If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hard disk test 'surprises' Google
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6376021.stm
http://labs.google.com/papers/disk_failures.pdf "The impact of heavy use and high temperatures on hard disk drive failure may be overstated, says a report by three Google engineers. The report examined 100,000 commercial hard drives, ranging from 80GB to 400GB in capacity, used at Google since 2001. The firm uses "off-the-shelf" drives to store cached web pages and services. ...." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hard disk test 'surprises' Google
Eric Gisin wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6376021.stm http://labs.google.com/papers/disk_failures.pdf "The impact of heavy use and high temperatures on hard disk drive failure may be overstated, says a report by three Google engineers. The report examined 100,000 commercial hard drives, ranging from 80GB to 400GB in capacity, used at Google since 2001. The pdf also makes it clear that thats an unusual result that is very different to the other analyses it cited found. It isnt clear why there is that dramatic difference with the google result being unique. The firm uses "off-the-shelf" drives to store cached web pages and services. ..." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hard disk test 'surprises' Google
"Eric Gisin" wrote in message
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6376021.stm http://labs.google.com/papers/disk_failures.pdf "The impact of heavy use and high temperatures on hard disk drive failure may be overstated, says a report by three Google engineers. The report examined 100,000 commercial hard drives, ranging from 80GB to 400GB in capacity, used at Google since 2001. The firm uses "off-the-shelf" drives So they don't manufacture their own harddrives. What a disgrace. to store cached web pages and services. So what do they use for their database then. ..." Btw, I found this far more interesting: Q We find that the group of drives with scan errors are 10 times more likely to fail than the group with no errors," said the authors. They added: "After the first scan error, drives are 39 times more likely to fail within 60 days than drives without scan errors." EQ Not that it actually means anything, but as far as sound bites go it sounds very technical and worrying, doesn't it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hard disk in HP test equipment | astalor | General | 4 | January 7th 07 06:05 PM |
hard disk in HP test equipment | astalor | Storage (alternative) | 1 | January 7th 07 10:04 AM |
procedure to test hard disk | [email protected] | Storage (alternative) | 2 | February 9th 06 07:08 AM |
Copy Image of 10Gb Hard Disk to 20Gb Hard Disk | Bob | General Hardware | 1 | December 17th 03 03:45 AM |
Disk Speed Test | Pat | Storage (alternative) | 7 | November 28th 03 09:22 PM |