A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage (alternative)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 4th 06, 02:24 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation

I am looking at the Gateway 823 LTO-3 Autoloader, and I will appreciate
user feedback. What features should I look for in such a tape drive?
The featues I seek include the following: U320 or U160 interface, NT
Backup and Veritas BENT/Win2003 compatibility, 8 slots, support for a
cleaning tape, internal barcode ready (as a future upgrade option), and
rackmountable. I'll look at other vendors if recommended.

Thanks

Dan Adams

  #2  
Old February 4th 06, 02:55 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation

I am looking at the Gateway 823 LTO-3 Autoloader, and I will appreciate
user feedback. What features should I look for in such a tape drive?
The featues I seek include the following: U320 or U160 interface, NT
Backup and Veritas BENT/Win2003 compatibility, 8 slots, support for a
cleaning tape, internal barcode ready (as a future upgrade option), and
rackmountable. I'll look at other vendors if recommended.


Interested in this too as I'm looking at our strategy for the next five
years. Anyone had any experience of the Freecom Superloader units? In the
UK, the 8 slot LTO2 is £2,300 and 8 slot LTO3 is £3,000. The HP 8 slot LTO3
StorageWorks is £3,400.

Cheers, Rob.


  #3  
Old February 4th 06, 11:48 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation

I haven't heard of the brand name. However I had a look at an EXABYTE
VXA autoloader. It uses propriertary media but the user was quite
bullish about the technology, and especially the option to use firewire
in a Mac XSERVE environment. BTW, EXABYTE also makes LTO drives.

What backup strategy are you looking at? I'm moving to a
disk-to-disk-to-tape system. I probably will go with disk-to-disk
replication using low-end DAS/NAS with SATA drives, and then upgrade to
a continous protection backup server with a higher end DAS
fiber-to-SATA backplane.

  #4  
Old February 5th 06, 06:58 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation

How does this differ from using DDS3 and DDS4 DAT drives to backup
files stored on local and remote servers using NT Backup and Veritas
Backup Exec ?

Dan

  #5  
Old February 6th 06, 10:14 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation

What backup strategy are you looking at? I'm moving to a
disk-to-disk-to-tape system. I probably will go with disk-to-disk


I don't think we need that level of redundancy so we'll be sticking (I
assume) with disk-to-tape backup across the network using BE agents with the
backups running most of the time across a gigabit backbone. Our current
backup requirements are only 200GB so actually a single LTO-3 drive would
suffice. But we're planning for growth.

Rob.


  #6  
Old February 6th 06, 10:22 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation

To Dan & Rob... you guys are aware that LTO-3 isn't the right choice
for every environment, right? It's not just a tape capacity issue,
you need to make sure that your solution will be able to _stream_ data
to the tape drive.


We'll be streaming off SCSI servers on a gigabit backbone. We'll probably
carry on using our existing LTO-1 tapes for anyway.

Should that be okay?

Thanks, Rob.


  #7  
Old February 6th 06, 04:55 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation

Also, LTO-3 drives can *read* LTO-1 media but you can not write on them.

Hmm, might be better sticking with LTO-2. Can an LTO-2 drive write to LTO-1
tapes?

Thanks, Rob.


  #8  
Old February 6th 06, 04:55 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation

"Rob Nicholson" wrote in message
...
To Dan & Rob... you guys are aware that LTO-3 isn't the right choice
for every environment, right? It's not just a tape capacity issue,
you need to make sure that your solution will be able to _stream_ data
to the tape drive.


We'll be streaming off SCSI servers on a gigabit backbone. We'll probably
carry on using our existing LTO-1 tapes for anyway.

Should that be okay?

Thanks, Rob.


A single LTO-3 drive (70+ MB/s native...) can fully saturate the practical
bandwith of a GbE interface, so in reality a Gigabit backbone is not
adequate. You'll also have a hard time getting all your servers to deliver
the required data fast enough. If you really want to use LTO-3 you'll need
either SAN shared connectivity or a local fast disk buffer on the backup
server (read up on D2D2T).

Also, LTO-3 drives can *read* LTO-1 media but you can not write on them.

Rob


  #9  
Old February 6th 06, 06:12 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation

"Rob Nicholson" wrote in message
...
Also, LTO-3 drives can *read* LTO-1 media but you can not write on them.


Hmm, might be better sticking with LTO-2. Can an LTO-2 drive write to
LTO-1 tapes?

Thanks, Rob.


Yes it can. You do have a media recycle and archive policy in use, I assume?
Do you keep track on how often your current tapes are used and when you
should retire them?

Rob


  #10  
Old February 7th 06, 07:41 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.arch.storage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation

How does my proposed setup stnadup against "shoe-shining":

12-bay dsik array with SCSI U320 to SATA backplane (initially 5 500GB
SATA II drives), and LTO3 drive attached to an Adaptec 39160 (SCSI
U160) PCI-X HBA on a Dual Xeon/800FSB 2.8Ghz box with 1GB DDR RAM.

Veritas Backup Exec 10d with CPS, AOFO, IDR and DLO pulls data from
servers and desktops/laptops to disk array, which in turn is backuped
to LTO3 autoloader.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LTO-3 Autoloader Recommendation Dan Adams Storage & Hardrives 20 February 9th 06 11:33 PM
HP color laser $299 includes jetdirect ethernet card - extra toners NEW $20, also hp 8500 $700 8550n $950 [email protected] Printers 2 November 12th 05 05:40 PM
FS printers/parts trays, printheads -- oki fujitsu dl3700 dl3800 hp genicom epson ibm dec jetdirect laserjet lexmark qms okidata microline 320 ml320 393 tally printronix tektronix qms toshiba zebra otc ibm intermec 7755 boul st laurent montreal ca cisco Printers 2 May 22nd 05 02:05 AM
FS PRINTER PARTS trays fusers drums printheads -- oki fujitsu hp genicom epson ibm dec jetdirect laserjet lexnmark qms okidata ml320 mannesmann tally printonix tektronix qms toshiba zebra otc ibm lexmark intermec dec compaq montreal canada toronto o [email protected] Printers 1 March 15th 05 05:50 AM
Cannot eject tape from PV 120T DLT1 Autoloader drive [email protected] Dell Computers 3 January 25th 05 08:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.