AMD accuses Nvidia of disabling multi-core CPU support in PhysX,to make GPU's look better

On Feb 1, 12:38*pm, chrisv wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part:
Sore losers are always calling the instant replay booth.

Even if so, that does not mean that everyone who calls the
"instant replay booth" is a sore loser. *Perhaps the truly
wronged might also call? *All A are B does not mean all B are A.

Arguing logically with R. Myers is like arguing logically with a road,
it's going only where it's going and it has always been going that way.

He's too smart for us, you know.

This is easy, Chris. If I'm not fun to talk to, then don't bother
with me and don't bother me.

Robert.

In csiphc Robert Myers wrote in part:
On Feb 1, 12:38*pm, chrisv wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In csiphc Robert Myers wrote in part:
Sore losers are always calling the instant replay booth.

Even if so, that does not mean that everyone who calls the
"instant replay booth" is a sore loser. *Perhaps the truly
wronged might also call? *All A are B does not mean all B are A.

Arguing logically with R. Myers is like arguing logically with a road,
it's going only where it's going and it has always been going that way.

He's too smart for us, you know.

This is easy, Chris. If I'm not fun to talk to,
then don't bother with me and don't bother me.

Why be so limited? PhD Myers makes a good foil.


-- Robert R

On Feb 2, 1:45*pm, Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In csiphc Robert Myers wrote in part:





On Feb 1, 12:38*pm, chrisv wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In csiphc Robert Myers wrote in part:
Sore losers are always calling the instant replay booth.

Even if so, that does not mean that everyone who calls the
"instant replay booth" is a sore loser. *Perhaps the truly
wronged might also call? *All A are B does not mean all B are A.

Arguing logically with R. Myers is like arguing logically with a road,
it's going only where it's going and it has always been going that way.

He's too smart for us, you know.
This is easy, Chris. *If I'm not fun to talk to,
then don't bother with me and don't bother me.

Why be so limited? *PhD Myers *makes a good foil.

The cloak of the master of French grammar and nineteenth century
French poetry falls away.

Actually, the French intelligentsia have always had a taste for gutter
brawling.

Robert.

In csiphc Robert Myers wrote in part:
On Feb 2, 1:45*pm, Robert Redelmeier wrote:
Why be so limited? *PhD Myers *makes a good foil.

The cloak of the master of French grammar and nineteenth
century French poetry falls away.

Actually, the French intelligentsia have always had a
taste for gutter brawling.

LOL! Fantasies.

Once you know the truth, lies are more informative
than the mere repetition of what is already known.
The misdirection reveals the liar's mindset.


-- Robert R

On Feb 4, 8:25*am, Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In csiphc Robert Myers wrote in part:

On Feb 2, 1:45*pm, Robert Redelmeier wrote:
Why be so limited? *PhD Myers *makes a good foil.

The cloak of the master of French grammar and nineteenth
century French poetry falls away.

Actually, the French intelligentsia have always had a
taste for gutter brawling.

LOL! *Fantasies.

Once you know the truth, lies are more informative
than the mere repetition of what is already known.
The misdirection reveals the liar's mindset.

Do you imagine that your denigrating messages to me and about me say
nothing about you? Something in the Bible about this situation. I'm
sure you know the passage.

Robert.