reality that they actually think that anything that looks good on a spreadsheet is a good business practice. That anyone ever would have admired Dell just boggles my mind, I don't know... There's worse. I remember years ago having to fight to get a Dell over a Compaq that was $1,500 more despite being far inferior (e.g. 486 vs. P90), not to mention that, IMO, desktop Compaqs were, and still are, garbage. "You get what you pay for", I heard, always from people who had *zero* clue about computers. I've had great success with generic hardware. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Marginal OEM Power Supply | Robert Myers | General | 28 | September 15th 22 05:30 PM |
power supply on new build w old power supply | ed jurewicz | Homebuilt PC's | 1 | December 19th 07 01:26 PM |
Antec TPII 550EPS12V or Cooler Master Real Power 550 power supply??? | brian | Homebuilt PC's | 7 | May 6th 05 07:56 AM |
Antec TPII 550EPS12V or Cooler Master Real Power 550 power supply??? | brian | Overclocking | 6 | May 5th 05 12:21 PM |
A marginal Samsung problem | r wiley | Printers | 1 | December 28th 03 02:29 AM |