Roxio DirectCD's recording speed can't be adjusted anymore...

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...mindspring.com
(Messages 10, 12 -- 34, 54 -- 69)

( No pipsqueaks have been able to prove ANY of the above is a libel )
( -- despite Mikey's supposed to have proof of misquotes!!! )


Tim Kroesen (Pipsqueak) "Ummmmmm"-ed:

Follow *all* advice at your own risk of course...g

[ Idiot's perpetual silly grin - g ]

Mine is to use the media the drive was *designed* for; not what it
*hopefully* may be backwards compatible with. Hopefully someone who
already had such problems will chime in...

No; I don't use RW drives at all;
just read the common problems reported here daily for years...g

[ Idiot's perpetual silly grin - g ]

Shouldn't you then stick to your MOANING, sicko?

====================================
Timmy Kroesen - Self-Righteous Idiot
====================================

========================================
From: Doc_Holliday
Date: 7/12/01

Timmy Kroesen ("Net-Kook") "Ummmmmm"-ed:


Tim, I will be posting at least once a day a post on you, not to you.
It will be a form letter post so as I will not be replying too. Just
read the form post, to keep your ego-trip going.

I think it will let new comers just know how you like to defend a
product you yourself have never tried. Also how you post to others
that have also not tried asking how they can talk about a product they
have not tried. It seems you have two standers when it comes to that.

It's ok for you but anyone else it's not. With all the problems I
have I can say I am no hypocrite unlike you. The post or 2 I send out
to warn the new comers will have a different name on them each time to
make sure they are seen by all. You Tim I have found to have a much
bigger mental problem than I have ever had, odd but that makes me feel
better. This is probable how you created SMH and now you have both of
us to deal with. I'm sure the group will not like having a second one
in here like that. But as long as people like you are in this group
I'm sure that more of us will be created. So see, just like the GOD
you want to be, you are. You now have created two and more on the way
I would guess. You are a smart-ass punk and someday that will bite you
right in your ass.

You are a self-righteous idiot on an ego-trip who thinks he can do no
wrong and this is apparent when you self admit you have not used ezcd
since 3.5 . But being a GOD in your own mind thinks he knows it all.

Your kind are a dime a dozen and I pity you.
With all my hang-ups I would not trade places with you.
========================================


"ned ludd" wrote...

Tim Kroesen (Pipsqueak) "Ummmmmm"-ed:

Ignore these idiots; you likely have a dying laser.
snip
BTW; use *only* discs speed rated for the drive you burn them on;
using 4x RW on a 32x modern drive is asking for trouble...

Have you ever owned a 32X writer, or any RW burner? Is this based on
personal experience or are you still parrotting of the rocket scientist's
crackpot theory that manufacturers are so cynical or incompetent that
they are incapable of or couldn't be bothered providing adequate firmware
for their writers.

Ignore the parrot.

Manufacturers still include 4X rewriting speeds on 52X writers, presumably
for backward compatibility with 1-4X media, though it's hard to tell from
the scanty specs provided for most models.

Just as several HS writers I have access to have no problems burning LS
media, my Ultraspeed also exhibits no misbehaviour with 1-4X media. The LS
media, some of it packet written has not faded after nearly 4 years
(obviously I can't make similar longevity claims for the Ultraspeed writer).
STILL waiting to lose ANY data from CD or DVD RW, can't make that claim for
write once media.

The one thing I wouldn't recommend is packet writing to 700MB RW discs
(though there may be others who have a writer/media match that works better
than mine). I have only found a single disc which is stable, 650MB discs
(even dubious, unheard of brands) have proved completely reliable, and the
same 700MB discs master with low error rates. If I ever lay my hands
on some Ricoh 700MB RW media I may investigate further.

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...mindspring.com
(Messages 10, 12 -- 34, 54 -- 69)

( No pipsqueaks have been able to prove ANY of the above is a libel )
( -- despite Mikey's supposed to have proof of misquotes!!! )

ned ludd wrote:

Tim Kroesen (Pipsqueak) "Ummmmmm"-ed:

BTW; use *only* discs speed rated for the drive you burn them on; using
4x RW on a 32x modern drive is asking for trouble...

Have you ever owned a 32X writer, or any RW burner? Is this based on
personal experience or

are you still PARROTTING of the rocket scientist's crackpot theory

======================
From: "CapCity"
Date: 9/4/03

Tim Kroesen (Pipsqueak) "Ummmmmm"-ed:


Aren't you the guy surgically attached to Mike Richter's ass? g
======================

that manufacturers are so cynical or incompetent that they
are incapable of or couldn't be bothered providing adequate firmware for
their writers.

Ignore the parrot.
Manufacturers still include 4X rewriting speeds on 52X writers, presumably
for backward compatibility with 1-4X media, though it's hard to tell from
the scanty specs provided for most models.

Just as several HS writers I have access to have no problems burning LS
media, my Ultraspeed also exhibits no misbehaviour with 1-4X media. The LS
media, some of it packet written has not faded after nearly 4 years
(obviously I can't make similar longevity claims for the Ultraspeed writer).
STILL waiting to lose ANY data from CD or DVD RW, can't make that claim for
write once media.

The one thing I wouldn't recommend is packet writing to 700MB RW discs
(though there may be others who have a writer/media match that works better
than mine). I have only found a single disc which is stable, 650MB discs
(even dubious, unheard of brands) have proved completely reliable, and the
same 700MB discs master with low error rates. If I ever lay my hands on some
Ricoh 700MB RW media I may investigate further.

I meant someone with media related packet writing problems, not mental
problems SMH...

Tim K

From: "smh"
Usual psychosis snipped-