If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dual Channel memory vs. clock speed?
On my Shutte AN35N Ultra I can oc my 2100+ to 2.17 (217x10) with my 2 sticks
(256 each) of pc3200 ram in single-channel mode. However, in dual channel mode, it gets unstable past 200 and the highest I can get is 200x10.5. My question is, which is better: 2170 w/single channel memory, or 2100 w/dual-channel memory? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
come on you have to know that 70 MHz you wont see performance increase its
only common sense to use the dual channel. "Key-Bored" wrote in message ... On my Shutte AN35N Ultra I can oc my 2100+ to 2.17 (217x10) with my 2 sticks (256 each) of pc3200 ram in single-channel mode. However, in dual channel mode, it gets unstable past 200 and the highest I can get is 200x10.5. My question is, which is better: 2170 w/single channel memory, or 2100 w/dual-channel memory? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Try a web search for modified BIOS for the AN35N. This sounds like a timing
issue with the memory controller in dual channel mode. There might be some one out there that has a modified BIOS for this MB that will allow you to OC in dual channel mode and possibly go a little higher than 217 provided that your memory and processor will allow it. "Key-Bored" wrote in message ... On my Shutte AN35N Ultra I can oc my 2100+ to 2.17 (217x10) with my 2 sticks (256 each) of pc3200 ram in single-channel mode. However, in dual channel mode, it gets unstable past 200 and the highest I can get is 200x10.5. My question is, which is better: 2170 w/single channel memory, or 2100 w/dual-channel memory? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Key-Bored" writes:
On my Shutte AN35N Ultra I can oc my 2100+ to 2.17 (217x10) with my 2 sticks (256 each) of pc3200 ram in single-channel mode. However, in dual channel mode, it gets unstable past 200 and the highest I can get is 200x10.5. My question is, which is better: 2170 w/single channel memory, or 2100 w/dual-channel memory? Most folks with typical applications seem to see well under 10% gain with dual channel memory, maybe somewhere between 5 and 7% seems typical. Most folks who don't have some sort of stopwatch to measure the difference, or who don't put two systems side by side so they can visually subtract the two times, will likely never notice any gain less than 30%, and only be able to notice something that small for a very short period of time. If you don't believe that it would be easy for someone to set up a carefully controlled experiment to test whether you can dependable detect 30%. Let you look at the system, send you outside, toss a coin to either speed it up or not, bring you back in an hour and ask you to look at it and decide. Repeat that a few times and you will probably have a lot less appreciation for the people who are going crazy to get an extra 4% out of their system. In one case I actually had a user who did not notice a 90% increase in speed, when they were not given any hints that this was what they were supposed to be looking for, but that was likely a special case. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Don Taylor" wrote Most folks who don't have some sort of stopwatch to measure the difference, or who don't put two systems side by side so they can visually subtract the two times, will likely never notice any gain less than 30%, and only be able to notice something that small for a very short period of time. I agree for regular apps. In gaming, it could help a borderline performing simulation alot. -- Ed Light Smiley :-/ MS Smiley :-\ Send spam to the FTC at Thanks, robots. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"homeboi" wrote in message ... come on you have to know that 70 MHz you wont see performance increase its only common sense to use the dual channel. Bad advice. First of all its 170MHz, not 70. Which is an 8.5% speed improvement. There's no way dual channel gives an 8.5% speed improvement, so go with the higher FSB and forget dual channel. Chip "Key-Bored" wrote in message ... On my Shutte AN35N Ultra I can oc my 2100+ to 2.17 (217x10) with my 2 sticks (256 each) of pc3200 ram in single-channel mode. However, in dual channel mode, it gets unstable past 200 and the highest I can get is 200x10.5. My question is, which is better: 2170 w/single channel memory, or 2100 w/dual-channel memory? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Depends on the app/game. I'd go for the dual channel so you could run your
CPU a little cooler as well. -- "I don't cheat to survive. I cheat to LIVE!!" - Alceryes "Key-Bored" wrote in message ... On my Shutte AN35N Ultra I can oc my 2100+ to 2.17 (217x10) with my 2 sticks (256 each) of pc3200 ram in single-channel mode. However, in dual channel mode, it gets unstable past 200 and the highest I can get is 200x10.5. My question is, which is better: 2170 w/single channel memory, or 2100 w/dual-channel memory? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Athlon 64 queries | Spiro | AMD x86-64 Processors | 11 | September 19th 04 01:30 AM |
Dual Channel Memory on Single Channel boards? | Rich Lowe | Overclocking AMD Processors | 24 | August 14th 04 03:17 AM |
Need advise on memory timings (Barton on Nforce II Ultra400 dual channel) | Nil Einne | Overclocking AMD Processors | 4 | January 13th 04 04:51 AM |
Dual Channel Memory Question | CiRcUiT | Overclocking AMD Processors | 18 | September 19th 03 05:01 PM |
What utilities can tell me if hyper-threading or dual channel DDR memory is working? | gotmail? | General | 0 | August 10th 03 07:10 PM |