If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
We have Konica/Minolta PagePro 1250W which was purchased on the cheap when on close-out at Staples. Beyond some annoying design defects (like a hanging paper feed shelf which is prone to break at the hinge) it produces very nice output at higher resolution than similar B&W lasers in this price class. We're now at the 4th spent toner cartridge, and my wake-up call came when Staples didn't have the replacement in stock on the store shelf anymore. Sure; I can order it with free shipping; but this gave me pause to think about the wisdom of continuing to feed it. The drum and toner are separate assemblies; so we're still on the original drum. How many toner cartridges expected before the usage is enough to require drum replacement? The cost of toner + drum durely exceeds the value of the printer (heck - saw a Samsung low end laser for $49.95 yesterday). What would you do? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
On Dec 28, 8:20*am, (Mike S.) wrote:
We have Konica/Minolta PagePro 1250W snip it produces very nice output at higher resolution snip We're now at the 4th spent toner cartridge snip we're still *on the original drum. snip What would you do? I'd refill the toner cartridge for about $15, over and over, until the drum started showing signs of failure http://tinyurl.com/8b2r3d. Then I'd probably get another refurb Brother laser printer. I've had good experiences with them, and they refill easily -- high capacity for about $11delivered http:// tinyurl.com/7vm65p. Best, Larry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
Mike S. wrote:
We have Konica/Minolta PagePro 1250W which was purchased on the cheap when on close-out at Staples. Beyond some annoying design defects (like a hanging paper feed shelf which is prone to break at the hinge) it produces very nice output at higher resolution than similar B&W lasers in this price class. We're now at the 4th spent toner cartridge, and my wake-up call came when Staples didn't have the replacement in stock on the store shelf anymore. Sure; I can order it with free shipping; but this gave me pause to think about the wisdom of continuing to feed it. $82.99 for 3,000-page toner, and you don't even get a new drum for that. That's very expensive to run. You've paid $332 to print 12,000 pages for toner alone. A LJ4050 cartridge rated at 10,000 pages and including a new drum is $135.49, less than half the per-page price. (That's from Staples, but both are cheaper elsewhere.) That "cheap" printer isn't saving you money. Buying refilled toner or refilling it yourself may be practical to get a little more operating life out of that printer. For me it would depend on whether I can find a better printer for about the same cost as a single toner change (probably). The drum and toner are separate assemblies; so we're still on the original drum. How many toner cartridges expected before the usage is enough to require drum replacement? The cost of toner + drum durely exceeds the value of the printer (heck - saw a Samsung low end laser for $49.95 yesterday). Replacing your current "cheap" printer with a newer "cheap" printer will have the same problem. The Samsung is probably the ML-2510, another GDI printer with 3,000-page toner refills at $83.99. Yikes. At least it looks like a cartridge includes a drum. What would you do? Probably replace it with a used business-class laser with much lower operating costs. Here's a thing I wrote on that a while back: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/usedlasers.pdf -- Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota * USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
I have two of their 1350W printers I don't honestly know what the
difference is between the 1250W and mine. With the 1350W, Konica Minolta has been incredibly irresponsible, IMHO in regard to environmental considerations. From my discussion with one of the upper end managers from their printer division, I'm not the least bit surprised by their attitude. On the 1350W (which what all my comments will be based upon), the toner cartridge is very easy to refill, but you do, of course, need to make sure you get the correct type of toner, as they are somewhat unique (the 3rd party distributors do sell toner they consider compatible). There is a chip on the cartridge which is literally designed to burn out when the cartridge is near empty. Once this chip is burned out, if you refill, the printer continually nags you that you have an "expired" or "out of service" cartridge, but you can click through this, and eventually it will print, however, as an extra punishment for refilling, the printer does lengthy cleaning cycles between each page, to slow the printer down to about 1/4h the normal speed. This helps to wear down components like the drum, wiper and such, and your patience. Konica/Minolta claims this is done to "protect" your printer from being damaged by inferior toners, which in fact it is just to inconvenience people, and to wear their components out more quickly. Some of the refilling/toner supply companies may offer that chip in the refill kit. If you do decide to replace your printer, I'd personally stay aware from Konica/Minolta due to their attitude about living in a toss away world. PS: the printer comes with a half filled cartridge relative to the replace cartridge models. Art If you are interested in issues surrounding e-waste, I invite you to enter the discussion at my blog: http://e-trashtalk.spaces.live.com/ Mike S. wrote: We have Konica/Minolta PagePro 1250W which was purchased on the cheap when on close-out at Staples. Beyond some annoying design defects (like a hanging paper feed shelf which is prone to break at the hinge) it produces very nice output at higher resolution than similar B&W lasers in this price class. We're now at the 4th spent toner cartridge, and my wake-up call came when Staples didn't have the replacement in stock on the store shelf anymore. Sure; I can order it with free shipping; but this gave me pause to think about the wisdom of continuing to feed it. The drum and toner are separate assemblies; so we're still on the original drum. How many toner cartridges expected before the usage is enough to require drum replacement? The cost of toner + drum durely exceeds the value of the printer (heck - saw a Samsung low end laser for $49.95 yesterday). What would you do? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
Thanks for the suggestions, all. If the 1350W has a chip in the cartridge to limit refilling options, I wonder if our earlier 1250W does as well - that would limit the attraction of trying to get it cheaply refilled. We may do so anyway, and if it craps out use that as the reason to replace it with something more economical to maintain. There's a Cartridge World not far from us; I'll pass by there one day and feel them out on this. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
Mike S. wrote:
We have Konica/Minolta PagePro 1250W which was purchased on the cheap when on close-out at Staples. Beyond some annoying design defects (like a hanging paper feed shelf which is prone to break at the hinge) it produces very nice output at higher resolution than similar B&W lasers in this price class. We're now at the 4th spent toner cartridge, and my wake-up call came when Staples didn't have the replacement in stock on the store shelf anymore. Sure; I can order it with free shipping; but this gave me pause to think about the wisdom of continuing to feed it. The drum and toner are separate assemblies; so we're still on the original drum. How many toner cartridges expected before the usage is enough to require drum replacement? The cost of toner + drum durely exceeds the value of the printer (heck - saw a Samsung low end laser for $49.95 yesterday). What would you do? In article , Arthur Entlich wrote: I have two of their 1350W printers I don't honestly know what the difference is between the 1250W and mine. With the 1350W, Konica Minolta has been incredibly irresponsible, IMHO in regard to environmental considerations. From my discussion with one of the upper end managers from their printer division, I'm not the least bit surprised by their attitude. On the 1350W (which what all my comments will be based upon), the toner cartridge is very easy to refill, but you do, of course, need to make sure you get the correct type of toner, as they are somewhat unique (the 3rd party distributors do sell toner they consider compatible). There is a chip on the cartridge which is literally designed to burn out when the cartridge is near empty. Once this chip is burned out, if you refill, the printer continually nags you that you have an "expired" or "out of service" cartridge, but you can click through this, and eventually it will print, however, as an extra punishment for refilling, the printer does lengthy cleaning cycles between each page, to slow the printer down to about 1/4h the normal speed. This helps to wear down components like the drum, wiper and such, and your patience. Konica/Minolta claims this is done to "protect" your printer from being damaged by inferior toners, which in fact it is just to inconvenience people, and to wear their components out more quickly. Some of the refilling/toner supply companies may offer that chip in the refill kit. If you do decide to replace your printer, I'd personally stay aware from Konica/Minolta due to their attitude about living in a toss away world. PS: the printer comes with a half filled cartridge relative to the replace cartridge models. I'm reviving this thread from late last year to give a followup and ask a new question. I ordered a refill kit specific to the Konica Minolta 1200/1300 series and filled the toner cartridge before it ran out. For 4 months or so, the printer output has been excellent - money well spent on the refill. Lately my wife complains that the printed pages are covered with a very light grey haze; and sure enough it is there. Adjusting the density using the control panel applet doesn't seem to change it. I removed the toner and drum cartridges and had a look. The drum is coated with a light dust of toner; I don't remember this appearance as being normal. I suppose this excess toner on the drum is related to the haze on the printed pages. I remembered discussions where proper refilling requires cleaning certain parts of the cartridge, and wonder if this is a side effect of re-using a toner cartridge not meant for extended use. Anything else to look for? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
On Fri, 08 May 2009 18:36:53 -0500, Mike S. wrote:
Mike S. wrote: We have Konica/Minolta PagePro 1250W which was purchased on the cheap when on close-out at Staples. Beyond some annoying design defects (like a hanging paper feed shelf which is prone to break at the hinge) it produces very nice output at higher resolution than similar B&W lasers in this price class. We're now at the 4th spent toner cartridge, and my wake-up call came when Staples didn't have the replacement in stock on the store shelf anymore. Sure; I can order it with free shipping; but this gave me pause to think about the wisdom of continuing to feed it. The drum and toner are separate assemblies; so we're still on the original drum. How many toner cartridges expected before the usage is enough to require drum replacement? The cost of toner + drum durely exceeds the value of the printer (heck - saw a Samsung low end laser for $49.95 yesterday). What would you do? In article , Arthur Entlich wrote: I have two of their 1350W printers I don't honestly know what the difference is between the 1250W and mine. With the 1350W, Konica Minolta has been incredibly irresponsible, IMHO in regard to environmental considerations. From my discussion with one of the upper end managers from their printer division, I'm not the least bit surprised by their attitude. On the 1350W (which what all my comments will be based upon), the toner cartridge is very easy to refill, but you do, of course, need to make sure you get the correct type of toner, as they are somewhat unique (the 3rd party distributors do sell toner they consider compatible). There is a chip on the cartridge which is literally designed to burn out when the cartridge is near empty. Once this chip is burned out, if you refill, the printer continually nags you that you have an "expired" or "out of service" cartridge, but you can click through this, and eventually it will print, however, as an extra punishment for refilling, the printer does lengthy cleaning cycles between each page, to slow the printer down to about 1/4h the normal speed. This helps to wear down components like the drum, wiper and such, and your patience. Konica/Minolta claims this is done to "protect" your printer from being damaged by inferior toners, which in fact it is just to inconvenience people, and to wear their components out more quickly. Some of the refilling/toner supply companies may offer that chip in the refill kit. If you do decide to replace your printer, I'd personally stay aware from Konica/Minolta due to their attitude about living in a toss away world. PS: the printer comes with a half filled cartridge relative to the replace cartridge models. I'm reviving this thread from late last year to give a followup and ask a new question. I ordered a refill kit specific to the Konica Minolta 1200/1300 series and filled the toner cartridge before it ran out. For 4 months or so, the printer output has been excellent - money well spent on the refill. Lately my wife complains that the printed pages are covered with a very light grey haze; and sure enough it is there. Adjusting the density using the control panel applet doesn't seem to change it. I removed the toner and drum cartridges and had a look. The drum is coated with a light dust of toner; I don't remember this appearance as being normal. I suppose this excess toner on the drum is related to the haze on the printed pages. I remembered discussions where proper refilling requires cleaning certain parts of the cartridge, and wonder if this is a side effect of re-using a toner cartridge not meant for extended use. Anything else to look for? You got what you paid for. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
measekite wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2009 18:36:53 -0500, Mike S. wrote: Mike S. wrote: We have Konica/Minolta PagePro 1250W which was purchased on the cheap when on close-out at Staples. Beyond some annoying design defects (like a hanging paper feed shelf which is prone to break at the hinge) it produces very nice output at higher resolution than similar B&W lasers in this price class. We're now at the 4th spent toner cartridge, and my wake-up call came when Staples didn't have the replacement in stock on the store shelf anymore. Sure; I can order it with free shipping; but this gave me pause to think about the wisdom of continuing to feed it. The drum and toner are separate assemblies; so we're still on the original drum. How many toner cartridges expected before the usage is enough to require drum replacement? The cost of toner + drum durely exceeds the value of the printer (heck - saw a Samsung low end laser for $49.95 yesterday). What would you do? In article , Arthur Entlich wrote: I have two of their 1350W printers I don't honestly know what the difference is between the 1250W and mine. With the 1350W, Konica Minolta has been incredibly irresponsible, IMHO in regard to environmental considerations. From my discussion with one of the upper end managers from their printer division, I'm not the least bit surprised by their attitude. On the 1350W (which what all my comments will be based upon), the toner cartridge is very easy to refill, but you do, of course, need to make sure you get the correct type of toner, as they are somewhat unique (the 3rd party distributors do sell toner they consider compatible). There is a chip on the cartridge which is literally designed to burn out when the cartridge is near empty. Once this chip is burned out, if you refill, the printer continually nags you that you have an "expired" or "out of service" cartridge, but you can click through this, and eventually it will print, however, as an extra punishment for refilling, the printer does lengthy cleaning cycles between each page, to slow the printer down to about 1/4h the normal speed. This helps to wear down components like the drum, wiper and such, and your patience. Konica/Minolta claims this is done to "protect" your printer from being damaged by inferior toners, which in fact it is just to inconvenience people, and to wear their components out more quickly. Some of the refilling/toner supply companies may offer that chip in the refill kit. If you do decide to replace your printer, I'd personally stay aware from Konica/Minolta due to their attitude about living in a toss away world. PS: the printer comes with a half filled cartridge relative to the replace cartridge models. I'm reviving this thread from late last year to give a followup and ask a new question. I ordered a refill kit specific to the Konica Minolta 1200/1300 series and filled the toner cartridge before it ran out. For 4 months or so, the printer output has been excellent - money well spent on the refill. Lately my wife complains that the printed pages are covered with a very light grey haze; and sure enough it is there. Adjusting the density using the control panel applet doesn't seem to change it. I removed the toner and drum cartridges and had a look. The drum is coated with a light dust of toner; I don't remember this appearance as being normal. I suppose this excess toner on the drum is related to the haze on the printed pages. I remembered discussions where proper refilling requires cleaning certain parts of the cartridge, and wonder if this is a side effect of re-using a toner cartridge not meant for extended use. Anything else to look for? You got what you paid for. What about that compatible photo paper you use? Did you get what you paid for? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
On May 8, 4:36*pm, (Mike S.) wrote:
I ordered a refill kit specific to the Konica Minolta 1200/1300 series and filled the toner cartridge before it ran out. For 4 months or so, the printer output has been excellent - money well spent on the refill. Lately my wife complains that the printed pages are covered with a very light grey haze; and sure enough it is there. Adjusting the density using the control panel applet doesn't seem to change it. I removed the toner and drum cartridges and had a look. The drum is coated with a light dust of toner; I don't remember this appearance as being normal. I suppose this excess toner on the drum is related to the haze on the printed pages. I remembered discussions where proper refilling requires cleaning certain parts of the cartridge, and wonder if this is a side effect of re-using a toner cartridge not meant for extended use. Anything else to look for? If I had to guess, I would guess your drum is wearing out and picking up a consistent back of toner, which gets transferred to the paper. Regardless you're in the troubleshooting zone. Replace with OEM Cartridge, if no work replace drum. You "could" do this in reverse order and have a spare drum on hand, just these things are light sensitive and a pain to store. Given you're output is consistent, I'd lean toward the drum. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Aging low-end laser: refill or replace?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Samsung Laser Refill Problem, HP 1018 any better for refill? | lbbss | Printers | 10 | October 12th 07 10:37 AM |
Ink refill Brother laser HL 2040 | [email protected] | Printers | 1 | December 19th 06 06:35 PM |
LASER JET TONER REFILL INSTRUCTIONS | wepaycash123 | Printers | 2 | April 7th 06 05:31 PM |
Laser Refill Kit Where | [email protected] | General | 1 | November 6th 03 01:13 AM |
laser Printer Toner refill | JohnNews | General | 9 | September 14th 03 04:29 AM |