If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cookies lag your browser
Cookies and other "persistent data" from websites is a lagging your browser and system as follows:
1. Tiny little ****ty files stored on your harddisk's file system causing: 1.1 Huge load times when the browser starts, harddisk needs to seek all these ****ty cookies and other crappy website data. 1.2 Fragments the file system over time. I urge all websites to stop using cookies cause it suxxx COCK hugely... 2. Further the NAG screens are super annoying. (3. Completely lags your system/harddisk as firefox tries to load all cookies at the same time making the seek times even worse and no more harddisk seek/performance resources available for other applications.) Bye, Skybuck. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Cookies lag your browser
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Cookies lag your browser
On Sat, 5 Jan 2019 17:58:13 -0500, Bill wrote:
wrote: Cookies and other "persistent data" from websites is a lagging your browser and system as follows: I use "CCleaner" to delete mine almost every day. Cookies are not going to go away any sooner than commercials are going to disappear from radio and television. May as well get CCleaner, and "fight the good fight". If cookies were ever going to "go away", we'd need something very similar to replace them. They provide a ton of functionality that people wouldn't be happy to give up. Also, contrary to the claims made in the first post in this thread, they don't cause lag, slowdowns, fragmentation, or anything else of that sort. HTTP is a stateless protocol. Cookies provide the illusion of statefulness. The web would be very different without cookies. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Cookies lag your browser
Char Jackson wrote:
HTTP is a stateless protocol. Cookies provide the illusion of statefulness. The web would be very different without cookies. Yes, we would have more privacy. I'd swap the browser remembering my username for that. How about cookies at the clients discretion instead of in the form of an "information grab". As you know, you can't even use a number of web sites without allowing them their use of cookies--and you don't even know their intentions (you may as well assume the worst, and hope you're wrong!). I think that many sites would sell whatever info they might have about you if they could get 50 cents for it--maybe they would settle for less than a dime. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Cookies lag your browser
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 01:06:28 -0500, Bill wrote:
Char Jackson wrote: HTTP is a stateless protocol. Cookies provide the illusion of statefulness. The web would be very different without cookies. Yes, we would have more privacy. We don't know that, but it seems incredibly unlikely that whatever is cooked up to replace cookies would be more respectful of user privacy. I'd swap the browser remembering my username for that. You don't need cookies for that. How about cookies at the clients discretion instead of in the form of an "information grab". AFAIK, all browsers already allow users to enable/disable cookies, and have from the beginning. As you know, you can't even use a number of web sites without allowing them their use of cookies Exactly. That's why, if cookies were to disappear for some reason, which itself is highly unlikely, the functionality they provide would have to be developed in another way. Would we be better off in the long run? I don't see how. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Cookies lag your browser
On 01/06/2019 10:05 AM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 01:06:28 -0500, Bill wrote: Char Jackson wrote: HTTP is a stateless protocol. Cookies provide the illusion of statefulness. The web would be very different without cookies. Yes, we would have more privacy. We don't know that, but it seems incredibly unlikely that whatever is cooked up to replace cookies would be more respectful of user privacy. I'd swap the browser remembering my username for that. You don't need cookies for that. How about cookies at the clients discretion instead of in the form of an "information grab". AFAIK, all browsers already allow users to enable/disable cookies, and have from the beginning. As you know, you can't even use a number of web sites without allowing them their use of cookies Exactly. That's why, if cookies were to disappear for some reason, which itself is highly unlikely, the functionality they provide would have to be developed in another way. Would we be better off in the long run? I don't see how. Well, we could have Candies or donuts! Me, I like Maple Fudge :-) :-) Rene |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Cookies lag your browser
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 01:06:28 -0500, Bill wrote:
As you know, you can't even use a number of web sites without allowing them their use of cookies--and you don't even know their intentions (you may as well assume the worst, and hope you're wrong!). - I never do. I keep a multiple OS array for that contingency, half a dozen browsers, with scrub-routines for a frequent binary wash of the connected OS. IOW - I don't go on sites without reason. VPNs and anonymous TOR are not unnecessarily unreasonable -- they are, however, suspicious discrepancies and blocked. They are also friends. Friends needn't be in all ways reasonable if they're as much accountable for that discrepancy. As there are, for the time being, among, as well, good to better sites for accounting perfunctory access across private network connections, such as Wikipedia. An acquaintance occurs when I'm blocked. I go there within a reason to be accepted on their terms and conditions, such as Ebay, but not Amazon. Two different reasons, two browsers and different operating systems, over two different HTML motives as operatives. In the former instance, Ebay will crash my browser upon "seeing" I'm directly stacking up their merchandise against Amazon offerings. Everybody's got one. Reasons are like opinions. In the military when a press representative is about, they sometimes call a briefing to be sure everyone understands they have one. They just call it by another name and body organ. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Cookies lag your browser
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 10:25:41 -0600, Rene Lamontagne
wrote: On 01/06/2019 10:05 AM, Char Jackson wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 01:06:28 -0500, Bill wrote: Char Jackson wrote: HTTP is a stateless protocol. Cookies provide the illusion of statefulness. The web would be very different without cookies. Yes, we would have more privacy. We don't know that, but it seems incredibly unlikely that whatever is cooked up to replace cookies would be more respectful of user privacy. I'd swap the browser remembering my username for that. You don't need cookies for that. How about cookies at the clients discretion instead of in the form of an "information grab". AFAIK, all browsers already allow users to enable/disable cookies, and have from the beginning. As you know, you can't even use a number of web sites without allowing them their use of cookies Exactly. That's why, if cookies were to disappear for some reason, which itself is highly unlikely, the functionality they provide would have to be developed in another way. Would we be better off in the long run? I don't see how. Well, we could have Candies or donuts! Me, I like Maple Fudge :-) :-) So no tapioca pudding, then? :-) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Cookies lag your browser
On 01/06/2019 5:40 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 10:25:41 -0600, Rene Lamontagne wrote: On 01/06/2019 10:05 AM, Char Jackson wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 01:06:28 -0500, Bill wrote: Char Jackson wrote: HTTP is a stateless protocol. Cookies provide the illusion of statefulness. The web would be very different without cookies. Yes, we would have more privacy. We don't know that, but it seems incredibly unlikely that whatever is cooked up to replace cookies would be more respectful of user privacy. I'd swap the browser remembering my username for that. You don't need cookies for that. How about cookies at the clients discretion instead of in the form of an "information grab". AFAIK, all browsers already allow users to enable/disable cookies, and have from the beginning. As you know, you can't even use a number of web sites without allowing them their use of cookies Exactly. That's why, if cookies were to disappear for some reason, which itself is highly unlikely, the functionality they provide would have to be developed in another way. Would we be better off in the long run? I don't see how. Well, we could have Candies or donuts! Me, I like Maple Fudge :-) :-) So no tapioca pudding, then? :-) Nope, but I love breaded Pickerel fillets or Walleye as yo call them, followed by Saskatoon pie. :-) Rene |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Cookies lag your browser
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:54:10 -0600, Rene Lamontagne
wrote: On 01/06/2019 5:40 PM, Char Jackson wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 10:25:41 -0600, Rene Lamontagne wrote: On 01/06/2019 10:05 AM, Char Jackson wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 01:06:28 -0500, Bill wrote: Char Jackson wrote: HTTP is a stateless protocol. Cookies provide the illusion of statefulness. The web would be very different without cookies. Yes, we would have more privacy. We don't know that, but it seems incredibly unlikely that whatever is cooked up to replace cookies would be more respectful of user privacy. I'd swap the browser remembering my username for that. You don't need cookies for that. How about cookies at the clients discretion instead of in the form of an "information grab". AFAIK, all browsers already allow users to enable/disable cookies, and have from the beginning. As you know, you can't even use a number of web sites without allowing them their use of cookies Exactly. That's why, if cookies were to disappear for some reason, which itself is highly unlikely, the functionality they provide would have to be developed in another way. Would we be better off in the long run? I don't see how. Well, we could have Candies or donuts! Me, I like Maple Fudge :-) :-) So no tapioca pudding, then? :-) Nope, but I love breaded Pickerel fillets or Walleye as yo call them, followed by Saskatoon pie. :-) I'm not familiar with those, but pickled herring is pretty good. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PowerExtreme announces a power supply that works on cookies ! | Skybuck Flying[_7_] | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | April 1st 14 09:10 AM |
remove temp files and cookies? | dh@. | Homebuilt PC's | 3 | October 2nd 05 02:48 AM |
Hotmail cookies broken? | Phred | Dell Computers | 6 | May 9th 05 12:54 PM |
Cookies | Ben Myers | Packard Bell Computers | 5 | September 10th 04 06:41 AM |
Cookies and fake email addresses | Kathy Tabb | Gateway Computers | 1 | April 7th 04 12:47 AM |