If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
I suggest you try Super Fdisk!
Super Fdisk is a driven disk partitioning utility. With Super Fdisk you can quickly and easily create, delete, format partitions on IDE/ATA/SATA/SCSI hard disk drives without destroying data. Super Fdisk manages for Windows 95/98/Me, MS-DOS, Freedos. more info : http://www.ptdd.com/manual2.htm |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 29 May 2005 22:00:28 -0400, "Peter"
wrote: But why you insist on using DLG? Is there a reason for that? It worked. Will backup occur if you leave your system in the BIOS screen, or boot with DOS floppy? (I mean no Windows running, but PC powered up) No. So "s/w scheduler" gets corrupted, Enermax will not do the Backup? Yes. Then backup is not entirely hardware based The copy part is. You could. What was the result? It worked. That indeed is weird. Unexplained. I must be doing something to screw things up. I am trying a lot of thing out. Did you scanned your disks outside of Enermax to see if they are healthy? No. I agree with you. It is an interesting product and it had quite good reviews. I have not seen any reviews. Can you point me to some of the more significant ones. Enermax also has a SATA unit for those into that technology. -- Map of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/vrwc.html If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank an American soldier. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
But why you insist on using DLG? Is there a reason for that?
It worked. Except that Windows error when it sets Active flag on. Then backup is not entirely hardware based The copy part is. Presumably. You would need to start backup and shutdown Windows to test it. You could. What was the result? It worked. Great, you must have all 3 drives the same size then. I have not seen any reviews. Can you point me to some of the more significant ones. http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=20476 http://www.coolergiant.co.uk/review/...CE-RAID352.jpg |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 07:26:42 -0400, "Peter"
wrote: But why you insist on using DLG? Is there a reason for that? It worked. Except that Windows error when it sets Active flag on. Yep. That's why I needed a utility like MBR Wizard to clear the Active bit. Once I did that, it all worked (but I had to remove the failed driver first to prevent Win2K from re-attaching it). Then backup is not entirely hardware based The copy part is. Presumably. You would need to start backup and shutdown Windows to test it. I presume you mean "shut down Windows in the middle of a backup". Yes, I have done that too. The result is as you would expect - the backup disk is corrupted beyond use. You could. What was the result? It worked. Great, you must have all 3 drives the same size then. Enermax claims that the target (RAID mirror or backup disk) must be the same size or larger. One of the things I do not like about the Enermax is that it copies the entire source disk, including unused space. That's great if you want to preserve deleted files but the user does not want to do that all the time. There should be a checkbox to let the user decide. Another thing I may have mentioned is that when you insert the target into its bay and lock it down, the s/w begins a backup whether you wanted it or not - and there is no Stop button available as with RAID. I have to kill the DynaView process in Task Manager, which may be the reason I have corrupted the source a couple of times. http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=20476 http://www.coolergiant.co.uk/review/...CE-RAID352.jpg Thanks. -- Map of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/vrwc.html If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank an American soldier. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you Bob for sharing your experiences with Enermax 352 DynaBack.
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 10:24:04 -0400, "Peter"
wrote: Thank you Bob for sharing your experiences with Enermax 352 DynaBack. Please understand that I am not endorsing the unit - I am evaluating it. Hopefully if I pass along my experiences I can save someone from some of the pitfalls I have experienced. For example since I last commented on the unit, I tried to make a backup out of a RAID-1 layoff. I set the s/w for RAID and let it create the RAID mirror on the target. When it was all over I tried to use the target to boot. I got disk errors. So I am going to use the Backup setting for backups. I thought it would be neat to let the unit keep making the mirror until such time that you were going to do something radical to your machine, in which case you would stop the mirror thereby creating a backup frozen at a time prior to any potential trouble. If you had to recover from the mirror disk it would be the absolute latest copy possible. But alas, I could not get it to work reliably. -- Map of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/vrwc.html If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank an American soldier. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 10:24:04 -0400, "Peter"
wrote: Thank you Bob for sharing your experiences with Enermax 352 DynaBack. Is that a diplomatic way of saying that you have had enough? :-) -- Map of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/vrwc.html If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank an American soldier. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Bob wrote in message ... Peter wrote Then backup is not entirely hardware based The copy part is. Cant be, otherwise you wouldnt get the effect below. Presumably. You would need to start backup and shutdown Windows to test it. I presume you mean "shut down Windows in the middle of a backup". Yes, I have done that too. The result is as you would expect - the backup disk is corrupted beyond use. Then the copy part ISNT entirely hardware based at all. You could. What was the result? It worked. Great, you must have all 3 drives the same size then. Enermax claims that the target (RAID mirror or backup disk) must be the same size or larger. One of the things I do not like about the Enermax is that it copies the entire source disk, including unused space. That's great if you want to preserve deleted files but the user does not want to do that all the time. There should be a checkbox to let the user decide. How is hardware sposed to work out what is free space ? Another thing I may have mentioned is that when you insert the target into its bay and lock it down, the s/w begins a backup whether you wanted it or not - and there is no Stop button available as with RAID. I have to kill the DynaView process in Task Manager, Then the copy part ISNT entirely hardware based at all. which may be the reason I have corrupted the source a couple of times. Urk, how utterly obscene. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you Bob for sharing your experiences with Enermax 352 DynaBack.
Is that a diplomatic way of saying that you have had enough? :-) Not at all. I just wanted to say that I appreciate your detailed comments about this product. If you have additional ideas or issues with this product, please let us know. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 14:00:32 -0400, "Peter"
wrote: Thank you Bob for sharing your experiences with Enermax 352 DynaBack. Is that a diplomatic way of saying that you have had enough? :-) Not at all. I just wanted to say that I appreciate your detailed comments about this product. If you have additional ideas or issues with this product, please let us know. Here's some more. The instructions warn you not to turn off the DynaView engine unless absolutely necessary for low-level disk operations like Norton Disk Doctor, et al. I have noticed that some low-level functions like SMART monitors will cause DynaView to stop on its own without warning. The instructions, and the popup warning, when you initiate the shutdown, state that you should not insert/remove any disks from the unit. I am beginning to suspect that the cause of the corruption of the main disk on those two occasions I mentioned have been caused by not having DynaView operational, in which case the unit does not know how to shut down properly. That possibly causes the pagefile to become corrupted, which is what CHKDSK reports when it attempts to fix things. -- Map of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy http://home.houston.rr.com/rkba/vrwc.html If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English, thank an American soldier. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Disk Management - New Partition option Greyed Out | Tapas Das | Dell Computers | 3 | March 23rd 05 03:58 PM |
Partition Table Problems "Number of sectors in partition is inconsistent." | Grey Hodge | Storage (alternative) | 9 | March 15th 05 06:02 PM |
corrupted partition table - help needed! | Justin Case | General | 0 | August 3rd 04 09:22 AM |
Lost Partition | Moir | Storage (alternative) | 3 | October 2nd 03 01:07 AM |
ABOUT PqRP - The PqRP de- mystified - PqRP FAQ - RFC | Joep | Storage (alternative) | 2 | August 4th 03 03:53 PM |