A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » System Manufacturers & Vendors » Compaq Computers
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Compaq PS 2018 powersupply..



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old November 13th 04, 03:16 PM
Ben Myers
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

After dealing with DEC's and Compaq's spare parts messes for years, I have to
claim that part of the problem with Compaq's on-going viability was simply the
total mess of spare parts. Poor management of parts made product builds,
logistics, inventories, and who knows what else far more complicated than
necessary.

Both DEC and Compaq generated more spare parts than they knew what to do with.
For example, as I've gone thru several generations of Compaq boxes and seen the
same darn 3.5" floppy without front bezel and with the trademark rounded eject
button. My unscientific guess is that Compaq had at least 20 part numbers for
the same doggone PHYSICAL part. Each part number was generated for a different
model and/or different manufacturer, but they were all interchangable among all
manner of Compaq desktops and servers. Before its demise, DEC had created the
same sort of part numbering monstrosity, compounded by hyper-expensive packaging
of spare parts which rotted on the shelf in warehouses.

Pity that nobody ever took a broad look at spare parts from the vantage point of
20000 feet... Ben Myers

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 08:20:37 -0500, "HH" wrote:

Agreed, except it had nothing to do with the merger, which Compaq had to do
in order to survive.
HH


  #12  
Old November 13th 04, 06:45 PM
Torbjørn Morka
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ben Myers wrote:
After dealing with DEC's and Compaq's spare parts messes for years, I have to
claim that part of the problem with Compaq's on-going viability was simply the
total mess of spare parts. Poor management of parts made product builds,
logistics, inventories, and who knows what else far more complicated than
necessary.

Both DEC and Compaq generated more spare parts than they knew what to do with.
For example, as I've gone thru several generations of Compaq boxes and seen the
same darn 3.5" floppy without front bezel and with the trademark rounded eject
button. My unscientific guess is that Compaq had at least 20 part numbers for
the same doggone PHYSICAL part. Each part number was generated for a different
model and/or different manufacturer, but they were all interchangable among all
manner of Compaq desktops and servers. Before its demise, DEC had created the
same sort of part numbering monstrosity, compounded by hyper-expensive packaging
of spare parts which rotted on the shelf in warehouses.

Pity that nobody ever took a broad look at spare parts from the vantage point of
20000 feet... Ben Myers

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 08:20:37 -0500, "HH" wrote:


Agreed, except it had nothing to do with the merger, which Compaq had to do
in order to survive.
HH





Anyone who knows how and where to obtain a schematic for this PSU ?

Torbjorn.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compaq FAQ HH Compaq Computers 0 October 10th 04 12:49 PM
Compaq FAQ HH Compaq Computers 0 September 23rd 04 12:21 PM
Compaq FAQ HH Compaq Computers 0 July 31st 04 02:23 PM
Compaq FAQ HH Compaq Computers 0 July 3rd 04 04:25 AM
Compaq ready to go Jazzy Ban Compaq Computers 0 October 14th 03 02:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.