A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 10th 08, 03:57 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.intel
Yousuf Khan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 914
Default AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's

Interesting the AMD 45nm technology does not yet include High-K & Metal
Gates (HKMG), yet it uses 15-30% less power. Of course AMD does use SOI,
which Intel doesn't. So it looks like currently SOI utilizes power
better than HKMG, but AMD also plans to use HKMG in later 45nm revision.

Yousuf Khan

Under the Hood: AMD's Shanghai marks move to 45-nm node
http://eetimes.eu/semi/212002481?pgno=1
  #2  
Old December 10th 08, 04:23 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.intel
Robert Myers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 606
Default AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's

On Dec 9, 9:57*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Interesting the AMD 45nm technology does not yet include High-K & Metal
Gates (HKMG), yet it uses 15-30% less power. Of course AMD does use SOI,
which Intel doesn't. So it looks like currently SOI utilizes power
better than HKMG, but AMD also plans to use HKMG in later 45nm revision.


http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/cbuilder?ticker1=amd

BUY!

Robert.
  #3  
Old December 15th 08, 11:48 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.intel
Sebastian Kaliszewski[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's

Robert Myers wrote:
On Dec 9, 9:57 pm, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Interesting the AMD 45nm technology does not yet include High-K & Metal
Gates (HKMG), yet it uses 15-30% less power. Of course AMD does use SOI,
which Intel doesn't. So it looks like currently SOI utilizes power
better than HKMG, but AMD also plans to use HKMG in later 45nm revision.


http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/cbuilder?ticker1=amd

BUY!


Go away to alt.stock.advocacy, troll


--
"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity" -- L. Lang
--
http://www.tajga.org -- (some photos from my travels)
  #4  
Old December 16th 08, 07:47 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.intel
Robert Myers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 606
Default AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's

On Dec 15, 5:48*am, Sebastian Kaliszewski
wrote:
Robert Myers wrote:
On Dec 9, 9:57 pm, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Interesting the AMD 45nm technology does not yet include High-K & Metal
Gates (HKMG), yet it uses 15-30% less power. Of course AMD does use SOI,
which Intel doesn't. So it looks like currently SOI utilizes power
better than HKMG, but AMD also plans to use HKMG in later 45nm revision.

  #5  
Old December 16th 08, 03:47 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.intel
Robert Redelmeier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 316
Default AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part:
On Dec 15, 5:48*am, Sebastian Kaliszewski
Robert Myers wrote:
BUY!

Go away to alt.stock.advocacy, troll

I remember you. You're the financial genius from the Warsaw pact.
Good time to move the US. The US needs more people with unjustified
self-confidence. It's done such good things for the world economy.


Speaking of unjustified self-confidence ... go look in a mirror.
You do not have any idea of how insulting you often are,
and thereby prove yourself a troll.


-- Robert


  #6  
Old December 16th 08, 06:38 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.intel
Robert Myers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 606
Default AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's

On Dec 16, 9:47*am, Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part:

On Dec 15, 5:48*am, Sebastian Kaliszewski
Robert Myers wrote:
BUY!
Go away to alt.stock.advocacy, troll


I remember you. *You're the financial genius from the Warsaw pact.
Good time to move the US. *The US needs more people with unjustified
self-confidence. *It's done such good things for the world economy.


Speaking of unjustified self-confidence ... go look in a mirror.
You do not have any idea of how insulting you often are,
and thereby prove yourself a troll.


That's unusually sloppy for you, Robert. Politeness, consideration
for others, or even an accurate self-image in interpersonal terms have
nothing to do with being right or wrong.

I have no unjustified self-confidence around people like you or the
other guy who works for people who are experts in risk management,
"expertise" of the kind that has nearly brought the world financial
order to its knees.

It's been interesting to watch the reactions of those burned in
Madoff's Ponzi scheme. They all come down to, "He didn't seem like
the sort," or "He knew all the right people."

Unfortunately for their personal wealth, interpersonal cues have
nothing to do with being right or wrong. There is right, wrong, and
don't know, the last of which is grotesquely underutizlized. A fraud
who is nice is still a fraud.

Robert.


  #7  
Old December 17th 08, 05:37 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.intel
Del Cecchi`
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's

Robert Myers wrote:
On Dec 16, 9:47 am, Robert Redelmeier wrote:

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part:


On Dec 15, 5:48 am, Sebastian Kaliszewski

Robert Myers wrote:

BUY!

Go away to alt.stock.advocacy, troll


I remember you. You're the financial genius from the Warsaw pact.
Good time to move the US. The US needs more people with unjustified
self-confidence. It's done such good things for the world economy.


Speaking of unjustified self-confidence ... go look in a mirror.
You do not have any idea of how insulting you often are,
and thereby prove yourself a troll.



That's unusually sloppy for you, Robert. Politeness, consideration
for others, or even an accurate self-image in interpersonal terms have
nothing to do with being right or wrong.

I have no unjustified self-confidence around people like you or the
other guy who works for people who are experts in risk management,
"expertise" of the kind that has nearly brought the world financial
order to its knees.

It's been interesting to watch the reactions of those burned in
Madoff's Ponzi scheme. They all come down to, "He didn't seem like
the sort," or "He knew all the right people."

Unfortunately for their personal wealth, interpersonal cues have
nothing to do with being right or wrong. There is right, wrong, and
don't know, the last of which is grotesquely underutizlized. A fraud
who is nice is still a fraud.

Robert.


The Madoff affair has been quite interesting to watch. One aspect is
the evolution... did it start out legitimate and evolve over time to a
fraud, or was it a fraud from the beginning? I have read plausible
speculation that it was the former.

And how he didn't get caught? Another article speculated that many
thought he was crooked and "front running" his market making operation.
So the Wall Street types wanted to get in on it.

And the "brightest guys in the room" almost wrecked the financial system
before this, with LTCM.


del
  #8  
Old December 17th 08, 06:32 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.intel
Robert Myers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 606
Default AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's

On Dec 16, 11:37*pm, Del Cecchi` wrote:


The Madoff affair has been quite interesting to watch. *One aspect is
the evolution... did it start out legitimate and evolve over time to a
fraud, or was it a fraud from the beginning? *I have read plausible
speculation that it was the former.

And how he didn't get caught? *Another article speculated that many
thought he was crooked and "front running" his market making operation.
* So the Wall Street types wanted to get in on it.

And the "brightest guys in the room" almost wrecked the financial system
before this, with LTCM.

I'm sure that many frauds start out with someone thinking that they
are taking a temporary measure that they will later be able to cover.
Lawyers holding funds in trust think of the funds as a line of credit,
for example.

I think that, ultimately, the calculations are little more than a
prop. The margins are so thin that just the tiniest bit of, say,
front-running or an unexposed conflict of interest (wanting to get in
on the scam without admitting to knowing about it) can change
everything.

Robert.


  #9  
Old December 17th 08, 07:53 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.intel
Robert Redelmeier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 316
Default AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part:
I think that, ultimately, the calculations are little more
than a prop. The margins are so thin that just the tiniest
bit of, say, front-running or an unexposed conflict of
interest (wanting to get in on the scam without admitting
to knowing about it) can change everything.


Yes ... to the advantage of the scam. Margins means levearage
works small advantages into large profits. The problem is like
in mountaineering on the backside -- how can you climb down?


-- Robert R




  #10  
Old December 17th 08, 07:54 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.intel
Robert Redelmeier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 316
Default AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's

In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part:
On Dec 16, 9:47*am, Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part:
I remember you. *You're the financial genius from the Warsaw pact.
Good time to move the US. *The US needs more people with unjustified
self-confidence. *It's done such good things for the world economy.


Speaking of unjustified self-confidence ... go look in a mirror.
You do not have any idea of how insulting you often are,
and thereby prove yourself a troll.


That's unusually sloppy for you, Robert. Politeness,
consideration for others, or even an accurate self-image in
interpersonal terms have nothing to do with being right or wrong.


You are confusing politics for science. Apart from IQ, nothing you
said about Sebastian has any scientific proveability or relevance.
Your statement was political, and must be judged as such.

I have no unjustified self-confidence around people like you
or the other guy who works for people who are experts in risk


Why do you equate us? I pointed you to Nassim Taleb's
"Black Swans" back in May. You are ignoring data.

Unfortunately for their personal wealth, interpersonal
cues have nothing to do with being right or wrong.


Then why do you invoke them against Sebastian?


-- Robert R

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPU Computing: Intel's Larrabee - AMD's Fusion - NVIDIA's Tesla + CUDA NV55 Intel 0 October 31st 07 01:21 AM
GPU Computing: Intel's Larrabee - AMD's Fusion - NVIDIA's Tesla + CUDA NV55 AMD x86-64 Processors 0 October 31st 07 01:21 AM
GPU Computing: Intel's Larrabee - AMD's Fusion - NVIDIA's Tesla + CUDA NV55 Nvidia Videocards 0 October 31st 07 01:21 AM
GPU Computing: Intel's Larrabee - AMD's Fusion - NVIDIA's Tesla + CUDA NV55 Ati Videocards 0 October 31st 07 01:21 AM
AMD's Athlon64 or Intel's P4? [email protected] General 38 February 8th 05 05:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.