If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Athlon XP 2400+ Asus A7V333 help please
Hi all,
I'm very confused as to which Athlon XP 2400+ my Asus A7V333 (PCB rev 1.1) can handle. Looking at the Asus site, I can only have the (Model 8?) Thoroughbred, as the Thornton is for the PCB rev 2.0 version A7V333 only. But I heard whisperings that it *could* actually take the Thornton but the cache wouldn't be reached or something. As I'm a 'novice intermediate' I would not bother getting the Thornton if it meant I had to tweak any BIOS settings to allow this CPU, and would therefore just go with the Thoroughbred - but I'm having difficulty finding a UK supplier with the Thoroughbred in stock, and Thornton's are all over the place. Please can someone advise me on this? Would I harm my board using the Thornton, or will it plain not handle it as the Asus site suggests? Any help would be most helpful. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:07:25 +0000, Chogaire wrote:
Hi all, I'm very confused as to which Athlon XP 2400+ my Asus A7V333 (PCB rev 1.1) can handle. Looking at the Asus site, I can only have the (Model 8?) Thoroughbred, as the Thornton is for the PCB rev 2.0 version A7V333 only. But I heard whisperings that it *could* actually take the Thornton but the cache wouldn't be reached or something. As I'm a 'novice intermediate' I would not bother getting the Thornton if it meant I had to tweak any BIOS settings to allow this CPU, and would therefore just go with the Thoroughbred - but I'm having difficulty finding a UK supplier with the Thoroughbred in stock, and Thornton's are all over the place. Please can someone advise me on this? Would I harm my board using the Thornton, or will it plain not handle it as the Asus site suggests? Any help would be most helpful. Why not just get a 2500+? Set divider to 5, fsb to 166-185, and/or raise multiplier if you happen to one that's not locked. I'm not sure what a thornton core is. What's the CPUID for it? A barton with only 256K L2 cache enabled? -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Not a good idea Wes...because the A7V333 rev1.1 only supports
133FSB.......for 166FSB support you would need the rev 2.0. Any chip you buy now is very likely to be multiplier locked so getting a 166FSB chip and increasing the multi/decreasing the FSB is no longer an option. This rev of A7V333 would be ok for any Socket A cpu that runs on a 133MHz FSB (266FSB in AMD speak) including the Thornton if they are available in 266FSB versions (the Thornton is just a Barton with half the L2 turned off) -- *****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address***** "Wes Newell" wrote in message news On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:07:25 +0000, Chogaire wrote: Hi all, I'm very confused as to which Athlon XP 2400+ my Asus A7V333 (PCB rev 1.1) can handle. Looking at the Asus site, I can only have the (Model 8?) Thoroughbred, as the Thornton is for the PCB rev 2.0 version A7V333 only. But I heard whisperings that it *could* actually take the Thornton but the cache wouldn't be reached or something. As I'm a 'novice intermediate' I would not bother getting the Thornton if it meant I had to tweak any BIOS settings to allow this CPU, and would therefore just go with the Thoroughbred - but I'm having difficulty finding a UK supplier with the Thoroughbred in stock, and Thornton's are all over the place. Please can someone advise me on this? Would I harm my board using the Thornton, or will it plain not handle it as the Asus site suggests? Any help would be most helpful. Why not just get a 2500+? Set divider to 5, fsb to 166-185, and/or raise multiplier if you happen to one that's not locked. I'm not sure what a thornton core is. What's the CPUID for it? A barton with only 256K L2 cache enabled? -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Look for a bios update....?
/Esso "BigBadger" skrev i meddelandet ... Not a good idea Wes...because the A7V333 rev1.1 only supports 133FSB.......for 166FSB support you would need the rev 2.0. Any chip you buy now is very likely to be multiplier locked so getting a 166FSB chip and increasing the multi/decreasing the FSB is no longer an option. This rev of A7V333 would be ok for any Socket A cpu that runs on a 133MHz FSB (266FSB in AMD speak) including the Thornton if they are available in 266FSB versions (the Thornton is just a Barton with half the L2 turned off) -- *****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address***** "Wes Newell" wrote in message news On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:07:25 +0000, Chogaire wrote: Hi all, I'm very confused as to which Athlon XP 2400+ my Asus A7V333 (PCB rev 1.1) can handle. Looking at the Asus site, I can only have the (Model 8?) Thoroughbred, as the Thornton is for the PCB rev 2.0 version A7V333 only. But I heard whisperings that it *could* actually take the Thornton but the cache wouldn't be reached or something. As I'm a 'novice intermediate' I would not bother getting the Thornton if it meant I had to tweak any BIOS settings to allow this CPU, and would therefore just go with the Thoroughbred - but I'm having difficulty finding a UK supplier with the Thoroughbred in stock, and Thornton's are all over the place. Please can someone advise me on this? Would I harm my board using the Thornton, or will it plain not handle it as the Asus site suggests? Any help would be most helpful. Why not just get a 2500+? Set divider to 5, fsb to 166-185, and/or raise multiplier if you happen to one that's not locked. I'm not sure what a thornton core is. What's the CPUID for it? A barton with only 256K L2 cache enabled? -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"esso" wrote in message ... Look for a bios update....? /Esso That's my problem, it's not the bios..I have the right bios, it's the PCB revision I'm lacking, but I can't see why it would not allow a Thorton, it has exactly the same specs as the thoroughbred - they are just Barton's with half the level 2 cache turned off. I just wish I could still find a 2400+ thoroughbred as AMD no longer make them, I don't really want the Thorton - it's just that I thought *if* I could get away with it, but it looks as though I can't because I don't have the rev 2.0 of my mobo. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I think I mentioned earlier...as long as it runs on a 133MHz (266DDR) FSB
you can run any socket A cpu, including a Thornton. You could even run a Barton but because they don't make any 133FSB bartons you would have to underclock the FSB. -- *****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address***** "Chogaire" wrote in message ... "esso" wrote in message ... Look for a bios update....? /Esso That's my problem, it's not the bios..I have the right bios, it's the PCB revision I'm lacking, but I can't see why it would not allow a Thorton, it has exactly the same specs as the thoroughbred - they are just Barton's with half the level 2 cache turned off. I just wish I could still find a 2400+ thoroughbred as AMD no longer make them, I don't really want the Thorton - it's just that I thought *if* I could get away with it, but it looks as though I can't because I don't have the rev 2.0 of my mobo. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"BigBadger" wrote in This rev of A7V333 would be ok for any Socket A cpu that runs on a 133MHz FSB (266FSB in AMD speak) including the Thornton if they are available in 266FSB versions (the Thornton is just a Barton with half the L2 turned off) Are you *dead* sure of this? When I look at the CPU support on the ASUS website, it says that rev 1.1 will only allow the model 8 (thoroughbred) and I would need rev 2.0 to allow the model 10 (Thorton). The only difference in the two I can see is the voltage - with the thoroughbred/palamino at 1.75 and the thorton running at 1.65. Even though I have the right BIOS, 1.65 is not a included option in the list in the BIOS, 1.75 is the minimum. As far as the 266FSB is concerned then the 2400+ Thorton is exactly that, and my board will happily have that as you say. I read somewhere on a forum last night that someone was trying to run the model 10 thorton in a board that would only *officially* allow the model 8 t-bred, and they were getting crashes and stuff. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Yep 'dead' sure...By the way, most T'breds run on 1.65V the same at
Thornton. The two CPU's are the same in every respect apart from the Thornton has extra cache, which is disabled and 'invisible' to the motherboard anyway...as long as it's 133FSB (266DDR) you will be fine. -- *****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address***** "Chogaire" wrote in message ... "BigBadger" wrote in This rev of A7V333 would be ok for any Socket A cpu that runs on a 133MHz FSB (266FSB in AMD speak) including the Thornton if they are available in 266FSB versions (the Thornton is just a Barton with half the L2 turned off) Are you *dead* sure of this? When I look at the CPU support on the ASUS website, it says that rev 1.1 will only allow the model 8 (thoroughbred) and I would need rev 2.0 to allow the model 10 (Thorton). The only difference in the two I can see is the voltage - with the thoroughbred/palamino at 1.75 and the thorton running at 1.65. Even though I have the right BIOS, 1.65 is not a included option in the list in the BIOS, 1.75 is the minimum. As far as the 266FSB is concerned then the 2400+ Thorton is exactly that, and my board will happily have that as you say. I read somewhere on a forum last night that someone was trying to run the model 10 thorton in a board that would only *officially* allow the model 8 t-bred, and they were getting crashes and stuff. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"BigBadger" wrote in message ... Yep 'dead' sure...By the way, most T'breds run on 1.65V the same at Thornton. The two CPU's are the same in every respect apart from the Thornton has extra cache, which is disabled and 'invisible' to the motherboard anyway...as long as it's 133FSB (266DDR) you will be fine. That's good news. By the way, will the BIOS recognise the v core change in the newly installed cpu and will it then show 1.65v as an option, as because I have said, in my list of options it's only upwards of 1.75v and that is what is concerning me and making me wonder if *that* is why the ASUS site is telling me I need rev 2.0 of my mobo, and that could be the reason why I've heard some model 10 Thortons are crashing PC's that should by rights take the model 8 t-breds. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I've just checked the Asus site and you are quite correct in the advice Asus
are giving. I've got to say that I've not actually tried a Thornton on a rev 1.1 (my system uses a rev2.0 board)...I cant see any reason at all why they would not work...FSB is ok, voltage is ok....If it were me I'd be happy to give it a try...but maybe when I said 'dead' sure I was being over confident...It's up to you. -- *****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address***** "Chogaire" wrote in message ... "BigBadger" wrote in message ... Yep 'dead' sure...By the way, most T'breds run on 1.65V the same at Thornton. The two CPU's are the same in every respect apart from the Thornton has extra cache, which is disabled and 'invisible' to the motherboard anyway...as long as it's 133FSB (266DDR) you will be fine. That's good news. By the way, will the BIOS recognise the v core change in the newly installed cpu and will it then show 1.65v as an option, as because I have said, in my list of options it's only upwards of 1.75v and that is what is concerning me and making me wonder if *that* is why the ASUS site is telling me I need rev 2.0 of my mobo, and that could be the reason why I've heard some model 10 Thortons are crashing PC's that should by rights take the model 8 t-breds. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
upgrading to asus k8v se deluxe mb with athlon 64 3000+ | Mike Simpson | AMD x86-64 Processors | 4 | November 6th 04 06:18 PM |
Athlon 2400 XP vs 2800 XP | Sam Carleton | General | 7 | February 9th 04 06:41 PM |
A7V333 with Athlon 3000 XP | MarkW | General | 8 | January 3rd 04 09:32 PM |
Slowest Athlon 64 humbles fastest P4 in gaming | Tone-EQ | Overclocking AMD Processors | 1 | December 15th 03 04:09 PM |
Asus A7V333 rev. 1.02 + AMD XP1800+ | Jean | General | 0 | September 6th 03 08:57 PM |