If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AMD Sempron ships
Looks like AMD has taken the wraps off of its budget Sempron line a few days
early. http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news...le.php/3387051 There are two distinct lines of Semprons, several K7-based Socket A and a K8-based Socket 754. The K8 Semprons have their 64-bit capabilities disabled. The K7's range in performance from 2200+ to 2800+, while the K8 is at 3100+. http://makeashorterlink.com/?M4CF229E8 http://www.computerweekly.com/articl...rch= &nPage=1 Here's the benches: http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2139 Yousuf Khan -- Humans: contact me at ykhan at rogers dot com Spambots: just reply to this email address ;-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Are you the unofficial spokesman for AMD? Why is this posted to the Intel
site... just curious. "Yousuf Khan" wrote in message ogers.com... Looks like AMD has taken the wraps off of its budget Sempron line a few days early. http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news...le.php/3387051 There are two distinct lines of Semprons, several K7-based Socket A and a K8-based Socket 754. The K8 Semprons have their 64-bit capabilities disabled. The K7's range in performance from 2200+ to 2800+, while the K8 is at 3100+. http://makeashorterlink.com/?M4CF229E8 http://www.computerweekly.com/articl...rch= &nPage=1 Here's the benches: http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2139 Yousuf Khan -- Humans: contact me at ykhan at rogers dot com Spambots: just reply to this email address ;-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:33:59 -0600, Judd wrote:
Are you the unofficial spokesman for AMD? Oh, good grief! Everyone with a brain is an AMD supporter! Why is this posted to the Intel site... just curious. My my, somone has their panties in a twist! You don't consider AMD worthy of talk in an Intel "Site" (I don't think CSI is supported by Intel, nor is the Usenet a "site" of any reasonable description). OTOH, you might just learn something from Mr. Khan (though I am stretching belief here). ....not to mention this is also posted to CSIPHC where all us Intel haters hang out. ;-) In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon! -- Keith |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:34:40 -0400, Keith wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:33:59 -0600, Judd wrote: Are you the unofficial spokesman for AMD? Oh, good grief! Everyone with a brain is an AMD supporter! Why is this posted to the Intel site... just curious. My my, somone has their panties in a twist! You don't consider AMD worthy of talk in an Intel "Site" (I don't think CSI is supported by Intel, nor is the Usenet a "site" of any reasonable description). OTOH, you might just learn something from Mr. Khan (though I am stretching belief here). ...not to mention this is also posted to CSIPHC where all us Intel haters hang out. ;-) In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon! lmao! no prisoners taken here! /daytripper (not that there's anything wrong with that ;-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 02:44:55 +0000, daytripper wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:34:40 -0400, Keith wrote: On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:33:59 -0600, Judd wrote: Are you the unofficial spokesman for AMD? Oh, good grief! Everyone with a brain is an AMD supporter! Why is this posted to the Intel site... just curious. My my, somone has their panties in a twist! You don't consider AMD worthy of talk in an Intel "Site" (I don't think CSI is supported by Intel, nor is the Usenet a "site" of any reasonable description). OTOH, you might just learn something from Mr. Khan (though I am stretching belief here). ...not to mention this is also posted to CSIPHC where all us Intel haters hang out. ;-) In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon! lmao! no prisoners taken here! Uneducated combatants are supposed to be taken prisoner? Someone call DonR! /daytripper (not that there's anything wrong with that ;-) ;-)) -- Keith |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Keith" wrote in message news On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:33:59 -0600, Judd wrote: Are you the unofficial spokesman for AMD? Oh, good grief! Everyone with a brain is an AMD supporter! Rah, rah, rah... go stick a sempron up your ass. Why is this posted to the Intel site... just curious. My my, somone has their panties in a twist! You don't consider AMD worthy of talk in an Intel "Site" (I don't think CSI is supported by Intel, nor is the Usenet a "site" of any reasonable description). OTOH, you might just learn something from Mr. Khan (though I am stretching belief here). ...not to mention this is also posted to CSIPHC where all us Intel haters hang out. ;-) In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon! What's a "maroon"? Webster says: " a dark red " and "a descendant of such a slave". Well, I may be a "maroon", but you are clearly a retard. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Judd" wrote in message
... In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon! What's a "maroon"? Webster says: " a dark red " and "a descendant of such a slave". Well, I may be a "maroon", but you are clearly a retard. I'm addressing this to all 3 readers of comp.arch who aren't Bugs Bunny cartoon fans. When Bugs wanted to denigrate the intelligence of another cartoon character, he would **intend** to say "What a moron!" but what actually came out (in the cartoon) would be "What a maroon!", suggesting some ambiguity as to whose sagacity should be impugned. I believe that this is the sense in which Keith was writing. If you seriously want to challenge someone's intellectual dexterity, I suggest sweetly inquiring if they rode the short bus to school. ;-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The Intel haters and AMD lovers should post to that group rather than
flooding comp.sys.intel with propoganda. It's to the point now where you can't talk nor get any information on Intel processors and architecture without the constant bashing. There should be a comp.religious.processor.wars or something more suitable for that stuff. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
It is not a matter of bashing, it is a matter of explaining to people
that they should research the alternatives first, then decide if an Intel processor is a good choice. In most instances, an AMD processor will provide better performance at each price point. Judd wrote: The Intel haters and AMD lovers should post to that group rather than flooding comp.sys.intel with propoganda. It's to the point now where you can't talk nor get any information on Intel processors and architecture without the constant bashing. There should be a comp.religious.processor.wars or something more suitable for that stuff. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:49:45 GMT, "Felger Carbon" wrote:
"Judd" wrote in message ... In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon! What's a "maroon"? Webster says: " a dark red " and "a descendant of such a slave". Well, I may be a "maroon", but you are clearly a retard. I'm addressing this to all 3 readers of comp.arch who aren't Bugs Bunny cartoon fans. When Bugs wanted to denigrate the intelligence of another cartoon character, he would **intend** to say "What a moron!" but what actually came out (in the cartoon) would be "What a maroon!", suggesting some ambiguity as to whose sagacity should be impugned. I believe that this is the sense in which Keith was writing. If you seriously want to challenge someone's intellectual dexterity, I suggest sweetly inquiring if they rode the short bus to school. ;-) Too cute by half. My current fave: "I don't know what your problem is, but I bet it's hard to spell" ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why 2200+ & 2800+ in both model 8 & model 10 Sempron? | Michael Brown | Overclocking AMD Processors | 3 | September 27th 04 07:07 AM |
Why 2200+ & 2800+ in both model 8 & model 10 Sempron? | [email protected] | General | 3 | September 27th 04 05:40 AM |
Why 2200+ & 2800+ in both model 8 & model 10 Sempron? | Michael Brown | Homebuilt PC's | 2 | September 27th 04 05:40 AM |
AMD SEMPRON CPU | patrick | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | July 29th 04 12:59 PM |
AMD Sempron - New processor | johny | Overclocking AMD Processors | 6 | June 12th 04 05:02 PM |