If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is PCI-X the same as 64-bit, 66 MHz PCI?
I haven't been following PCI developments too closely. It __seems
that__ the two are identical, but perhaps not. I have already RTF web sites. Can anyone enlighten me. maggie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:12:22 -0700, Lady Margaret Thatcher
wrote: I haven't been following PCI developments too closely. It __seems that__ the two are identical, but perhaps not. I have already RTF web sites. Can anyone enlighten me. Regardless of the operating frequency, PCI-X Mode 1 uses a slightly different bus-level protocol than PCI (all signals get a full bus tick to make transfers, no need for "sneak clocks" in the io ring to make timing back to the bus from hot-off-the-bus inputs). The comparitively rare PCI-X Mode 2 is quite different electrically; PCI-X Mode 1 and PCI use single-ended signaling while PCI-X Mode 2 uses differential signaling, includes ECC at the bus level and is more packet oriented... /daytripper |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:28:28 -0400, daytripper
wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:12:22 -0700, Lady Margaret Thatcher wrote: I haven't been following PCI developments too closely. It __seems that__ the two are identical, but perhaps not. I have already RTF web sites. Can anyone enlighten me. Regardless of the operating frequency, PCI-X Mode 1 uses a slightly different bus-level protocol than PCI (all signals get a full bus tick to make transfers, no need for "sneak clocks" in the io ring to make timing back to the bus from hot-off-the-bus inputs). The comparitively rare PCI-X Mode 2 is quite different electrically; PCI-X Mode 1 and PCI use single-ended signaling while PCI-X Mode 2 uses differential signaling, includes ECC at the bus level and is more packet oriented... /daytripper Thanks. I guess my next question is: If I have a motherboard with 64-bit wide PCI slots, but without any mention of PCI-X in its specs, can I use a PCI-X board in this motherboard? The motherboard is an ASUS A7M-266D. Thanks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lady Margaret Thatcher wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:28:28 -0400, daytripper wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:12:22 -0700, Lady Margaret Thatcher wrote: I haven't been following PCI developments too closely. It __seems that__ the two are identical, but perhaps not. I have already RTF web sites. Can anyone enlighten me. Regardless of the operating frequency, PCI-X Mode 1 uses a slightly different bus-level protocol than PCI (all signals get a full bus tick to make transfers, no need for "sneak clocks" in the io ring to make timing back to the bus from hot-off-the-bus inputs). The comparitively rare PCI-X Mode 2 is quite different electrically; PCI-X Mode 1 and PCI use single-ended signaling while PCI-X Mode 2 uses differential signaling, includes ECC at the bus level and is more packet oriented... /daytripper Thanks. I guess my next question is: If I have a motherboard with 64-bit wide PCI slots, but without any mention of PCI-X in its specs, can I use a PCI-X board in this motherboard? The motherboard is an ASUS A7M-266D. Your board uses the AMD-768 chip, which supports PCI 2.2. PCI-X is _supposed_ to be backward compatible with PCI 2.2 so PCI-X boards _should_ work fine. What _should_ happen and what _does_ happen are not always the same, but in general PCI-X boards should work Thanks. -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|