If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Just a crazy backup thought / discussion
I have a Canon HV20 Camcorder that takes MiniDV tapes. A 1 hour tape
obviously holds 1 hour of video, which imports in RAW format to over 12GB of 'M2T' files. I therefore presume that a 1.5hour tape would hold over 18GB of data. Is there any software in existence that can turn raw binary, hard disk data into video format for storage out to tape as this would clearly be a high density backup medium and (for owners of such devices) would cost zero! I figure that at just 2:1 compression, it would be possible to store nearly 40GB of files onto a single 1.5hour tape. At 5:1 compression it could manage around 100GB per tape. The backup process would be mindblowingly slow at 1.5 hours + operating overheads for a backup or restore, but for this amount of data at no cost, would anyone here consider it? It would probably be very slow for random access of backed up data, as with most tape systems - have to refer to the index at the beginning, then 'zoom' to the right place on the tape and read it back. However, for those who can't be bothered using 35 CDs and don't have tape backup or a DVD writers (8 DVDs), its better than nothing! Thoughts / comments? -- GT |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Just a crazy backup thought / discussion
"GT" wrote in message ... I have a Canon HV20 Camcorder that takes MiniDV tapes. A 1 hour tape obviously holds 1 hour of video, which imports in RAW format to over 12GB of 'M2T' files. I therefore presume that a 1.5hour tape would hold over 18GB of data. Is there any software in existence that can turn raw binary, hard disk data into video format for storage out to tape as this would clearly be a high density backup medium and (for owners of such devices) would cost zero! I figure that at just 2:1 compression, it would be possible to store nearly 40GB of files onto a single 1.5hour tape. At 5:1 compression it could manage around 100GB per tape. The backup process would be mindblowingly slow at 1.5 hours + operating overheads for a backup or restore, but for this amount of data at no cost, would anyone here consider it? It would probably be very slow for random access of backed up data, as with most tape systems - have to refer to the index at the beginning, then 'zoom' to the right place on the tape and read it back. However, for those who can't be bothered using 35 CDs and don't have tape backup or a DVD writers (8 DVDs), its better than nothing! yep it's a crazy idea all right. DVD burners are now going for about $30 and the media is 17cents a disk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Just a crazy backup thought / discussion
"philo" wrote in message
... "GT" wrote in message ... I have a Canon HV20 Camcorder that takes MiniDV tapes. A 1 hour tape obviously holds 1 hour of video, which imports in RAW format to over 12GB of 'M2T' files. I therefore presume that a 1.5hour tape would hold over 18GB of data. Is there any software in existence that can turn raw binary, hard disk data into video format for storage out to tape as this would clearly be a high density backup medium and (for owners of such devices) would cost zero! I figure that at just 2:1 compression, it would be possible to store nearly 40GB of files onto a single 1.5hour tape. At 5:1 compression it could manage around 100GB per tape. The backup process would be mindblowingly slow at 1.5 hours + operating overheads for a backup or restore, but for this amount of data at no cost, would anyone here consider it? It would probably be very slow for random access of backed up data, as with most tape systems - have to refer to the index at the beginning, then 'zoom' to the right place on the tape and read it back. However, for those who can't be bothered using 35 CDs and don't have tape backup or a DVD writers (8 DVDs), its better than nothing! yep it's a crazy idea all right. DVD burners are now going for about $30 and the media is 17cents a disk I would never use it either, but its still a good idea! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Just a crazy backup thought / discussion
data at no cost, would anyone here consider it? It would probably be very slow for random access of backed up data, as with most tape systems - have to refer to the index at the beginning, then 'zoom' to the right place on the tape and read it back. However, for those who can't be bothered using 35 CDs and don't have tape backup or a DVD writers (8 DVDs), its better than nothing! yep it's a crazy idea all right. DVD burners are now going for about $30 and the media is 17cents a disk I would never use it either, but its still a good idea! Well I have a few tape drives that I took out of some old servers and did play with making tape backups... but it was a bit of a PITA... Burning DVD's is cheap and easy...and no special software is needed to read the data. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Just a crazy backup thought / discussion
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 21:42:08 -0000, "GT"
wrote: I have a Canon HV20 Camcorder that takes MiniDV tapes. A 1 hour tape obviously holds 1 hour of video, which imports in RAW format to over 12GB of 'M2T' files. I therefore presume that a 1.5hour tape would hold over 18GB of data. No, the video is stored in some compressed format, like MJPEG for DV. When you import it as RAW you are decompressing it. If you have the option not to import it RAW, don't do so as there is minimal benefit to it, that would only slightly decrease CPU processing time to decode while editing or recompressing, but at a great expense of hard drive space. Is there any software in existence that can turn raw binary, hard disk data into video format for storage out to tape as this would clearly be a high density backup medium and (for owners of such devices) would cost zero! No, you can zip or rar something to compress it, and these are higher compression rates than from raw to MJPEG. IOW the basic premise is flawed in that the MiniDV tape can't hold as much data as suspected. If you really want a tape backup your best best is one made for computer tape backups. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Just a crazy backup thought / discussion
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:17:49 -0500, kony
wrote: On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 21:42:08 -0000, "GT" wrote: I have a Canon HV20 Camcorder that takes MiniDV tapes. A 1 hour tape obviously holds 1 hour of video, which imports in RAW format to over 12GB of 'M2T' files. I therefore presume that a 1.5hour tape would hold over 18GB of data. No, the video is stored in some compressed format, like MJPEG for DV. When you import it as RAW you are decompressing it. If you have the option not to import it RAW, don't do so as there is minimal benefit to it, that would only slightly decrease CPU processing time to decode while editing or recompressing, but at a great expense of hard drive space. Is there any software in existence that can turn raw binary, hard disk data into video format for storage out to tape as this would clearly be a high density backup medium and (for owners of such devices) would cost zero! No, you can zip or rar something to compress it, and these are higher compression rates than from raw to MJPEG. IOW the basic premise is flawed in that the MiniDV tape can't hold as much data as suspected. If you really want a tape backup your best best is one made for computer tape backups. Upon reflection, part of my post is wrong. The tape can hold the capacity but not using DV format for data, it would have to be a compression format optimized for data compression which is lossless and optimized for more than just video, unlike MJPEG. What still remains is that the tape is not unusual in density, you would still be better off using a tape drive with a direct computer interface. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Just a crazy backup thought / discussion
GT wrote:
I have a Canon HV20 Camcorder that takes MiniDV tapes. A 1 hour tape obviously holds 1 hour of video, which imports in RAW format to over 12GB of 'M2T' files. I therefore presume that a 1.5hour tape would hold over 18GB of data. Is there any software in existence that can turn raw binary, hard disk data into video format for storage out to tape as this would clearly be a high density backup medium and (for owners of such devices) would cost zero! I figure that at just 2:1 compression, it would be possible to store nearly 40GB of files onto a single 1.5hour tape. At 5:1 compression it could manage around 100GB per tape. The backup process would be mindblowingly slow at 1.5 hours + operating overheads for a backup or restore, but for this amount of data at no cost, would anyone here consider it? It would probably be very slow for random access of backed up data, as with most tape systems - have to refer to the index at the beginning, then 'zoom' to the right place on the tape and read it back. However, for those who can't be bothered using 35 CDs and don't have tape backup or a DVD writers (8 DVDs), its better than nothing! Thoughts / comments? I can only say that it isn't a new idea -- back in the dark ages of personal computers the idea was to record "vast" amounts of data to your handy VHS recorder. There must have been a half-dozen companies producing hardware and software along these lines. One that comes to mind is ArVid and they was probably one of the last purveyors of such. It never worked well at all in any of its incarnations. Even tapes and transports which were made for the job such as DAT and QIC were slow, expensive, and don't hold enough data to make them useful for modern backup needs. Even worse, the tapes themselves are fragile and even the slightest hiccup dooms the contents of the tape. I'll stick with backing up to portable hard drives and to DVDs, both of which are cheap and easy and which hold a useful amount of data. -- John McGaw [Knoxville, TN, USA] http://johnmcgaw.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Just a crazy backup thought / discussion
"Rookie" wrote in message news:Xns99FEE4FCC9963jfk6@localhost... "philo" wrote in : Burning DVD's is cheap and easy...and no special software is needed to read the data. Still too difficult having to burn more than 10 dvds for a full system backup... let's hope blu ray recorders finally get cheaper. True, but to me, as long as I keep all the data backed up... I feel pretty safe. Harddrives are so cheap now that I've actually made two clones of my main system onto two other harddrives. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Just a crazy backup thought / discussion
"Rookie" wrote in message news:Xns99FEE4FCC9963jfk6@localhost... "philo" wrote in : Burning DVD's is cheap and easy...and no special software is needed to read the data. Still too difficult having to burn more than 10 dvds for a full system backup... let's hope blu ray recorders finally get cheaper. HDDs are VERY cheap for the amount they store. Just get an external drive an back up to it occasionally. Shut it off when not it use and it's safe. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Just a crazy backup thought / discussion
John McGaw wrote in
: GT wrote: I have a Canon HV20 Camcorder that takes MiniDV tapes. A 1 hour tape obviously holds 1 hour of video, which imports in RAW format to over 12GB of 'M2T' files. I therefore presume that a 1.5hour tape would hold over 18GB of data. Is there any software in existence that can turn raw binary, hard disk data into video format for storage out to tape as this would clearly be a high density backup medium and (for owners of such devices) would cost zero! I figure that at just 2:1 compression, it would be possible to store nearly 40GB of files onto a single 1.5hour tape. At 5:1 compression it could manage around 100GB per tape. The backup process would be mindblowingly slow at 1.5 hours + operating overheads for a backup or restore, but for this amount of data at no cost, would anyone here consider it? It would probably be very slow for random access of backed up data, as with most tape systems - have to refer to the index at the beginning, then 'zoom' to the right place on the tape and read it back. However, for those who can't be bothered using 35 CDs and don't have tape backup or a DVD writers (8 DVDs), its better than nothing! Thoughts / comments? I can only say that it isn't a new idea -- back in the dark ages of personal computers the idea was to record "vast" amounts of data to your handy VHS recorder. There must have been a half-dozen companies producing hardware and software along these lines. One that comes to mind is ArVid and they was probably one of the last purveyors of such. It never worked well at all in any of its incarnations. Even tapes and transports which were made for the job such as DAT and QIC were slow, expensive, and don't hold enough data to make them useful for modern backup needs. Even worse, the tapes themselves are fragile and even the slightest hiccup dooms the contents of the tape. I'll stick with backing up to portable hard drives and to DVDs, both of which are cheap and easy and which hold a useful amount of data. I have some old data tapes lying around here. The 3M DC2120 tapes say '120 Mbytes' and the Sony QIC WIDE QW 5122F (F= preformatted?) plastic tape cartridge holder says '200MB Native' and '420MB Compressed'. Of course those were the days of 700 MB hard drives. The tapes were good for full system backups and large data dumps or restoring the same. They were and still are slow for restoring single files since they are sequential access, although newer tape formats store directory information on a chip inside the cartridge making that information immediately available. They were good for companies that did overnight backups of their servers. Tapes were created and swapped for the oldest of a batch of tapes by an off site storage company in a rotation scheme. New tapes were usually added every so often and one of the batch retired for permanent storage. Tapes can be written to faster than most might guess, 3 - 16 MB/Sec. Some manufacturers claim a 30+ year shelf life. Has anyone priced tape drives lately? I have. They are four times + the cost of a decent 300 GB hard drive making them a poor choice for the average PC user. -- Alan "Pecos" Norton |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I thought my AMD 64 X2 was 64bit? | sicc | General | 9 | November 30th 07 11:44 AM |
NF325-A7 Sound problem: sounds like an echo ,,echo...echo makes me crazy...crazy...crazy...help...help...help | David Sontag | Homebuilt PC's | 17 | November 30th 07 06:45 AM |
Harddisk to tape backup (A backup inside a backup or another way) with Symantec Backup Exec? | markm75 | Storage & Hardrives | 0 | February 26th 07 06:32 PM |
I thought I got it working but ... | Norberto Rivera | Webcams | 1 | October 11th 04 05:54 PM |
And You thought selling a barely released high end FX5900 video card for over $1,000 on ebay was crazy? | lyon_wonder | Nvidia Videocards | 4 | September 19th 03 05:14 PM |