Advice Please: The Importance of Hard Drive RPMs

JAD wrote:

(bottom posting corrected)

http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html -- Anton Smit: "Why is
Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
http://www.alt-html.org/index.html#usenet -- Brucie's alt.html General
Information
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/zen/zen-1.0_6.html -- zen and the art
of the internet (usenet section)
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html -- Jukka Korpela presents
Tobias Brox's Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet
http://www.estreetjournal.com/cgi-lo...net/Etiquette/
-- Netiquette links
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/posting-rules/part1/ -- "rules" for posting
to usenet
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting.html -- Richard
Kettlewell: Quoting Style
http://www.html-faq.com/faq.php?clue=topposting -- alt.html FAQ reference
on posting methods
http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/ -- "How not to look like an
idiot", What do you mean "my reply is upside-down"?
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html -- Netmeister: "How do I
quote correctly in Usenet"
http://www.topfloor.com/pr/communities/ch3.htm -- TopFloor Publishing:
Online communities - Participating effectively
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g.mccau...ks/uquote.html --
G.McCaughan: The advantages of Usenet's quoting conventions
http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/quote.html -- FAQ of Proper Quoting
http://www.windfalls.net/ukrm/postinghelp.html -- "Suggestions on how to post"
http://www.xs4all.nl/~wijnands/nnq/nquote.html -- news.newusers.questions FAQ



What are you comparing? Using arbitrary words like OLD NEW, doesn't
cut it. AND YOU SAID A HARDDRIVE upgrade will make more of a
performance kick than upgrading the CPU.

He said more of an improvement in *system response*, not 'performance'.

\
OK then lets talk what era's we are referring to. 1980's HD Vs 2002?
Why would we be comparing this?

No one was except you in trying to create a silly scenario with which to
argue about. It's called a strawman.

OLD HDs are usually connected to an OLD chipsets, so no matter the HD
upgrade the performance will be gimped. Larger HD's (which are usually
faster RPM wise) after being filled up will bog the file system and
hence slow the system in some barely noticeable way.

That's funny. First you say that 7200 RPM isn't faster than 5400 and now
you say a large drive will bog things down. So your recommendation is to
get a small, slow, 5400 RPM drive to keep things 'speedy'?

The poster is simply giving you a personal account of what I was telling
you all along. That the typical user tends to perceive 'speed' (or, as he
put it, system response) in program load times that are, barring a
deficiency somewhere else, primarily a result of hard drive performance.


"chrisv" wrote in message
...

"JAD" wrote:

(top posting corrected)


"chrisv" wrote:

I think you're right. In my experience, upgrading an older

machine

with a modern HD makes a much more noticeable improvement in
system response than a CPU upgrade does.

you are absolutely out on 'cloud 9'

Incorrect, oh clueless one.

I wasn't going to respond to this but I'm in a foul

mood............if

you are saying that a 5400 rpm HD upgraded to a 7200rpm drive is

more

of a UPGRADE than replacing the CPU with a newer faster CPU, your a
lot more clueless than I.

Having reading difficulties, JAD? I did not compare "5400 RPM HD

vs.

7200RPM HD", it was "old HD vs. modern HD".

Also note that I said that a modern HD gives a more noticeable
improvement in "system response", compared to a CPU upgrade. Note
that "system response" does not mean more FPS in Quake, or whatever
you personally might consider an "upgrade". It means how quickly
common file-based operations (the things that usually make you wait)
occur. It's quite unusual to be waiting on your CPU to

crunch-through

something, in normal computer usage...

bite me NG nazi

"David Maynard" wrote in message
...
JAD wrote:

(bottom posting corrected)

http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html -- Anton Smit: "Why is
Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
http://www.alt-html.org/index.html#usenet -- Brucie's alt.html
General
Information
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/zen/zen-1.0_6.html -- zen and
the art
of the internet (usenet section)
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html -- Jukka Korpela
presents
Tobias Brox's Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet

http://www.estreetjournal.com/cgi-lo...net/Etiquette/
-- Netiquette links
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/posting-rules/part1/ -- "rules" for
posting
to usenet
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting.html -- Richard
Kettlewell: Quoting Style
http://www.html-faq.com/faq.php?clue=topposting -- alt.html FAQ
reference
on posting methods
http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/ -- "How not to look like an
idiot", What do you mean "my reply is upside-down"?
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html -- Netmeister: "How
do I
quote correctly in Usenet"
http://www.topfloor.com/pr/communities/ch3.htm -- TopFloor
Publishing:
Online communities - Participating effectively
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g.mccau...ks/uquote.html --
G.McCaughan: The advantages of Usenet's quoting conventions
http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/quote.html -- FAQ of Proper Quoting
http://www.windfalls.net/ukrm/postinghelp.html -- "Suggestions on
how to post"
http://www.xs4all.nl/~wijnands/nnq/nquote.html --
news.newusers.questions FAQ



What are you comparing? Using arbitrary words like OLD NEW,
doesn't
cut it. AND YOU SAID A HARDDRIVE upgrade will make more of a
performance kick than upgrading the CPU.

He said more of an improvement in *system response*, not
'performance'.

\
OK then lets talk what era's we are referring to. 1980's HD Vs
2002?
Why would we be comparing this?

No one was except you in trying to create a silly scenario with
which to
argue about. It's called a strawman.

OLD HDs are usually connected to an OLD chipsets, so no matter the
HD
upgrade the performance will be gimped. Larger HD's (which are
usually
faster RPM wise) after being filled up will bog the file system
and
hence slow the system in some barely noticeable way.

That's funny. First you say that 7200 RPM isn't faster than 5400 and
now
you say a large drive will bog things down. So your recommendation
is to
get a small, slow, 5400 RPM drive to keep things 'speedy'?

The poster is simply giving you a personal account of what I was
telling
you all along. That the typical user tends to perceive 'speed' (or,
as he
put it, system response) in program load times that are, barring a
deficiency somewhere else, primarily a result of hard drive
performance.


"chrisv" wrote in message
...

"JAD" wrote:

(top posting corrected)


"chrisv" wrote:

I think you're right. In my experience, upgrading an older

machine

with a modern HD makes a much more noticeable improvement in
system response than a CPU upgrade does.

you are absolutely out on 'cloud 9'

Incorrect, oh clueless one.

I wasn't going to respond to this but I'm in a foul

mood............if

you are saying that a 5400 rpm HD upgraded to a 7200rpm drive is

more

of a UPGRADE than replacing the CPU with a newer faster CPU, your
a
lot more clueless than I.

Having reading difficulties, JAD? I did not compare "5400 RPM HD

vs.

7200RPM HD", it was "old HD vs. modern HD".

Also note that I said that a modern HD gives a more noticeable
improvement in "system response", compared to a CPU upgrade. Note
that "system response" does not mean more FPS in Quake, or
whatever
you personally might consider an "upgrade". It means how quickly
common file-based operations (the things that usually make you
wait)
occur. It's quite unusual to be waiting on your CPU to

crunch-through

something, in normal computer usage...

JAD wrote:

bite me NG nazi

I was content to say nothing about it till you found it necessary to go
around 'correcting' people with the "bottom posting corrected" jab.


"David Maynard" wrote in message
...

JAD wrote:


(bottom posting corrected)

http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html -- Anton Smit: "Why is
Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
http://www.alt-html.org/index.html#usenet -- Brucie's alt.html General
Information
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/zen/zen-1.0_6.html -- zen andthe art
of the internet (usenet section)
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html -- Jukka Korpel presents
Tobias Brox's Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet
http://www.estreetjournal.com/cgi-lo...net/Etiquette/
-- Netiquette links
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/posting-rules/part1/ -- "rules" for posting
to usenet
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting.html -- Richard
Kettlewell: Quoting Style
http://www.html-faq.com/faq.php?clue=topposting -- alt.html FAQ reference
on posting methods
http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/ -- "How not to look like an
idiot", What do you mean "my reply is upside-down"?
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html -- Netmeister: "How do I
quote correctly in Usenet"
http://www.topfloor.com/pr/communities/ch3.htm -- TopFloorPublishing:
Online communities - Participating effectively
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g.mccau...ks/uquote.html --
G.McCaughan: The advantages of Usenet's quoting conventions
http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/quote.html -- FAQ of Proper Quoting
http://www.windfalls.net/ukrm/postinghelp.html -- "Suggestions on how to post"
http://www.xs4all.nl/~wijnands/nnq/nquote.html -- news.newusers.questions FAQ



What are you comparing? Using arbitrary words like OLD NEW, doesn't
cut it. AND YOU SAID A HARDDRIVE upgrade will make more of a
performance kick than upgrading the CPU.

He said more of an improvement in *system response*, not 'performance'.

OK then lets talk what era's we are referring to. 1980's HD Vs 2002?
Why would we be comparing this?

No one was except you in trying to create a silly scenario with which to
argue about. It's called a strawman.


OLD HDs are usually connected to an OLD chipsets, so no matter the HD
upgrade the performance will be gimped. Larger HD's (which are usually
faster RPM wise) after being filled up will bog the file system and
hence slow the system in some barely noticeable way.

That's funny. First you say that 7200 RPM isn't faster than 5400 and now
you say a large drive will bog things down. So your recommendation is to
get a small, slow, 5400 RPM drive to keep things 'speedy'?

The poster is simply giving you a personal account of what I was telling
you all along. That the typical user tends to perceive 'speed' (or, as he
put it, system response) in program load times that are, barring a
deficiency somewhere else, primarily a result of hard drive performance.

you don't read well do you.....

...it was a retaliatory strike, not a 'first'

as I said earlier, head back to the tackle box........


"David Maynard" wrote in message
...
JAD wrote:

bite me NG nazi

I was content to say nothing about it till you found it necessary to
go
around 'correcting' people with the "bottom posting corrected" jab.


"David Maynard" wrote in message
...

JAD wrote:


(bottom posting corrected)

http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html -- Anton Smit: "Why is
Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
http://www.alt-html.org/index.html#usenet -- Brucie's alt.html
General
Information
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/zen/zen-1.0_6.html -- zen
andthe art
of the internet (usenet section)
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html -- Jukka Korpel
presents
Tobias Brox's Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet

http://www.estreetjournal.com/cgi-lo...mputers/Intern
et/Etiquette/
-- Netiquette links
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/posting-rules/part1/ -- "rules"
for posting
to usenet
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting.html -- Richard
Kettlewell: Quoting Style
http://www.html-faq.com/faq.php?clue=topposting -- alt.html FAQ
reference
on posting methods
http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/ -- "How not to look like
an
idiot", What do you mean "my reply is upside-down"?
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html -- Netmeister:
"How do I
quote correctly in Usenet"
http://www.topfloor.com/pr/communities/ch3.htm --
TopFloorPublishing:
Online communities - Participating effectively
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g.mccau...ks/uquote.html --
G.McCaughan: The advantages of Usenet's quoting conventions
http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/quote.html -- FAQ of Proper Quoting
http://www.windfalls.net/ukrm/postinghelp.html -- "Suggestions on
how to post"
http://www.xs4all.nl/~wijnands/nnq/nquote.html --
news.newusers.questions FAQ



What are you comparing? Using arbitrary words like OLD NEW,
doesn't
cut it. AND YOU SAID A HARDDRIVE upgrade will make more of a
performance kick than upgrading the CPU.

He said more of an improvement in *system response*, not
'performance'.

OK then lets talk what era's we are referring to. 1980's HD Vs
2002?
Why would we be comparing this?

No one was except you in trying to create a silly scenario with
which to
argue about. It's called a strawman.


OLD HDs are usually connected to an OLD chipsets, so no matter
the HD
upgrade the performance will be gimped. Larger HD's (which are
usually
faster RPM wise) after being filled up will bog the file system
and
hence slow the system in some barely noticeable way.

That's funny. First you say that 7200 RPM isn't faster than 5400
and now
you say a large drive will bog things down. So your recommendation
is to
get a small, slow, 5400 RPM drive to keep things 'speedy'?

The poster is simply giving you a personal account of what I was
telling
you all along. That the typical user tends to perceive 'speed'
(or, as he
put it, system response) in program load times that are, barring a
deficiency somewhere else, primarily a result of hard drive
performance.

Another posting nazi. Please everyone, top post for Davy.

There are no rules for usenet posting style. Get a ****ing life.

"David Maynard" wrote in message
...

http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html -- Anton Smit: "Why is
Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
http://www.alt-html.org/index.html#usenet -- Brucie's alt.html General
Information
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/zen/zen-1.0_6.html -- zen and the art
of the internet (usenet section)
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html -- Jukka Korpela presents
Tobias Brox's Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet

http://www.estreetjournal.com/cgi-lo...net/Etiquette/
-- Netiquette links
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/posting-rules/part1/ -- "rules" for posting
to usenet
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting.html -- Richard
Kettlewell: Quoting Style
http://www.html-faq.com/faq.php?clue=topposting -- alt.html FAQ reference
on posting methods
http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/ -- "How not to look like an
idiot", What do you mean "my reply is upside-down"?
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html -- Netmeister: "How do I
quote correctly in Usenet"
http://www.topfloor.com/pr/communities/ch3.htm -- TopFloor Publishing:
Online communities - Participating effectively
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g.mccau...ks/uquote.html --
G.McCaughan: The advantages of Usenet's quoting conventions
http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/quote.html -- FAQ of Proper Quoting
http://www.windfalls.net/ukrm/postinghelp.html -- "Suggestions on how to
post"
http://www.xs4all.nl/~wijnands/nnq/nquote.html -- news.newusers.questions
FAQ

JAD wrote:

you don't read well do you.....

..it was a retaliatory strike, not a 'first'

I didn't say it was a 'first'. The difference is he was right and you were
wrong, as the links demonstrate.


as I said earlier, head back to the tackle box........

I'm curious; what's the weather like on your planet? Because we don't get
much other than earth news here.


"David Maynard" wrote in message
...

JAD wrote:


bite me NG nazi

I was content to say nothing about it till you found it necessary to

go

around 'correcting' people with the "bottom posting corrected" jab.



"David Maynard" wrote in message
...


JAD wrote:



(bottom posting corrected)

http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html -- Anton Smit: "Why is
Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
http://www.alt-html.org/index.html#usenet -- Brucie's alt.html

General

Information
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/zen/zen-1.0_6.html -- zen

andthe art

of the internet (usenet section)
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html -- Jukka Korpel

presents

Tobias Brox's Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet

http://www.estreetjournal.com/cgi-lo...mputers/Intern

et/Etiquette/

-- Netiquette links

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/posting-rules/part1/ -- "rules"

for posting

to usenet
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting.html -- Richard
Kettlewell: Quoting Style
http://www.html-faq.com/faq.php?clue=topposting -- alt.html FAQ

reference

on posting methods
http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/ -- "How not to look like

an

idiot", What do you mean "my reply is upside-down"?
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html -- Netmeister:

"How do I

quote correctly in Usenet"
http://www.topfloor.com/pr/communities/ch3.htm --

TopFloorPublishing:

Online communities - Participating effectively
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g.mccau...ks/uquote.html --
G.McCaughan: The advantages of Usenet's quoting conventions
http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/quote.html -- FAQ of Proper Quoting
http://www.windfalls.net/ukrm/postinghelp.html -- "Suggestions on

how to post"

http://www.xs4all.nl/~wijnands/nnq/nquote.html --

news.newusers.questions FAQ




What are you comparing? Using arbitrary words like OLD NEW,

doesn't

cut it. AND YOU SAID A HARDDRIVE upgrade will make more of a
performance kick than upgrading the CPU.

He said more of an improvement in *system response*, not

'performance'.

OK then lets talk what era's we are referring to. 1980's HD Vs

2002?

Why would we be comparing this?

No one was except you in trying to create a silly scenario with

which to

argue about. It's called a strawman.



OLD HDs are usually connected to an OLD chipsets, so no matter

the HD

upgrade the performance will be gimped. Larger HD's (which are

usually

faster RPM wise) after being filled up will bog the file system

and

hence slow the system in some barely noticeable way.

That's funny. First you say that 7200 RPM isn't faster than 5400

and now

you say a large drive will bog things down. So your recommendation

is to

get a small, slow, 5400 RPM drive to keep things 'speedy'?

The poster is simply giving you a personal account of what I was

telling

you all along. That the typical user tends to perceive 'speed'

(or, as he

put it, system response) in program load times that are, barring a
deficiency somewhere else, primarily a result of hard drive

performance.

Eric Gisin wrote:

Another posting nazi. Please everyone, top post for Davy.

There are no rules for usenet posting style. Get a ****ing life.

Got one, thank you.

Why don't you try getting a clue. I posted a few to make it easier.


"David Maynard" wrote in message
...

http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html -- Anton Smit: "Why is
Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
http://www.alt-html.org/index.html#usenet -- Brucie's alt.html General
Information
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/zen/zen-1.0_6.html -- zen and the art
of the internet (usenet section)
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html -- Jukka Korpela presents
Tobias Brox's Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet


http://www.estreetjournal.com/cgi-lo...net/Etiquette/

-- Netiquette links
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/posting-rules/part1/ -- "rules" for posting
to usenet
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting.html -- Richard
Kettlewell: Quoting Style
http://www.html-faq.com/faq.php?clue=topposting -- alt.html FAQ reference
on posting methods
http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/ -- "How not to look like an
idiot", What do you mean "my reply is upside-down"?
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html -- Netmeister: "How do I
quote correctly in Usenet"
http://www.topfloor.com/pr/communities/ch3.htm -- TopFloor Publishing:
Online communities - Participating effectively
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g.mccau...ks/uquote.html --
G.McCaughan: The advantages of Usenet's quoting conventions
http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/quote.html -- FAQ of Proper Quoting
http://www.windfalls.net/ukrm/postinghelp.html -- "Suggestions on how to

post"

http://www.xs4all.nl/~wijnands/nnq/nquote.html -- news.newusers.questions

FAQ

Boys, boys, behave yourselves.

David Maynard wrote:

JAD wrote:

you don't read well do you.....

..it was a retaliatory strike, not a 'first'

I didn't say it was a 'first'. The difference is he was right and you were
wrong, as the links demonstrate.


as I said earlier, head back to the tackle box........

I'm curious; what's the weather like on your planet? Because we don't get
much other than earth news here.


"David Maynard" wrote in message
...

JAD wrote:


bite me NG nazi

I was content to say nothing about it till you found it necessary to

go

around 'correcting' people with the "bottom posting corrected" jab.



"David Maynard" wrote in message
...


JAD wrote:



(bottom posting corrected)

http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html -- Anton Smit: "Why is
Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
http://www.alt-html.org/index.html#usenet -- Brucie's alt.html

General

Information
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/docproject/zen/zen-1.0_6.html -- zen

andthe art

of the internet (usenet section)
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html -- Jukka Korpel

presents

Tobias Brox's Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet

http://www.estreetjournal.com/cgi-lo...mputers/Intern

et/Etiquette/

-- Netiquette links

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/posting-rules/part1/ -- "rules"

for posting

to usenet
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting.html -- Richard
Kettlewell: Quoting Style
http://www.html-faq.com/faq.php?clue=topposting -- alt.html FAQ

reference

on posting methods
http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/ -- "How not to look like

an

idiot", What do you mean "my reply is upside-down"?
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote2.html -- Netmeister:

"How do I

quote correctly in Usenet"
http://www.topfloor.com/pr/communities/ch3.htm --

TopFloorPublishing:

Online communities - Participating effectively
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g.mccau...ks/uquote.html --
G.McCaughan: The advantages of Usenet's quoting conventions
http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/quote.html -- FAQ of Proper Quoting
http://www.windfalls.net/ukrm/postinghelp.html -- "Suggestions on

how to post"

http://www.xs4all.nl/~wijnands/nnq/nquote.html --

news.newusers.questions FAQ




What are you comparing? Using arbitrary words like OLD NEW,

doesn't

cut it. AND YOU SAID A HARDDRIVE upgrade will make more of a
performance kick than upgrading the CPU.

He said more of an improvement in *system response*, not

'performance'.

OK then lets talk what era's we are referring to. 1980's HD Vs

2002?

Why would we be comparing this?

No one was except you in trying to create a silly scenario with

which to

argue about. It's called a strawman.



OLD HDs are usually connected to an OLD chipsets, so no matter

the HD

upgrade the performance will be gimped. Larger HD's (which are

usually

faster RPM wise) after being filled up will bog the file system

and

hence slow the system in some barely noticeable way.

That's funny. First you say that 7200 RPM isn't faster than 5400

and now

you say a large drive will bog things down. So your recommendation

is to

get a small, slow, 5400 RPM drive to keep things 'speedy'?

The poster is simply giving you a personal account of what I was

telling

you all along. That the typical user tends to perceive 'speed'

(or, as he

put it, system response) in program load times that are, barring a
deficiency somewhere else, primarily a result of hard drive

performance.

Boys, boys, behave yourselves.

--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:39:26 -0700, "Eric Gisin"
wrote:

Another posting nazi. Please everyone, top post for Davy.

There are no rules for usenet posting style. Get a ****ing life.


Funny how it disturb you enough to stop and whine about it.

kony wrote:

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:39:26 -0700, "Eric Gisin"
wrote:


Another posting nazi. Please everyone, top post for Davy.

There are no rules for usenet posting style. Get a ****ing life.



Funny how it disturb you enough to stop and whine about it.

Not to mention I'm a 'nazi' for merely posting links that discuss it.