If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Benchmark tests for OC...
New here. Just wondering if anyone knew of any good downloadable
software to test my benchmarks. -- Posted using the http://www.hardwareforumz.com interface, at author's request Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards Topic URL: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/Overcl...pict57444.html Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/eform.php?p=289296 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
'AngryPigeon' posted:
"New here. Just wondering if anyone knew of any good downloadable software to test my benchmarks." What exactly do you wish the benchmarks to do? If you want to see the change as it affects the operation of the CPU and memory, and as a guide to increasing overclock performance, then 'SiSoft Sandra 2004' ( http://www.sisoftware.net/ ) will show the effect of overclocking on different aspects of memory and CPU subsystems (L2 cache, memory bandwidth, SSE instructions, floating point) with the tests 'CPU Arithmetic Benchmark', CPU Multi-Media Benchmark', 'Memory Bandwidth Benchmark', 'Memory and Cache Benchmark.') If you want to see the improve of the overall performance of your system, the best test of that is how the performance 'feels' to you in the applications you actually use. If you want to compare overall system performance, be aware that there are many subsystems that aren't affected by overclocking (hard drives, removable media drives, display adapters [which can sometimes be overclocked separately]), so a 30% overclock of the CPU and memory may effect a much smaller increase in overall system performance. For this kind of comparison the benchmarks used by review sites like 'Tom's Hardware' ( http://www.tomshardware.com/index.html ) and 'Anand Tech' ( http://www.anandtech.com/ )are useful, but many of these benchmarks are hundreds of megabytes in size, and mainly useful for bragging rights. By the way, I recommended 'SiSoft Sandra 2004' even though there is a newer version "SiSoft Sandra 2005' available. That's because, while there is a free, but limited version of each available, the 2005 free version is not quite as useful. The only reasons for using the 2005 version are (1) you can't find the 2004 version on the web (2) you want to compare your overclock performance to that of other overclockers. 'SiSoft Sandra 2004' is simple to use, gives rapid results, and is a small download. No matter what information you wish to gather, 'SiSoft Sandra 2004' is a good starting point. (note: 'Sisoft Sandra' has had weaknesses in the past, but it has improved over the years; the low-level benchmarks are good, it's just that some of the other types of information that 'SiSoft Sandra' gathers might have some inaccuracies. Just like overclocking, start small and work up, results vary according to your patience. Phil Weldon "AngryPigeon" wrote in message news:7_289296_58968a0398473c144d30d20295f2e3cb@har dwareforumz.com... New here. Just wondering if anyone knew of any good downloadable software to test my benchmarks. -- Posted using the http://www.hardwareforumz.com interface, at author's request Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards Topic URL: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/Overcl...pict57444.html Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/eform.php?p=289296 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
First benchmark test is that of stability :-)
o BIOS screen with temp reading is useful ---- in most cases there is no power mgt re CPU o Memory test in particular is very important ---- prove timings now, not with data later o HD testing should not be ignored ---- re cooling using A/V scan or Defrag o CPU/GPU testing ---- stability trading voltage / frequency ---- temperatures at peak - ideally hot environment Secondly, measurement of gains :-) o Matching gains to usage, eg, MPEG to Games Typically it is worth stepping back from the most severe settings where stability is of more concern. -- Dorothy Bradbury www.dorothybradbury.co.uk for NMB & Panaflo (MMM) fans, free shipping |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
'Dorothy Bradbury' wrote, in part:
"First benchmark test is that of stability :-)" A good suggestion, to start with stability tests. Your post has suggested to me that BASELINE results of all tests should be gatherred before any overclocking is attempted. Phil Weldon "Dorothy Bradbury" wrote in message ... First benchmark test is that of stability :-) o BIOS screen with temp reading is useful ---- in most cases there is no power mgt re CPU o Memory test in particular is very important ---- prove timings now, not with data later o HD testing should not be ignored ---- re cooling using A/V scan or Defrag o CPU/GPU testing ---- stability trading voltage / frequency ---- temperatures at peak - ideally hot environment Secondly, measurement of gains :-) o Matching gains to usage, eg, MPEG to Games Typically it is worth stepping back from the most severe settings where stability is of more concern. -- Dorothy Bradbury www.dorothybradbury.co.uk for NMB & Panaflo (MMM) fans, free shipping |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ran Tests Promise vs Intel | zoomer | Asus Motherboards | 1 | May 30th 04 06:11 AM |
ANN: PerformanceTest Benchmark V5 released | David Wren | Overclocking | 0 | January 19th 04 01:18 AM |
Athlon 64 Vs. Pentium 4 article: On the Justification for Quake3 as a CPU Benchmark | rms | Overclocking | 6 | October 2nd 03 05:16 PM |
Athlon 64 Vs. Pentium 4 article: On the Justification for Quake3 as a CPU Benchmark | rms | General | 6 | October 2nd 03 05:16 PM |
parhelia w/ 3 monitors | tony wong | Matrox Videocards | 16 | September 12th 03 03:59 AM |