If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
2.0v vcore for a Barton?
I was wondering what people thought of using a vcore of 2.0v on a Barton
2500+. I notice BigBadger runs at this voltage - but also seems to get rid of the cpus pretty quick I have just started running my 2500+ (AQXEA 0326MPM) at 2.0v at 160Mhz x 15 to give me 2400MHz, (my other best option is 14 x 167 for 2340Mhz) as I have generic pc2700 on an Asus A7V333(rev2). The vcore options are to 1.85v standard or an undocumented option of 2.0v - nothing in-between. It is currently idling at 33C/21C and full load at 47C/23C @ vcore 2.0v with a Coolermaster HAC-V81 and 2 x 80mm (exhaust), 1 x 100mm (internal agitator/board heat sensor cooler) fans. I was thinking that it would be ok, but have recently read rumours about vcore killing cpus. I was thinking that so long as the temperature was reasonable, that no real harm, (other than a moderate shortening of its lifespan in a few years time) would be done, or am I seriously wrong? Your thoughts and experiences would be much appreciated. Paul |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hippy Paul wrote:
I was wondering what people thought of using a vcore of 2.0v on a Barton 2500+. I notice BigBadger runs at this voltage - but also seems to get rid of the cpus pretty quick I have just started running my 2500+ (AQXEA 0326MPM) at 2.0v at 160Mhz x 15 to give me 2400MHz, (my other best option is 14 x 167 for 2340Mhz) as I have generic pc2700 on an Asus A7V333(rev2). The vcore options are to 1.85v standard or an undocumented option of 2.0v - nothing in-between. It is currently idling at 33C/21C and full load at 47C/23C @ vcore 2.0v with a Coolermaster HAC-V81 and 2 x 80mm (exhaust), 1 x 100mm (internal agitator/board heat sensor cooler) fans. I was thinking that it would be ok, but have recently read rumours about vcore killing cpus. I was thinking that so long as the temperature was reasonable, that no real harm, (other than a moderate shortening of its lifespan in a few years time) would be done, or am I seriously wrong? Your thoughts and experiences would be much appreciated. Paul sheesh i'm running my xp2500 at 2.2ghz 200x11 at 1.725v 2v seems stupid, although your temps are good i think |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Temps are killing cpus and 2.0V is better if you have watercoolinh,even if
you kill it buy another one if you kill it probably they are going to be very cheap the Bartons or buy another one as backup its only 100 euros in Greece. "Hippy Paul" wrote in message ... I was wondering what people thought of using a vcore of 2.0v on a Barton 2500+. I notice BigBadger runs at this voltage - but also seems to get rid of the cpus pretty quick I have just started running my 2500+ (AQXEA 0326MPM) at 2.0v at 160Mhz x 15 to give me 2400MHz, (my other best option is 14 x 167 for 2340Mhz) as I have generic pc2700 on an Asus A7V333(rev2). The vcore options are to 1.85v standard or an undocumented option of 2.0v - nothing in-between. It is currently idling at 33C/21C and full load at 47C/23C @ vcore 2.0v with a Coolermaster HAC-V81 and 2 x 80mm (exhaust), 1 x 100mm (internal agitator/board heat sensor cooler) fans. I was thinking that it would be ok, but have recently read rumours about vcore killing cpus. I was thinking that so long as the temperature was reasonable, that no real harm, (other than a moderate shortening of its lifespan in a few years time) would be done, or am I seriously wrong? Your thoughts and experiences would be much appreciated. Paul |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Paul,
In my set-ups 2.0vdc vcore is too high (even with a vaporchill!). I've actually observed increased stability issues with that little bit of voltage... but you may have a different situation. Now that the 2500+ is $80+/-... why not get that last little bit extra. Will it shorten the processor life? Yes. I can't argue with your temps. Very low... in your situation, I'd go for it. Have you run something really aggressive to test it (Prime95)? Karl "Hippy Paul" wrote in message ... I was wondering what people thought of using a vcore of 2.0v on a Barton 2500+. I notice BigBadger runs at this voltage - but also seems to get rid of the cpus pretty quick I have just started running my 2500+ (AQXEA 0326MPM) at 2.0v at 160Mhz x 15 to give me 2400MHz, (my other best option is 14 x 167 for 2340Mhz) as I have generic pc2700 on an Asus A7V333(rev2). The vcore options are to 1.85v standard or an undocumented option of 2.0v - nothing in-between. It is currently idling at 33C/21C and full load at 47C/23C @ vcore 2.0v with a Coolermaster HAC-V81 and 2 x 80mm (exhaust), 1 x 100mm (internal agitator/board heat sensor cooler) fans. I was thinking that it would be ok, but have recently read rumours about vcore killing cpus. I was thinking that so long as the temperature was reasonable, that no real harm, (other than a moderate shortening of its lifespan in a few years time) would be done, or am I seriously wrong? Your thoughts and experiences would be much appreciated. Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Simple rule :
Voltage ------- GOOD Heat ----------- BAD Voltage per se, is not harmful - only excessive heat Q ---------------- Epox 8RGA+ Rev 2.0 NB lapped + fanned SB lapped + Zalman passive Voltages : 2.025-core / 2.0-dd / 2.9-dimm / 1.5-agp XP1800+ DUT3C - 220 x 10.5 (2309 MHz) Volcano 9+ 2 x 256 OCZ PC3700 - 8 3 3 2 Sync Dual Gigabyte Radeon 8500 DL – 308/600 32CFM Maxtor DM9Plus (8MB) – fanned Vantec Nexus 4-channel fan control Air - Idle 49/58 Load "Hippy Paul" wrote in message ... I was wondering what people thought of using a vcore of 2.0v on a Barton 2500+. I notice BigBadger runs at this voltage - but also seems to get rid of the cpus pretty quick I have just started running my 2500+ (AQXEA 0326MPM) at 2.0v at 160Mhz x 15 to give me 2400MHz, (my other best option is 14 x 167 for 2340Mhz) as I have generic pc2700 on an Asus A7V333(rev2). The vcore options are to 1.85v standard or an undocumented option of 2.0v - nothing in-between. It is currently idling at 33C/21C and full load at 47C/23C @ vcore 2.0v with a Coolermaster HAC-V81 and 2 x 80mm (exhaust), 1 x 100mm (internal agitator/board heat sensor cooler) fans. I was thinking that it would be ok, but have recently read rumours about vcore killing cpus. I was thinking that so long as the temperature was reasonable, that no real harm, (other than a moderate shortening of its lifespan in a few years time) would be done, or am I seriously wrong? Your thoughts and experiences would be much appreciated. Paul |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Well thanks for the replies
I decided that as I was not totally sure of what I was doing that I would leave it out, and as it was such a relatively small increase in cpu speed (60MHz) that I did not want to chance breaking something. Was wondering if I had maybe reached the ceiling of the cpu at 2400MHz, any more and prime95 was complaining, hence the fsb of 160 x 15. So I am now at a much safer vcore of 1.825v currently @ 42C/23 under load at 14 x 167 (2340MHz) safe in the knowledge that I can go further and that in all probability I will get away with. Paul "Hippy Paul" wrote in message ... I was wondering what people thought of using a vcore of 2.0v on a Barton 2500+. I notice BigBadger runs at this voltage - but also seems to get rid of the cpus pretty quick I have just started running my 2500+ (AQXEA 0326MPM) at 2.0v at 160Mhz x 15 to give me 2400MHz, (my other best option is 14 x 167 for 2340Mhz) as I have generic pc2700 on an Asus A7V333(rev2). The vcore options are to 1.85v standard or an undocumented option of 2.0v - nothing in-between. It is currently idling at 33C/21C and full load at 47C/23C @ vcore 2.0v with a Coolermaster HAC-V81 and 2 x 80mm (exhaust), 1 x 100mm (internal agitator/board heat sensor cooler) fans. I was thinking that it would be ok, but have recently read rumours about vcore killing cpus. I was thinking that so long as the temperature was reasonable, that no real harm, (other than a moderate shortening of its lifespan in a few years time) would be done, or am I seriously wrong? Your thoughts and experiences would be much appreciated. Paul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
You're doing better than me. I've got my Barton 2800+ running at 1.95V (200*12
= 2400). My idle temp is 47. I've got a Thermalright SLK900U and a Tornado 90mm (loud but a lot of CFM). I fried my Tbird 1200 by running it at 2.1V and 1500Mhz. Like you said though, who cares? By the time the CPU burns up, the Barton you bought for say 150.00$ will be worth 50.00$. I was wondering what people thought of using a vcore of 2.0v on a Barton 2500+. I notice BigBadger runs at this voltage - but also seems to get rid of the cpus pretty quick I have just started running my 2500+ (AQXEA 0326MPM) at 2.0v at 160Mhz x 15 to give me 2400MHz, (my other best option is 14 x 167 for 2340Mhz) as I have generic pc2700 on an Asus A7V333(rev2). The vcore options are to 1.85v standard or an undocumented option of 2.0v - nothing in-between. It is currently idling at 33C/21C and full load at 47C/23C @ vcore 2.0v with a Coolermaster HAC-V81 and 2 x 80mm (exhaust), 1 x 100mm (internal agitator/board heat sensor cooler) fans. -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Hippy Paul" wrote Well thanks for the replies snip So I am now at a much safer vcore of 1.825v currently @ 42C/23 under load at 14 x 167 (2340MHz) safe in the knowledge that I can go further and that in all probability I will get away with. snip Hi, yes I had similar experiences overclocking my Barton. I followed all the helpful suggestions/posts here and built a machine based on popular consensus (specs below), anyway I was able to push the 2500+ to 2.2Ghz with a small voltage increase (1.75v), but to get it to run stably (24/48hours Prime95) at 2.3GHz I had to whack up the vCore to 1.9v (yes I was a bit anxious). No matter what I tried I couldn't hit 2.4Ghz, luck of the draw I guess. In the end I decided to back-off to the 1.75v setting as the extra 100Mhz wasn't worth the large vCore increase. As I said before 3200+ speeds are simply amazing for me. . . . have fun. . . -- Wayne ][ Barton (AQXEA) XP2500+ @ 2.2GHz (10x220) - 1.75vCore CoolerMaster Aero 7 Lite - 3,200rpm ABIT NF7-S (v2.0 - BIOS#14) 512MB Dual TwiSTER PC3500 @ DDR440 (8,3,3,2.0 - 2.8v) Sapphire Atlantis 9800 - 3.3ns Samsung 240GB (2x120GB) WD-SE SATA RAID-0 (16k Stripe) Antec SX630II Mini-Tower Case Inc 300w PSU WinXP-PRO-SP1 Cat 3.7 - DX9.0b |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why do you run your FSB so low ?
For good performance, you need memory bandwidth - a direct function of FSB. Gross MHz are pretty meaningless on their own, and the likelihood is that you'll achieve the same gross regardless of FSB. For a serious o/c, max out your FSB before your multiplier. "Hippy Paul" wrote in message ... Well thanks for the replies I decided that as I was not totally sure of what I was doing that I would leave it out, and as it was such a relatively small increase in cpu speed (60MHz) that I did not want to chance breaking something. Was wondering if I had maybe reached the ceiling of the cpu at 2400MHz, any more and prime95 was complaining, hence the fsb of 160 x 15. So I am now at a much safer vcore of 1.825v currently @ 42C/23 under load at 14 x 167 (2340MHz) safe in the knowledge that I can go further and that in all probability I will get away with. Paul "Hippy Paul" wrote in message ... I was wondering what people thought of using a vcore of 2.0v on a Barton 2500+. I notice BigBadger runs at this voltage - but also seems to get rid of the cpus pretty quick I have just started running my 2500+ (AQXEA 0326MPM) at 2.0v at 160Mhz x 15 to give me 2400MHz, (my other best option is 14 x 167 for 2340Mhz) as I have generic pc2700 on an Asus A7V333(rev2). The vcore options are to 1.85v standard or an undocumented option of 2.0v - nothing in-between. It is currently idling at 33C/21C and full load at 47C/23C @ vcore 2.0v with a Coolermaster HAC-V81 and 2 x 80mm (exhaust), 1 x 100mm (internal agitator/board heat sensor cooler) fans. I was thinking that it would be ok, but have recently read rumours about vcore killing cpus. I was thinking that so long as the temperature was reasonable, that no real harm, (other than a moderate shortening of its lifespan in a few years time) would be done, or am I seriously wrong? Your thoughts and experiences would be much appreciated. Paul |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
already have - it is generic pc2700, if I take it over 167Mhz with a high
cpu clock I start getting errors. Reason it was at 15 x 160 was because that was as fast as I could get it without errors. That is one of the reasons I took it back down to 14 x 167 @ (now)1.85v as I could not work out if the loss of bandwidth was worth the few extra mhz on the cpu, when combined with everything else. Better ram is on my wish list... "Q" wrote in message ... Why do you run your FSB so low ? For good performance, you need memory bandwidth - a direct function of FSB. Gross MHz are pretty meaningless on their own, and the likelihood is that you'll achieve the same gross regardless of FSB. For a serious o/c, max out your FSB before your multiplier. "Hippy Paul" wrote in message ... Well thanks for the replies I decided that as I was not totally sure of what I was doing that I would leave it out, and as it was such a relatively small increase in cpu speed (60MHz) that I did not want to chance breaking something. Was wondering if I had maybe reached the ceiling of the cpu at 2400MHz, any more and prime95 was complaining, hence the fsb of 160 x 15. So I am now at a much safer vcore of 1.825v currently @ 42C/23 under load at 14 x 167 (2340MHz) safe in the knowledge that I can go further and that in all probability I will get away with. Paul "Hippy Paul" wrote in message ... I was wondering what people thought of using a vcore of 2.0v on a Barton 2500+. I notice BigBadger runs at this voltage - but also seems to get rid of the cpus pretty quick I have just started running my 2500+ (AQXEA 0326MPM) at 2.0v at 160Mhz x 15 to give me 2400MHz, (my other best option is 14 x 167 for 2340Mhz) as I have generic pc2700 on an Asus A7V333(rev2). The vcore options are to 1.85v standard or an undocumented option of 2.0v - nothing in-between. It is currently idling at 33C/21C and full load at 47C/23C @ vcore 2.0v with a Coolermaster HAC-V81 and 2 x 80mm (exhaust), 1 x 100mm (internal agitator/board heat sensor cooler) fans. I was thinking that it would be ok, but have recently read rumours about vcore killing cpus. I was thinking that so long as the temperature was reasonable, that no real harm, (other than a moderate shortening of its lifespan in a few years time) would be done, or am I seriously wrong? Your thoughts and experiences would be much appreciated. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Worth getting Barton 2500 now that Athlon64 is here? | Steve Wolfe | General | 22 | August 23rd 04 11:30 PM |
Vcore measurement is low - Is it a problem? | Email Invalid | Overclocking | 2 | June 29th 04 11:29 PM |
XP2500 Barton or XP2600 Barton? | As mellow as a horse | General | 1 | December 11th 03 09:25 PM |
Sunday Roast: Barton 2500+ @ 2.3GHz - 1.875 vCore 50°c Load | Wayne Youngman | Overclocking AMD Processors | 4 | September 22nd 03 12:39 AM |
Vcore is 1.88v with wire trick, what should clock multiplier/Cpu freq be to suit? | Tony | Overclocking AMD Processors | 3 | September 19th 03 06:08 PM |