If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Epson Photo 830 or Canon i550
Hi, I am deciding between either a Canon i550 or an Epson Stylus Photo
830. On the budget end I am looking at the Canon i320 and i450. Can anyone offer some advice or comments on your own experiences with these printers? I am leaning towards the Epson 830 because the actual printouts from a demo unit absolutely blew me away, i have to really squint to try and see the dithering patterns. With the Canon i550, although the pictures are indeed nice with beautiful colors, but if I hold the photo at normal viewing distance, I can just make out the dithering and some very slight banding. I have listed out the pros and cons on each printer yet can't make a final decision... Canon i550 - higher initial printer price than Epson - low running costs (inks) - in my experience Canon ink fades too quickly - quiet but paper feed is noisy - large footprint - prints borderless photos - individual cartridges but only 4 color - easily refillable cartridges though I don't intend to - frequent head cleaning - Exif 2.2 support - USB and parallel - economical on ink Epson 830 - cheap printer but - expensive inks especially black ink more expensive than the 5 color cart - 6 colors standard - supposedly more lightfast than canon inks - high running costs (inks) but gorgeous printouts - large footprint - quiet printing but very noisy clicketty paper feed/head cleaning - nice silver black color! - borderless prints - Exif 2.2 support - USB and parallel - ink hog i don't print all too much, if I did, I guess the i550 is a no brainer with its low running costs. but then again, i read here that the epson 830 is prone to clogging if not used for more than a week?? an article i read on pcworld.com about counterfeit ink mentions that they look like the real thing. maybe some of the epson ink head clogging problem is as a result of having used counterfeit ink unknowingly? i want a printer more for photos and color as i already have a laser printer for my text needs. i have a canon digital camera that i shoot a lot with. overall, i really loved the epson's photo quality but if head clogging is a real problem as well as epson's suspect practice of chipping the cartridges so they don't print even when still filled with useable ink amounts, then... decisions decisions decisions! if u were in my shoes, which would u go for? i can't afford a canon i950 and even if i could, i still question canon's lightfastness. what good is a gorgeous photo that fades within a month? (i read a user comment that his canon photo pro print turned yellow within just three weeks). are epson's photos really that lightfast? i mean when stuck to a wall, not under glass. i tried this with a canon photo and it fade sooner than you could say canon! i was expecting at least a few months worth of display! that photo was from a canon S300 on coated paper. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I have a lot of users with the 820/830 and one significant fact is that
colour cartridges outsell black 2 to 1. That raises the interesting thought that they all print colour photo work or it is an ink hog. For that reason - dare I suggest you consider JetTec (Lightfast) and save a bundle. www.inkylink.co.uk Tony -- aberdabadoo UK auction site with special free sellers bonus setup - get in quick... http://www.aberdabadoo.co.uk "hm" wrote in message om... Hi, I am deciding between either a Canon i550 or an Epson Stylus Photo 830. On the budget end I am looking at the Canon i320 and i450. Can anyone offer some advice or comments on your own experiences with these printers? I am leaning towards the Epson 830 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Or could it be that the black cartridge contains more ink????
"Tony1thatmatters" wrote in message ... I have a lot of users with the 820/830 and one significant fact is that colour cartridges outsell black 2 to 1. That raises the interesting thought that they all print colour photo work or it is an ink hog. For that reason - dare I suggest you consider JetTec (Lightfast) and save a bundle. www.inkylink.co.uk Tony -- aberdabadoo UK auction site with special free sellers bonus setup - get in quick... http://www.aberdabadoo.co.uk "hm" wrote in message om... Hi, I am deciding between either a Canon i550 or an Epson Stylus Photo 830. On the budget end I am looking at the Canon i320 and i450. Can anyone offer some advice or comments on your own experiences with these printers? I am leaning towards the Epson 830 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
the 450 has the same print head design as the i850 only it uses the bci 24
colou cartridge and teh bci black cartridge. retail at £12.99 which is good. Quality is almost i850 but prints slower. well made machine though. the 320 isn't quite as good uses 5picolitres instead of 2 and is slower still. cartridge instead 4 bci3 tanks. the i550 is cheaper to run over long periods but the i450 is between the i550 and i850 in terms of photo quality. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The prints out of an 820/830 are indeed very nice.
However, the 820/830 has a horrible nozzle clogging problem. You will waste much time/money/ink unclogging the print head unless you use the thing weekly. Also, the Epson drivers suck. They have a bug that causes USB trouble with some types of system (mine of course). Fortunately the 820 also has a parallel port, so it's still usable. I've been putting up with this problem because 1) The printer cost me only $50 2) Costco sells a two color - one black Epson ink set for $52. Even with head clogs it costs me about $0.75 per 4X6 print on average. A value I can tolerate. However, I'm really considering ditching my 820 and you can be damn sure I'm not going to replace it with another Epson. I've heard the Canon i950 is quite nice. Neil "hm" wrote in message om... Hi, I am deciding between either a Canon i550 or an Epson Stylus Photo 830. On the budget end I am looking at the Canon i320 and i450. Can anyone offer some advice or comments on your own experiences with these printers? I am leaning towards the Epson 830 because the actual printouts from a demo unit absolutely blew me away, i have to really squint to try and see the dithering patterns. With the Canon i550, although the pictures are indeed nice with beautiful colors, but if I hold the photo at normal viewing distance, I can just make out the dithering and some very slight banding. I have listed out the pros and cons on each printer yet can't make a final decision... Canon i550 - higher initial printer price than Epson - low running costs (inks) - in my experience Canon ink fades too quickly - quiet but paper feed is noisy - large footprint - prints borderless photos - individual cartridges but only 4 color - easily refillable cartridges though I don't intend to - frequent head cleaning - Exif 2.2 support - USB and parallel - economical on ink Epson 830 - cheap printer but - expensive inks especially black ink more expensive than the 5 color cart - 6 colors standard - supposedly more lightfast than canon inks - high running costs (inks) but gorgeous printouts - large footprint - quiet printing but very noisy clicketty paper feed/head cleaning - nice silver black color! - borderless prints - Exif 2.2 support - USB and parallel - ink hog i don't print all too much, if I did, I guess the i550 is a no brainer with its low running costs. but then again, i read here that the epson 830 is prone to clogging if not used for more than a week?? an article i read on pcworld.com about counterfeit ink mentions that they look like the real thing. maybe some of the epson ink head clogging problem is as a result of having used counterfeit ink unknowingly? i want a printer more for photos and color as i already have a laser printer for my text needs. i have a canon digital camera that i shoot a lot with. overall, i really loved the epson's photo quality but if head clogging is a real problem as well as epson's suspect practice of chipping the cartridges so they don't print even when still filled with useable ink amounts, then... decisions decisions decisions! if u were in my shoes, which would u go for? i can't afford a canon i950 and even if i could, i still question canon's lightfastness. what good is a gorgeous photo that fades within a month? (i read a user comment that his canon photo pro print turned yellow within just three weeks). are epson's photos really that lightfast? i mean when stuck to a wall, not under glass. i tried this with a canon photo and it fade sooner than you could say canon! i was expecting at least a few months worth of display! that photo was from a canon S300 on coated paper. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I have a number of inkjet printers, including an Epson 830.
The only nozzle blockage I ever had, was, when I used non-Epson ink on my Stylus 600. I'm now only using original Epson ink and have no problems. I use a small rainbow template picture 3cm x 3cm to print once every week, when I'm not printing anything else, to keep the nozzles in use. When I use the 830 for photo prints (that's what I bought it for), I'm very happy. To avoid fading colours, I now only use the original Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper. Originally I quite liked the Kodak Picture Papers, although most of my prints on those have now faded away to half-strength after about 6 months, with the exception of Kodak's Premium picture paper perhaps. My five cents worth : If you're using non-original ink on these fine nozzles, you're asking for trouble. At the same time I acknowledge that the prices for genuine ink are way over the top. Good luck with your final choice, Troy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
To avoid fading colours, I now only use the original Epson Premium Glossy
Photo Paper. Originally I quite liked the Kodak Picture Papers, although most of my prints on those have now faded away to half-strength after about 6 months, with the exception of Kodak's Premium picture paper perhaps. To Troy: Have you tried Epson's economy photo papers, i can't find their premium papers in any stores where i live. the economy papers are quite cheap and i have tried printing on them and they r quite beautiful too. oh btw, i have another gripe about the epson 830, that's the fact that it won't allow for full resolution printing (5880 dpi is it?) when printing borderless. have u tried this mode and how much is the difference in the photos in the different modes? i know the "fine" or quick photo mode looks horrible. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
i'm curious, i read often that the epson 830 color cartridge runs out
far more quickly than the black and in fcat sometimes the black is still full when the color is out. does the printer use the black cartridge for text printing only and mixes the other colors for black in photos? or...? if it produces black on photos by mixing the colors then perhaps that is also why the colors run out so quickly! i mean i know someone who has an epson 830 and he has just printed only 4 or 5 fullpage borderless A4 pictures and the color cartridges are already almost halfway depleted as indicated in the driver. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
It doesn't mix colors to make black. If you are talking about the 1st
cartridge that one goes down faster but I have gotten 40 8x10's out of a cartridge. "hm" wrote in message om... i'm curious, i read often that the epson 830 color cartridge runs out far more quickly than the black and in fcat sometimes the black is still full when the color is out. does the printer use the black cartridge for text printing only and mixes the other colors for black in photos? or...? if it produces black on photos by mixing the colors then perhaps that is also why the colors run out so quickly! i mean i know someone who has an epson 830 and he has just printed only 4 or 5 fullpage borderless A4 pictures and the color cartridges are already almost halfway depleted as indicated in the driver. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
You are not going to see much of a difference between 2880 and 5760. If you
really look you can see some but not worth printing at the higher number. "hm" wrote in message om... To avoid fading colours, I now only use the original Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper. Originally I quite liked the Kodak Picture Papers, although most of my prints on those have now faded away to half-strength after about 6 months, with the exception of Kodak's Premium picture paper perhaps. To Troy: Have you tried Epson's economy photo papers, i can't find their premium papers in any stores where i live. the economy papers are quite cheap and i have tried printing on them and they r quite beautiful too. oh btw, i have another gripe about the epson 830, that's the fact that it won't allow for full resolution printing (5880 dpi is it?) when printing borderless. have u tried this mode and how much is the difference in the photos in the different modes? i know the "fine" or quick photo mode looks horrible. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon Canoscan 3200F or Epson Perfection 1670 | Jose Ortega | Scanners | 0 | September 18th 04 12:03 PM |
Which Scanner: Canon LiDE80 or Epson Photo 3170 | Alan Dempster | Scanners | 0 | May 12th 04 03:49 PM |
Having driver problems getting my new Epson 3170 Photo image scanner to install | Idris Alooma | Scanners | 5 | September 26th 03 06:55 PM |
Should I replace a Canon 5000f with an Epson Perfection 2400 | Stephen Smith | Scanners | 0 | August 28th 03 02:04 PM |
Epson 950 or Canon I950 | Tony1thatmatters | Printers | 1 | July 28th 03 06:01 AM |