|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
September 3rd 04, 04:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
AMD XP2600 vs Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz
exaqctly what the topic says
AMD Athlon XP 2600 333 mhz FSB and 512 l2 Cache I believe the Intel Celeron is as follows Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz 400 mhz FSB and 128 l2 cache which one do you think would perform better on an overall basis including gaming/desktop work and multimedia playback.. DVD's etc. 
|
|
#2
September 3rd 04, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well i have a 2600xp and my mates 2.8 ghz celeron system runs like a dog
compared to mine. doughy "Christo" wrote in message ... exaqctly what the topic says AMD Athlon XP 2600 333 mhz FSB and 512 l2 Cache I believe the Intel Celeron is as follows Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz 400 mhz FSB and 128 l2 cache which one do you think would perform better on an overall basis including gaming/desktop work and multimedia playback.. DVD's etc.
|
|
#3
September 3rd 04, 05:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Doughnut" wrote in message ... Well i have a 2600xp and my mates 2.8 ghz celeron system runs like a dog compared to mine. doughy "Christo" wrote in message ... exaqctly what the topic says AMD Athlon XP 2600 333 mhz FSB and 512 l2 Cache I believe the Intel Celeron is as follows Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz 400 mhz FSB and 128 l2 cache which one do you think would perform better on an overall basis including gaming/desktop work and multimedia playback.. DVD's etc. a dog being crap yeah?
|
|
#4
September 3rd 04, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 16:48:44 +0100, Christo wrote:
exactly what the topic says AMD Athlon XP 2600 333 mhz FSB and 512 l2 Cache I believe the Intel Celeron is as follows Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz 400 mhz FSB and 128 l2 cache which one do you think would perform better on an overall basis including gaming/desktop work and multimedia playback.. DVD's etc. The new Celeron 335 (2.8GHz) is about equal to an XP 2400+ in some apps. It falls way behind the AMD in others. The Sempron's ratings are for direct comparison to Celerons. And a Sempron 2800+ is basically an XP 2400+. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm
|
|
#5
September 3rd 04, 09:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Christo" wrote in message ... exaqctly what the topic says AMD Athlon XP 2600 333 mhz FSB and 512 l2 Cache I believe the Intel Celeron is as follows Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz 400 mhz FSB and 128 l2 cache which one do you think would perform better on an overall basis including gaming/desktop work and multimedia playback.. DVD's etc. Can't believe youre asking... Athlon without a doubt. If you havent already bought it yet, get a mobile 2500+ hamman
|
|
#6
September 4th 04, 12:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah
"Christo" wrote in message ... "Doughnut" wrote in message ... Well i have a 2600xp and my mates 2.8 ghz celeron system runs like a dog compared to mine. doughy "Christo" wrote in message ... exaqctly what the topic says AMD Athlon XP 2600 333 mhz FSB and 512 l2 Cache I believe the Intel Celeron is as follows Intel Celeron 2.8 ghz 400 mhz FSB and 128 l2 cache which one do you think would perform better on an overall basis including gaming/desktop work and multimedia playback.. DVD's etc. a dog being crap yeah?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Gigabyte GA-8IDML with mobile CPU? | Cuzman | Overclocking | 1 | December 8th 04 08:20 PM |
| Ghost speed differerent in AMD & Intel | Zotin Khuma | General | 7 | November 17th 04 06:56 AM |
| Celeron 300 on intel BX | Ygrek | Overclocking | 4 | June 9th 04 11:02 PM |
| CPU info.- Celeron 2.4 vs Intel P4 | Taishi | General | 20 | April 14th 04 06:12 AM |
| intel celeron 366 on MU440EX | pil | Overclocking | 1 | March 27th 04 08:40 PM |
Linear Mode
