If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anybody have 4 GB (ram) in their system ?
"Tom Lake" wrote in message ... I have an MSI GNB Max with P4 3.06GHz and 4GB dual channel DDR RAM. Do you get the full 4GB in Windows? In my experience, there's no motherboard out there today designed for non-workstation chips (i.e. non-Xeon / Opteron) that works 100% - and I mean 100% - stable with more than 2GB of memory. Windows reports 3.5GB RAM and the GNB Max *IS* 100% stable. The chipset is the Intel E7205 server chipset with a 533MHz FSB and can only use up to DDR 2100 but with the dual channel configuration, that gives the CPU all the bandwidth it can use anyway. Using faster RAM wouldn't speed up the processor at all. I've run it 24/7 for about two years now, only rebooting after new software installs or updates Tom Lake If you ran with XP server, given that yours is a 'server' chipset, you ought to see 4GB reported, rather than 3.5GB. This is because of the memory limitations I mentioned, where the motherboard devices need some memory area. There is an address extension mode, that gets round this, is supported on the SLI, ought to be supported on your board, but requires XP server, or 'better' to use. On the SLI, how much memory you see in standard XP, depends on what video cards you have fitted. It can drop to only about 3.2GB, if you have two cards using SLI. Best Wishes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Anybody have 4 GB (ram) in their system ?
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 21:14:38 GMT, "Roger Hamlett"
wrote: "Tom Lake" wrote in message .. . I have an MSI GNB Max with P4 3.06GHz and 4GB dual channel DDR RAM. Do you get the full 4GB in Windows? In my experience, there's no motherboard out there today designed for non-workstation chips (i.e. non-Xeon / Opteron) that works 100% - and I mean 100% - stable with more than 2GB of memory. Windows reports 3.5GB RAM and the GNB Max *IS* 100% stable. The chipset is the Intel E7205 server chipset with a 533MHz FSB and can only use up to DDR 2100 but with the dual channel configuration, that gives the CPU all the bandwidth it can use anyway. Using faster RAM wouldn't speed up the processor at all. I've run it 24/7 for about two years now, only rebooting after new software installs or updates Tom Lake If you ran with XP server, given that yours is a 'server' chipset, you ought to see 4GB reported, rather than 3.5GB. This is because of the memory limitations I mentioned, where the motherboard devices need some memory area. There is an address extension mode, that gets round this, is supported on the SLI, ought to be supported on your board, but requires XP server, or 'better' to use. On the SLI, how much memory you see in standard XP, depends on what video cards you have fitted. It can drop to only about 3.2GB, if you have two cards using SLI. Best Wishes I'm running 4 gigs of DDR 3200 on a P4C800-E Deluxe, W2K Pro, and the machine is showing 3,797,740 KB of Ram. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Anybody have 4 GB (ram) in their system ?
"justindavid" wrote in message news On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 21:14:38 GMT, "Roger Hamlett" wrote: "Tom Lake" wrote in message . .. I have an MSI GNB Max with P4 3.06GHz and 4GB dual channel DDR RAM. Do you get the full 4GB in Windows? In my experience, there's no motherboard out there today designed for non-workstation chips (i.e. non-Xeon / Opteron) that works 100% - and I mean 100% - stable with more than 2GB of memory. Windows reports 3.5GB RAM and the GNB Max *IS* 100% stable. The chipset is the Intel E7205 server chipset with a 533MHz FSB and can only use up to DDR 2100 but with the dual channel configuration, that gives the CPU all the bandwidth it can use anyway. Using faster RAM wouldn't speed up the processor at all. I've run it 24/7 for about two years now, only rebooting after new software installs or updates Tom Lake If you ran with XP server, given that yours is a 'server' chipset, you ought to see 4GB reported, rather than 3.5GB. This is because of the memory limitations I mentioned, where the motherboard devices need some memory area. There is an address extension mode, that gets round this, is supported on the SLI, ought to be supported on your board, but requires XP server, or 'better' to use. On the SLI, how much memory you see in standard XP, depends on what video cards you have fitted. It can drop to only about 3.2GB, if you have two cards using SLI. Best Wishes I'm running 4 gigs of DDR 3200 on a P4C800-E Deluxe, W2K Pro, and the machine is showing 3,797,740 KB of Ram. Yes. The loss is dependant on how many areas are mapped into the area below 4GB (and how large they are). Your figure would drop if (for instance), you added a typical SCSI adapter, or some video cards. Two SLI cards, create _large_ holes in this area... Best Wishes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Anybody have 4 GB (ram) in their system ?
I'm running 4 gigs of DDR 3200 on a P4C800-E Deluxe, W2K Pro, and the machine is showing 3,797,740 KB of Ram. Yes. The loss is dependant on how many areas are mapped into the area below 4GB (and how large they are). Your figure would drop if (for instance), you added a typical SCSI adapter, or some video cards. Two SLI cards, create _large_ holes in this area... Best Wishes I am running an Adaptec 2940 U2/U2W scsi card with a scsi hard drive... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Anybody have 4 GB (ram) in their system ?
"justindavid" wrote in message ... I'm running 4 gigs of DDR 3200 on a P4C800-E Deluxe, W2K Pro, and the machine is showing 3,797,740 KB of Ram. Yes. The loss is dependant on how many areas are mapped into the area below 4GB (and how large they are). Your figure would drop if (for instance), you added a typical SCSI adapter, or some video cards. Two SLI cards, create _large_ holes in this area... Best Wishes I am running an Adaptec 2940 U2/U2W scsi card with a scsi hard drive... Your figure sounds just a fraction lower than I'd have expected, with a modern AGP video card, and a SCSI card, but it is still a possible level. However the memory 'holes' vary so much from card to card, that it is very difficult to be sure. For example, a Radeon, 9800GT, with 128MB fitted, normally creates a 128MB hole on it's own. Two 256MB GeForce cards running in SLI, make a 512MB hole, just for their main memory (and a few others as well...). Conversely, a standard Matrox AGP card, with just 64MB of RAM, only creates a 64MB hole, and the Adaptec, normally creates a small hole for a buffer, and another for it's BIOS (if the BIOS isn't enabled, the space drops a little). This is why I say 'some video cards'. Also some makes of older SCSI card are a little 'naughty', and despite only having a small BIOS, reserve a hole, that is far larger than the memory that is fitted. If you run a couple of large video cards, some network cards (many older designs only reserve ports, not parts of the main PCI memory map), with a BIOS present, etc. etc., it is suprisingly 'easy' to find 3/4GB, having disappeared!... Best Wishes |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newbie: OC Advice: AMDXP2200 CPU | Donald Bock | Overclocking AMD Processors | 2 | March 12th 05 12:14 AM |
Hard Drive as slave keeps system from booting | jack | General | 6 | March 7th 05 05:13 AM |
Dual processor system vs Single processor system | HawkEye_42 | General | 3 | January 27th 04 11:01 AM |
Multi-boot Windows XP without special software | Timothy Daniels | General | 11 | December 12th 03 05:38 AM |
The Technology of PS3 | subsystem | General | 31 | November 22nd 03 03:05 AM |