|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 2nd 07, 07:35 PM
posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
|
|||
|
|||
Western Digital or Seagate (SataII) performance wise? Some benchmark results...
Another fun questionare...
Just wondering what everyone has found regarding this question. I ran some quick benches using HDTach RW (read only tests) and this is what I have found: WD1600YS SataII (enterprise): 157.9 MB/s burst/ 54.1 MB/s read Seagate 160gb SATA II (I forget the model): 230 MB/s burst and 59.7 read I believe the random access values for Seagate were around 18ms, while WD was around 13 (12.6). At least by read tests, it appears Seagate wins. Write tests could change this greatly though.. 
|
|
#2
July 2nd 07, 08:31 PM
posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
|
|||
|
|||
|
Western Digital or Seagate (SataII) performance wise? Some benchmark results...
"markm75" wrote in message ps.com
Another fun questionare... A nicer word for troll bait? Just wondering what everyone has found regarding this question. I ran some quick benches using HDTach RW (read only tests) and this is what I have found: WD1600YS SataII (enterprise): 157.9 MB/s burst/ 54.1 MB/s read Seagate 160gb SATA II (I forget the model): 230 MB/s burst and 59.7 read I believe the random access values for Seagate were around 18ms, while WD was around 13 (12.6). Yup, definately a troll. At least by read tests, it appears Seagate wins. Write tests could change this greatly though.. And what not.
|
|
#3
July 3rd 07, 12:26 AM
posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
|
|||
|
|||
|
Western Digital or Seagate (SataII) performance wise? Some benchmark results...
Previously markm75 wrote:
Another fun questionare... Just wondering what everyone has found regarding this question. I ran some quick benches using HDTach RW (read only tests) and this is what I have found: WD1600YS SataII (enterprise): 157.9 MB/s burst/ 54.1 MB/s read Seagate 160gb SATA II (I forget the model): 230 MB/s burst and 59.7 read I believe the random access values for Seagate were around 18ms, while WD was around 13 (12.6). At least by read tests, it appears Seagate wins. Write tests could change this greatly though.. I doubt that. The read-tests are very close here and WD could be ahead in a different benchmark. 10% is not a significant speed difference for these types of tests. Arno
|
|
#4
July 3rd 07, 02:17 AM
posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
|
|||
|
|||
|
Western Digital or Seagate (SataII) performance wise? Some benchmark results...
On Jul 2, 3:31 pm, "Folkert Rienstra" wrote:
"markm75" wrote in glegroups.com Another fun questionare... A nicer word for troll bait? Just wondering what everyone has found regarding this question. I ran some quick benches using HDTach RW (read only tests) and this is what I have found: WD1600YS SataII (enterprise): 157.9 MB/s burst/ 54.1 MB/s read Seagate 160gb SATA II (I forget the model): 230 MB/s burst and 59.7 read I believe the random access values for Seagate were around 18ms, while WD was around 13 (12.6). Yup, definately a troll. What is a Troll? (LOL) At least by read tests, it appears Seagate wins. Write tests could change this greatly though.. And what not. And what not what? Engles?
|
|
#5
July 3rd 07, 03:33 AM
posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
|
|||
|
|||
|
Western Digital or Seagate (SataII) performance wise? Some benchmark results...
Previously markm75 wrote:
On Jul 2, 3:31 pm, "Folkert Rienstra" wrote: "markm75" wrote in glegroups.com Another fun questionare... A nicer word for troll bait? Just wondering what everyone has found regarding this question. I ran some quick benches using HDTach RW (read only tests) and this is what I have found: WD1600YS SataII (enterprise): 157.9 MB/s burst/ 54.1 MB/s read Seagate 160gb SATA II (I forget the model): 230 MB/s burst and 59.7 read I believe the random access values for Seagate were around 18ms, while WD was around 13 (12.6). Yup, definately a troll. What is a Troll? (LOL) Somebody that is "trolling", i.e. posting nonsense, acting superiour, claiming (without proof or justification) that other people are wrong and generally wasting peoples time with worthless statement. A perfectly good example of a troll is Folkert. At least by read tests, it appears Seagate wins. Write tests could change this greatly though.. And what not. And what not what? Don't try to understand Folkert. He lives in his own world where he is king and everybody else is stupid. Arno
|
|
#6
July 3rd 07, 12:52 PM
posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
|
|||
|
|||
|
Western Digital or Seagate (SataII) performance wise? Some benchmark results...
On Jul 2, 10:33 pm, Arno Wagner wrote:
Previously markm75 wrote: On Jul 2, 3:31 pm, "Folkert Rienstra" wrote: "markm75" wrote in glegroups.com Another fun questionare... A nicer word for troll bait? Just wondering what everyone has found regarding this question. I ran some quick benches using HDTach RW (read only tests) and this is what I have found: WD1600YS SataII (enterprise): 157.9 MB/s burst/ 54.1 MB/s read Seagate 160gb SATA II (I forget the model): 230 MB/s burst and 59.7 read I believe the random access values for Seagate were around 18ms, while WD was around 13 (12.6). Yup, definately a troll. What is a Troll? (LOL) Somebody that is "trolling", i.e. posting nonsense, acting superiour, claiming (without proof or justification) that other people are wrong and generally wasting peoples time with worthless statement. A perfectly good example of a troll is Folkert. At least by read tests, it appears Seagate wins. Write tests could change this greatly though.. And what not. And what not what? Don't try to understand Folkert. He lives in his own world where he is king and everybody else is stupid. Arno- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - LOL.. I thought this may have been the case. Thanks for explaining the term too.
|
|
#7
July 3rd 07, 02:35 PM
posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
|
|||
|
|||
|
Western Digital or Seagate (SataII) performance wise? Some benchmark results...
"markm75" wrote in message ps.com
On Jul 2, 3:31 pm, "Folkert Rienstra" wrote: "markm75" wrote in glegroups.com Another fun questionare... A nicer word for troll bait? Just wondering what everyone has found regarding this question. I ran some quick benches using HDTach RW (read only tests) and this is what I have found: WD1600YS SataII (enterprise): 157.9 MB/s burst/ 54.1 MB/s read Seagate 160gb SATA II (I forget the model): How convenient. 230 MB/s burst and 59.7 read I believe the random access values for Seagate were around 18ms, while WD was around 13 (12.6). Yup, definately a troll. What is a Troll? (LOL) This is. This will certainly draw the babblebot out with a vengeance, without a doubt: the perfect troll. At least by read tests, it appears Seagate wins. Write tests could change this greatly though.. And what not. And what not what? What And what not what? "This"? Engles? What?
|
|
#8
July 3rd 07, 04:21 PM
posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
|
|||
|
|||
|
Western Digital or Seagate (SataII) performance wise? Some benchmark results...
On Jul 3, 9:35 am, "Nermal" wrote:
"markm75" wrote in glegroups.com On Jul 2, 3:31 pm, "Folkert Rienstra" wrote: "markm75" wrote in glegroups.com Another fun questionare... A nicer word for troll bait? Just wondering what everyone has found regarding this question. I ran some quick benches using HDTach RW (read only tests) and this is what I have found: WD1600YS SataII (enterprise): 157.9 MB/s burst/ 54.1 MB/s read Seagate 160gb SATA II (I forget the model): How convenient. ST3160815AS
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Western Digital & Seagate HD's | Gilbert | General | 3 | August 1st 05 03:00 AM |
| Which drives are the most reliable Western Digital or Seagate ? | Mark Hobley | General Hardware | 2 | February 20th 05 04:28 PM |
| Serial ATA: Western Digital or Seagate? | Zed | Storage (alternative) | 2 | February 29th 04 09:21 PM |
| Western Digital, Maxtor or Seagate | @drian | General | 25 | October 20th 03 06:24 PM |
| Western Digital, Maxtor or Seagate | @drian | Homebuilt PC's | 26 | October 20th 03 06:24 PM |
Linear Mode
