A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » Overclocking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Problem with new P4 3.06 & win98se installation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 22nd 04, 01:02 AM
David Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael Brown wrote:

127.0.0.1 wrote:

Just upgraded my processor from a P4 1.7 - P4 3.06ghz.

The problem is Windows 98 SE always locks up at the same point at the
start.

I established that the system is stable by putting windows XP on an
external hard drive and running PRIME95 & MEMTEST. Both ran fine for
hours with 0 errors.

My board is ABIT TH7IIRAID and although it doesnt offically support
the 533 FSB,
I overclocked it to 133fsb x 23. I underclocked the RAM to 300.

The windows98 SE can boot fine into safe mode but when ever I go into
normal mode
the lock up always happens at start up.



98SE and earlier have issues with CPUs over ~2.1GHz due to overflow
problems. See
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;312108
I've had a friend who tried to get the patch out of MS without paying for
support, but it seems to be impossible to do. Fortunately, someone who HAS
got it out of them has been kind enough to post it on the web:
http://www.sjordan.com/ndis_fix.html


I got "access forbidden" on that server.

  #12  
Old April 22nd 04, 01:05 AM
David Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

DaveW wrote:

You know, of course, that Win 98SE, cannot use more than 512MB of RAM or the
systems freezes/crashes.


Well, no. You limit the vcache size in system.ini and then it's fine.

  #13  
Old April 22nd 04, 01:10 AM
Noozer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And how do you make this entry during Win9x installation?

"Pen" wrote in message
...
That is incorrect. 9X only requires an entry in the vcache section of
system.ini to limit vcache to no more than 512.

"DaveW" wrote in message

news:NTChc.56$_L6.6422@attbi_s53...
You know, of course, that Win 98SE, cannot use more than 512MB of RAM or

the
systems freezes/crashes.

--
DaveW



"127.0.0.1" wrote in message
...
X-No-Archive: yes

Just upgraded my processor from a P4 1.7 - P4 3.06ghz.

The problem is Windows 98 SE always locks up at the same point at the

start.

I established that the system is stable by putting windows XP on an

external
hard drive and running PRIME95 & MEMTEST. Both ran fine for hours with

0
errors.

My board is ABIT TH7IIRAID and although it doesnt offically support

the
533
FSB,
I overclocked it to 133fsb x 23. I underclocked the RAM to 300.

The windows98 SE can boot fine into safe mode but when ever I go into

normal
mode
the lock up always happens at start up.

There are no conflicts in the device manager.. and I even went so far

as
to
put a fresh install
of 98se on another hard disk and it does it on that as well. Ive

removed
all
PCI cards and it
still locked up... the only thing that works is putting the P4 1.7

back
in.

May be win98se doesnt like P4 3.06ghz or it sees the HT feature and

crashes
???

Its driving me nuts Ive been at this for 3 days now.

BTW: I looked into something regarding an "ndis.vxd" bug but I think

this
bug is only on
win98 and not win98se - can anyone confirm its fixed on 98SE.

Anyway shed any light onto what I can do ??








  #14  
Old April 22nd 04, 01:12 AM
Michael Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David Maynard wrote:
Michael Brown wrote:

[...]
98SE and earlier have issues with CPUs over ~2.1GHz due to overflow
problems. See
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;312108
I've had a friend who tried to get the patch out of MS without
paying for support, but it seems to be impossible to do.
Fortunately, someone who HAS got it out of them has been kind enough
to post it on the web: http://www.sjordan.com/ndis_fix.html


I got "access forbidden" on that server.


Wierd ... rechecked just now and it works fine. Another place to try is
http://home.planet.nl/~dorp0043/2002.htm#fix

--
Michael Brown
www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more
Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open


  #15  
Old April 22nd 04, 01:19 AM
Michael Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael Brown wrote:
[...]
98SE and earlier have issues with CPUs over ~2.1GHz due to overflow
problems. See
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;312108


Note: It doesn't mention 98SE on this page, but it appears that SE suffers
from the same problem:
http://www.abxzone.com/forums/showthread/t-17663.html
Looks like pulling NDIS.VXD from a WinME install (or other sources ) will
do the trick as well.

[...]
--
Michael Brown
www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more
Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open


  #16  
Old April 22nd 04, 01:21 AM
David Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael Brown wrote:

David Maynard wrote:

Michael Brown wrote:


[...]

98SE and earlier have issues with CPUs over ~2.1GHz due to overflow
problems. See
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;312108
I've had a friend who tried to get the patch out of MS without
paying for support, but it seems to be impossible to do.
Fortunately, someone who HAS got it out of them has been kind enough
to post it on the web: http://www.sjordan.com/ndis_fix.html


I got "access forbidden" on that server.



Wierd ... rechecked just now and it works fine.


Could be a domain restriction because it's definitely coming from his server.

Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /ndis_fix.html on this server.

Apache/1.3.29 Server at www.sjordan.com Port 80

I also tried just http://www.sjordan.com/ and got the same thing.

Another place to try is
http://home.planet.nl/~dorp0043/2002.htm#fix


Thanks. I was able to get it from there.


--
Michael Brown
www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more
Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open



  #17  
Old April 22nd 04, 01:23 AM
Pen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

http://support.microsoft.com/default...3912#appliesto

"Noozer" wrote in message
news:E3Ehc.187272$Pk3.149210@pd7tw1no...
And how do you make this entry during Win9x installation?

"Pen" wrote in message
...
That is incorrect. 9X only requires an entry in the vcache section of
system.ini to limit vcache to no more than 512.

"DaveW" wrote in message

news:NTChc.56$_L6.6422@attbi_s53...
You know, of course, that Win 98SE, cannot use more than 512MB of RAM

or
the
systems freezes/crashes.

--
DaveW



"127.0.0.1" wrote in message
...
X-No-Archive: yes

Just upgraded my processor from a P4 1.7 - P4 3.06ghz.

The problem is Windows 98 SE always locks up at the same point at

the
start.

I established that the system is stable by putting windows XP on an
external
hard drive and running PRIME95 & MEMTEST. Both ran fine for hours

with
0
errors.

My board is ABIT TH7IIRAID and although it doesnt offically support

the
533
FSB,
I overclocked it to 133fsb x 23. I underclocked the RAM to 300.

The windows98 SE can boot fine into safe mode but when ever I go

into
normal
mode
the lock up always happens at start up.

There are no conflicts in the device manager.. and I even went so

far
as
to
put a fresh install
of 98se on another hard disk and it does it on that as well. Ive

removed
all
PCI cards and it
still locked up... the only thing that works is putting the P4 1.7

back
in.

May be win98se doesnt like P4 3.06ghz or it sees the HT feature and
crashes
???

Its driving me nuts Ive been at this for 3 days now.

BTW: I looked into something regarding an "ndis.vxd" bug but I think

this
bug is only on
win98 and not win98se - can anyone confirm its fixed on 98SE.

Anyway shed any light onto what I can do ??










  #18  
Old April 22nd 04, 03:16 AM
kony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:19:30 +1200, "Michael Brown"
wrote:

Michael Brown wrote:
[...]
98SE and earlier have issues with CPUs over ~2.1GHz due to overflow
problems. See
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;312108


Note: It doesn't mention 98SE on this page, but it appears that SE suffers
from the same problem:
http://www.abxzone.com/forums/showthread/t-17663.html
Looks like pulling NDIS.VXD from a WinME install (or other sources ) will
do the trick as well.

[...]


The MS KB article specifically mentions the NDIS.VXD file for the patch is
to be v 4.10.2000 or later version.

Win98SE (at least this particular original Win98SE CD I have here) has
NDIS.VXD v4.10.2222, which setup extracts from "NET9.CAB". It is running
on a system with a 2.1GHz CPU without this issue being apparent.
  #19  
Old April 22nd 04, 03:49 AM
David Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

kony wrote:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:19:30 +1200, "Michael Brown"
wrote:


Michael Brown wrote:
[...]

98SE and earlier have issues with CPUs over ~2.1GHz due to overflow
problems. See
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;312108


Note: It doesn't mention 98SE on this page, but it appears that SE suffers


from the same problem:


http://www.abxzone.com/forums/showthread/t-17663.html
Looks like pulling NDIS.VXD from a WinME install (or other sources ) will
do the trick as well.

[...]



The MS KB article specifically mentions the NDIS.VXD file for the patch is
to be v 4.10.2000 or later version.

Win98SE (at least this particular original Win98SE CD I have here) has
NDIS.VXD v4.10.2222, which setup extracts from "NET9.CAB". It is running
on a system with a 2.1GHz CPU without this issue being apparent.


Yes. My Win98SE installations have that version too, although none are on
machines that fast.

  #20  
Old April 22nd 04, 04:08 AM
Michael Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

kony wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 12:19:30 +1200, "Michael Brown"
wrote:

Michael Brown wrote:
[...]
98SE and earlier have issues with CPUs over ~2.1GHz due to overflow
problems. See
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;312108


Note: It doesn't mention 98SE on this page, but it appears that SE
suffers from the same problem:
http://www.abxzone.com/forums/showthread/t-17663.html
Looks like pulling NDIS.VXD from a WinME install (or other sources
) will do the trick as well.

[...]


The MS KB article specifically mentions the NDIS.VXD file for the
patch is to be v 4.10.2000 or later version.

Win98SE (at least this particular original Win98SE CD I have here) has
NDIS.VXD v4.10.2222, which setup extracts from "NET9.CAB". It is
running on a system with a 2.1GHz CPU without this issue being
apparent.


Hmm, should have checked my 98SE disks before posting :| My 98SE has the
same version (2222) and it gave the NDIS error on boot when I was running my
CPUs at 2.2GHz (though it's Prime95 stable at these speeds). Haven't tried
it since dropping dropping down to 2GHz (allowed me to run at much lower
voltages, and hence with less noise), though it might just be 98 not liking
the dual-Barton setup

--
Michael Brown
www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more
Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows XP installation problem MLK General 16 August 26th 04 02:15 AM
This problem has baffled everyone... Nick G General 46 May 22nd 04 04:01 AM
Problem with new P4 3.06 & win98se installation 127.0.0.1 General 49 April 24th 04 08:35 PM
Epson CX3200 driver installation problem Muhammad Berki General 1 December 23rd 03 02:34 PM
NIC installation problem Maureen General 1 June 25th 03 02:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.