If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:51:17 -0400, Keith R. Williams wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 08:19:47 -0400, George Macdonald wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:20:25 GMT, "Wes Newell" wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:28:14 -0400, George Macdonald wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:49:35 GMT, "Wes Newell" wrote: I thought you would understand that I meant the bus was QDR. And pray tell what does QDR mean???? My own offshoot of DDR, Quad Data Rate. Easier than typing quad pumped. I know what the letters mean. The thing is do you? IOW how does one achieve QDR signalling... apparently with the bus' base clock? No. I don't know the exact way Intel does it. Nor do I care. SO we all agree. You haven't a clue what you're talking about. The only difference I see here is that George and I have some interest in technical correctness. Yes I know what I'm talking about. It's you that doesn't seem to have a clue. I haven't owned an Intel proc. since I last used a 486SX20. And this is the AMD overclocking ng. Wrong! Look again. At issue has been the Intel FSB, not what you think it "should be". You're the one who has butted into a discussion, sans information. So now you're so smart that you know what cpu's I've owned. And the only thing at issue that I was aware of was the Intel designation of the FSB as 800MHz, which both of you agreed was wrong. I don't know who started the cross posting. So save your typing fingers, I'm not interested. It's been cross-posted to where I (and I assume George, since he's regular on .chips too) have been since the beginning. You really do need to rent a clue. Try arguing with your fellow over-clockers, rather than those who are trying to give you a clue. This is being crossposted in 2 newsgroups. These: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd , comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips I only subscribe to the first, so I sure as hell didn't cross post it to chips. Perhaps it time you concentate more on common sense than anything technical. I couldn't care less about the internal workings of the P4. It'll be a cold day in hell before I ever own another Intel cpu. Now you and George can continue your discussion, just remove the alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd newsgroup from it. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.html |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 06:58:51 GMT, "Wes Newell"
wrote: (alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd removed) I couldn't care less about the internal workings of the P4. It'll be a cold day in hell before I ever own another Intel cpu. This kind of attitude is what I was talking about earlier. Even many "computer enthusiasts" don't give a rip about the technical details. At work, I'm surrounded by "technical" people who don't know or care, beyond what's required to do their jobs. |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 06:58:51 GMT, "Wes Newell"
wrote: On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:51:17 -0400, Keith R. Williams wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 08:19:47 -0400, George Macdonald wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:20:25 GMT, "Wes Newell" wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:28:14 -0400, George Macdonald wrote: On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:49:35 GMT, "Wes Newell" wrote: I thought you would understand that I meant the bus was QDR. And pray tell what does QDR mean???? My own offshoot of DDR, Quad Data Rate. Easier than typing quad pumped. I know what the letters mean. The thing is do you? IOW how does one achieve QDR signalling... apparently with the bus' base clock? No. I don't know the exact way Intel does it. Nor do I care. SO we all agree. You haven't a clue what you're talking about. The only difference I see here is that George and I have some interest in technical correctness. Yes I know what I'm talking about. It's you that doesn't seem to have a clue. I haven't owned an Intel proc. since I last used a 486SX20. And this is the AMD overclocking ng. Wrong! Look again. At issue has been the Intel FSB, not what you think it "should be". You're the one who has butted into a discussion, sans information. So now you're so smart that you know what cpu's I've owned. And the only thing at issue that I was aware of was the Intel designation of the FSB as 800MHz, which both of you agreed was wrong. I don't know who started the cross posting. So save your typing fingers, I'm not interested. It's been cross-posted to where I (and I assume George, since he's regular on .chips too) have been since the beginning. You really do need to rent a clue. Try arguing with your fellow over-clockers, rather than those who are trying to give you a clue. This is being crossposted in 2 newsgroups. These: alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd , comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips I only subscribe to the first, so I sure as hell didn't cross post it to chips. Perhaps it time you concentate more on common sense than anything technical. I couldn't care less about the internal workings of the P4. It'll be a cold day in hell before I ever own another Intel cpu. Now you and George can continue your discussion, just remove the alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd newsgroup from it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[7CIT] I Do Not Think That Anyone In Here Can Answer This; Albeit, | Ken Maltby | Overclocking | 16 | February 7th 05 12:00 AM |
[7CIT] I Do Not Think That Anyone In Here Can Answer This; Albeit, | Aaron Dinkin | Overclocking | 0 | February 7th 05 12:00 AM |
[7CIT] I Do Not Think That Anyone In Here Can Answer This; Albeit, | Aaron Dinkin | Overclocking AMD Processors | 0 | February 7th 05 12:00 AM |
XP install hangs at Windows Setup with floppy light on - ANSWER | AFN | General | 0 | November 27th 04 05:49 AM |
Chaintech support answer verification. | Hormel Bait | Homebuilt PC's | 4 | July 14th 03 06:05 AM |