If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
opinions on motherboards for AMD Opteron
Hello.
I am thinking of buying a PC with one AMD 64 bits processor (bi-processor Tyan motherboards cost about $500, so that will wait for next year's budget). I will use Suse Linux 9.0 64 bit. I am not looking for maximum performance, but for reliability. So, I wanted some suggestions / opinions about motherboards. The 2 boards I am considering a Asus SK8N Tyan K8S (S2850) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chipset Nvidia nForce 3 AMD-8111 I/O hub pro 150 Winbond W83627HF Super I/O Winbond W83782D Hardware Monitor ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advantages - AGP slot - only PCI (32 bits) slots Asus - audio (6 channel) - no audio including digital output - Promise R20378 RAID - optional RAID (1 IDE, 2 Serial ATA) (4 Serial ATA) - firewire IEEE1394 - no firewire - 6 USB 2.0 - 4 USB 1.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advantages - only 10/100 ethernet - Gigabit Ethernet (2 ports) Tyan - no integrated graphics - integrated graphics with separated video memory - maximum IDE disk size - 48 bit LBA (for big disks) 128GB = 137438953472 bytes ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tied or - 4 DDR slots (8GB maximum) nearly tied price $200 $180 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- If I was building a workstation, the Asus would look like the better option, despite the lack of Gigabit Ethernet. But for low-end server use, they are quite tied, with some advantage for the Tyan. About the chipsets, is there enough experience yet to know if either one is more troublesome than the other ? And will AMD drop theirs in a few months, or this time they are staying on the chipset business ? Thanks in advance for any replies. -- http://www.mat.uc.pt/~rps/ ..pt is Portugal| `Whom the gods love die young'-Menander (342-292 BC) Europe | Villeneuve 50-82, Toivonen 56-86, Senna 60-94 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
nvidia has announced a nforce3 revision for november, you might keep that in
mind. rms |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro" wrote in message ... Hello. I am thinking of buying a PC with one AMD 64 bits processor (bi-processor Tyan motherboards cost about $500, so that will wait for next year's budget). I will use Suse Linux 9.0 64 bit. I am not looking for maximum performance, but for reliability. So, I wanted some suggestions / opinions about motherboards. Have you considederd MSI's dual cpu board targetting workstation usage. Not much more expensive than the Asus single chip unit. It is called; K8T Master2-FAR Now it is based on the VIA chipset, but before you shudder, consider that generally people are having more issues with the Nvidia K8 chipset than the VIA one. Both seem to report very FEW problems anyways. At least with this MSI board you can throw in an extra CPU when the time is right. The Tyan and Asus boards are nice, but too damn close to the price of this dual monster not to think about it. Tim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Tim Cunnings" timken wrote:
"Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro" wrote in message ... I am thinking of buying a PC with one AMD 64 bits processor (bi-processor Tyan motherboards cost about $500, so that will wait for next year's budget). I will use Suse Linux 9.0 64 bit. I am not looking for maximum performance, but for reliability. So, I wanted some suggestions / opinions about motherboards. Have you considederd MSI's dual cpu board targetting workstation usage. I had not thought about that one, but one of the local vendors mentioned it when I talked with him. Not much more expensive than the Asus single chip unit. It is called; K8T Master2-FAR http://www.msi.com.tw/program/produc...il.php?UID=484 This is one of those crippled boards in which only one processor has direct access to the memory (only 4 DIMM slots). This makes its price a bit less attractive than it seems at first look. Tyan has a similar model (Tiger K8W (S2875)), but for some reason I can't find a price for it in pricewatch (not yet released ?). Looking at MSI's product list, http://www.msi.com.tw/program/produc...o_svr_list.php I see that they have another model: the MSI K8D Master Series http://www.msi.com.tw/program/produc...il.php?UID=441 But that one has a price similar to the comparable Tyans (around $450 at pricewatch). Now it is based on the VIA chipset, Shudder but before you shudder, consider that generally people are having more issues with the Nvidia K8 chipset than the VIA one. Both seem to report very FEW problems anyways. At this time I am a bit allergic to VIA chipsets. We have 16 computers which have Gigabyte GA-7ZX motherboads (chipset VIA Apollo KT133A) and they have been quite troublesome. The problems might be caused by something else*, but IIRC some of those boards were replaced under warranty, which in some of the cases solved the problem. So, I am not willing to try VIA again at this time. * For instance, the cases are quite small, and we have been exchanging them when the power supplies or the CPU fans** fail (and both have been failing)). I also don't trust too much the ethernet boards (Netgear) and I am starting to replace them. ** because the big fans don't fit on the small cases. The power supply gets in the way (mini-tower cases: the power supply is on the side of the motherboard instead of above it as in the medium-sized cases). At least with this MSI board you can throw in an extra CPU when the time is right. How does this work with the AMDs Opterons ? IIRC, with the Intel P3s it was reccomended/mandatory that both CPUs were the same revision. So buying a 2nd CPU later was not guaranteed to work. The Tyan and Asus boards are nice, but too damn close to the price of this dual monster not to think about it. At this point, all Opteron boards are a bit expensive. Still, if that means a better quality control than the cheap boards I don't mind too much at this time. Thanks for your reply. -- http://www.mat.uc.pt/~rps/ ..pt is Portugal| `Whom the gods love die young'-Menander (342-292 BC) Europe | Villeneuve 50-82, Toivonen 56-86, Senna 60-94 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:06:09 +0100, Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro wrote:
snip This is one of those crippled boards in which only one processor has direct access to the memory (only 4 DIMM slots). This makes its price a bit less attractive than it seems at first look. Tyan has a similar model (Tiger K8W (S2875)), but for some reason I can't find a price for it in pricewatch (not yet released ?). snip Do you have any data to back-up "crippled", or are you just shooting from the hip? From what little test data I've seen on this board compared to a board who does do the memory the "right" way is that it doesn't seem to make a whole lotta of difference. Of course, the web sites that usually end-up with this kind of nice hardware to test seem to benchmark the most trivial things. Also, don't forget the form-factor issue, the direct-access boards all seem to be huge. -- The three questions of greatest concern are -- 1. Is it attractive? 2. Is it amusing? 3. Does it know its place? -- Fran Lebowitz, "Metropolitan Life" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Douglas Bollinger wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:06:09 +0100, Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro wrote: snip This is one of those crippled boards in which only one processor has direct access to the memory (only 4 DIMM slots). This makes its price a bit less attractive than it seems at first look. Tyan has a similar model (Tiger K8W (S2875)), but for some reason I can't find a price for it in pricewatch (not yet released ?). snip Do you have any data to back-up "crippled", or are you just shooting from the hip? The opteron supports a seperate 5.3 GB/sec (peak not observer) memory bus PER cpu. So boards sold in the 4+0 configuration are basically ommiting the second memory bus. While benchmarks often only use a single memory bus and don't notice, this can seriously impede performance. From what little test data I've seen on this board compared to a board who does do the memory the "right" way is that it doesn't seem to make a whole lotta of difference. Of course, the web sites that usually end-up with this kind of nice hardware to test seem to benchmark the most trivial things. Agreed. Also, don't forget the form-factor issue, the direct-access boards all seem to be huge. Indeed dual 940 pin sockets, dual sets of 4 dimms, AGP, and a couple PCI add up to a pretty decently sized board. -- Bill Broadley Mathematics UC Davis |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Douglas Bollinger wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:06:09 +0100, Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro wrote: snip This [MSI K8T Master2-FAR] is one of those crippled boards in which only one processor has direct access to the memory (only 4 DIMM slots). This makes its price a bit less attractive than it seems at first look. Tyan has a similar model (Tiger K8W (S2875)), but for some reason I can't find a price for it in pricewatch (not yet released ?). snip Do you have any data to back-up "crippled", Not really, but it seems quite obvious that forcing the second processor to access memory through the first (so, extra latency) is crippling it, but I have not searched for benchmarks. I would be interested in seeing SPECrate results, but I kind of doubt that vendors (AMD or others) have benchmarked the "crippled" boards. I am now looking at the results at: http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/rint2000.html http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/rfp2000.html AMD has a number of results published. Selecting all the 5 that test Einux A4800, all 5 have 8x512MB PC2700 DDR ECC Registered SDRAM CL2.5, so I think they are using both banks (each bank has only 4 slots, right?). Has C'T published something ? I searched a bit: http://www.google.pt/search?q=site%3...ate_base 2000 http://www.heise.de/ct/Redaktion/as/spec/ct032098/ http://www.heise.de/ct/Redaktion/as/spec/ct0309106/ Looking at 2 results, that seem comparable: http://www.heise.de/ct/Redaktion/as/...P2000.014.html http://www.heise.de/ct/Redaktion/as/...P2000.004.html The values obtained are quite near (18.6 for the MSI K8T-Master2 (the board which was being discussed) , with 2x1024MB PC2700 Reg-ECC DDR SDRAM 2533 versus 18.4 for the Newisys with 6 GByte DDR333, presumably in 2 banks), despite the MSI using AMD Opteron 246 (2000 MHz), while the Newisys uses AMD Opteron 244 (0F50) (1768 MHz) *. So it seems that the extra memory bank makes a difference. * the page says "CPU(s) enabled: 1" but this must be a typo, because the runtimes for two copies of the benchmarks are quite similar to runtimes for the MSI board, which is said to be using 2 cpus. A benchmark where the 2 banks should have a big effect would be to run 2 copies of STREAM at the same time (assuming that the OS manages to put each instance in one CPU and use the local memory, it should be possible to get near 100% of the bandwidth in both). I found a report of such a test (in ppt format): http://wwwseminars.web.cern.ch/wwwse...t-20030903.ppt In slide 13 there is: 1x Stream: 2x Stream: 4x Stream: 2x Opteron, 1.8 GHz, HyperTransport: 1006 1671 MB/s 975 1178 MB/s 924 1133 MB/s 2x Xeon, 2.4 GHz, 400 MHz FSB: 1202 1404 MB/s 561 785 MB/s 365 753 MB/s It is not very obvious what is being reported here, because the Opteron numbers seem too good. It is understable that the Xeon numbers are halved going from 1 STREAM to 2 and then halved again with 4 (shared bus). It is also understable that the Opteron numbers don't fall much from 1 STREAM to 2. It is less understable that 4 STREAMs are almost as fast than 2, since there are only 2 memory buses. I have just run STREAM on my computer and I saw this message: "Each test is run 100 times, but only the *best* time for each is used." So, unless the benchmark is modified**, if one has two copies running at the same time, it might happen that one manages to do a run while the other is inactive for some reason (it has already finished, for instance), and that is the number which will be reported. ** I have not verified if this is already checked. Ignoring the few first and last runs should be enough to prevent the problem. Also, don't forget the form-factor issue, the direct-access boards all seem to be huge. For my purposes, it doesn't matter much. I'll probably use a tower case, anyway. But such boards are able to fit in a 1U computer. See the Newisys 2100 on the ppt mentioned above. -- http://www.mat.uc.pt/~rps/ ..pt is Portugal| `Whom the gods love die young'-Menander (342-292 BC) Europe | Villeneuve 50-82, Toivonen 56-86, Senna 60-94 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On 6 Nov 2003 20:05:03 -0000, Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro
wrote: Douglas Bollinger wrote: On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:06:09 +0100, Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro wrote: snip This [MSI K8T Master2-FAR] is one of those crippled boards in which only one processor has direct access to the memory (only 4 DIMM slots). This makes its price a bit less attractive than it seems at first look. Tyan has a similar model (Tiger K8W (S2875)), but for some reason I can't find a price for it in pricewatch (not yet released ?). snip Do you have any data to back-up "crippled", Not really, but it seems quite obvious that forcing the second processor to access memory through the first (so, extra latency) is crippling it, but I have not searched for benchmarks. I would Interesting bit to think about here. Assuming that you OS doesn't do any fancy tricks with regards to NUMA systems or processor affinity (as of a few years ago most operating systems didn't, though it's been added now), the difference isn't much. Reason? If you have no processor affinity, then on a dual-processor Opteron board with both memory controllers you essentially have a 50/50 shot of the memory you need being local/remote. Memory just kind of goes wherever. So each processor does half of it's memory accesses locally and half remote. Switch it to a setup where you have memory on only one processor, you then have one processor doing 100% local memory access and one processor doing 100% remote memory access. Total amount of local and remote memory accesses are the same in either case. Of course, there's a bit more at work here. First off, this assume that your two processors are doing equal amount of work. If your software tends to assign more work to processor 0 (the one with local memory) than to processor 1 (no local memory), then you could actually see a bit of a benefit to only having memory attached to one chip. Alternatively if one of your chips does lots of memory access all over the place and the other is sitting around processing all from cache, you can see a fairly large benefit from having memory on both chips. Also, if you have memory on both chips, presumably your memory requests are split roughly 50/50 in terms of direction, and with hypertransport having two unidirectional links, you have twice as much bandwidth than if all your traffic is one-way. All that being said though, I'd still recommend sticking to dual Opteron boards that have memory off BOTH processors. Particularly as operating systems continue to improve, this should give you optimal performance. ------------- Tony Hill hilla underscore 20 at yahoo dot ca |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I'll warn about the SK8N. I'm having a bear of a time getting Suse
9.0 installed because it won't recognize the onboard Promise RAID controller. I've gone through their help docs, but so far they haven't helped. - Greg Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro wrote in message ... Hello. I am thinking of buying a PC with one AMD 64 bits processor (bi-processor Tyan motherboards cost about $500, so that will wait for next year's budget). I will use Suse Linux 9.0 64 bit. I am not looking for maximum performance, but for reliability. So, I wanted some suggestions / opinions about motherboards. The 2 boards I am considering a Asus SK8N Tyan K8S (S2850) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chipset Nvidia nForce 3 AMD-8111 I/O hub pro 150 Winbond W83627HF Super I/O Winbond W83782D Hardware Monitor ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advantages - AGP slot - only PCI (32 bits) slots Asus - audio (6 channel) - no audio including digital output - Promise R20378 RAID - optional RAID (1 IDE, 2 Serial ATA) (4 Serial ATA) - firewire IEEE1394 - no firewire - 6 USB 2.0 - 4 USB 1.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advantages - only 10/100 ethernet - Gigabit Ethernet (2 ports) Tyan - no integrated graphics - integrated graphics with separated video memory - maximum IDE disk size - 48 bit LBA (for big disks) 128GB = 137438953472 bytes ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tied or - 4 DDR slots (8GB maximum) nearly tied price $200 $180 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- If I was building a workstation, the Asus would look like the better option, despite the lack of Gigabit Ethernet. But for low-end server use, they are quite tied, with some advantage for the Tyan. About the chipsets, is there enough experience yet to know if either one is more troublesome than the other ? And will AMD drop theirs in a few months, or this time they are staying on the chipset business ? Thanks in advance for any replies. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions on Which Dual Opteron Board To Use? | J. Hinkey | AMD x86-64 Processors | 1 | December 17th 04 01:32 AM |
Opinions on these motherboards? | Guertin Graphics Art Department | Homebuilt PC's | 4 | February 7th 04 05:10 AM |
New Itanium chips cost just $744 | Yousuf Khan | General | 343 | November 13th 03 09:58 PM |
Who is selling Opteron 4-way or 8-way SMP boards? | Tony Hill | General | 8 | October 13th 03 11:11 PM |
Where are the Opteron workstation motherboards? | steve | Asus Motherboards | 0 | July 15th 03 01:48 PM |