A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage & Hardrives
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Guide to the common implementations of RAID



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 4th 05, 07:07 PM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Guide to the common implementations of RAID

Hi guys,

I've written a short guide to the most common levels of RAID in use,
mainly so people new to computers and storage solutions can get to
grips with it. I know I would have found a guide useful a year ago when
I was new to RAID. I know there are many resources out there, but I
tried to make mine more accessible. Please let me know what you think,
and feel free to comment if you have any opinions.

RAIDers of the lost Archives:
http://www.thedaytoday.com/archives/000012.php

Thank you.

Dave

  #2  
Old February 4th 05, 07:54 PM
Yura Pismerov
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Another link for Google search ?

Dave wrote:
Hi guys,

I've written a short guide to the most common levels of RAID in use,
mainly so people new to computers and storage solutions can get to
grips with it. I know I would have found a guide useful a year ago when
I was new to RAID. I know there are many resources out there, but I
tried to make mine more accessible. Please let me know what you think,
and feel free to comment if you have any opinions.

RAIDers of the lost Archives:
http://www.thedaytoday.com/archives/000012.php

Thank you.

Dave


  #3  
Old February 4th 05, 09:09 PM
Maxim S. Shatskih
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

RAID 10, or RAID 1+0 - a stripe of several small mirrors. The best, if $$$
is not a limiter.

--
Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation

http://www.storagecraft.com

"Dave" wrote in message
oups.com...
Hi guys,

I've written a short guide to the most common levels of RAID in use,
mainly so people new to computers and storage solutions can get to
grips with it. I know I would have found a guide useful a year ago when
I was new to RAID. I know there are many resources out there, but I
tried to make mine more accessible. Please let me know what you think,
and feel free to comment if you have any opinions.

RAIDers of the lost Archives:
http://www.thedaytoday.com/archives/000012.php

Thank you.

Dave



  #4  
Old February 4th 05, 09:30 PM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Do you have personal experiance of RAID 10 or 1+0? I wanted to keep my
guide simple and didn't include them for that reason. They do sound
like the best of both worlds (speed and fault tolerance). Can they be
configured via software or is hardware RAID required. If software,
which?

  #5  
Old February 4th 05, 10:19 PM
Bill Todd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave wrote:
Hi guys,

I've written a short guide to the most common levels of RAID in use,
mainly so people new to computers and storage solutions can get to
grips with it. I know I would have found a guide useful a year ago when
I was new to RAID. I know there are many resources out there, but I
tried to make mine more accessible. Please let me know what you think,
and feel free to comment if you have any opinions.


Only a couple of nits:

1. Two-drive RAID-0 configurations are entirely possible and sensible.

2. *Drives* do not have parity data in RAID-5 ("Each drive's parity
data is distributed to the remaining drives" is nonsense).

3. 'A stripe array that is mirrored' is a very rare RAID construct:
most 'RAID-10' implementations are a set of mirror pairs which are then
striped.

- bill
  #6  
Old February 5th 05, 12:56 AM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks. I noticed the first one, and someone else also e-mailed me
about it. Also your second point makes perfect sense - I didn't think
that through did I!? As for the last, isn't that the same thing phrased
differently? I do admit your phrasing does make it easier to
comprehend. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Also, if I was being pedantic (sorry, but it's just in my nature) I'd
point out that three 'nits' is more than a couple.

I'll make adjustments to the guide tomorrow - thanks for your input.

Dave

  #7  
Old February 5th 05, 02:10 AM
Bill Todd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave wrote:
Thanks. I noticed the first one, and someone else also e-mailed me
about it. Also your second point makes perfect sense - I didn't think
that through did I!? As for the last, isn't that the same thing phrased
differently?


No. A RAID-0 stripe which is then mirrored (to another RAID-0 stripe)
is quite different in failure (and performance after a failure)
characteristics from a set of disk mirror pairs across which data is
then striped (in a RAID-0 manner but using mirror pairs rather than
individual disks in the array).

I do admit your phrasing does make it easier to
comprehend. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Also, if I was being pedantic (sorry, but it's just in my nature) I'd
point out that three 'nits' is more than a couple.


The physical dictionary closest to my hand includes as its fourth
definition of couple "an indefinite small number; a few". I wrote my
opening phrase with only the first two corrections in mind, but when a
third appeared did not feel the need to alter it.

- bill
  #8  
Old February 5th 05, 04:09 AM
Faeandar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 4 Feb 2005 12:30:26 -0800, "Dave" wrote:

Do you have personal experiance of RAID 10 or 1+0? I wanted to keep my
guide simple and didn't include them for that reason. They do sound
like the best of both worlds (speed and fault tolerance). Can they be
configured via software or is hardware RAID required. If software,
which?


"The Best" raid is dependent on your workload and IO patterns. Not
all workloads are optimal under raid 10. Example would be very large
file transfers (multimedia, geological exploration, etc), they are
much better served by raid3 performance-wise if implemented properly.

But, for 95% of applications, raid 10 is "the best".

~F
  #9  
Old February 5th 05, 01:30 PM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for your clarification bill. As for your use of 'couple', I
shall let you off - assuming you were using it informally. As an IT guy
though I prefer to be strictly correct, which is why I appreciate your
feedback.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
P4P800 Deluxe - Questions about moving from standalone IDE to IDE RAID Bob Rafuse Asus Motherboards 3 January 9th 05 11:53 PM
Asus P4C800 Deluxe ATA SATA and RAID Promise FastTrack 378 Drivers and more. Julian Asus Motherboards 2 August 11th 04 12:43 PM
How to set up RAID 0+1 on P4C800E-DLX MB -using 4 SATA HDD's & 2 ATA133 HHD? Data Wing Asus Motherboards 2 June 5th 04 03:47 PM
P4P800DLX from non-raid to raid Splitskull Asus Motherboards 2 June 2nd 04 10:51 AM
Gigabyte GA-8KNXP and Promise SX4000 RAID Controller Old Dude Gigabyte Motherboards 4 November 12th 03 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.